sense of global citizenship totake hold in a student's life in both present and future behaviors.MethodsThis research is part of a larger study funded by the National Science Foundation invested indeveloping curriculum tools to teach sustainability more effectively as an integrated part ofcoursework from sophomore to senior year in engineering and other science majors. This largerstudy is currently in its third year and operates on the principle that certain majors/disciplineshave unique psychographic characteristics that influence the manner in which they engage insustainability topics and that best practice instruction methods for engineering students are likelyto differ from those in other disciplines.The institution involved in this study
opportunities, goal setting, andcommunication. All these sessions were conducted by guests invited from across campus and theCREATE management team. In addition, design, based on an engineering challenge and hands-on cohort team building activities was integrated into the seminars to promote social interaction.For the design activities, scholars were divided into teams of four, with facilitation provided by apeer mentor. They were given constraints on the materials and supplies they could use. Theseminars and design activities were held in person before the pandemic but due to safetyguidelines during the pandemic, they were moved to an online format. All theme seminars andteam activities were followed by food and soft drinks. When activities were held
senior designexperience. A project with significant design content, where work is completed in a teamenvironment, is universally desired. The following statement is from ABET’s Engineeringprogram accreditation requirements: “Students must be prepared for engineering practicethrough a curriculum culminating in a major design experience based on the knowledge andskills acquired in earlier course work and incorporating appropriate engineering standards andmultiple realistic constraints.”1 What fits the bill better than having students work withinindustry, maybe even as paid interns, on an active company project? Nothing could be more realsince the project is real. Such projects automatically include real schedules, deadlines,constraints, codes
), they must experience the concept in question in a way that aligns with theNewtonian view but would not make sense if their mental model held on to the common butinaccurate idea that a body in motion at constant speed requires an external force. [5]The notion of threshold concepts encourages the thinking of problems as entry points for tacklingvital concepts within particular disciplines and is relevant for the integration of theconstructivist-based strategy, Problem-Based (or Project-Based) Learning (PBL) [6]. Much hasbeen written about the effectiveness of using problem or project based learning for deeperconceptual learning in college science coursework [7], [8]. Markham, Larmer, and Ravitzdescribe PBL as “a systematic teaching method that
faculty and student focus groups, a large pilot test, and afield administration involving 4,558 seniors at 39 randomly selected colleges of engineering.The resulting nine factor-scales align closely with the EC2000 criteria and retain 72% of theoriginal item variance. All but two scales have internal consistency reliabilities above .83. Theinstrument appears to be a conceptually faithful, psychometrically sound, and practical tool forassessing student learning on Criterion 3.*************************************************************************** In 1996, the ABET Board of Directors adopted a transformative set of criteria forprogram accreditation that shifted the reaccreditation focus away from an emphasis on meetingcurricular
. In 2020, Dr. Siewert joined California State University Chico to teach computer science as full-time faculty and he continues in an adjunct professor role at University of Colorado Boulder. Research interests include real-time systems, interactive systems, machine vision and machine learning applied to sensor networks, sensor fusion, and instrumentation. Dr. Siewert is a co-founder of the Embedded Systems Engineering graduate program at the University of Colorado and is a graduate curriculum committee chair at California State Chico. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Preparing Students to Master Hybrid and Co-Processing Methods for High Performance
everydayactivities.ConclusionThe complexities of the systems that we “engineer” are beginning to be understood because ofthe many breakthroughs in science. These complexities must be incorporated into engineeringcurriculum. Industry realizes the need for this change. Desmond Hudson, President of NorthernTelcom Inc., said that, “My concern is for the students who come out of school suitably versed inmathematics, physics, and the sciences, but lacking an appreciation for literature, history, andphilosophy. The view they have is that modern technology is a collection of components ratherthan an integral part of our society, our culture, our business environment.”2 There is a need fora change in the current engineering curriculum. The Accreditation Board of
software tools to make measurements of physical quantities. • Models: Identify the strengths and limitations of theoretical models as predictors of real- world behaviors. • Experiment: devise an experimental approach, specify appropriate equipment and procedures, implement these procedures, and interpret the resulting data to characterize an engineering material, component or system. • Teamwork: work effectively in teams, including structure individual and join accountability; assign roles, responsibilities, and task; monitor progress; meet deadlines; and integrate individual contributions into a final deliverable. • Sensory Awareness: use the human senses to gather information and to make sound
Retention of Under-Represented Minority Engineering Students through Practice-Oriented Experiential Education Richard Harris1, Hameed Metghalchi2, Claire Duggan3, Emanuel Mason4, Rachelle Reisberg5, Deepti Dutt6Abstract – New England is home to several universities that have engaged in a well-established National ScienceFoundation (NSF) Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (LSAMP) partnership, referred to as NortheastLSAMP. The NELSAMP members include Northeastern University, The University of Connecticut, The Universityof Massachusetts Amherst, The University of Rhode Island, and Worcester Polytechnic Institute. The NELSAMPare pursuing an NSF-funded
currently a professor of engineering technology at Middle Tennessee State University. He received a B.S. degree in E.E. from Damascus University and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in E.E. from Tennessee Technological University. He is actively engaged in curriculum development for technology education. He has authored and co-authored several industry-based case studies. He is also conducting research in the area of mass spectrometry, power electronics, lasers, instrumentation, digital forensics, and microcontroller applications. He can be reached at sbenaty@mtsu.edu. Page 25.941.1 c American
environment (ALOE) to provide a practical learning environmentthat facilitates developing many of the needed technical and soft skills without the inherentdifficulty and cost associated with radio frequency components and regulation. We define sixlearning stages that assimilate the standardization process and identify key learning objectivesfor each. We discuss our experiences when employing the proposed methodology at BarcelonaTech in Spain, compare the approach with an equivalent class at Virginia Tech in the US andmake the following observations: (1) The complexity of standards need to be abstracted andpresented in a form suitable for a given class. (2) Educating about cellular communicationsstandards is most effective when students are immersed
responsibility for their own learning. Educators call this traditional method, “instructor-centered teaching.” In contrast, “learner-centered teaching” occurs when instructors focus on thelearner and authentic problems rather than on the structured analysis of the curriculum content(Blumberg 2008, Gunderman et al. 2003). If teacher’s primary focus is covering the content,students respond by memorizing the material with limited understanding. If the students are theones doing hard and messy work, then the understanding is deeper (Weimer, 2013). Learninginvolves active construction of meaning by the learner, who construct meaning by combining whatthey currently know with the new information that they are acquiring. Meaningful learning can befacilitated by
teams, it was often just enough time. Should there be additional teams thenI recommend either more joint-lecture time or additional joint-lectures.Lastly, other disciplines to collaborate with will be explored. In the exit interview survey givento the Spring 2024 CS students suggested marketing students, animators, and business studentsas possible collaborators that could improve the course. I have also spoken to professors from theSchool of Education where research integrating video games into university curriculum is beingconducted.Acknowledgements © American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 2024 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceI need to thank my children, Luna and Alec, for their
able to look at the diagrams and design different robots without my help. Having the concrete robotics materials to work with serve as visuals as well. The small group discussions also help the LEP students practice English.5. No, I don’t think that these students need science connections from the curriculum to society anymore than other kids. They all probably need it. What I notice about these kids in MESA is that they are different from most of their peers. They watch TV shows like Nature and Discovery a lot without being told because they are interested in the subjects. They seem to have an intellectual spark already, and I’m not sure where it came from.6. The only part of the 5E Model I used to any extent was the Exploration
transition. One major component is a series of mentoring courses that the entering studentcan select for the first semester. These courses are designed to help the freshman make thismajor transition. This paper will discuss the purpose of the mentors, the ENGR0081 SeminarCourse concept, the mentor selection process, and the topics covered in the mentoring sessions.IntroductionNumerous studies document the importance of interaction with the freshman students duringtheir first semester [1 - 9]. This concept is nothing new, as reflected in the fact that mostcolleges have an orientation program for entering students. One component we use at theUniversity of Pittsburgh is getting the involvement of parents and other family members in theprocesses and
., Gastineau, J., ... & Risley, J. (1999). Case study of the physics component of an integrated curriculum. American Journal of Physics, 67(S1), S16-S24.[20] Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students' understanding of electromagnetism concepts? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243-279.[21] Taylor, S. S. (2009). Effects of studio space on teaching and learning: Preliminary findings from two case studies. Innovative Higher Education, 33(4), 217-228.[22] Cotner, S., Loper, J., Walker, J. D., & Brooks, D. C. (2013). "It's Not You, It's the Room"² Are the High-Tech, Active Learning Classrooms Worth It? Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(6
reliable ethicalpractices. Engineering ethics is defined as: “(1) the study of moral issues and decisionsconfronting individuals and organizations involved in engineering and (2) the study of relatedquestions about moral conduct, character, policies, and relations of people and corporationsinvolved in technological activity” [1]. Engineering ethics has been increasingly emphasized inengineering curricula. The Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) hasspecific student outcomes related to ethical considerations. Despite the need for ethical decision-making among the undergraduate civil engineers, incorporating ethics into the curriculum hasnot been an easy task.In some academic institutions, ethics courses could be offered by a non
/03043797.2016.1158789 [2] A. Yadav, D. Subedi, M. Lundeberg, and C. F. Bunting, “Problem-based Learning: Influence on Students’ Learning in an Electrical Engineering Course,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 253–280, Apr. 2011, mAG ID: 2137085812. [3] A. Wiek, A. Xiong, K. Brundiers, and S. van der Leeuw, “Integrating problem- and project-based learning into sustainability programs: A case study on the School of Sustainability at Arizona State University,” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 431–449, Aug. 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2013-0013/full/html [4] A. C. B. Reis, S. C. M. Barbalho, and A. C. D. Zanette, “A
proportional, integral and derivative components. At the lowest level of instructional design, performance outcomes determine the contentof each experiment. The four performance outcomes listed below are specific to the closed loopcontrol experiment used in MET 382. Preface each statement with the phrase “After completingthis module students will be able to:” 1. Recognize common sensors and actuators used in commercial HVAC systems. 2. Evaluate closed loop control algorithms used for regulating temperature, pressure, or flow in an HVAC system. 3. Compute the output signal from a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller. 4. Identify how software features like scheduling, trending, or runtime monitoring are used to
., 2017). Lastly, consumers often believe that they want a product that is loadedwith features but later may be overwhelmed by the product’s complexity (Rust et al., 2006). Itbecomes clear that a sharper focus on stakeholders and features is a critical requirement forproduct success and an integrated approach is needed to help students navigate thesecomplexities. A systems engineering approach for undergraduate design education has been applied in firstyear to capstone design courses to help students with designing systems (Simoni, et al., 2016).The advantages of the approach are that one set of models or views is applicable to a widevariety of design problems making the common approach easier for students to learn and facultyto teach and assess
designed and weldedthe model bridges they tested. Basic welding knowledge and techniques were introducedand practiced in the freshman-level materials and processes course. Affording studentsthe opportunity to draw on relatively disparate learning from previous courses was thethird implicit instructional goal for the designed beam deflection project. As the studentsprogress toward their senior capstone integrative experience, this small-scale multi-disciplinary project contributes to establishing the learning scaffolding needed to preparethem for the capstone’s broad-based integration of knowledge.[5, 6] This is a greatopportunity to connect the previous course learning and hands-on experience to recentstudy in an applied method.For the designed
developments and trends, we believedthat it was important and timely to develop upper-level undergraduate courses and laboratorieson renewable energy systems, and to include renewable energy projects in senior project designcourses in our ET program. There is a well-documented demand and need in offering programstudy, courses and training in the areas of renewable energy5-10. Future engineers must be taughtto be creative, flexible and imaginative. Future engineering curriculum should be built arounddeveloping and increasing skills and technical knowledge. The topic of renewable energy is notonly relevant to a multitude of issues today, it is also an effective vehicle for developinginstruction that applies across a variety of content disciplines and
AcknowledgementThis work was funded in part by a grant from the NSF-HBCU-UP/RISC grant. We are thankful to theNSF for providing us with this help. References1. Swain, N. K., Korrapati, R., Anderson, J. A. (1999) “Revitalizing Undergraduate Engineering, Technology, and ScienceEducation Through Virtual Instrumentation”, NI Week Conference, Austin, TX..2. Elaine L., Mack, Lynn G. (2001), “Developing and Implementing an Integrated Problem-based Engineering TechnologyCurriculum in an American Technical College System” Community College Journal of Research and Practice, Vol. 25, No.5-6, pp. 425-439.3. Buniyamin, N, Mohamad, Z., 2000 “Engineering Curriculum Development: Balancing Employer Needs and
- sponsible for supporting curricular assessment and developing instructional support programs for faculty in the College of Engineering. In her research role, Dr. Zappe is interested in the integration of creativity into the engineering curriculum, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Dr. Zappe holds a doctorate in edu- cational psychology specializing in applied testing and measurement. Her measurement interests include the development of instruments to measure the engineering professional skills and using qualitative data to enhance the response process validity of tests and instruments.Dr. Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
studentsfor jobs in the high tech arena. This includes an Associate of Science degree in ManufacturingQuality Technology at St. Petersburg College; an Associate of Science degree in ManufacturingTechnology at Hillsborough Community College; programs focused on the field of Modeling,Simulation & Training at Daytona Beach Community College; and a two plus two program in Page 8.295.2Photonics at Valencia Community College. Proceedings for the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exhibition. Copyright © 2003, American Society of Engineering EducationChip Camp OverviewChip Camp is a free
allowresearchers to collect participants’ socio-cultural data. During each check-in interview, Cohort 1participants are also asked to work an example problem while explaining their reasoning. Theseproblems have either been taken from curricular materials (such as text books, homework sets orexams) from courses the participants are currently enrolled in or brought in by participants asexamples of problems that have been particularly challenging for them to work on. This ability to Page 23.1365.4help dictate the content of the interviews and work through problems that are currentlychallenging them creates an environment of reciprocity in the
cooling towersand supplying HVAC equipment. In this paper, we exposed the summary of the methodology followed toteach high-rise plumbing.A case study has been developed to demonstrate the difference between plumbing designs in othercountries, such as China where the venting system is not required. We presented the results ofcomparison between the two codes.This design class has been positively accepted by the students, and has provided them with acomprehensive experience in both design and systems integration. Students are required to usemultiple codes and make the comparison between several designs and codes. Finally, it providesthe students an opportunity to improve their skills in both written and oral communication.References: 1) Alfred
Paper ID #16481Leveraging New Platforms to Provide Students with a Realistic SoC DesignExperienceDr. Andrew Danowitz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Andrew Danowitz received his PhD in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University in 2014, and is currently an Assistant Professor of Computer Engineering at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo. His engineering education interests include student mental health, retention, and motivation.Antonio Leija, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Antonio Leija is now a Test Engineer at Green Hills Software in Santa
pioneers in physics and chemistryin the field of nuclear and radiochemistry. Extensive usage of the Web for historical accounts andimages is integrated into the lecture format. Our main goal with creating the animation is to supplement the traditional teaching formatand enhance the learning experience, thus, giving the student the ability to independently revisitthe nuclear processes they learned in class. Most of the animations are based on alreadydeveloped well-known scientific figures and tables in the book. Thus there is no need to “re-invent Page 8.225.3“Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
inindustry or in everyday life.A common complaint from industry regarding new engineering graduates is their lack of hands-on practice [4], particularly with actual equipment. This may be due in part to the general lack ofactual engineering experience for engineering faculty [5]. Ralston and Cox write, “Leaders inU.S. engineering education point to increased ‘real world’ skills as crucial for meeting thechallenges of engineering in the future” [6].Experience plays a central role in the learning process [7] and therefore is an important part ofthe engineering curriculum. Kolb writes, “Knowledge results from the combination of graspingand transforming experience. Grasping experience refers to the process of taking in information,and transforming