minorities inengineering disciplines. However, very little has focused on the issues faced byunderrepresented minorities who pursue a graduate degree or the need for effective mentoring ofpost-docs and faculty in engineering to attract and retain them to pursue academic careers.Women and ethnic minorities usually do not persist in academia because they frequently receivelower salaries, heavier teaching loads, less research support, and serve on more committees thantheir male counterparts. Although these disparities are more pronounced at the faculty level, thisleads to higher attrition rates at every level of career their development, starting at theundergraduate level.This paper will present our approach and preliminary results of a National
(VFI), was adapted for usewith DREAM Mentors. The 7-point Likert scale, 30 item VFI assesses six functions potentiallyserved by volunteering: Career, Social, Values, Understanding, Enhancement and Protective. Page 25.951.2Previous research has shown that the individual scales of the VFI possess a high degree ofinternal consistency (i.e., the items of each scale relate to one another) and are stable (responsesto the scales are consistent over time) (Clary and Snyder, 1999: 157). The internal consistency isverified here for use with DREAM Mentors. The VFI is informative about the motivationsthemselves and their importance to respondents (Clary and
AC 2011-1650: STEM PROFESSIONALS WITH CLASSSharon F. Bendall, San Diego State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Sharon Bendall started her career as a professional physicist at IBM’s T.J. Watson Laboratory but early on switched her focus to physics education. She is an Adjunct Faculty member of the San Diego State University Physics Department and a Senior Scientist in SDSU’s Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education. As a nationally recognized materials developer and leader of professional develop- ment, she has been the PI or co-PI on many NSF grants in science. She has developed and implemented numerous content and pedagogical workshops for K-12 teachers, and is a
. As a result, this research will consider an extendedSTEM pipeline that includes both undergraduates and professionals, recognizing the importanceof not only recruiting but also retaining diverse genders in STEM.Social cognitive theory proposes that self-efficacy and expected outcomes form the basis forprofessional identity and motivation. This research will test social cognitive theory as aframework for attracting diverse groups to engineering. Specifically, it proposes thatparticipation in EWB-USA changes the expected outcomes of engineering—from Dilbert to theengineer of 2020. In addition, it provides career scaffolding that helps members navigatecareers. Both of these aspects are hypothesized to be particularly attractive and beneficial
engineer, and the thought of pursuing anengineering career was very intimidating. As I continued into graduate school and intoengineering education research, I found myself fascinated by student career pathways andprofessional formation. I conduct this work to gain a better understanding of this process andhow to help facilitate it in others so they can enter the engineering workforce as confidentengineers.Theoretical FrameworkThis study is grounded in social identity theory (SIT), which implies that membership in a group– in this context, in engineering – is constructed through comparisons of values and behaviorsthat members make between themselves and members of other groups [6], [7], [8]. Groupmembers use these comparisons to partially define
success, retention, transfer, graduation,and academic/career pathways of low-income and high-achieving students. This project alsoseeks to advance understanding about the effect of evidence-based, context-specific interventionsto ensure success for STEM program students in open-admissions universities. The frameworkof this project is to study and address several institutionally identified attrition points including:(i) high attrition of first- and second-year students, (ii) slow pace of students to matriculation intothe Civil and Mechanical Engineering programs, and (iii) low participation and completion ratesof women, underrepresented minorities, and first-generation students. In addition to thescholarship award, several approaches have been
perceivedsupport from family members and friends, level of motivation to pursue a STEM career, andstudent experiences at the university. Variables of interest focused on sex, ethnicity, and STEMmajor status. Results and implications are discussed in the following manuscript.Introduction The significance of underrepresented women entering STEM (science, technology,engineering, and mathematics) fields and careers is critical for extinguishing the long-lastingnegative stereotypes around women and minorities in the field [1]. Both women and racialminorities have historically been the lowest group to be involved within the STEM fields andhave been so for several years [2]. Prior work suggests that women are less likely to seek andobtain STEM degrees
outreach efforts have not prompted increased enrollments in the courseworkrequired to pursue an IT career, most notably the mathematically rigorous computer sciencecurriculum. In 2002, the Advanced Placement (AP) assessment for computer science recordedthe lowest female participation rate of any AP discipline, with girls accounting for only 10% ofthe test takers for the advanced exam.6 “In secondary schools across the nation, a repeatedpattern plays out: a further increase in boys confidence, status, and expertise in computing and adecline in the interest and confidence of girls.”7 The multiple applications of technology thatattract girls to their use do not seem to have the same effect on their interest in developing anddesigning technology as it
personalconcern (t= 0.88, p =0.39)).Research Question 2: Does the perception of male mentees at The Citadel about the role of amentor differ from the perception of female mentees?The perceptions of mentees about the role of a mentor were also investigated. The mentees wereasked to respond in one of two ways (very important or not important) to nine statements shownin Table 2.Table 2. Roles of mentor adapted from [6] Male or Female Very Important Not Important 1. Giving me advice about careers 2. Helping me to find internship 3. Working on my behalf 4. Guiding research methods 5. Helping me with research literature 6. Guiding
addressing the nationwide issue of faculty diversity in community colleges,the NSF INCLUDES Aspire Alliance dedicated to developing inclusive and diverse STEMfaculty was established in 2018,with the vision to create “Inclusive and diverse national STEMfaculty who thrive within inclusive organizational cultures, leading to high retention from URG’sin STEM career pathways”[21]. The Alliance utilizes collaborative leadership models toorganize its work in change teams at three levels, referred to as Institutional, National andRegional Collaboratives . For the scope of this paper we will be specifically addressing the RCs(Regional Collaboratives) which are collaborative networks of geographically related two andfour year institutions.Figure 1. Regional
, and pre-engineering university students (those who are required totake foundational courses before being admitted to an engineering program) may not have accessto someone who is able to clearly articulate how applications of early science and math coursesconnect to engineering careers. For many students interested in pursuing engineering, the “why”of the course is important. When students fail to see the connection between the material they arelearning and their career interest, they may lack motivation to learn the material, thus hinderingtheir performance in future engineering curriculums, or they may choose not to pursueengineering altogether, thus contributing to the “leaky pipeline” in STEM. Therefore, it isessential to support students
InstituteKeywords: education center, HSI, career development, academic servicesAbstractSan Francisco State University is a Hispanic Serving and a Primarily Undergraduate Institutionlocated in the diverse San Francisco Bay Area community. As part of a National ScienceFoundation Hispanic Serving Institute Improving Undergraduate STEM Education grant, theEngineering Success Center was established in late 2021, with an official launch in Spring 2022.SFSU’s School of Engineering is home to 1,400 undergraduate students of which 67% are ethnicminorities, and 18% are female. Surveys conducted through Institutional programs showed thatonly 14% of students attained a position prior to graduation. Within this context, the EngineeringSuccess Center was created to
the following goals for this 3-yearcycle: (1) Excite, empower, and educate 30 undergraduate participants in traditional/advancedmetrology and NDI, (2) for the undergraduate participants to experience an immersive research-training through a related transformative project, (3) to mold the undergraduate participants asboth independent/collaborative researchers capable of effective communication, (4) for theundergraduate participants to learn to ask the right questions, formulate plans, pragmaticallyinterpret data, and (5) inspire and enable the undergraduate participants to pursue advanced studyand related STEM careers. This site was a direct response to a recurring concern raised byindustry partners and technical workforce recruiters about the
include optical coatings, 3D printed structures, light-weight composites, and antimicrobial surfaces. Her national awards include selection for the Fulbright Specialist Roster (2015), the American Institute of Chemical Engineers Nanoscale Science and Engineering Forum’s Young Investigator Award (2012), the Presidential Early Career Award for Sci- entists and Engineers (2010), and a National Science Foundation CAREER Award (2009). Her Auburn University awards include the Excellence in Faculty Outreach (2015), an Auburn University Alumni Pro- fessorship (2014), the Auburn Engineering Alumni Council Awards for Senior (2013) and Junior (2009) Faculty Research, the Faculty Women of Distinction Award (2012), and the Mark A
Career Fair and student placement related activities. Creating a link between his courses and industry experts and mentors is one of his signature activities.Dr. Sez Atamturktur Ph.D., Pennsylvania State University Dr. Sez Atamturktur is the Harry and Arlene Schell Professor and Department Head of Architectural Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University. Previously, she served as Associate Vice President for Research Development and Provost’s Distinguished Professor at Clemson University. Dr. Atamturktur’s research, which focuses on uncertainty quantification in scientific computing, has been documented in over 100 peer-reviewed publications in some of the finest engineering science journals and proceedings
students to pursue careers in naval science & technology (Kiss, 2011; Lundquist,2014). Because there are relatively few institutions in the United States that offer comprehensivenaval architecture programs, there is an opportunity for smaller programs to help meet the needby developing quality curricula on Navy-related S&T subjects, and to make students aware ofpotential careers in this area.The program discussed in this paper has been developed at the University of Iowa, whichprovides unique challenges for attracting students with interest in naval science & technology. Itis therefore important to cultivate that interest through exposure to relevant curricular topics andengineering challenges. In addition, due to the limited faculty
Initiatives • NSF Cross-cutting Priorities – Advanced Manufacturing – Cognitive Science and Neuroscience – Clean Energy – Communications and Cyberinfrastructure – National Nanotechnology – Cyber-Enabled Materials, Manufacturing, Initiative and Smart Systems (CEMMSS) – Science, Engineering, and Education for Sustainability (SEES) – Education and Career Development – Interdisciplinary Research – Research Centers – Innovation Corps
engineering students for their careers, curriculumcan provide greater exposure to the conceptual representations common in the workplace. Onepotential area for improvement could be integrating more structural drawings and codes intodesign courses so students are more exposed to where loads come from and how they flowthrough a structure. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2019 American Society for Engineering Education
Universities and their localschools is looked at as a possible positive contributor to enhance STEM education withinthe classroom. Several outreach programs have been established including a well knownNational Science Foundation (NSF) funded program that involves students in collegeestablishing a relationship with a teacher through a school year by helping them in theclassroom encourage students to excel in STEM education.The NSF Graduate Teaching fellows in K-12 Education (GK-12) “provides funding tograduate students in NSF- supported science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) disciplines to acquire additional skills that will broadly prepare them forprofessional and scientific careers in the 21st century.”3In 2002-2006, The National
A Professional Development Program for Graduate Students at North Carolina State UniversityI. Introduction The traditional engineering graduate school experience involves taking courses, selectinga dissertation or thesis advisor and project, performing the research under the advisor’ssupervision, and completing and defending the dissertation. Such an experience trains graduatestudents to carry out research on a problem someone else has defined and gotten funded. It doesnot, however, prepare them for anything else they might be called upon to do in graduate schooland in their professional careers, including: • Teaching assistant responsibilities. Grade assignments, projects, and tests; supervise laboratories
in business andcommunications are important components in PSM degrees. Industrial advisory boards play anactive role in the development of the degree. This well designed degree prepares students for currentas well as future professional career opportunities. Requirements of the thirty hour program includesnine hours of business/ communications courses, six hours of core mechanical engineeringtechnology (MET) courses, six hours of a mechanical engineering concentration, six hours ofapproved electives and three hours of professional experience.Typical advanced degrees for engineering and engineering technology programs are MS degrees orthe MBA degree. The PSM is new and a “non-standard” degree. Therefore, many factors wereconsidered before
Session 13-2 Engineers of the Future by Design James Mayrose, Steven Macho, Clark Greene State University of New York College at Buffalo AbstractThe Engineers of the Future Program (EoF) was a grant funded initiative to promote interest inengineering as a career path. Design as a pedagogical approach was used to deliver STEM relatedcontent. Courses were developed to train technology teachers in skills and techniques which will helpmiddle and high school level students pass rigorous pre-engineering courses. One notable objective
, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects, and all havestudent bodies that are primarily from underrepresented minority groups (average 88%), lowincome (average 77%), and first generation to college. The goal “to involve teachers inengineering research” has been accomplished by satisfying 3 objectives linked to the intendedoutcomes and impacts. The objectives are: 1) Provide contemporary engineering researchexperiences and enhance understanding of the nature of engineering; 2) Scaffold teacherdevelopment of authentic inquiry activities for the high school classroom; and 3) Improve publicschool teachers’ knowledge about careers in engineering. Assessment of the program isintegrated into its structure providing regular feedback which is
different missions at home station and while on deployments to Europe and the Middle East. With her background in science and professional experience in higher education, her research interests include: STEM Education, Culture in STEM, and Access & Equity in STEM. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 PIPELINES: Fostering University-Community College Partnerships and STEM Professional Success for Underrepresented PopulationsAbstractA survey of literature reveals a major problem in retaining engineering college students due tothe perceived lack of connections with, and real access to STEM-related careers. This effectappears more
less than 20 percent of thecomputing and engineering fields [7].According to a recent research study (2012), in order to increase participation we must expand ourresearch into K-12 to better understand boosters and barriers to students entrance into STEM fieldsof study [8]. As such, in order to find out how to attract more female students to this maledominated field, it is important to further investigate and understand the barriers and factors thatinfluence female students’ educational pursuits and career choices along the key transition pointsmiddle school, high school and entire college. In this study we focused on female students’occupational aspirations and paths from middle school, beginning of high school, and beginningof college
Science and Mathematics, Engineering, and Technical EducationAbstractSTEM students face general education requirements in humanities as a part of theirdegree programs. Many students believe these courses are of little value to theireducation and career goals. Policy discussions at all levels of government has politicizedhistory education. History curriculum focusing on societal and political developmentsseems obscure to the high school or undergraduate STEM student. STEMstory focuses onengaging STEM students by examining history general education courses through thelens of history of technology. The study proposes curriculum for a U.S. history surveycourse focusing on progress in science and technology incorporating best practices
describes how a student expects to perform ina course4. Perceptions of the future describes the clarity of the students’ future career goals.Perceived instrumentality describes how useful students perceive their coursework to be. Andfinally, future on present describes how students’ present tasks influence their perceptions of thefuture15. Page 26.396.3Using these four factors, students’ FTPs have been conceptually represented in past research asdifferent shapes of ice cream cones placed on axes representing instrumentality and timeorientation: Sugar Cone, Waffle Cone, and Cake Cone6. A diagram showing the different conetypes can be seen below in
local elementary schools• Math AP Tutoring 5 high schools, Saturday classes (The Algebra Project) Projects linked to Math Ranu Jung, March 30, 2016 College Credit & Teacher Training Dual Enrollment • Cohort-based • On-campus • 20-30 students per semester Teacher Training +1M in federal funding • Interactive Virtual Training for Early Career Teachers in
Detroit high school teachers• 32 UM undergraduate and graduate student mentors• 45 Detroit area professional engineers, UM alumni, and UM faculty GoalsPropel the youth of Detroit to higher education and careers in the STEMfield by:• Exposing Detroit high school students to STEM through challenging, exciting, and hands-on experiences• Leveraging the UM community and Detroit area professional engineers to provide training and mentoring• Encouraging camaraderie and teamwork• Providing tailored preparation information to students and their families about college opportunities, financial aid and scholarships, and the college application process Outcomes• Significant increase in
advanced study and STEMcareers. These were tabulated against the goals of the REU site, and conclusions drawn on thesite’s progress in achieving its intended objectives. Details are also provided on the recruitingefforts undertaken and the applicant pool it generated, especially regarding the switching of theapplication portal from one that was managed individually by the REU site, to a common pilotapplication system managed at the NSF program level. Finally, the demographics and regionalspread of the participants as well as their intentions for advanced-study and STEM career choicesare detailed as well. Altogether, the experience, outcomes and lessons learned from this REU siteoperation are expected to guide the effective and efficient operation