in Australia by a federal committee.specified. This will prove to be an excellent means of His research interests include vibration suppression anddeveloping critical awareness skills in students. computer simulation of dynamic systems.The computer control and the low speeds ensure that the rig isinherently safe and so it will be possible to allow students touse the rig unsupervised. It is also planned to arrange to havethe rig to be accessed from more than one computer. Studentsmay thus be queued and single rig may be used for multipleand parallel student experiments
elevated to higherimportance. Since teaching is a primary area of activity, it should have a high level ofachievement. Teaching may be separated into the two components of instructional delivery andinstructional development. If one thinks seriously about the art and science of teaching, it is clearthat these two components have a huge impact on student learning and, in reflection, thecandidate’s achievement. In essence, both of these components are distinct, yet interdependent.Effective delivery depends upon careful planning and development. Course developmentdepends on the commitment of continual improvement of delivery and subject mastery. Themeasurement of teaching effectiveness often takes the form of student evaluations, peerevaluations and
solving, and met regularly to study problems in their work andmake recommendations to management5. Although a number of companies were successful withquality circles, in the 1980s, most organizations abandoned them and moved to total qualitymanagement. Total quality management (TQM) is a management system whose basic elements werecustomer focus, quality planning, process measurement, continuous improvement cycles, quality Page 3.542.3goals and objectives, and total participation within an organization. It can be tailored for a
Engineering at RPI. Dr. Komisar was educated atYale University (BA), UMass (BSCE, MS Environmental Engineering) and the University of Washington (Ph.D.).His research work focuses on biological processes in water and wastewater and hazardous waste remediation. GEORGE F. LIST (Ph.D. University of Pennsylvania) is Professor and Chair of the Dept of Civil Engineeringat RPI and director of the Center for Infrastructure and Transportation Studies. Dr. List’s research is focused onreal-time control of system operation; hazardous materials transportation; capacity investment decision making,especially for highway and railroad networks; and operations planning, routing, scheduling, and fleet sizing
/instructor evaluation is planned at the end of the course. Student comments regardingthe use of FEA software will be solicited at that time.References1 Budinski, Kenneth G., Engineering Materials: Properties and Selection, Fifth Edition, Prentice Hall, 19962 Beer, Ferdinand P. and Johnston, Russell E., Mechanics for Engineers Statics and Dynamics, Fourth Edition, McGraw-Hill, 19873 Mott, Robert L., Applied Strength of Materials, Third Edition, Prentice Hall, 19964 Roylance, David, Mechanics of Materials, First Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 19965 Huebner, Kenneth H., Thornton, Earl A., & Byrom, Ted G., The Finite Element Method for Engineers, Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 19956 Introduction to ANSYS Release 5.3
, & project management, and & applications of engineering economics.It is hoped that the following discussion of the procedures for the planning and the administrationof these project design courses at Rose-Hulman will assist other institutions in realizing the samebenefits.PROJECT PLANNINGThe two most important aspects of a senior design course are to learn the methodology of design,including engineering economics, and to gain design experience. The methodology can be learnedin the classroom but the experience is best gained by completing actual projects, preferably as amember of a design team. These projects can be chosen by the students, i.e. something they'reinterested in, or they can be created by the instructor
of a $100million gift from New Jersey Industrialists Henry and Betty Rowan in May, 1992. The Page 3.583.1University, then Glassboro State College, formed an advisory council of leaders ineducation and engineering industries to develop the best plan for a college of engineeringand an engineering curriculum to meet the needs of students, the profession and thecountry into the 21st Century. This effort led to the development of engineering curriculain the four major disciplines (chemical, civil, electrical and mechanical engineering) thatintegrated design throughout and incorporated liberal use of computers. Design isincorporated throughout the four
, 3.4, and 3.5, which includethe following student outcomes [1]:Criterion 3.3 An ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiencesCriterion 3.4 An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contextsCriterion 3.5 An ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectivesGiven the recognition that development of non-technical skills like communication, taskaccountability, work
enact new ways of doing things. Resourcefulness and The ability of teachers to combat stress and persist with Coping difficult goals/tasks. Networked-ness The tendency for a teacher to participate in a social network (inside or outside of the organization). Time Management The act or process of planning and exercising control and Organizational over the amount of time spent on specific activities, Skills especially to increase efficiency or productivity; skills that enable people to carry on activities effectively, to put
Paper ID #43339Board 14: Work in Progress: Exploring the Integration of Bio-Inspired DesignInventions in Biomedical EngineeringEisa A. Khawaja, Alpharetta High School Eisa Khawaja is currently a senior at Alpharetta High School in Alpharetta, Georgia. He plans to pursue a degree in mechanical engineering. He is also interested in Artificial Intelligence and participated in an AI Scholars summer program.Dr. Hoda Ehsan, The Hill School Hoda is Chair for Engineering and Computer Science Department and the Director of Quadrivium Design and Engineering at The Hill School. She holds a Ph.D in Engineering Education from Purdue
individualinterviews collected periodically over a period of three years. Specifically, the project conductedthree focus groups in Spring 2021 (24 students), nine in Spring 2022 (50 students), and eight inSpring 2023 (48 students). Focus groups were recorded and up to an hour long. Focus groupquestions focused on students’ future academic and career plans, experiences and motivations forparticipating in STEM CONNECT, experiences at their institution (including in their STEMcourses), and, when relevant, experiences transferring from a community college to abachelor’s-granting institution. Data were transcribed, then coded using Dedoose qualitativesoftware and a preliminary list of a priori codes based on the structure of the central researchquestions and the
than any specific combination ofprogrammatic features. Consequently, understanding students’ perspectives about what excitesthem about STEM is crucial to program development, program evaluation, and supportingpersistence through STEM career entry.Future WorkFuture plans for the qualitative synthesis are to analyze an updated sample of primary sources toexamine the extent to which the themes identified in the first sample are upheld. Furthermore,the qualitative synthesis will result in analytic themes, which will enable interpretation of thenature of the relationship between STEM interventions and STEM career outcomes beyond adescriptive summary [8].References[1] D. Reider, K. Knestis, and J. Malyn-Smith, "Workforce education models for K-12
research by capitalizing on the strengths of each approach. Thissequential mixed-methods approach will enable a more comprehensive understanding and enrichthe research findings. The planned approach for this project is summarized in Figure 1.Presently, the first phase of this project has been completed, which is an exploratory qualitativestudy making use of interviews. Second Phase: Quantitative Third Phase: Mixed Method First Phase: Qualitative (qual) (QUAN) (QUAL) • In this phase of the qualitative • The second phase of the study • At this phase, a second round (qual) study, we carried out introduces
. "Journal Club." https://phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=962 (accessed Feb. 01, 2024).[18] J. Cham. "Journal Club, pt. 2." https://phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=963 (accessed Feb. 01, 2024).[19] J. Cham. "Journal Club, pt. 3." https://phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=964 (accessed Feb. 01, 2024).[20] B. K. Ige and UCLA Graduate Division. "Steps to Success: Writing a Winning Statement of Purpose." https://grad.ucla.edu/asis/agep/advsopstem.pdf (accessed Feb. 07, 2024).[21] NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program. "Personal, Relevant Background and Future Goals Statement and Graduate Research Plan Statement." https://nsfgrfp.org/applicants/statements/ (accessed Feb. 07, 2024
a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Association of Environmental Engineering and Science Professors (AEESP), Environmental & Water Resources Institute (EWRI) and ASEE.Dr. Timothy Chow, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Timothy Chow serves as the Director of Institutional Research in the Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment (IRPA) at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He is a member of Rose-Hulman’s Data Governance Committee and the Quality of Education Committee. Timothy is a longtime member of the Association for Institutional Research (AIR), Indiana Association for Institutional Research (INAIR), and Overseas Chinese Association for Institutional Research (OCAIR
Outcome Assessment (SOA) form is a direct assessment of student outcome achievement covered in a course by the instructor. • Annual program assessment and unit reports encapsulating yearly assessment and continuous improvement actions. • Meeting minutes containing student outcome assessment achievement and decisions on needed actions. Criterion 5 – Curriculum • Meeting minutes of discussion on curriculum. • Student examples and syllabi of all technical course materials. • Student examples and syllabi of all supporting course materials. • Links to the campus catalog on the program and plan of study. • Support
were in the Spring 2020 special offering of theclass, which had 35 students; therefore, it is difficult to determine the level of preparation forthese enrolled students. The 2020 Spring quarter offering of the class was of course taughtonline. Because of staffing issues, we have not been able to offer the section since.Course FormatAs mentioned previously, the class was offered in a flipped format, with online video shortlectures and example problems. We utilized undergraduate Learning Assistants (LAs) in eachcourse cohort. The Learning Assistant model consists of three basic principles: the LAs receiveinstruction in pedagogical strategies, they work closely with the instructors to understand andhelp plan course activities, and they help the
—instead ofas a final step once results have been obtained and analyzed”, RT is more effective for use bypolicymakers and communities.[3], [8] The third finding (2.3) is that “effective community-level translation methods place an emphasis on using a variety of interactive and participatorystrategies aimed at soliciting, valuing, and engaging with community.” [8] These could go fromauthentic participatory action research (PAR) strategies in the planning of research, tocommunity-owned workshops, to k-12 education modules to inform local teachers and studentsof the effects of research, to name a few. [15] Based on our experiences, the fourth finding (2.4)is that while RT-committed researchers might suffer from lack of trust from communities asresult
gradedassessments. This requires approval by curriculum and department leadership as it affects gradedassessments. The intent is to reduce student workload by incorporating PLTL with existingassessments vice requiring additional assignments. The authors plan to scale this work beyondthe three previously identified courses.ConclusionThe results so far have been encouraging and show the peer support intervention has positiveeffects on student grades. The course averages indicate that students involved with PLTLactivities have higher course averages an indicator of academic success that has potential to leadto persistence in engineering pathways compared to those students not involved with PLTLactivities. This preliminary data appears to support the overall
providebest practices or action plans to reduce CO2 emissions. However, this area has limited research to provideeasy and robust approaches to analyzing carbon footprint and drive research and experimentation design.Note that research and educational activity in higher education differs from industrial settings in that theprocess usually operates at the most efficient point to maximize profits. In higher education,teaching/research activities aim to understand specific processes or fulfill the identified learning outcomes,so operation conditions are often varied and can be less economical. Teaching laboratories are essential for higher education, providing students with hands-onexperience and practical application of theoretical knowledge
managementfor online learners are highly encouraged for REACH students to address these concerns. Theworkshops are provided at no cost to CGCC students on the platform:www.college2success.com and include: “Online Courses: Staying Motivated & Disciplined”, “10Tips For Success In Your Online Course”, “Study Tips & Note-Taking Strategies”. Aftercompleting one of the workshops, the students are invited to fill out an action plan that includes4 points of reflection: Overcome challenges, Establish a schedule, Know your instructor, andBreak large tasks into smaller chunks. In the next semesters, a question will be added to thesurvey to assess the impact of taking those workshops on the academic integration scores. This preliminary study includes only
in the regular TA-led recitation sessions, which underscores the intervention’s main achievement, to help students pass the course who might otherwise fail. In addition, this illustrates that the PLSG method helps all students, including transfer students, pass the course at higher rates. The inclusion of other factors pertaining to students’ starting course competency could potentially further elucidate these results. The research team plans to include demographic data and examine how transfer status is affected by study group participation in later studies. Ongoing and Future Work Ongoing work for the project includes investigating how the PLSGs affect students compared to the traditional TA-led
Illinois State University, teaching in the Sustainable and Renewable Energy program. Dr. Jo also leads the Sustainable Energy Consortium at the university. Dr. Jo is an honors graduate of Purdue University, where he earned a B.S. in Building Construction Management. He earned his M.S. in Urban Planning from Columbia University, where he investigated critical environmental justice issues in New York City. His 2010 Ph.D. from Arizona State University was the nation’s first in sustainability. His research, which has been widely published, focuses on renewable energy systems and sustainable building strategies to reduce the negative impacts of urbanization.Allison Antink-Meyer, Illinois State University Allison
San Diego County Office of Education andwith the San Diego Science Project to create a series of lesson plans centered on the webapplications, incorporating playful activities that explore how everyday objects create sound. Thecurrent version of the curriculum can be accessed for free through this team’s websitewww.listeningtowaves.com.All these activities have been carried out in an iterative manner: evaluating how children interactwith the curriculum and applications and how teachers respond to the training. This paperexamines how teachers' attitudes toward the teaching of waves change as they participate in theprofessional development.2. MethodsTwenty-four science teachers from 19 schools across 10 districts in California participated in
fromhttp://depts.washington.edu/cerse/research/current-research/.Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity, and Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology(2018). Creating Shared Vision: A Tip Sheet from REvolutionizing Engineering and ComputerScience Departments (RED) Participatory Action Research. Retrieved fromhttp://depts.washington.edu/cerse/research/current-research/.Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity, and Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology(2022). Planning for Leadership Change: A Tip Sheet from REvolutionizing EngineeringDepartments (RED) Participatory Action Research. Retrieved fromhttp://depts.washington.edu/cerse/research/current-research/Vuori, J. (2018) Understanding academic leadership using the four-frame model
additional data collection of pre-transfer andpost-transfer surveys and interviews with pre-transfer students and two-year college faculty,staff, and administrators. Following the collection of that data, all data collected during thisproject will be mixed to create greater understanding of the assets that assets, factors, andstrategies that enable access to engineering transfer pathways and the ways in which these itemsvary across student demographics, locations, institutions, or intention to transfer. Beginning inYear 3, with this information, and data from other studies conducted in this CAREER grant, theresearchers plan to develop an interactive, digital Engineering Transfer Student Dashboard,based on constructs identified by transfer student
. Additionally, an extensiveFOI analysis of multiple data sources (both qualitative and quantitative) can help provide adeeper understanding of the intervention.RecommendationsRecommendations for higher education practitioners and researchers engaged in fidelity ofimplementation activities are provided below: • Develop clear guidelines, such as a rubric outlining key components of the professional development framework or intervention. These guidelines can support practitioners and researchers to ensure a shared understanding of the intended implementation structure and process [1],[8]. • Examine how professional development activities (planning, teaching, and reflection) advance particular components of
(1994) usability inspection methods, usability testing will be done throughfocus groups to explore participants’ perceptions of the user interface design, identify designproblems, and uncover areas to improve the user interface and user experience in Ecampus andhybrid courses (RQ1). A heuristics evaluation [16, 17] of the user interface will be conducted toensure that usability principles are followed to provide a user interface with inclusivity andaccessibility (RQ2). A Likert scale will be adapted from Bandura’s (1989) MultidimensionalScales of Perceived Self-Efficacy [18] to explore participants' self-regulatory efficacy (RQ3).Planned InterventionThe proposed study will combine elements of both exploratory and quasi-experimental
use standard statistical tests (using mean comparisons, chisquare, and regression, etc.) abiding by the standards for statistical significance. For qualitativedata, we will use axial coding and thematic analysis.SedimentSketch softwareSedimentSketch will be a web-based software application that will allow instructors to createcustomized virtual lab classes with a personalized experience and automated feedback tostudents. No coding experience is needed for instructors to tailor these classes to use with theirteaching plan. The active learning software SedimentSketch will facilitate student mastery ofsediment identification and description; and provide a unique interactive environment for studentsto practice and improve their sedimentology
addition tothese questions, we have recently added an investigation into the conceptual understanding ofengineering material when practicing with OEMPs. This new research question has beenmotivated by student survey results and instructor feedback. Future plans include developing afaculty development workshop that will explain how to design an OEMP, why they are beneficialto students’ education and development as an engineer, and how to implement them in theclassroom. The goal of this workshop will be to encourage professors to use open-endedproblems in engineering science courses and give their students an opportunity to practiceengineering judgment. With this, we can begin to understand all of the ways in which studentsdevelop as engineers from