-ure occurs. For example, one type of failure in this test produces:Test case 1:Initial value of pu16_a: 0x1000Initial value of pu16_b: 0x1002Initial value of u16_c: 0x0000 (0)Initial value of au16_d: [0] = 0x56A1 (22177) [1] = 0x12FC (4860) [2] = 0x0000 (0) [3] = 0x0000 (0)5 The remaining three test values were omitted to improve the formatting of the paper.Running test...Expected location: middle. Actual location: middle.Testing value of pu16_a...Expected data: 0x1000. Actual data: 0x1000.Testing value of pu16_b...Expected data: 0x1002. Actual data: 0x1002.Testing value of u16_c...Expected data: 0x699D (27037). Actual data:0x0000 (0).FAIL.5. ResultsThe framework discussed in this paper forms an integral part of an interactive e
their interactionswithin teams so that they can improve the overall well-being of the team.ConclusionThis pilot project developed a preliminary approach to evaluate teamwork and leadership withinthe Civil Engineering, and Construction Engineering and Management curriculum using an SLR,peer-evaluation, and psychological safety (PS) survey. Through the project we evaluated thestudents' ability to effectively perform within a group on a few team assignments. They eachprovided artifacts directly aligned to SO 5: provided leadership, created a collaborative andinclusive environment, established goals, planned tasks, and met objectives.Based on the SLR and the peer-evaluation, students’ notion of leadership was closely tied to therole of a leader. In
captures the degree to which anindividual uses each of four learning patterns. Through these patterns the learner represents howhe or she sees the world, takes in stimuli, integrates the stimuli and formulates a response to it.An individual can begin his or her learning with a particular pattern or patterns, use patterns asneeded, or avoid them. Teams were then created in order to maximize individual and collectiveuse of learning patterns. This paper will report1. The results of the initial study conducted during the Fall 2001 semester.2. An overview of the patterns that resulted from the administration of the LCI to all Freshmen and Sophomore Engineering students at Rowan3. Examples of the patterns of the teams that were assigned (to show how
and keep track of the sources used in their projects.Web Conferencing TechnologiesWith available technologies, such as Web Conferencing, Chat Reference or Instant Messaging,Email Reference, Course Management System Integration, Blogs, Text Messaging, andTelephone service, distance learners receive necessary assistance needed for their projects andassignments through virtual environments. Library instructional sessions can now be heldthrough these technologies. Online students at their convenience will be able to learn newinformation research and educational skills. They can also simultaneously ask questions andshare their thoughts with their online classmates resulting in an interactive and engaging learningenvironment.Adobe Connect Pro
Paper ID #37038Case Study: Encouraging Faculty Adoption of New Grading SoftwareDr. Ben Mertz, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Ben Mertz received his Ph. D. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Notre Dame in 2010 and B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 2005. He spent 7 years as a part of a lecturer team at Arizona State University before joining the Mechanical Engineering Department at Rose-Hulman as an Assistant Professor in 2018. His research interests in Engineering Education include teaching teamwork skills and implementing non-traditional content delivery
collectedwith the instruments described in this paper. To describe the others briefly:2) Sophomore Engineering Clinic I is an integrated course in which technical writing andengineering design are taught concurrently. Prior to 2004 the course always employed a Page 15.966.7semester-long design project. In 2004 the Sophomore Clinic team replaced the semester-long project model with a sequence of design projects of continuously increasingcomplexity. It was hypothesized that if this change was beneficial, students shouldperform better in subsequent courses (Sophomore Engineering Clinic II and capstonedesign courses) that involved substantial design content
teaching”,which can be defined as the personal belief of teachers in their abilities to positively affectstudents’ educational attainments4. For example, teachers’ self-efficacy in teaching mathematics,or the lack thereof, significantly impacts students’ attainment in mathematics5. Thus, aninstrument to measure teacher self-efficacy towards teaching is context and domain-specific4. Inorder to adequately address needs of teachers and to evaluate the success of teacher professionaldevelopment programs for K-12 Engineering, an instrument for teaching engineering self-efficacy needs to be developed and rigorously tested.Theoretical FrameworkSelf-efficacy is one’s personal belief about his or her capability to take an action toward anattainment6. Since
balance an understanding ofboth the technical context with consideration for the social, contextual, and cultural influence onengineering, especially since different countries have different approaches to problem-solving,collaboration, and communication [2]. One way of integrating global competency learning intothe engineering curriculum is through study abroad programs [3]. These programs range induration such as two-week or summer-long time frames and focus on context, country, andlanguage-learning components. However, one of the main barriers for these programs isaccessibility and the lack of flexibility in engineering curricula. Hence, some programs offershort international experiences during the summer to allow students to participate
, "Model of Integrating Humanitarian Development into Engineering Education," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, April 2010.7 M. J. Prince and R. M. Felder, "Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 123-138, 2006.8 M. Borrego and J. Bernhard, "The emergence of engineering research as an internationally connected field of inquiry," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 14-47, 2011.9 J. S. Brown, A. Collins and P. Duguid, "Situated cognition and the culture of learning," Educational Researcher, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 32-41, 1989
effort andis more persistent in solving the problem. Creative engineers generate new and valuablesolutions to design problems. However, prior studies suggest that the creativity of mechanicalengineering students decreases over the course of an engineering program. This paperinvestigates the latter claim, and searches for ways to increase creativity of engineering students.Firstly, a four-year longitudinal study investigates the changes in design self-efficacy and designcreativity of students in an engineering program1. Over the course of an engineering curriculum,the design self-efficacy and creativity of the students should increase. This longitudinal studytracked one cohort of students for four years, which resulted in two sets of data: within
number of sensor ports and interfacing capabilities. The HandyBoard includes 32K of battery-backed static RAM, a connector system that allows active sensorsto be individually plugged into the board, an LCD screen, and an integrated, rechargeable batterypack.The platform is supported with a nearly complete subset of the C programming language in aninteractive Windows-based environment called Interactive C (IC).7 A useful feature of IC is itsvirtual machine approach to executing programs. Most embedded systems rely on an edit-compile-link-download cycle. In contrast, IC provides a virtual machine that runs on the68HC11 and interprets pseudo-code (called "p-code") that is produced by the compiler. Thisapproach is similar to that employed by the
Paper ID #38275Voices of experience: Enhancing learning on resilientinfrastructure and sustainability through servingnessRuben Esteban Leoncio Caban Hello, my name is Rubén E. Leoncio Cabán and I am 22 years old, I come from a town called Lares in Puerto Rico. It is rural and small, and its charm is part of what makes me like it so much. I’m currently an undergraduate student pursuing a double bachelor's in electrical engineering (in power electronics) and in computer engineering (in software). Additionally, I have completed a minor concentration entitled: Integrated practice of engineering and architecture, part
college by providing an ME-intensive course that allows students to apply the requiredmath and science curriculum and promoting early engagement in the field of engineering. Buildingon the notion of lack of identification with the field of engineering (especially amongunderrepresented groups [34]), research indicates that freshmen are 1.5 times less likely to identifyas engineers compared with sophomores, juniors, or seniors [38], and a review of retentionresearch indicates that students with lower self-confidence and/or self-efficacy are more likely toleave engineering fields [14]. Thus, there is a potential for FIRE to have significant impact onminimizing attrition rates. By engaging students in research and connecting them with faculty at
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”I. Introduction Undergraduate research should be an important part of our Engineering Technology (ET)curriculum because it better prepares our students for the graduate school. This additionalexperience also helps our majors in their career regardless of the job type because they learn towork independently as undergraduate researchers. However, it has been our observation that ETstudents are far less motivated to do research and report writing than those in other fields such asBiology, Chemistry and Physics. This is more apparent at Middle Tennessee State University(MTSU) since we have a large number
elementary school [1]. First-year engineering programsoften take on the task of providing students with engineering experiences to help mold theirexpectations of what an engineer does and what various engineering disciplines are available tothem in an effort to improve retention [2].As many different first-year engineering (FYE) programs have shown, students can beintroduced to engineering experiences earlier in their education through course work, designprojects, or lab experiences. A challenge of this discipline-exposure component of a first-yearengineering curriculum is how to efficiently use course time to introduce so many differentengineering disciplines in ways that are impactful and meaningful to students. One such way ofproviding first-year
assess the student. • For some outcomes, the workplace is simply better suited for assessment. For example, the assessment of teamwork skills in the academic setting might take place through a variety of projects, activities, and labs scattered throughout the curriculum. (Not every course is conducive to assessment of teamwork!) However, these are often very discrete events and the faculty member may have limited access to observe the student interactions. In contrast, an employer can work closely with a student on a full-time basis over an extended period of time. Since most industry settings rely heavily on teamwork skills, we believe that the supervisor is much
Potential, and Practical Applications. Routledge, NY.Lester, J., Klein, C. Rangwala, H. & Johri, A. (2017). Learning Analytics in Higher Education.ASHE Monograph Series, Vol. 3, Issue 5.Macan, T.H., Shahani, C., Dipboye, R.L., & Phillips, A.P. (1990). College students' timemanagement: Correlations with academic performance and stress. Journal of educationalpsychology, 82(4), 760-768.Nonis, S.A., & Hudson, G.I. (2006). Academic performance of college students: Influence oftime spent studying and working. Journal of Education for Business, 81(3), 151-159.Siemens, G., Gasevic, D., Haythornthwaite, C., Dawson, S., Buckingham-Shum, S., Ferguson,R., Duval, E., Verbert, K., Baker, R. (2011). Open Learning Analytics: an integrated &
mentor would be doing the, the same things. So general supportiveness, but also coupled with a, with a spirit of transparency.”Integral Mentorship: Mentees emphasized the importance of “whole person” mentoring, whichaddresses personal and human aspects alongside professional relations. This holistic approach tomentorship extends beyond just professional knowledge; it encompasses individual development,well-being, and advancing of mentoring culture. Dawn shared an experience about beingproactive in creating a comfortable environment. “I think if you're being proactive, as you're asking questions, how they're doing? You're asking about, you know, teaching research service, if you're asking about the social parts, then I
-related activities, males prefer outside-of-school activities [46]. Over 65% of studentsacknowledge an interest in STEM before middle school age, yet often formal STEMprogramming is not part of the curriculum until high school [46]. Policies and interventionsbeing focused on this older student population have given rise to informal educational spaces, forexample, museums, camps, and science fairs, being available to a wider age range of people [47].These informal educational spaces provide participants with authentic, hands-on, interactivelearning, prior to more formal introductions, and it is believed that these informal spaces appealto a more diverse group of people [47].2.3 Gender SocializationGendered messaging manifests in many implicit ways
testing educational materials and learning spaces that stimulate serious play. Page 13.280.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Case Study: A Space Designed for Cooperative Learning with Multiple ProcessesAbstractThe importance of cooperative and active approaches to classroom learning has long beenrecognized. However most of our resources, textbooks, curriculum structures and learningspaces are not designed with these pedagogies in mind. Many instructors have developed theirown materials and figured out how to conduct an engaged, active and cooperative class in
course offered in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, students explore thedirect and indirect stakeholders involved in a coastal engineering design example. During an in-class session, students learn how to brainstorm the values and norms of stakeholders that theyidentify, and then integrate those values into design criteria such that it benefits a broader swathof the community. The students then applied the VSD concepts to a course project that requiredthem to create design criteria that satisfied stakeholder’s needs beyond the original client. Theinclusion of this activity in the course curriculum created students who were more invested andaware of the potential impacts of their design.Introduction and Literature Review
extracurricular learning opportunities and hands-on supplements to traditional courseinstruction. The following paper describes the integration of a Formula SAE (FSAE) teamproject into a junior-level mechanical engineering experimentation course; it represents one ofnine projects in this course.The first half of the course is divided into modules that, for all students, progressively address: 1)the measurement chain and laboratory best practices using pre-existing experiments, 2) sensordesign, selection, and calibration, 3) statistical data analysis and uncertainty limits, and 4)technical communication skills. The second half tasks student teams to propose, design, build,and carry out an original experiment to an engineering problem they perceive can
intentionalinvestment over the summer to orient and prepare new faculty members prior to their firstinstructional class with students. This strategy of integrating new faculty into the institution andof developing a classroom training environment has paid dividends with instructors havinggreater success during their first semester of teaching. New faculty members are given theopportunity to understand their role in the larger institutional outcomes, to learn best practicesand techniques, and to practice teach with their peers and mentors, allowing for refinement,before their first class. The department’s faculty development strategy has been recognized bythe Dean and shared with other departments as an exemplary approach to preparing faculty toteach. Written
Session 1532 Visualizing Pedagogical Circuits Richard D. Christie, Ph.D., Peter M. Trinidad Department of Electrical Engineering, Box 352500 University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195-2500 Phone: (206) 543-9689 Fax: (206) 543-3842 christie@ee.washington.eduAbstract Visualization techniques are integrated with a circuit simulator and applied to pedagogicalcircuits to communicate circuit behavior in an intuitive way. Several representations of voltageand
-world. But, what have they actually learned about solving ambiguous problemsand integrating Making into their design thinking, engineering doing, and the design process?The American Society for Engineering Education has generated reports [1], [2] on the role ofMaking within an engineering context.What does it mean to learn Making? Does the student’s own understanding of the engineeringdesign process change as a result of such experiences, and how? Many engineering faculty reporton “cool stuff” they do in class in support of learning but few bolster their reports withevaluations of the student learning or ground them in prevailing cognitive science or educationalpsychology [3]. This study aims to work towards understanding the cognitive process
other seminars are included in courses specific to particular majors. Anintroductory engineering technology course titled “Manufacturing, Materials, and Processes”has been modified to include a seminar and is effectively required for all students entering arange of majors.One of the goals for this particular seminar class is to acquaint the students with the courses intheir majors, and how the courses integrate with the goals of the major. A case study wasdeveloped based on a damaged lawn mower, and presented in the seminar. The problempresented in the case study was purposely incomplete, with a series of tasks listed which wouldbe necessary to resolve the damage to the lawnmower. The students were required to search thecourses of their major
is explicitly stated in multiple ABET criterion and the BOK. The BOK’s Outcome9 calls for graduates to “design a system or process to meet desired needs within such realisticconstraints as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,constructability, and sustainability.” The ABET General Criterion 3 requires “an ability todesign a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability.” ABET General Criterion 5 also requires that “students must be prepared forengineering practice through a curriculum culminating in a major design experience based on theknowledge and skills
. Thus, the course may emphasize the theory of and modeling with HardwareDescription Languages, but the course also introduces the students to additional aspectsof computer architecture and digital design.I. Overview: The design methodology for digital integrated circuits has changed dramaticallyfrom their early inception. Not only has technology advanced to the point where asignificant “system” can be placed on a single chip, but the design methodology to designsuch a chip has also advanced to allow such an implementation. In 1980 HardwareDescription Languages (HDLs) existed but were proprietary. In the 1980s, thedevelopment of a “standardized” HDL began. The language requirements for thelanguage were established in 1981. The first
samescenario tested in this experiment. Figure 20 shows the results of the FEA simulation run for theFSAE spaceframe. The simulation was run with 400 ft-lbf, an average suspension load, appliedacross the front axle. The torsional stiffness at the front axle from FEA was calculated to bearound 1100 ft-lbf/deg. This is within 10% of the value calculated from the experimental setup. Figure 20: The results of the torsional rigidity computer simulation.Course StructureThe implementation of the laboratory experiment consisted of both horizontal and verticalcurricular integration with other courses.Horizontally, this laboratory experiment in ME160 Engineering Experimentation is an extensionof an experiment that is done earlier in the course
common gases and liquids used in engineering.The first half of the course focuses on the physical properties of fluids and the second half on thephysical and mechanical properties of solids. A review of the curriculum and the course role isavailable online as an ASEE Conference publication [9]. These topics are combined through a focus on properties and selection while still retaining asomewhat traditional approach for solid materials as in material science classes. Processingdetails for ferrous and nonferrous alloys are not included, while the metal alloy phase diagramsand heat treatments are still included, but with less emphasis. The temperature dependence offerrous and nonferrous engineering alloys is paralleled with the temperature