Paper ID #34344Measuring the Impact of a Study Abroad Program on Engineering Students’Global PerspectiveMr. Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education and an M.S. student in Indus- trial and Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech (VT). Tahsin holds a bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and has worked as a manufacturing professional at a Fortune 500 company. As an Engineering Education researcher, he is interested in enhancing professional competencies for engi- neering workforce development in academia
entire period energized and stimulated. Another part of the "how" is inselection of words to use in class conversations which are an integral part of active learning andcollaborative problem solving. Words have powerful emotional associations in human brains,and as such, make great tools for creating positive stimuli. For a good resource on the wordchoice that inspires participation, see [5].Integration of the above studies, research findings, and practice-tested theories, indeed predicts amissing piece in the out-of-class part of the existing flip methodology, and at the same time, itleads the way toward a redesign to maintain the strength of the methodology and exchange itsshortcoming for another strength.Our hypothesis. We mentioned that
is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering Technology at the University of Pittsburgh atJohnstown (UPJ) in Johnstown, Pennsylvania. Before joining the faculty at UPJ, he was a Staff Engineer with GAIConsultants in Pittsburgh. His teaching interests include soil mechanics, foundation design, structural steel design,structural analysis, and incorporating practical design experience into the undergraduate civil engineeringtechnology curriculum. His research interests include soil behavior, behavior of laterally loaded transmission linestructure foundations, and statistical calibration of foundation design models. Dr. Rose received B.S. and M.S.degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Connecticut in 1985 and 1986 and a Ph.D. from
and products created. While this data has much potential for exploration and improvingthe production process, analyzing the data can be incredibly complex due to the size of the dataset and the sheer number of variables.Both advanced manufacturing and data science knowledge and expertise are now requirements formanufacturing sectors. With this growing field, it is necessary to align the development ofundergraduate and graduate curriculum to support the advancing field of manufacturing. Theinstruments developed for this proposal will support the field of advanced manufacturing and data 1science in academic institutions as there are only a handful of degree programs integrating theseconcepts into
Paper ID #34546A Grounded Theory Analysis of COVID-19 Information and ResourcesRelayed Through University Webpages: Implications for a More InclusiveCommunityDr. Sreyoshi Bhaduri, McGraw Hill Dr. Sreyoshi Bhaduri is an Engineering Educator and People Researcher. She currently heads Global People Research and Analytics at McGraw Hill, where she leads research leveraging employee data to generate data-driven insights for decisions impacting organizational Culture and Talent. Her research interests include assessing the impact and effectiveness of inclusion initiatives as well as employing in- novative, ethical and inclusive
AC 2011-658: DOCTORAL STUDENTS AS COURSE INSTRUCTORS: THREEENGINEERING TEACHING ASSISTANTS’ SOCIALIZATION EXPERI-ENCESIrene B. Mena, Purdue University, West Lafayette Irene B. Mena has a B.S. and M.S. in Industrial Engineering, and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. Her research interests include K-12 engineering education, first-year engineering, and graduate student professional development.Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette Heidi Diefes-Dux is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Food Science from Cornell University and her Ph.D. in Food Process Engineering from the Department of Agricultural and Biological
development in civil engineering. The research questions intended tobe addressed through this study are outlined as follows: (i) How does participation in an integrative design project involving 3D printing with concrete influence students' understanding of engineering design processes? (ii) To what extent do projects incorporating emerging additive technologies like 3D concrete printing enhance students' skills in experimental design and material design concepts within a civil engineering curriculum? (iii) Given that prototyping is not commonly emphasized in civil engineering, what are students' perceptions of the value and relevance of prototyping in civil engineering after participating in the
the level of SEM skills of individuals. Based on the design of this study, no causalrelationship should be inferred from the results since it was a correlation study rather than a casestudy. The implication of this study and avenue for future are listed below: • This study provides a beginning point for further investigation into an individual's ability to engage in complicated managerial problem-solving situations. • From an academic standpoint, this research will assist curriculum planners in developing academic curricula at the undergraduate level especially focusing on engineering management or industrial engineering, business management-related programs. Moreover, faculty be able to assess their students
AC 2010-1079: FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF AHIGH-SCHOOL TEACHER.Rod Paton, University of Auckland Rod Paton holds BSc and MSc degrees in physics from the University of Auckland, New Zealand. He has been teaching high-school science and physics since the start of 1994. For the past 12 years he has been Head of Physics at Westlake Boys’ High School, Auckland, New Zealand. Rod has integrated ICT into the school’s physics programs and developed problem-solving books and practical manuals to enhance the skills and abilities of all students. His main research interests are centred on implementing steps to improve the problem-solving and academic-writing abilities of high-school
Paper ID #16996Exploring Graduate Funding: Variation Across Engineering Disciplines andRelationships to Student Engagement and SatisfactionMr. Timothy Kinoshita, Virginia Tech Timothy Kinoshita is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His research interests include graduate education, curriculum development, faculty development, global engineering education, and education policy.Dr. Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Tech Dr. Amelink is Director of Graduate Programs and Assessment in the College of Engineering, Virginia Tech. She is also an affiliate faculty member in the Departments of
mental imageryis engaged for both blind and sighted people when interpreting engineering graphics.Mental imagery is cognitively part of visuospatial working memory, used for reasoning [11], andnot merely an internalization of the visual percept (actual sight). Mental imagery differs fromvision in that vision is a bottoms-up process, where visual stimuli are processed into sight, versusa tops-down process where knowledge is processed into imagery [8]. Some visual processes donot occur in mental imagery [12], but mental imagery does seem to depend on areas of the brainrelated to higher levels of integration in typical visual processing [13].Since this study examines how a blind student learned engineering graphics, understandingdifferences in the
physicists, college physics professors andhigh school physics teachers with multiple missions which include enhancing science andengineering knowledge through hands-on experience among high school students. Besidesbuilding cosmic ray detectors, we instituted a related activity in the studying of cosmic ray and/orsolar proton induced muon production. This activity concerns whether the muon flux fluctuationhas a relationship to solar eruption event effects. Mathematical skills at the pre-calculus level inthe high school curriculum was found to be sufficient to perform the necessary analyses. Theanalysis of a magnetic cloud event detected by the ACE spacecraft on April 14-15, 2013 waspresented as an example. Together with the fast time resolution with
, selection, orientation, the junior college experience, academicplanning and advising, community-building, curriculum development, and institutional selectionand alignment. A fundamental difference of this program is the number of expectations placedon the student during the Scholars year, spelled out in the written contract and reinforced duringorientation. Some methods of assessment have been presented.References1 Wood, Sandra; Hsia, Steven; Johnson, Pauline; Boykin, Karen; Wood, Sandy; Bowen, Larry; Whitaker, Kevin “Integrated engineering math-based summer bridge program for student retention,” Conference Proceedings, 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2007.2 Bielefeldt, Angela, “Introduction to environmental engineering courses aimed
consumption in office buildings by integrating research and curriculum development. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2019, American Society for Engineering Education
Paper ID #9157Development of a Faculty Led Education Abroad Program and the LessonsLearnedDr. Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University Acharya joined RMU in Spring 2005 after serving 15 years in the Software Industry. With US Airways, Acharya was responsible for creating a conceptual design for a Data Warehouse which would integrate the different data servers the company used. With i2 Technologies he led the work on i2’s Data Mining product ”Knowledge Discover Framework” and at CEERD (Thailand) he was the product manager of three energy software products (MEDEE-S/ENV, EFOM/ENV and DBA-VOID) which were/are used in
+ Guest speaker Due: Reflection 2 Workshop 4 Encouraging an Inclusive Learning Environment, Connections in the Classroom, and Identity Safety + Guest speakers Due: Reflection 3 Workshop 5 Providing and Receiving Feedback + Guest speaker Due: Reflection 4 Workshop 6 Celebration of completion, individual presentations of learning Due: Final reflection and implementation plan Post-survey Post-survey link administered; due by end of semesterThe workshop curriculum was adapted from the national program to fit the institution’s HSIidentity and graduate student audience, such that participants framed their thinking within theuniversity-specific
- things like workforce preparation, service and stew- ardship, integrity, equity and justice, or faith.✔ TIP: Craft messages that communicate how change supports the shared values, how change aligns the organization’s values to today’s realities, and how change creates an opportunity to position the organi- zation to enact shared values. “I think all of us want to know how can we make the engineering curriculum more inclusive, what can we do, and at the same time everybody still struggles with needing to cover core content, and if we do something else, will we lose that.” Speak to Stakeholder Motivations Change projects have numerous stakeholders, all with different interests in the process and outcome. Successful
conceptual rigor. It is calledphilosophy and early efforts in iFoundry were devoted to (and continue in) better connecting Page 15.1130.3philosophy and engineering in ways that help change engineering faculty minds through themaking of better arguments.Together, the need for appropriate organizational and conceptual change efforts have played arole in iFoundry’s development from the beginning. However, the coming of the first freshmenin Fall 2009 necessitated more focused thinking about students, their engagement, and how tocreate an experience that would be maximally impactful with modest resources and a relativelysmall footprint in the curriculum
scratch the surface, but I am hopeful that it has given the reader a good overview ofthe techniques that are available. Reading individual papers will convey good ideas, a few at atime. To peruse techniques in larger batches, become familiar with the following resources. • For an overview of considerations in applying ACL to computing, and how to go about integrating it into your courses, see Jeffrey McConnell’s series in Inroads.19, 20, 21, 22 • For a large set of games that can be played in class, see http://www.thiagi.com/games.html. • For programming puzzles that can be turned into games, Pollard and Duvall27 recommend the “Head First” series of books.10, 30 • A large set of kinesthetic learning
extended beyond my discipline curriculum and I believe it has a great impact on improving my professional skills preparing me for my future career. While participating in this project, I had the opportunity to practice and integrate much of the knowledge I learned during my three years of course work as an undergraduate student. Working in the renewable energy lab in a team of two with an expert professor, enhanced my communication abilities; team working skills; and added a valuable experience that I could not obtain during my usual course work. Throughout the time I spent working on this project, I had the chance to express my ideas and think critically and independently in solving related problems
manufactured by differentcompanies, it is to the author’s knowledge the first time that pressure distribution measurementshave been integrated with stepper motor control of the angle of attack using LabVIEW software.The learning objective has been for the students to get the experience of working together as adesign group towards the completion of a specified task that includes the use of their knowledgegained in different courses.Junior and senior students in the fluid mechanics course designed the experimental setup forpressure measurements around the airfoil. The reason for the selection of this project in thiscourse was to increase student learning by incorporating a lab on airfoil performance which ispart of the course curriculum. It is also
of view, this means every group is on a different page and having adifferent set of problems. This does present logistical challenges, but it also allows students atdifferent levels to progress at their own pace within the same course, thus maximizing individualstudent achievement. It also fosters student interactions with stronger students helping theweaker students with both reaping benefits.The successesThe real success of the curriculum change is seen in the students’ fourth semester capstoneprojects. We now require the capstone project to be microcontroller based and treat the designcourse as a follow-up course to Introduction to Microprocessors. This year’s collection ofprojects include an autonomous robot, a basketball shot clock
. Page 25.233.2Supto1 taught for many years as an adjunct and humorously describes how adjuncts can betreated as a “pet rock” which is a near-perfect low-maintenance pet. Adjuncts typically are “offthe radar screen” of the Dean and Chair, hence receive minimal feedback except from students intheir classes. Adjuncts often have little authority to improve the laboratory/class they teach andmay not be included in curriculum decisions. Supto recommends that “every adjunct shouldhave a full-time faculty member assigned as an advocate and resource” but this often isn’t thecase1. Adjuncts are often left to fend for themselves.Departments and faculty may want to do an excellent job of teaching undergraduates, yet it isoften the lack of resources and not
thread requires further work, either to efficiently integrate inclusive teaching into theexisting reward system, or to fundamentally change what counts in engineering.ConclusionLet us conclude with a few comments about bridging the valley of neglect that we defined in theabstract to be the missing link that divides scholarly work about DEI from concrete changes thatbenefit students, employers, and the broader community. On the one hand, there is a phenomenalbody of literature informing the practice of engineering education in general, and inclusiveengineering education in particular. On the other hand, even at an engineering college where asizeable percentage of the engineering faculty volunteered for a three-year faculty learningcommunity
&M University. He holds a joint appointment with the Department of Engineering Technology and the De- partment of Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include engineering education, cognitive task analysis, automation, robotics and control, intelligent manufacturing system design, and micro/nano manufacturing. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state-of-the-art facility for education and research in the areas of automation, control, and automated system integration. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 MAKER: Smart Lighting Module for Teaching High School Science and Engineering
AC 2007-819: A COURSE PROJECT WITH A FOCUS ON PRODUCTDEVELOPMENT PROCESSWei Zhan, Texas A&M University Dr. Wei Zhan is an Assistant Professor of Electronics Engineering Technology at Texas A&M University. Dr. Zhan earned his D.Sc. in System Science from Washington University in 1991. From 1991 to 1995 he worked at University of California, San Diego and Wayne State University. From 1995 to 2006, he worked in the automotive industry as a system engineer. In 2006 He joined the Electronics Engineering Technology faculty at Texas A&M. His research activities include control system theory and applications to industry, system engineering, robust design, modeling, simulation
researchers, across fields, to more critically examinetheir methodologies and to center the well-being of the participant over the benefit of theresearcher.Introduction:Historically, engineering education has neglected the experiences of its students. Students areexpected to work in intensive, difficult curriculums in the name of rigor and aptitude [1].“Numerous publications have documented an engineering culture pointing not only to issues of‘climate’ but also to the lack of role models, rigid pedagogical approaches that lack creativedesign elements and teamwork, and even subtle habits used to establish who belongs inengineering and who does not'' [2]. However, “[e]ngineering has reflected some unjust biasesembedded in our social structures to the
meaningful project skills andlearning which might be significant when considering the lower amount of effort required.References1. Gelmon, S. B. (2001). Assessing service-learning and civic engagement: Principles and techniques. Campus Compact, Brown University.2. Lima, M., Oakes, W. C., & Gruender, J. L. (2006). Service-learning: Engineering in your community. Wildwood, MO: Great Lakes Press.3. Ropers-Huilman, B., Carwile, L., & Lima, M. (2005). Service-learning in engineering: A valuable pedagogy for meeting learning objectives. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 155-165.4. Coyle, E. J., Jamieson, L. H., & Sommers, L. S. (1997). EPICS: A model for integrating service-learning into the engineering curriculum
effectively we can impress upon students the benefits ofgrowing grittiness. The discussion will center on EduGuide’s features, accessibility, and reportedeffectiveness.IntroductionThe research of Angela Lee Duckworth that culminated in her New York bestseller Grit: ThePower of Passion and Perseverance [1] brings forth two big ideas: first, that grit (comprised of aperson’s perseverance and passion) can be among the most important predictors of success, and;second, that one’s grit can indeed be self-developed. The popularity of these ideas hasencouraged a conflagration of efforts to incorporate and integrate grit into every facet of theeducation system, from curriculum development to personal and professional development.As posited by Duckworth, the
incorporates cooperative or clustered learning and experimentation by students; 2. Create a structured critique process based on performance assessment for CG, developing a rubric for the critique which takes into account program objectives and which documents student learning; and, 3. Eventual integration of the critique-based learning outcome assessment into the program assessment for eventual accreditation. The CGT program at PUC is currently in year one of the three year process described above. PUC’s initial example of this process was to create an integrated set of rubrics for a mid-semester and a final project in each class (total of six critiques and rubrics) for the following courses: CGT 111, CGT