challenging factors they experiencedduring their studies at US universities. There were five different options to be selected from 1. Admission 2. Getting VISA 3. In school 4. I did not have difficult phase 5. Other (Please specify) Figure 2, shows the respondent‟s ratings of difficult phases during graduate studies. Themost difficult phase for both current students and alumni was „in school (coursework, funding,adjusting with culture, etc)‟. Alumni ranked securing job after graduation as equally difficult tothis. As shown in graph, „obtaining a job after graduation‟ was one of the most difficult phaseschosen by alumni, as this option was not provided to current students
, Refrigeration, Compressors, and Heating Systems, by Westphalen D. and Koszalinski S., Office of Building Equipment, DOE, Arthur D. Little Reference No. 36922-00, 2001.4. U.S. Household Electricity Report, Energy Information Administration, http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/reps/enduse/er01_us.html, 2005.5. U.S. Department of Energy Solar Decathlone Homepage, http://www.solardecathlon.gov/, 2011.6. The Future of HVAC, Part 1: A Revolution in HVAC Design, by D. Wulfinghoff, 2007.7. U.S. Green Building Council LEED Information, http://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage.aspx?CategoryID=19, 2011.8. NCEES PE Exam Specifications, http://www.ncees.org/Exams/PE_exam.php, 2011.9. LEED Green Associate Candidate Handbook, Green Building Certification Institute, 2010.10
-15]. The Engineering Clinicalso has been shown to provide students with the opportunity to strengthen their core “a-k”ABET competencies. In addition, the Engineering Clinic provides ample opportunities to dealwith many of the “other” areas that a program needs to address such as ethics, economicconsiderations, and societal impacts. Bibliography[1] J. L. Schmalzel, A. J. Marchese, J. Mariappan and S. A. Mandayam, "The Engineering Clinic: Afour-year design sequence," presented at the 2nd An. Conf. of Nat. Collegiate Inventors and InnovatorsAlliance, Washington, D.C., 1998.[2] J. L Schmalzel, A. J. Marchese and R. P. Hesketh, "What's brewing in the Clinic?," HP EngineeringEducator,2:1, Winter 1998, pp. 6-7.[3] "Civil & Environmental
insight into this innovative learning experience.IntroductionAlthough remote laboratory experiments have been studied for educational applications since theearly 1990’s, they are still in their infancy, and are only recently becoming a reality. 1 Moore’sLaw proposes that computer technology development doubles every year, and completeddevelopmental stage can then be utilized the next year to continue these advancements. 2 Takinginto account this exponential growth in computer technology, remote laboratories are now at adevelopmental stage where their potential to become an essential tool for science education ispromising.It is not uncommon to see simulations of experiments used as supplementary educational tools.These virtual laboratories exist
present future plans.† This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underInnovations in Engineering Education, Curriculum, and Infrastructure (IEECI) Grant No.093510. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material Page 22.573.2are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation (NSF).VESLL: Virtual Engineering ExperienceVESLL is establishing an online interactive learning environment designed to introduce studentsto engineering concepts through visualization and collaborative problem solving. Our long-termvision is to create a
campus. Co-PI Anthony Dotson leads the VRC team. As a retiredU. S. Army Lieutenant Colonel, Mr. Dotson is in a position to provide important informationabout, and access to, military/veteran students. BCTC is in the process of developing a similarresource center for their campus efforts. Mr. Alexander DeSha, a National Guard veteran of theIraq war, was hired in November 2010 as the Military and Veterans Student ServicesCoordinator to lead the development for BCTC. Mr. DeSha is lending his experience to theircenter development efforts.The VRC focuses on four main areas of support to veterans; recruiting, transition, retention, andtransition again. While many institutions are leaning heavily on the first two, UK feels that toprovide the best
of the module are depicted in Figure 3 and 4. Figure 3. Different views of the scenarios Figure 4. Virtual lecture, parameter adjustment, and interactionScenario 2: A human cannonball is launched with an initial velocity v m/s at an angle θ, find thedistance and height the cannonball can travel. Mathematically, we can solve the problem byfinding the cannonball’s vertical and horizontal initial speeds and calculating the distances basedon two different equations (depicted in Figure 5). vy v θ vx v x = v ⋅ cos θ and v y = v ⋅ sin θ
inventories. Journal of Engineering Education, 2007. 96: p. 205-212. 4. McGee, M.G., Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 1979. 86(5): p. 889-918. 5. Boersma, N., A. Hamiln, and S. Sorby. Work in progress-impact of a remedial 3-D visualization course on student performance and retention. in 34th Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 2004. Houghton, MI. 6. Hsi, S., M.C. Linn, and J.E. Bell, The rol of spatial reasoning in engineering and design of spatial instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, 1997. 86(2): p. 151-158. 7. Miller, C.L. and G.R. Bertoline, Spatial visualization
teams varies asthe CDE is dependent on faculty, postdoctoral researchers, graduate students, and their labspace. Over the past two years, research teams have worked in the engineering disciplines ofbiomedical engineering, chemical engineering, civil and environmental engineering,mechanical engineering, and electrical and computer engineering. Research teams are assignedafter participants have been provided with an overview of each field of engineering either byfaculty members or graduate and undergraduate students. Based on their desired interests,SEI participants select and rank the top two/three areas of engineering where they would liketo conduct research. Using these selections, the executive program director and leadcounselor(s) assign
. Mustar, P.,‖ Technology Management Education: Innovation and Entrepreneurship at MINES ParisTech, Page 22.633.6 a Leading French Engineering School‖, The Academy of Management Learning and Education (AMLE), 8:3, 2009, pp418—4255. Luryi, S. and Tang, W. and Lifshitz, N. and Wolf, G. and Doboli, S. and Betz, J.A. and Maritato, P. and Shamash, Y.,‖ Entrepreneurship in engineering education‖, Frontiers In Education Conference-Global Engineering: Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports, 2007. FIE'07. 37th Annual‖ IEEE, 2008.6. Chang, J.C. and Sung, H.Y.,‖Planning and implementation
version of this concept inventoryexam. Be aware that this is a work in progress. Please send inquiries to the David Lanning(lannind@erau.edu) or Wahyu Lestari (lestariw@erau.edu).Acknowledgements This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0837009. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Page 22.645.9The authors also wish to thank student assistants Matt Bender and Brad Pols for their
m is embracedd by engineerringmanagerss as a part off their organnizations logiistics and project managgement proceess. An effecctivepractice of o quality/prrocess managgement imprroves the efffectiveness of o a system asa a whole byyaddressinng the overalll process, raather than thhe ‘silo’ (i.e.,, the lack of collaboratioon andstandardiization betw ween businesss units) apprroach. Qualitty/process management m can controlvariationn within the system s in ordder to produuce more connsistent qualiity, in the prrocess improovingthe comppetitive edgee of an organnization
Perspectives on Engaging Future Engineers, Journal of Engineering Education, Special Centennial Issue. Vol. 100, No. 1, pp. 48–88. 2. Brophy, S., S. Klein, M. Portsmore, and C. Rogers. 2008. Advancing engineering education in the P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education 97 (3): 369–87. 3. Katehi,L. Pearson, G., Feder, M. (2009) The Status and Nature of K-12 Engineering Education in the United States. The Bridge, 3(3). Retrieved January 5, 2011, from http://www.nae.edu/Publications/TheBridge/Archives/16145/16161.aspx 4. D. Evangelou, J. Dobbs-Oates, A. Bagiati, S. Liang, & J. Young Choi (2010). "Talking About Artifacts: Preschool Children's Explorations with Sketches, Stories and Tangible Objects
variousanalog/mixed-signal VLSI circuits such as current sources and sinks, amplifiers, S/Hcircuits, switching-capacitance circuits, analog-to-digital and digital-to-analogconverters, etc. They are expected to be able to design analog VLSI layouts, decidetransistor sizing, and simulate the designed VLSI circuits.2.4. EE 549 - VLSI TestingAs VLSI continues to grow in its complexity, VLSI testing and design-for-testabilityare becoming more and more important issues. This course covers VLSI testingtechniques such as such as VLSI fault modeling (stuck-at-fault), automatic testgeneration, memory testing, design for testability (DFT), etc. VLSI scan testing andbuilt-in self-test (BIST) are also covered. Students learn various VLSI testingstrategies and how
Multi-level Multi-dimensional Perspective with Mental ModelsAbstractEntrepreneurship education programs typically include a large range of student outcomesincluding knowledge, skills, and attitudes as well as outcomes that go beyond the classroom.Because of the extent of inclusions and the broad range of effects, assessing the effectiveness ofentrepreneurship education programs is frequently challenged. Based upon Block and Stumpf[1]’s idea of “hierarchy of criteria” for evaluation, the main purpose of this research is to providea multi-level multi-dimensional perspective that systematically investigates factors related to thesuccess of entrepreneurship education programs. Such programs, in turn, can stimulate and bringsuccess to new
category where our categorization largely follows the original paper4 although we haveupdated the categories to reflect the questions given on the newest version 5.0 of the DT-SSCItest. Category # Questions Mathematical Background (B) 5 Linearity and Time Invariance (LTI) 4 Convolution (C) 3 Transform Representations (T) 5 Filtering (F) 2 Sampling (S) 2 Pole Zero Plots
Examination 5 2 Draw Select Conclusions W.S.U. Rubric 4 Analyze Data 3 Collected Page 22.250.7APPENDIX B: Rubrics courtesy of W S U, Pullman, WA. Rubrics based on Likert Scale5 Has demonstrated excellence
the natural frequency of the system, and the output voltage was measuredacross the capacitor. The circuit resulted in a transfer function as shown in Equation (2). 1 T ( s) = R 1 (2) 2 s + s+ L LC The transfer function was used to create Bode plots of gain and phase angle for thedifferent values of inductance. The plots were then used to predict the
Development and Usage Representation is provided below; more detail is available inSeniow et al.’s work.12Model Development and Usage RepresentationStudent journals and memorandum reports are the primary source of information as they containall notes, references, results and calculations relevant to the project and its development overtime. Model components are identified in student journals and verified in other sources (reports,run data, oral presentations). A student researcher assembles this information and constructs thepreliminary Model Representation. A faculty member, a domain expert, then reviews andevaluates this information for accuracy and correctness. The separation of the studentresearcher’s production of the preliminary Model
, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle Page 22.398.9 River, 2006.[2] J.M. Grandin, “Preparing Engineers for the Global Workplace,” Engineering Education, vol. 1, 2006.[3] M. Grudzinski-Hall, H.W. Stewart-Gambino, K.L. Jellison, and R.N. Weisman, “Engineering Students in a Global World: Lehigh University’s Global Citizenship Program,” Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, vol. 2, 2007, pp. 1-8.[4] A. Parkinson, J. Harb, and S. Magleby, “Developing Global Competence in Engineers: What does it mean? What is most important?,” Proceedings ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, vol. 023, 2009, pp. 1-13.[5
provide more exposure to clean room equipment.AcknowledgementThe authors would like to acknowledge the National Science Foundation (NSF) for their supportof this work through grant number NUE 0938434 to both authors. Page 22.468.9References 1. National Nanotechnology Initiative, http://www.nano.gov/html/facts/faqs.html, (Accessed Oct. 2010).2. Anwar S. and H. Dhillon, “Development of an On-line Introduction to Nanotechnology course: Issues and Challenges,” Proceedings of the ASEE annual conference and exposition, 2008.3. Raju V. and P. Muthuswamy, ”Nanotechnology Applications: Issues in
Page 4.324.4Figure 1 Chapter integration of thinking skills, creative problem solving, and engineering design.Let us use an analogy. When we learned calculus in the 1960’s, we spent hours painstakinglyplotting curves and intersecting surfaces, and even then it was difficult to visualize what reallyhappened (in physical terms) when parameters in equations were changed. Today, with a touch ofa button or two, students can visualize much more complicated equations in an instant; they canplay around with changing different parameters and thus gain a much deeper understanding of whatthe equations (and their parameters) signify. Once students master the fundamental thinking skills(listed in Table 2), they will be free to concentrate on the process
Kentucky, 1990.James, Horace. The Two Great Wars of America. An Oration Delivered in NewBern, North Carolina, Before the Twenty-Fifth Regiment Massachusetts Volunteers, July 4, 1862. By Rev. Horace James Chaplain. Boston: W. F. Brown & Co., 1862.Jamieson, Perry D. Crossing the Deadly Ground: United States Army Tactics, 1865-1899. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1994.Johnson, Curtis D. Redeeming America: Evangelicals and the Road to Civil War. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1993.Keeley, Stuart M., M. Neil Browne, and Jeffrey S. Kreutzer. “A Comparison of Freshmen and Seniors on General and Specific Essay Tests of Critical Thinking,” Research in Higher Education 17:2 (1982): 139-54.King, Patricia M., K. S. Kitchener
-use materials andsupplies, etc.Faculty & StaffThe course instructors are adjunct faculty drawn from industry and consulting firms. The prox-imity of a variety of industries allows the course to benefit from instructors of a variety of ages(30’s to 60’s), some relatively new to the engineering workforce, some retired from a range ofengineering disciplines. Some are alumni, both recent and otherwise, though most are not. In-structors are recruited (by the Associate Dean) via alumni publications, announcements toalumni with jobs in nearby locations, personal reference by alumni and others, etc. Experiencewith such adjunct faculty had been positive for the four years of a similar design course for stu-dents in their second semester of the
need for tedious programming of the DSK, and isfreely available from the Web site: http://wseweb.ew.usna.edu/ee/LINKS/EE_Links.htm(should the URL be changed, then from the Naval Academy home page select Academics,Academic Divisions and Departments, Electrical Engineering, Links).A companion program for teaching DSP using MATLAB and the C31 DSK, which allows studentsto perform interactive adjustment and “what if?” analysis of pole-zero plots, is described in anaccompanying paper15 by Welch, Wright, and Morrow.4. REFERENCES[1] Kubichek, R. F., “Using MATLAB in a Speech and Signal Processing Class,” Proceedings of the 1994 ASEE Annual Conference, pp. 1207–1210, June 1994.[2] Burrus, C. S., “Teaching Filter Design Using MATLAB
Session 0455 Training Graduate Student Instructors Effectively: The University of Michigan Model Trevor S. Harding Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2136IntroductionMost of todays graduate student instructors (GSIs, a.k.a. "the TA") were undergraduatesthemselves a mere semester or two before. Can we say with confidence that theseindividuals are adequately prepared to teach their former peers and perhaps some-daytake the place of their professors? We must look not only at how GSI training programsmight improve
UNDERSTANDING AND IMPLEMENTING ABET ENGINEERING CRITERIA 2000 Gerald S. Jakubowski, W. Thomas Calder Loyola Marymount UniversityAbstractThe Engineering Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology has established new criteria for the accreditation of engineering programs. Thenew criteria, called Engineering Criteria 2000, are significantly different from the old criteria.In the past, the accreditation criteria focused almost entirely on resources and curriculum. Incontrast, EC 2000 is a remarkably shorter, less prescriptive, much broader document that alsofocuses on processes and outcomes.EC 2000 has eight
on the computer. 1 With more than 1000 institutions offering distance-education courses 2which are increasingly Web based, there is clearly enough raw material for course databases inmany academic fields. Moreover, this material falls into well understood categories, such aslectures, problems, test questions, labs, software, and multimedia tools. Given such a database,instructors would have little difficulty exploiting it.Improving the educational experience: In technological fields, education needs to be up to date.Not only must the instructor keep current with the state of the art; (s)he must develop newcourse materials. This involves course components in all the categories mentioned above. Onecan rely on problems from a textbook, but too
: An Engineering Case Study, European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 22, No1.5. McLean, C. Lewis, S. Copeland, J. Lintern, S. & O’Neill, B. (1997). Masculinity and the Culture of Engineering, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 7, No2. Page 4.54.66. Copeland, J. & Lewis, S. (1998). Changing the Culture, not the Women: Unsettling Engineering, 3rd National Equity & Access Conference, Australia.7. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. & Smith, K.A., (1998). Maximising Instruction through Cooperative Learning, ASEE Prism, Feb, pp24 - 29.8. Smith, K.A. in cooperation with Johnson, D.W. &
Session 8230 BESTEAMS: Student Team Experience Differs by Institution Type L. Schmidt, P. Mead, M. Natishan, D. Bigio, J. Greenberg University of Maryland C. Lathan, S. Brown, S. Mouring, I. Goswami Catholic University of America/United States Naval Academy/Morgan State University1. IntroductionProject teams are the standard working group in many engineering fields and engineering collegecurricula. Teams are ultimately judged by the quality of their work product. Teams are alearning