Session 2647 AN ASSESSMENT OF THE PERFORMANCE OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY GRADUATES CHARLIE P. EDMONSON, JOSEPH A. UNTENER The University of DaytonABSTRACTGraduates of Engineering Technology Programs continue to perform at high levels of employersatisfaction in very diverse positions. This paper describes a study performed by The Universityof Dayton Engineering Technology Department of graduates between the years of 1992 - 1996.This study addresses salary levels, satisfaction of graduates with the Engineering TechnologyProgram, academic preparation, and career mobility
Engineering award due to her efforts to increase the recruitment, retention, and graduation rates of under-represented students in engineering.Barbara Bogue, Pennsylvania State University BARBARA BOGUE is Associate Professor of Engineering Science and Mechanics and Women in Engineering. She is Co-Director of AWE and AWISE. Her research interests include recruitment and retention of women in engineering, assessment and career development.Chia-Lin Tsai, University of MissouriFleur Gooden, Virginia Tech FLEUR N. GOODEN is a graduate assistant in the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. She received her B.S. in Computer Science and
Liaison. In that position, she is helping to create a pathway for American Indian high school and tribal college students into STEM careers through STEM camps and Sunday Academies. She also supports the ND EPSCoR/Tribal College research capacity building effort at the five North Dakota Tribal Colleges. Page 22.120.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 A Unique University-Tribal College Collaboration to Strengthen Native American Pathways to STEM EducationAbstractThe authors and some of their colleagues have been engaged in strengthening the STEMeducation
class all affect the number of AP classes offered in high schools.I. IntroductionA problem with many high schools is that challenging courses are not offered, especially inmathematics and the sciences. In its final report of 2001, The National Commission on theHigh School Senior Year urged states to offer challenging alternatives to the traditionalhigh school senior year. The report said that not enough high schools are preparingstudents for college and careers and that while 70 percent of today’s high school graduatesgo on to some form of postsecondary education, only one-half of those who enroll at four-year institutions leave with a degree. The main reason cited was that they were notprepared for the rigors of college academics in high
: Incoming FreshmenPEER/WISE Experience Mission Give incoming freshman a Increase retention of students in Encourage students to pursue theirglimpse of what their freshman engineering by easing their transition from Masters or PhD following year will be like. high school into college. undergraduate graduation.PWE Justification• The bridge from high school to college demands intentional critical care for students (Raines, 2012; Stole-McAllister, 2011) • Career Exploration • Comfortability• Widely used to address inequitable educational opportunities that impact student achievement (Kitchen, Sandler, &
ProgramsAbstractBackground: This research paper extends previously reported results in which we demonstratedthat students in project-based engineering programs report less self-reported stress anddepression, stronger personal vision of an engineering career, more positive perceptions ofdepartment caring and diversity, and greater pride in their department than those the studentpopulation in Jensen and Cross’s study of engineering stress culture. No statistically differentdifferences were found for reported anxiety or engineering identity.Purpose: We examine how these reported measures of engineering stress culture change over timeas students participate in entirely project-based engineering and computer science programs. Weseek to establish a baseline of measured
Work In Progress: Stepping Back and Letting Students Take the Lead – Student-led Projects for a First-Year Introduction to Engineering Course Matthew T. Siniawski1, Adam R. Carberry2, Nazmul Ula1 1 - Loyola Marymount University / 2 - Arizona State UniversityAbstractA first-year introduction to engineering course was redesigned to encourage active learningthrough a project-based pedagogy. A major goal of this approach was to improve students’engagement, learning, and interest in pursuing an engineering career. Student teams participatedin four unique engineering projects throughout the course. Each project varied the degree towhich the instructor
the MS in Technology Management degreeprogram, out of a total of 360 graduates in the entire School of Engineering at the University ofBridgeport. The Technology Management program was the smallest program in the School ofEngineering, which also awarded graduate degrees in Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineeringand Computer Science and Engineering.At that time, we conducted a review of the TM program and made recommendations to transform thedegree into a modern, relevant and growth oriented program with the following goals: • Attract new career oriented graduate students and develop future industry and technology leaders adept at managing technology dependent organizations, technological change, and skilled in
through a qualitative case study on onemid-size North American engineering consulting firm. Preliminary findings from a subset of ourinterviews with engineering consultants across various career stages are presented. This workaligns with ASEE LEAD division’s strategic initiative “Explore” as it contributes tounderstanding how engineering leadership is understood in professional practice. This work isalso particularly relevant to knowledge-intensive, high-autonomy work environments.Introduction:In recent decades, leadership skills are increasingly recognized as an important aspect of theengineering profession. Accreditation boards across North America have included leadershipcapabilities, such as effective collaboration and teamwork skills and
External Relations Director College of Engineering Iowa State University ligouri@iastate.edu Pat N White Manager of Student & Alumni Career Services Program College of Engineering Iowa State University patwhite@iastate.edu Larry F Hanneman Director Engineering Career Services Adjunct Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering College of Engineering Iowa State University
the MS in Technology Management degreeprogram, out of a total of 360 graduates in the entire School of Engineering at the University ofBridgeport. The Technology Management program was the smallest program in the School ofEngineering, which also awarded graduate degrees in Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineeringand Computer Science and Engineering.At that time, we conducted a review of the TM program and made recommendations to transform thedegree into a modern, relevant and growth oriented program with the following goals: • Attract new career oriented graduate students and develop future industry and technology leaders adept at managing technology dependent organizations, technological change, and skilled in
LowellExtended Abstract April 27-28, 2012Students additionally demonstrated a strong excitement regarding future studies of engineering, and future careers inengineering. Importantly, students strongly agreed that “Technology plays an important role in solving society’sproblems,” and that “Engineers have contributed greatly to fixing problems of the world.” Students displayedoverall excitement for the future. Further, students’ comments revealed the positive impact of the course. Onefreshman student stated, “It was awesome to see that there’s this whole world out there just meant to empowerpeople to build stuff. I really like that we had ideas and made them right away
four-year scholarships. This work analyzes the third-year activities of re-building, sustaining, and nurturing the cohort of about 20 scholars consistingof mechatronics, civil engineering technology, computer information systems, physics, biology,chemistry, and mathematics students. When compared with the previous year, results show asignificant improvement in retention. Mentoring needs and activities increased while tutoringneeds ended. Some cohort members started undergraduate research projects with their mentorswhile some others became involved in engineering design projects and competitions. Through anaggressive student placement program and two career fairs, some cohort students were able tosecure internships.IntroductionTo battle high
minority students [1-7]. Doctoral students effectively mentored by their advisors willexperience a lower risk of anxiety and depression and higher confidence [8-10]. Furthermore, aneffective mentoring relationship can improve doctoral students’ research skills and productivity[11-14]. On the other hand, ineffective mentoring from advisors can lead to graduate students’negative mentoring experience, which in turn leads to detrimental career and psychosocialconsequences, such as missed opportunities for career networking and undermining of researchconfidence [15]. Although faculty mentoring has enormous effects on doctoral students’academic careers and confidence, no faculty is born a natural mentor. Unfortunately, facultyadvisors generally do not
.”),and three Likert Scale style questions asking students to rate their perceptions of how useful,interesting, and impactful the robotic arm was in their learning and career plans (e.g.,“Howinteresting do you think it was to use the robotic arm for learning activities?”) [17]. We structuredthe survey in this way to provide students an opportunity to discuss the robotic arm unpromptedfirst, before we specifically addressed those activities. We conducted this survey at the end of thesemester, prior to final exams to assess students’ complete experiences of the course. As part ofthe consent process, participants had the opportunity to grant access to assignment grades to beused in the research. Thirty-six participants consented to having their
Industrial Engineering (MIE) in the COE has modified itscurriculum to include a course, which addresses essential life and career skills to its students intheir final semester. The course addresses challenges ranging from how to deal with financialpressure, seeking career opportunities, time management, workplace etiquette, and othernecessary skills. It consists of five different modules: Financial Planning, Effective Job Hunting,Accelerating Your Career, Learning Never Stops, and Entrepreneurship. Modules utilizemethodologies from experiential learning theory to enhance student learning and contribute tothe body of knowledge of teaching methods in STEM.An initial assessment was performed to measure the impact of this course and its modules.Metrics
participation engineering clubs andprofessional societies might facilitate post-graduation career commitment in engineering.Moreover, results suggest gaps in opportunities in engineering for women persist even aftergraduation.IntroductionScience and technology industry leaders, educators, and policymakers fear that the United Statesmay soon lack, or is currently deficient in, the skilled labor force required to occupy high-paying,high-skilled jobs in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce.1The problem, often dubbed the “STEM Crisis”, has garnered considerable scholarly, financial,and human resources across the higher education enterprise, as well as an immense amount offederal financial support. The goal is simple: in
Paper ID #25150Enhancing Gender Diversity in STEM Requires Support from AllDr. Keith J. Bowman, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Dr. Keith J. Bowman is Dean of the College of the College of Engineering and Information Technology (COEIT) and Constellation Professor of Information Technology and Engineering at UMBC, the Uni- versity of Maryland, Baltimore County. Dr. Bowman began his academic career as a Purdue University Assistant Professor after receiving BS and MS degrees from Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) and a PhD degree in materials science and engineering from the University of Michigan. He served as
covered in lecture. • Successful engineering students spend as much time on campus as possible to take advantage of available resources. They use on-campus programs and on-campus resources to help them achieve their educational goals.These behaviors align with behaviors discussed in many publications on student success andstudent retention.1234Student PopulationHighline College is an open access two-year college located south of Seattle, WA and within 10minutes of an international airport. During the 2014-2015 school year, 161 students enrolled inour Introduction to Engineering Careers class over fall, winter, and spring quarters. Studentsself-selected enrollment into the course which has no pre-requisites. Of the students who
for student affairs. He serves as university adviser to the Philip- pine Student Association (PhilSA), Beta Tau Omega (BTO), an Asian-interest fraternity, and the Society for Asian Scientists and Engineers (SASE). Pariyothorn completed a B.S. in industrial/organizational psy- chology (business minor), M.S. in management (human resource management emphasis) from the Mays Business School, and is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in human resource development, all from Texas A&M University. His research interests include workplace mentoring relationships, career development, and graduate school recruitment.Nandita Kohli, Texas A&M University Nandita Kohli is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Chemical Engineering
percentages explicitly within engineering academia are difficult to obtainbecause the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics does not disaggregate thedoctoral workforce numbers of women, underrepresented minorities, and those with disabilitiesby discipline beyond S&E or provide a feature making data based on intersectional identitiesavailable [8].B. Approaches frequently used to diversify faculty demographicsStarting in 2001, the National Science Foundation (NSF) funded a program, called ADVANCE,designed to “increase the representation and advancement of women in academic science andengineering careers” in a systemic way [9, para. 1]. Under the auspices of the ADVANCEprogram, more than one hundred institutions of higher education
expectations. Some of the topics are discussedcontinually through weekly GA meetings and individual meetings with a program coordinator.Women in Engineering and Technology Initiative-- FEMME ProgramThis initiative, designed for elementary, middle and secondary school girls in order to increasethe number of women entering and successfully completing STEM careers, is one approachutilized by NJIT to stop the migration of capable and interested students out of the STEMpipeline. Our program builds on existing partnerships in order to produce systemic changes inthe attitudes, behaviors, academic preparation and performance of female students.First offered as FEMME in 1981, the initiative was designed to improve the mathematics andscience backgrounds of
discussing data fromparticipant surveys.In response to numerous requests from both students and faculty to support academic e-mentoring, and with support from a grant from the National Science Foundation, MentorNet in2003 began a pilot program for MentorNet ACE (Academic Career E-Mentoring). This newproject focuses on providing One-on-One e-mentoring services for graduate students, matchingthem with tenured faculty as mentors, and will eventually experiment with offering such servicesto tenure track faculty members seeking or pursuing academic science and engineering careers.The paper will also describe initial engagement with this new program, and offer preliminaryfindings about the potential benefits to be gained from e-mentoring for those
strides toward creatingeducational opportunities for the youth of the Reservation. However, there is concernwith the low numbers of students who attempt or succeed at careers, which requirehigher-level science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) skills. NorthDakota State University, as one of the premier educational institutions of the State, for itspart has often collaborated on educational initiatives with the TCCs in the State in thepast fulfilling its land grant responsibility.Turtle Mountain Reservation is located in north central North Dakota and is home toabout 13,000 members of the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians. TheReservation consists of a six-by-twelve mile tract of land. According to the 2000 census,about 41% of
explicate thedevelopment of a professional skills certification framework for undergraduate students in amicroelectronics engineering workforce development program and creation of the mechanism(s)to assess professional skill development. The framework facilitates students’ acquisition ofprofessional skills through experiential learning as viewed through the overarching theoreticallens of both social cognitive career theory and self-determination theory. The certificationframework, rubric, and assessment development are described, and the implications arediscussed.Tags: professional skills definitions, implementation, portfolio, professional skills,microelectronics, reflections, rubricIntroductionEmployers and educators alike have recognized a lack
scientists and engineerswho work closely with their partner teachers to engage middle and high school students inscience and engineering activities related to the fellows' research. The program goals are toenhance STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) curriculum, inform andinspire students about careers in science and engineering, and improve the graduate fellow'sability to communicate their research to a broad audience. In this paper, we present the middleschool math classroom activities developed related to one particular fellow’s research on carbonnanotube composites. Using lightweight carbon nanotube composites for a car chassis canincrease fuel efficiency, decrease emissions, and maintain the desired properties of the
program was conducted with a larger group of students inthe summer of 2022. Thus far, our results indicate that this program will be beneficial to studentswell after regular programming resumes at full capacity. GREaT GradS was designed to servegroups of graduate students who are typically marginalized within science with an eye towardretention through support and mentorship. The overall goals were to provide (1) ResourceRecognition by introducing students to the various academic and personal resources available oncampus, (2) Personal Preparation through programming on subjects such as personal finance andmental health, (3) Career Preparation through writing workshops and curriculum vitae editing,and (4) Network Building by connecting students
and distributors.She also wrote the book, New Media Careers for Artists and Designers in 2003. In 2007, Dr. Faison waspresented the Exemplary Teaching and Service Award by North Carolina Central University’s College ofLiberal Studies. She has taught graphic design and new media at universities in Ohio, Georgia, Virginia,and North Carolina, and has seven years of academic management experience in higher education. Page 26.1744.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 The Recruit-Support-Connect Program: Women Advancing in Technology AbstractThe Recruit
a step that is needed to reach a long term goal 8,12,14;this is exogenous instrumentality6,12. An example of exogenous instrumentality would be when astudent believes they need to pass a course in order to reach their academic goals 8. The task canbe perceived as directly related to the future goal, which is described as endogenousinstrumentality6,12. An example of endogenous instrumentality is a student believing that theyneed the information from a course in order to be successful in their future career 8.These three dimensions—extension, future time attitude, and perceived instrumentality—can berepresented as three axes, as demonstrated in Figure 115. On these axes one’s FTP can berepresented as different shapes of a cone10,16. Within
engineering education, identity and equity. Address: Engineering Training Center II (ETC) 204 East Dean Keeton Street Austin, TX 78712 Email: apatrick@utexas.eduDr. Maura Borrego, University of Texas, Austin Maura Borrego is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Curriculum & Instruction at the University of Texas at Austin. She previously served as a Program Director at the National Science Foun- dation and an associate dean and director of interdisciplinary graduate programs. Her research awards include U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE), a National Science Foundation CAREER award, and two outstanding publication awards from the American Educational Research