required totake. Additionally, at these institutions, graduate students have served as instructors of record.They will be invited to participate in the study as well. We also plan to collect data from thestudents of these first-year programs using an exploratory survey. The questions on the survey willseek to gather information about students’ initial interest in engineering prior to enrolling in theirrespective institutions, their general perception of the first year courses they have just completed,what their intended majors are, what types of activities they engaged in during their first yearcourse and if/how these activities fueled or increased their desire to continue to pursue theirengineering degrees.References[1] S. L. Christenson, A. L
realm of a computer screen, and has increased my interest in the program.SummaryThis paper presents the results of a work-in-progress implementation of an idea to integrate theMakerspace into first-year engineering curriculum. So far, we have seen encouraging results,active participation and liking among the student participants as shown in Table 1.Since this was started a year ago, we plan to conduct future surveys to track whether thesestudents used the Makerspace in the future semesters since the time they were exposed to thefacility as part of this FED101 course offering.
thesemester working in final project groups that consisted of one student from each of the specialtygroups. The final project involves constructing a warehouse robot that can: receive remoteinstructions and broadcast findings wirelessly, visually identify a location, plan an efficient path,navigate an unknown warehouse layout, identify a product, and coordinate all of these actionsbetween multiple devices. This project is designed to require knowledge developed in each of thespecializations, thus leveraging and requiring the expertise distributed throughout the group.Approximately 70 students are enrolled in this section.Methods:Using data from surveys, interviews, student artifacts, and class observations, we are conductinga mixed methods
Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Engineering Mechanics (BS, MS) and in Educational Psychology (MAEd, PhD).Mr. William Michael Anderson, Virginia TechMs. Marlena McGlothlin Lester, Virginia Tech Marlena McGlothlin Lester is the Director of Advising for the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She leads the undergraduate advising team and oversees the advising process for all General Engineering students. She is responsible for the development of a hands-on, minds-on orien- tation model for all first-year engineering students, the creation of a comprehensive engineering major exploration tool, Explore Engineering, and enhancement of the academic planning resources available for first-year
. I am a former member of Dallas Robotics Group at the Dallas Makerspace, and plan to enroll in the National Stem certification program. I have completed PLTW and Robotics and Automation certificate programs, and attended Ar- duino Project and Raspberry Pie. I have been a mentor for the College Readiness and Leadership Program (CRLP) with the goal of implementing student leadership in our school. In addition, I like to work with 3D printing and design, and am a member of Enabling Hand, a team that creates and assembles prosthetic arm designs.Dr. Sheng-Jen ”Tony” Hsieh, Texas A&M University Dr. Sheng-Jen (”Tony”) Hsieh is a Professor in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. He
bring them together as a group and a CoP [with a community, a domain, and apractice] begins to solidify.As the new community forms, the PEPS research team must support the new core whileallowing them the autonomy to make their own decisions. The PEPS researchers areproviding support by hosting a webinar where partner schools will get a chance to meet 3each other and learn about the results of the PEPS results for their respective institutions.This webinar becomes the first step for planning the joint symposium that will be the firstproduct of the new CoP. At the symposium, information about the new practice (usingresearch-based decisions to inform the design of career services and programs) will
students andsubsequent choice of engineering as a major and career. To develop engineering-specific theories of how engineering identities are formed, thispaper describes the methodological plan for understanding interest and identity development ofthree middle-school populations participating in engineering summer camps offered by theCollege of Engineering at the University of Nevada, Reno, NV: (1) women in engineering (2)first generation students and, (3) open-enrollment engineering camps. The research designleverages existing quantitative surveys along with focus groups and observations based on aselected set of questions from these surveys.Research Design, Methods and InstrumentsThe research design for this project is based on
development of the MEA curriculum is guided by content experts to ensure that thecurriculum is culturally relevant, connects with the community, aligns with state content standards,and is developmentally appropriate for middle school students.Objective 2: Teacher Professional DevelopmentTeacher professional development (TPD) on the use of CR MEAs is conducted for seven teachersin grades four through six. The TPD is designed to focus on increasing teachers’ knowledge, skilland confidence in using an instructional method that is math and science rich and culturally andcommunity relevant. The TPD is designed to encourage teachers’ collaboration in planning,teaching, observing, revising, and sharing lessons learned from the implemented CR MEAs.Objective
. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The Diversity of College Engineering Degrees: The Roles of Geography and the Concentration of Engineering Degree Production Executive SummaryIntroductionTo meet the growing demand for a larger technological and scientific labor force in the UnitedStates, a prominent policy goal is to expand and broaden participation in science and engineeringcollege programs (e.g., [1], [2]). Previous
-course survey also emphasized the effectiveness of thisnew method in terms of addressing the learning objectives of the course (Figure 1).Future developments To further deepen this research, we plan to (1) maintain and further develop the active learning aspectsof the course by enriching the teaching with other voices and perspectives and (2) design a robust andobjective method of assessment of the active learning elements of the course. To address our first objective, we will update the papers that are studied on a regular basis to keepthem current. We will also introduce new perspectives by developing a system of online annotation of thepapers. The instructors will use annotations to draw the students’ attention on the ideas of
resulted (last column of Table 1). Some groups that included reactantrecycle reported only minimal improvement in conversion associated with the recycle. In thecase of a vinyl chloride process (performed by two different groups), hydrochloric acid generatedas a by-product of a third reactor was recycled back to the beginning of the process where it wasutilized as a reactant in one of the first two parallel reactions. Besides reactant recycle, threedesign groups included recycling of non-reactant chemicals added for the express purpose ofproduct recovery (triethylene glycol for water recovery, paraffin oil for isobutylene recovery, anddibutyl phthalate for maleic anhydride recovery). In the future, the instructor plans to requestthat the students
environment with other students and the course instructor.We plan to utilize evidence-based evaluation techniques to assess the effectiveness of the course(and individual features of the course) toward student learning. Possible evaluation methods willbe discussed, and feedback from the audience will be encouraged.Keywords: Chemical Engineering, Engineering Education, Bridging Course, Online Course,Continuing Education1. INTRODUCTIONChemical engineering graduate programs often receive applications from students whoseundergraduate degree is in chemistry, physics, biology, or another engineering discipline. Thesetypically are excellent students with undergraduate research or work experience, but their lack ofchemical engineering background can present
accountof the unfolding of their actions and the reactions they elicit.MethodsThe primary question guiding the research in this paper was to understand studentexperience of working with underserved communities. This inquiry was conducted bycollaborating with the students to understand their experiences in their own words. Theresearch plan was to author cases of student experiences of the class and determine whataspects (if anything) from the class were helpful outside the class context. The secondpart of the inquiry was added to identify if the class could satisfy ABET criteria 3h thatrequires that students “to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global,economic, environmental, and societal context”16.GEE has been offered twice so
otherwise would not havebeen covered to the same degree, if at all, in the courses described here. Even though everystudent in these courses didn’t explore every topic in detail, the fact that students aredisseminating their results through oral presentations provides everyone in the class additionalexposure to these topics. In addition to providing significant breadth within each course, these“mini project” assignments promote information literacy and life-long learning, important piecesfor our curriculum not only in regards to ABET assessment, but also for our University’s new 5-year Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP), an integral part of regional reaccreditation. Bydemonstrating the ability to find, analyze, synthesize and appropriately cite current
Trustworthy Cyberspace (SaTC) Securing our Nation’s cyberspace• Aligns with the national Trustworthy Cyberspace: Strategic Plan for the Federal Cybersecurity Research and Development Program (released December 2011).• SaTC cross-directorate program (NSF 13-578): Aims to support fundamental scientific advances and technologies to protect cyberspace.• Scholarship for Service: Aims to increase the number of cybersecurity professionals in the U.S.• Focus on Privacy: Dear Colleague Letter for new collaborations between Computer and Social Scientists, including a focus on privacy. CISE, EHR, ENG, MPS, and SBE Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace (SaTC) Solicitation NSF 13-578
, shape, and other quality attributes of plant or animal products (including forest products), or for monitoring air or water quality.Multi-Agent Command, Coordination, and Communication. Examples includethe following areas: • High-level task planning, execution, and control systems for spatially distributed autonomous or semi-autonomous robots that operate in concert with human co-workers. • Communication protocols and standards for inter-agent coordination and unattended collaboration. • Distributed intelligence and fault tolerance that will allow high-level task completion despite failure of one or more agents.Robotics Priorities for AgDexterous Manipulators with Tactile Feedback. Examples include thefollowing areas: • Vision-directed
Internship Program (BS, MS, PhD) laboratory TD and CO as it relates to mission areas and responsibilities• All FY09 projects map to the Naval S&T strategic plan 9 Defense Research SciencesONR Core 6.1 Programs•Basic research programs executed by ONR program officersBasic Research Challenge (BRC)•Select and fund promising research programs in new areas not addressedby the current basic research program. Young Investigator Program (YIP)•Identify and support academic scientists and engineers who are in atenure-track position.Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Institutions•Increase the quantity and quality of minority
applied project-based experiences among lower development, etc. In addition, lectures on entrepreneurshipdivision courses causes many students to lose interest and were integrated during Winter quarter to allow students toleave engineering during the first year, without understanding develop a business plan related to the quadcopter project.the importance of rigorous training in math and physical Lab sessions were designed for students to apply thesciences. Many programs implemented innovative first-year technical contents to their project and were co-instructed bycourses to enhance engineering curriculum and increase graduate teaching assistants and laboratory staff. Studentsstudent retention [1
there was a statistically significantAdditionally, communication is in the top three most difference in the students’ performance in UN1015 andimportant competencies ranked by engineering graduates ENG1102. For both of these comparisons, a significance(planning and time management is first; problem solving is level α of 0.01 was chosen prior to data comparison to testsecond). Yet communication remains one of the skills the null hypothesis of no difference in the means.engineering students struggle with the most, often failing“to appreciate that written words, not just calculations, An additional analysis was performed on 105 students withexpress engineering content” [3]. The assumption is that
manufactured andtested their design towards a final project showcase. As teams transitioned from their design justexisting in CAD to a physical manifestation of their ideas, they participated in a second designreview where they presented a draft of their educational materials and plans for manufacture.Two out of three of the parents that participated in the first design review returned for the seconddesign review. Figure 3 provides a visual of the parts that were 3D printed for the fuel cell carexample and the final product after manufacture. Figure 3: The 3D printed parts created in the design phase (left) and the final design after fabrication (right). The final design was functional, using the fuel cell for forward movement.MethodsAfter
project success to upfront organization, group planning, and/orgood time-management. The references to the elements of technology, whether hardware orsoftware, were divided as to whether these elements attributed to the shortfall of the project or tothe project successes.DiscussionWhile the specificities and depth of student responses varied across both projects, the resultsnevertheless revealed that students did see value in a breadth of technical to non-technicalengineering attributes from the onset through to the completion of the course. This findingsuggests that the instructor found at least some success in implementing a human-centereddesign project towards the end of the semester in a way that did not de-emphasize or neglectpreviously
major choice at the end of the fall semester. Future work will include a think-aloud interview protocol asking students to explain what they were thinking about their major asthey were responding to the survey. We anticipate two general outcomes of this work. First, thiswork will help improve the language used in surveys for FYE students to ensure that participantsare consistently interpreting prompts that evaluate fit, satisfaction, and anticipated plans tocomplete the program. Additionally, this work will also help elucidate how students in FYEprograms see that program relating to their discipline-specific engineering curriculum and howstudents begin to build their engineering identities.ConclusionsThis study begins to unpack how
improve the graduates’ capability to evolve in aninternational working setting.The collaboration between both higher education institutions, in technology development andinnovation, has proved to be an essential strategic program, planned for the better understandingof a multicultural cross-border region. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2019, American Society of Engineering Education Session ETD 335AcknowledgementThe authors would like to thank the UTRGV Dean’s office, College of Engineering andComputer Science, and the TecNM/ITM Director, who supported the
, governments, and support the program objectives in educating its students.The goal of this program’s advisory board is similar but also unique to provide the information,recruitment, and skills vital for the student’s success in their chosen career and the program. Theprogram is continuously planning, developing, and modifying its curriculum as well as other areasto keep abreast of the changes and advancements being made of this major. The industrialrelationships and partnerships that the program developed with its board is one critical element to its Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2019 American Society for Engineering Education
strategic plan and goals. The college is considered the “EngagementArm” of the PNW with regional industry. To this extend, each faculty is encouraged to identifyone industry and work with them. Faculty do work with industry to train the employees on theexisting tools and technology common to that industry as well as working on projects with them Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2019 American Society for Engineering Education Session ETD 345and leading them to the new technology which will affect that industry in the near future. Thepartnership has had mutual
, identify environmental improvement projectsand how to prioritize them within the organization. This module uses three resources developedby Cummins; an environmental treasure hunt guideline document, a scoring matrix, and a projecthopper with information used to populate the matrix.Module 10 examines the Energy Management Systems (EnMS) –ISO 50001 standard released in2011 that allows an organization to build a management system to monitor, measure andimprove energy performance. The content focuses on the Plan, Do, Check, Act (PDCA) systemand discusses the continuous improvement methodology.AssignmentsAll assignments are individual and use real-world situations and/or data. The focus is onreasoning and justification skills and how potential
to both these questions show that they had 75-minute long lecture sessions.effective learning experience over the 75-minute duration. While we are encouraged by the positive responses shown and discussed in this paper, we realize our study can be strengthened by a larger data set from several semesters and from different instructors/courses. We are planning to pursue along that direction. We will also seek
University’s School of Engineering and Computerindependent of each other in the recent past. In the past year, Science,” two existing courses in embedded systems, eachhowever, this is beginning to change, with plans developing to taught from differing perspectives, have joined to integratecombine the project portion of the two courses into one multi- software and hardware design and implementation in theirdisciplinary group project. group projects. This paper will discuss the existing courses
April 4-6, 2018This work intends to build and further refine the study of American Society for Engineering Education Annualengineering identity in undergraduates as well as those in Conference, New Orleans, LA2016 pp. Pagesdifferent places in the engineering pathway such as high 6 Meyers, K.L., Ohland, M.W., Pawley, A.L.,school and graduate students. In future work we plan to use Silliman, S.E., and Smith, K.A.: ‘Factors relating tothis scale to investigate student attitudes across the engineering identity’, Global Journal of Engineeringengineering trajectory, and between groups that have been Education, 2012, 14, (1), pp. 119-131traditionally underrepresented in engineering
different approaches, the students found theapplied three methods to acquire the values of stresses and advantages and disadvantages of each method, anddeflections of members in the given truss bridge. First, they understood the reason why the results show reasonablycalculated the stresses and deformations theoretically. acceptable differences.Second, they actually conducted an experiment of the trussbridge with electronic measuring equipment. Lastly, they 2. Planning an Integrated Projectbuilt two simulation models with Autodesk Inventor and There are many ways of approaching design educationDassault Systèmes SolidWorks. From the comparisons of that appear to offer both systematic