isspecifically designed to guide the hazard evaluation for a particular machine has been shown tobe effective, 1, 2 but the underlying problem of compliance seems to be a lack of adequateunderstanding of the applicable laws and standards. The apparent lack of understanding of thesesafety requirements seems to suggest a deficiency in relevant education and training.The role of the manufacturing engineer in machine safety practices is somewhat unclear. Mostmanufacturing engineers, from a variety of manufacturing backgrounds (manufacturing,mechanical, industrial, etc.), will have some direct interaction with manufacturing equipment intheir professional careers. In many cases, the manufacturing engineer is given some level ofresponsibility for the safe
and Residential Experience program at Michigan State University. He earned his M.S. degree in pavement Page 14.848.1 engineering in 1988 from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor and his Ph.D. in pavement and materials engineering from Texas A&M University, College Station, in 1995. Dr. Buch began his academic career at Michigan State University in 1996. Dr. Buch teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in concrete materials and pavement engineering. He is also involved in teaching© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 short courses on pavement design and
where you perform the following skills? In other words, which of the following skill sets would you prefer to use your future career? Page 14.462.15 a. Computer modeling b. Experimental analysis c. High-throughput data analysis d. Integrating heterogeneous datasets e. None of these Rank-order the skills that you would be most interesting in using in your future career. Fill in numbers 10-14 with one of the letters above, where 10 is your top preference, and 14 is your lowest preference.In the second round of the survey given January 2009, two questions were added: 15. How much does your
following six questions:Q1: To what extent did you enjoy the learning experience?Q2: To what extent was the workload worth the learning outcome?Q3: To what extent do you think this course would be useful for your future career?Q4: To what extent did teamwork help you develop the design skills?Q5: Overall, how satisfied are you with the teaching/ learning process in this course?Q6: Do you think that you could obtain similar learning experience in one semester (instead of two semesters)?The ranking was based on a five-grade Likert ordinal scale [33], with the following codes:1: Not at all2: To a limited extent3: To a fair extent4: To a great extent5: To a very great extent Table 5. Students’ feedback Rank 1 2
14.328.2Pre-Engineering as an Integrative CurriculumIn Rising Above the Gathering Storm, the National Research Council3 calls for educationalleaders to optimize the knowledge-based resources and energize the STEM career pipeline. Thereport repeatedly emphasizes the importance of science and math achievement as a precursor fortechnical advancement, and relates the poor international showing of US students in math andscience to the declining impact of the US in research, patent issuance and economic andtechnological standing.The primacy of math and science to engineering is a common view that can, in educationalsettings, at least, clash with the objectives of engineering. The Nobel laureate Herbert Simon4observed in the late 1960’s that “Engineering
-lifeproblems, thus exposing participants to both theory and applications.As mentioned earlier, the AMALTHEA effort is funded and supported under the NSF’s REUprogram2 which states that it “…supports active research participation by undergraduatestudents in any of the areas of research funded by the National Science Foundation” andconstitutes one of the several NSF programs that aim to develop a diverse and globally-competitive workforce of future US engineers and scientists. Project Kaleidoscope (PKAL)3 aninformal alliance of faculty, focuses on building learning environments that attract and sustainundergraduate students to the study of STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) fieldsand motivate them to consider careers in related fields
Page 14.917.5teams; hands-on and integrative experience in the first year; and emphasis on social relevance,service learning, and collaboration16.For example, the Colorado School of Mines allows freshmen to discover important connectionsamong multi-disciplines, and to acquire a deeper appreciation of the importance of theirEngineering studies and their interrelation with upper-level courses, their careers and life. Itincludes extensive use of active and cooperative learning strategies for interdisciplinary topicsthrough student peer study group17. The evaluation of the program indicates that the interventionimprove students' academic performance. Interactions with faculty and peers were the mostpositive aspect of students' experience. Turf
interdisciplinary collaboration. The conceptualgrounding in interdisciplinarity not only makes sense theoretically; it also facilitates orienting theminor toward a variety of undergraduate major disciplines. Thus, in developing the minor,faculty participants agreed on the importance of connecting sustainability education withstudents’ disciplinary interests and career aspirations. And luckily, despite pedagogicalshortcomings with the electives approach to big-picture education for most engineering students,the curricular format makes it easy for engineering undergraduates to elect the sustainabilitystudies minor in STS within their existing curricular templates. H&SS electives are simplyreplaced with specific courses that meet the sustainability
prepared toenter STEM careers. The introduction of engineering into the K-12 classroom, which may befacilitated by partnerships between universities and K-12 schools, is a promising means toaccomplish this goal. This abstract describes one such partnership between an eighth-grade science teacher at anurban middle school and faculty from the Technology and Engineering Education Department ofa neighboring university. Technology and Engineering Education, K-12, a program housed in theSchool of Engineering and Technology of the university partner, is a comprehensive pre-engineering undergraduate program that prepares students for teacher certification, grades K-12.Throughout the program, emphasis is placed on designing, developing and using
attended by 935 professors from 209 different schools (Appendix A).Information about the NETI can be found at . Topics covered in the NETI include designing instruction to address the full spectrum ofstudent learning styles; planning courses (including writing learning objectives covering allcognitive levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy); assessing and evaluating learning; effective lecturing;active learning; teaching problem-solving skills; time management; and dealing with a variety ofproblems that commonly arise in the careers of engineering educators. Cooperative learning andinductive teaching methods such as inquiry-based learning and problem-based learning areintroduced but minimal instruction in them is given. During the afternoon of the
where a school of engineering and aschool of business create a systemic partnership37. Faculty from both schools collaborated toidentify core business knowledge that engineering students should have. In this program abusiness faculty member began teaching a project management course for engineers, where theydeveloped a product and a business plan for it. The plan for this program is to develop Page 14.1297.14“graduates who can see the big picture and integrate solid technical skill and real businessunderstanding early in their professional careers” 38. In addition to real-world business skills, engineers also need more real-world
master’s students in general cared less about the number of Page 11.130.13papers they published and where their papers are published considering that such achievementstypically are not as important to their career goals as they are to goals of Ph.D. students.Questions (H3) and (H6) produced specific, overlapping comments.However, there were some potential validity issues associated with Blocks G and H. At least onestudent was confused by the term “methodology” in (G1). Several respondents selected multipleanswers in (G2) suggesting that they were considering with equal weight multiple career optionsfor after graduation. In future surveys, (G2
motivation, career clarity, enhanced employability, andvocational maturity, and employers by providing labor force flexibility, enhancedrecruitment/retention of trained workers, and a mechanism for providing input into curricula [3]. Page 11.793.2However, cooperative education has also been criticized for “the lack of well-done research thatempirically demonstrates these benefits” [4] and has also been criticized for placing too muchemphasis on placements rather than learning, and for its emphasis and focus on administration,logistics, placements, and procedures [5].Another criticism, particularly relevant to educators in technical fields with highly
is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies. Matusovich
relationship as w = Ww/Ws. So given, w, known or easilymeasured from the lab, we can quickly figure out how much water is in a soil mass with the Wseasily estimated/measured or known. This water or moist content concept should be emphasizedthroughout the soil mechanics courses and even throughout a geotechnical engineer’s career aswell. Water content, w, is important because Atterberg limits like Liquid limit (LL) plastic limit(PL) are all fundamentally water content. And without emphasizing this fact, it is easy to forgetthis fundamental idea and concept. In this regard, the author recommends that LL and PL bewritten as and as in several classical soil mechanics textbooks. Putting the w, watercontent before LL and PL will help reminding
) has evolved sincethe institution’s inception in 1802 1: To educate, train, and inspire the Corps of Cadets so that each graduate is a commissioned leader of character committed to the values of Duty, Honor, Country and prepared for a career of professional excellence and service to the Nation as an officer in the United States Army.The Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering is one of 11 departments at USMA, andboth the civil and mechanical engineering programs are ABET accredited. The mission of thedepartment parallels that of the Academy, and focuses on educating and inspiring engineeringstudents 2: To educate, develop, and inspire agile and adaptive leaders of character who design and implement innovative solutions
new topics. “The US-Denmark PIRE Program was life changing, and the highlight of my college career. Without a doubt, the professor that led this program made this a truly memorable experience.”Moreover, participants were better able to define their own career paths, developing confidencefor future endeavors. “I want to work in the energy field, this course help me to define what I am the most interested in, thanks to the field trips but also lectures. Working on solar thermal energy for district heating is relevant for me because it was a topic I did not know a lot about, but now I can consider applying for a job related to it.” “My participation in this program has afforded me the opportunity to experience education in an
Paper ID #19292Early Validation of the Motivation in Team Projects (MTP) AssessmentDr. Peter Rogers, The Ohio State University Dr. Peter Rogers is a Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. He joined the university in October 2008 bringing with him 35 years of industry experience. His career includes senior leadership roles in engineering, sales, and manufacturing developing products using multidisciplinary teams to convert customer needs to commercially viable products and services. Rogers co-led the development of an ABET-approved year-long Capstone design experience
gender dynamics in MIT’s Mechanical Engineering Department havechanged over the past decade and a half, a range of mechanical engineering faculty wereinterviewed on their thoughts from their own career paths in engineering to what they haveobserved at MIT to what they think could be done better in achieving gender balance in the fieldof mechanical engineering.Ten MIT staff and tenure-track faculty members were interviewed for the original thesis. For thepurpose of condensing the findings into this conference paper, only quotes from four interviewsubjects are included here.Three of the four interviewees quoted in this paper are tenure-track faculty members, while thefourth heads MIT’s undergraduate admissions office. Two of the interviewees are
Paper ID #20403Guiding Principles and Pedagogical Tools for an Introductory Software De-velopment CourseDr. Mark Hoffman, Quinnipiac University Mark Hoffman is a professor of computer science at Quinnipiac University. He joined the University in 2001 following a career in industry and has taught a wide variety of courses including data structures, computer architecture and organization, software development, and the senior capstone project. His re- search interests include communication and critical thinking skills in computer science education, and the impact of technology on work/home boundary management. He received
Engineering d, lIntroduction to water pollution, air pollution, noise, hazardous and solidwastes, and their control. Environmental impact statements and globalpollution issues.Engineering Environmental Sustainability d, mAn introduction to the examination of global-scale resource utilization,food, energy and commodity production, population dynamics, andtheir ecosystem impacts.Environmental and Ecological Engineering Professional Practice lSeminarSeminar lectures and discussions to introduce students to aspects ofprofessional practice within Environmental and EcologicalEngineering. Topics include career planning and placement skills,professional responsibility and ethics
Competition.The primary goal of this study was to provide undergraduate Mechanical Engineering students inMECH 486 an introduction to lean manufacturing goals, tools, and best practices, and betterprepare students for their future careers. A secondary goal was to validate that leanmanufacturing principles can be taught to students in an introductory-level lecture, and thenapplied by students to a variety prototype projects.Background and Literature ReviewTo begin this study, two publications were reviewed to develop baseline knowledge on leanmanufacturing. The first was The Machine That Changed the World, a summary of a five yearresearch study on the automobile industry and differences between Japanese and Westernmanufacturing styles published by Womack
Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Patrice M. Buzzanell is a Distinguished Professor in the Brian Lamb School of Communication and the School of Engineering Education (courtesy) at Purdue University. She also serves as the Butler Chair and Director of the Susan Bulkily Butler Center for Leadership Excellence. Editor of four books and author of over 175 articles and chapters as well as proceedings and encyclopedia entries, her research centers on the intersections of career, change, leadership, and resilience. Fellow and past president of the International Communication Association, she has received numerous awards for her research, teaching/mentoring, and engagement. She has worked on
engineering, in eachcase no student reported a gain lower than moderate. 75% rated their gains at 4 or 5, foraverages of 4.2 in each of those three prompts.Additionally the open-ended prompts at the end of the survey suggest that students had animproved appreciation for the topic of sanitation and its importance in society. Somerelevant quotes are: “I have a better understanding of the variables one must take into consideration when addressing sanitation issues, such as culture, available resources, and community involvement.” “I had never considered working on solving sanitation issues in my engineering career. This course has made me realize the great potential we have as engineers to address (these) issues
is concerning for many reasons. Stevens and collaborators point out that: “Students often have vague images of professional engineering work, and the images they do have are strongly colored by the experiences in their educational careers…As a result, students often ignore, discount, or simply do not see images of engineering that emphasize its nontechnical, noncalculative sides and its non-individual aspects” ([6], p. 120).Similarly, Jonassen also notes problems in the discrepancy between engineering problems solvedby students and practitioners: “Learning to solve classroom problems does not effectivelyprepare engineering graduates to solve workplace problems” ([7], pp. 103-104). When apracticing engineer fails to consider social
electronicallybefore the beginning of the next class. The beginning of the next class began with discussion ofsolutions from these assignments.Five types of assignments were available to students: concept questions, practice problems,homework problems, unit tests, and an advanced project. Concept questions were designed tohelp students learn to connect detailed course content with their outside experiences, othercourses in the curriculum, and their own career goals. Some of these questions asked students toreflect on and self-assess their own learning processes. Practice problems were similar tohomework and test problems. The advanced project was a group project that involved visiting alab to acquire EEG data during an “oddball” experiment and performing data
creativityand innovation: Civil engineers don't magically become creative and innovative later in their careers. We must foster this during the pre-licensure period. Any job that does not require creativity and innovation can be automated and done by robots. Are we training engineer robots? or are we training problem solvers? Creativity should be promoted in our profession as much as is reasonable. The smartest tend to be the most creative and if we shun that part of a young person's interest, we will lose that valuable talent to another profession. Civil engineering is being left out of the innovation centers that are becoming so popular on campuses and proving to be highly effective in expanding the learning opportunities for
Paper ID #26697Tensions in Applying a Design-Thinking Approach to Address Barriers to In-creasing Diversity and Inclusion in a Large, Legacy Engineering ProgramSean Eddington, Purdue University, West Lafayette Sean Eddington (Ph.D., Purdue University) will be an assistant professor of Communication Studies at Kansas State University beginning Fall 2019. Sean’s primary research interests exist at the intersec- tions of organizational communication, new media, gender, and organizing. Within engineering contexts, Sean has examined career issues within the engineering discipline regarding (1) new faculty experiences
Paper ID #26443The Impact of Multidisciplinary Teams on Sustainability Projects in EPICSDr. Stephanie M. Gillespie, Arizona State University Stephanie Gillespie joined the EPICS@ASU program after finishing her Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. She has extensive experience in K-12 outreach and curriculum development, and is passionate about giving students opportunities to make a difference throughout their academic career. As the EPICS Director of Instruction, Stephanie leads the EPICS pro- gram’s curriculum development, EPICS-Community College program, and program
systemsthinking, ethics, social justice, and social responsibility (SR) into engineering education. Forexample, the problem rewrite assignment is a form of problem-based learning, a pedagogicalstrategy that others are using to teach SR and SJ [22]. Another promising strategy is usingcorporate social responsibility (CSR) as a tool in engineering ethics education, as a way ofpreparing students for “the CSR dimensions of their careers” and broadening studentsunderstanding of stakeholders, especially to include oppositional groups [23]. Nieusma andCieminski [24] suggest “a shift to ethics knowledge as ‘skills that must be practiced in order tobe learned’ [that] could fit nicely with the contemporary emphasis on active and problem-basedlearning approaches in