Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 21451 - 21480 of 36275 in total
Conference Session
Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rupa Purasinghe, California State University, Los Angeles; Akshay Ghanshyam Patel, Pramukh Mono-Strand Structures Pvt. Ltd.
Tagged Divisions
Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies
: Integrated Approach to Designing College Course,” Texas Christian University PR, 2018. 2. Einde, L., Deng W., Wilson P., Elgamal A, Hubbard P, “NEESit MacBook Accelerometer and Video Sensor Platform for Education and Research,” 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, NY, 2008. 3. Dusicka, P., Berman J.W., and Purasinghe R., “Steel Frame Lateral System Concept Utilizing Replaceable Links,” Proceedings of the 2009 NZSEE Annual Technical Conference, New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering, Christchurch, NZ, 2009 4. Singh, A., Ferry, D., Mills, S., “ Improving Biomedical Engineering Education Through Continuity in Adaptive, Experimental, and Interdisciplinary Learning Environments
Conference Session
CEED Technical Session II: Developing Research and Design Skills Through Experiential Learning
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Vicki V. May P.E., Dartmouth College; Charles R. Sullivan, Dartmouth College; Honor J. Passow P.E., Dartmouth College; Benoit Cushman-Roisin, Dartmouth College
Tagged Divisions
Cooperative and Experiential Education
: 10.18260/p.26912. https://peer.asee.org/26912[6] Barnard, S., Hassan, T., Bagilhole, B., Dainty. A. (2012). “They’re not girly girls: An exploration of quantitative and qualitative data on engineering and gender in higher education.” European Journal of Engineering Education. 37(2): 193-204.[7] Zastavker, Y.V., Ong, M., Page, L. (2006). “Women in engineering: Exploring the effects of project-based learning in a first-year undergraduate engineering program.” Proceedings of the 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. San Diego, CA. Vol 4: 742- 747.[8] Chesler, N. C. and Chesler, M. A. (2002), Gender-Informed Mentoring Strategies for Women Engineering Scholars: On Establishing a Caring Community. Journal
Conference Session
Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Teresa L. Larkin, American University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics and Physics
the egg from breaking. Be sure to make clear the key physics concept(s) involved in your response.Question 1 was worth 3 points. The correct response is option C. For this multiple choicequestion, the students either got the question correct or they got it incorrect. There was no partialcredit or explanation required of the students on any of the multiple choice questions on theexam. Question 2 was worth 6 points. Tables 3 and 4 provided the aggregate data andassociated scores for Questions 1 and 2 respectively. Table 3. Data and Results for Question 1 Response Number of Students Percentage (%) Correct
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Arthur L. Chlebowski, University of Southern Indiana
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering
(using sprint components) ofbiomechanics, biomaterials, bioelectric, and bioinstrumentation phases.The main steps within the Google Sprint include:• “Lightning Demos” - 3 minute presentation of important findings after research/inspiration• “ 4 Step Sketch” - Collecting ideas from research and lightning demos, creating initial sketches, performing crazy 8’s, and creating an individual final solution sketch• Group Decision - Determining as a group their best collective idea.The five-day breakdown (Figure 3) of activities introduce the students to anemphasis area, determine a problem they are personally interested in,explore what has been done to combat the problem, determine individualsolutions, decide on a group solution and present their
Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael J. Scott, University of Illinois, Chicago
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
best describes the level of importance of this concept: (a) Unimportant (b) Somewhat important (c) Important (d) Very important 4. (Round One) Select the appropriate level(s) for this concept: (a) Undergraduate (b) Graduate (Round Two) Indicate if this concept is only appropriate at a graduate level.Table 1: Paired t-test for comparing the standard deviations of average importance and averageunderstanding between rounds one and two Average Importance Average Understanding Round One Std. Dev. Mean 0.6600 24.520 Round Two Std. Dev. Mean 0.7086 21.540
Conference Session
Educational Research and Methods Division Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
William E. Lee III P.E., University of South Florida
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Undergraduate Engineering Education – WIPThis work-in-progress investigates the applicability and relevance of Harvard professor HowardGardner’s theory of multiple intelligences (MIs) to undergraduate engineering education.Gardner developed the theory of multiple intelligences in the early 1980’s, initially identifyingseven distinct intelligences (also referred to as learning styles in the MI literature): 1) visual-spacial; 2) bodily-kinesthetic; 3) musical; 4) interpersonal; 5) intrapersonal; 6) linguistic; and 7)logical-mathematical. Subsequent researchers have sought to add to this list (for example,“naturalistic”), but only Gardner’s original seven MIs will be addressed within this investigation.According to
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Brock J. LaMeres, Montana State University; Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University; Chris Organ
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
cohort.ReferencesMooney, C., & Kishenbaum, S. (2009). Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens our Future. New York: Basic Books.Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century. (2007). Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. The National Academies Press: Washington D. C.Sharon AJ and Baram-Tsabari A. (2014). Measuring mumbo jumbo: A preliminary quantification of the use of jargon in science communication, Public Understanding of Science, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 528-546, July 2014.
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tomas Oppenheim, California State University Maritime
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing
, Washington.10.18260/p.23523[7] P. Foster, “AC 2012-3107: Evolution of the Stirling Cycle: Empasis on Reliability, Durability,and Long-Term Unattended Operation,” Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/21350[8] J. Weller and V. Kumar and S. Grove and R. Bordia, “The Development of a Project-BasedIntroduction to Manufacturing Laboratory Involving a Stirling Engine,” Paper presented at 1998Annual Conference, Seattle, Washington. https://peer.asee.org/7033[9] N. Allen and JM. Cunnington and L. Westra and M. Klein and E. Odom and RE. Smelser,“Adapting the MIT Stirling Engine Project at the University of Idaho, A Land Grant Instiution,”Paper presented at 2002 Annual Conference, Montreal
Conference Session
Works in Progress: Curricula and Pathways
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lance C. Perez, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Presentacion Rivera-Reyes, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
: an overview. Theory into Practice, Vol. 41, 4. College of Education. The Ohio State University.11. Clark, A.C. & Ernst, J.V. (2010). Engineering and technical graphics education; using the revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Journal for Geometry and Graphics, Vol. 4, No. 2, 217-226.12. Ferguson, C. (2002). Using the revised taxonomy to plan and deliver team-taught, integrated, thematic units. Theory into Practice, Vol. 41, 4. College of Education. The Ohio State University.13. Huitt, W. (2011). Bloom et al.'s taxonomy of the cognitive domain. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved from http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cognition/bloom.html14. Writing objectives using Bloom’s
Conference Session
Student Success II: Self-Regulatory, Metacognitive, and Professional Skills
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Christopher Herring, University of Georgia; Joachim Walther, University of Georgia
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Conference Session
Student Teams, Groups, and Collaborations
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Emily Miller, Ohio State University; Laura Hirshfield, University of Michigan; Debbie Chachra, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
).Emergent Codes Definition Example Quote(s)Expecting too Expecting other teammates “Oh, well, you're not working onmuch from others to contribute beyond their anything.” I'd be like, “Well, I did my part “fair share”, especially to already, so that's why I'm not working on avoid responsibility it.” And then they'd be like, “Well, can themselves you pick up my slack and do what I was supposed to do?”Failing to advance Passively failing to add “She just didn’t really contribute astoward project’s value to activities that move much... I know
Conference Session
Space Side of Aerospace
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Thomas W. Arrington, Texas A&M University; Nicolas Federico Hurst, Texas A&M 2015 Capstone Design Spacecraft; David B. Kanipe, Texas A&M University; Joanna M. Schiefelbein , Texas A&M University; David Charles Hyland, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions
Aerospace
/default/files/109th-congress- 2005-2006/reports/10-09-spacelaunch.pdf, 2006, (Accessed September 2015). 5. Encyclopedia Astronautica, “RL-10A-4-2,” http://www.astronautix.com/engines/rl10a42.htm, (Accessed October 2015). 6. WiTricity Corporation, “WiTricity – The Basics,” http://witricity.com/technology/witricity-the-basics/, (Accessed February 2015). 7. D. Ben J. Bussey, Kirsten E. Fristad, Paul M. Schenk, Mark S. Robinson and Paul D. Spudis, “Planetary science: Constant illumination at the lunar north pole,” Nature, 434, 842, April 2005. 8. NASA Goddard Space Center, “Peary Crater,” http://lunar.gsfc.nasa.gov/lola/feature20110228.html, 2011, (Accessed February 2015). 9. David T. Smith, Maria T
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 5A: Work-In-Progress: 5 Minute Postcard Session I
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mary Fraley, Michigan Technological University; Amber Kemppainen, Michigan Technological University; Amy J. Hamlin, Michigan Technological University; Gretchen L. Hein, Michigan Technological University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, August 8-9, 2013.6. Yoon, S., Imbrie, P., Reed, T., “First Year Mathematics Course Credits and Graduation Status in Engineering,” 6th First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference, College Station, TX, August 7 – 8, 2014.7. Tewari, D., “Is Matric Math a Good Predictor of Student’s Performance in the First Year of University Degree? A Case Study of Faculty of Management Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa,” Int J Edu Sci, Vol 8, No. 1, pg. 233-237, 2014.8. Hamlin, B., Riehl, J., Hamlin, A., Monte, A., “Work in Progress - What are you thinking? Over Confidence in First Year Students,” 40th ASEE/FIE Frontiers in Education Conference, Washington, DC
Conference Session
SDR & Programming in ECE Education
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Wesley G. Lawson, University of Maryland, College Park; Stephen Secules, University of Maryland, College Park; Shuvra Bhattacharyya, University of Maryland, College Park, and Tampere University of Technology; Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
, University of Maryland, College Park Stephen is an Education PhD student at UMD, researching engineering education. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught introduction to engineering design in the Keystone Department at the UMD A. James Clark Engineering School. Stephen’s research interests include equity, culture, and the sociocultural dimensions of engineering education.Prof. Shuvra Bhattacharyya, University of Maryland, College Park, and Tampere University of Technology Shuvra S. Bhattacharyya is a Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Maryland, College Park. He holds a
Conference Session
Using Laboratories for Instruction in Mechanical Engineering
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amanie N. Abdelmessih, California Baptist University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
proceedings of the ASME/JSME 8th Thermal Engineering Joint Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii.(6) Abdelmessih, A., N, Beakley, M., Campbell, S., McKnight, E., Roberts, M., and Woodward, E., 2010, “Infrared Electric Emitters for Drying Paper,” proceedings of the 14th International Heat Transfer Conference, Washington DC.(7) Abdelmessih, A., de Sam Lazaro, A., and Jung, I., July 2005 “An Integrated Concept-to-Prototype Capstone Design Experience,” ASEE conference proceedings, Portland.(8) Hersey, D., Demopoulos, G., Loeffler, B., Tjutarwy, B., LaPoint, S., and Abdelmessih, A., August 1997, “Testing and Thermal Analysis of Multichip Modules,” HTD-Vol 343, 32nd National Heat Transfer Conference, ASME Proceedings, v. 5, pp 17-26, Baltimore.(9
Conference Session
Virtual and Web Learning in Chemical Engineering
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jessie Keeler, Oregon State University; Thomas W Ekstedt, Oregon State University; Ying Cao, Oregon State University; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
simulations.AcknowledgementsThe authors gratefully acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation under thegrant TUES 1245482. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References 1. Bowen, A. S., Reid, D. R., & Koretsky, M. D. (2015). Development of Interactive Virtual Laboratories to Help Students Learn Difficult Concepts in Thermodynamics. Chemical Engineering Education 49(4), 229- 238. 2. Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R.. (2003). Enhancing teaching-learning environments in undergraduate courses. Occasional Report, Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment, The University of Edinburgh
Conference Session
Engineering Technology Division Poster Session
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Wes Stone, Western Carolina University; Michael Sean June, Western Carolina University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
commitment to this worthwhile, industry-necessary endeavor.Bibliography[1] Stone, W. L., & Chang, G. A. (2013). An Evolving Capstone Course used in ABET Assessment. Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26, 2013.[2] Goldberg, D. E., & Somerville, M. (2014). A Whole New Engineer. Douglas, MI: ThreeJoy Associates, Inc.[3] Downing, C. G. (2011). Using Design for Six Sigma Practices to Develop a “Rose” Belt Course. Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, June 26-29, 2011.[4] Jackson, A., Jackson, S., & Mehta, Merwan. (2009). Applying The Six Sigma
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session I
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mohamed F. Chouikha, Howard University; Kenneth A Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Dianna Newman, University at Albany-SUNY
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
), Perspectives on the Learning Environment: Classroom Culture and Social Transactions at an HBCU Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio, Texas21. Fuller, J., & Northern, J. (2007, June), Project Based Learning For A Digital Circuits Design Sequence At Hbcus Paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii.22. Parrish, L., & Williams, M., & Desai, S. (2008, June), Improving Retention And Continuing Education Through Undergraduate Research Program Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania23. Fredericks, A. C., & Fleming, L. N., & Burrell, J. O., & Griffin, A. R. (2012, June), Perspectives on the Learning Environment
Conference Session
Thermodynamics, Fluids, and Heat Transfer II
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amy L. Hermundstad, Virginia Tech; Thomas E. Diller, Virginia Tech; Christopher B. Williams, Virginia Tech; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
. Rittle-Johnson, R. S. Siegler, and M. W. Alibali, “Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process.,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 346–362, 2001.[2] M. T. Chi, J. D. Slotta, and N. De Leeuw, “From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts,” Learn. Instr., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 27–43, 1994.[3] C. Venters, L. McNair, and M. Parerti, “Writing and conceptual knowledge in statics: Does learning approach matter?” in Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2014 IEEE, 2014, pp. 1–8.[4] S. Vosniadou, “Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change,” Learn. Instr., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 45– 69, 1994.[5] R. A. Streveler, T. A. Litzinger, R. L
Conference Session
Communication Across the Divisions I
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jessie Stickgold-Sarah, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Rebecca Thorndike-Breeze, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
-specific sections. One example of a professional networking design paper, offered in anearly version of this class as a model, included sections titled “Understanding [project]’s gains,”“Implementation details”, and even “Making it work.”18Recently in the broader context of STEM writing, communication scholars have recognized thisvariation and criticized the uniform approach, first for its tendency to apply the Classicalparadigm too liberally to the rhetorics of STEM,19, cited in 17 and second, because the speed withwhich STEM genres and modes of argument - particularly visual modes of argument - outpacesexisting methods communication scholars use to analyze them.20, cited in 17 Indeed, more recentlySwales himself has encouraged methods of move
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 5B: Work-In-Progress: 5 Minute Postcard Session II
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Anita Vila-Parrish, North Carolina State University; Tameshia Ballard Baldwin, North Carolina State University; Lina Battestilli, North Carolina State University; Hailey Queen, North Carolina State University; Jessica Young Schmidt; Susan Carson, North Carolina State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
the students free rein in theirreflections, we thought it more useful to prompt them through the following questions: ● Did you, as an individual, come up with more than one design idea when working on the project? How did you decide on which idea(s) to share with your team? ● Did your original design idea(s) change after listening to your teammates' ideas? If so, in what ways did they change? ● Were there any ideas that you or your team initially deemed "bad" ideas that you ended up using? Or were there any "good" ideas that you got rid of? Explain why. ● Describe the process your team went through to narrow down ideas and arrive at a final project design. What factors did your team
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 2A: Using Alternative Measurements to Look at Students and Their Success
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nicholas Andres Brake, Lamar University; James C. Curry
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
Engineering o Assembled a cantilever tower with and without a point mass. Recorded data of the tower vibration after introducing an initial displacement. o Determined the damping ratio and natural frequency of the tower using inverse analysis o Determined the pseudo lateral force acting of the tower using a response spectrum provided.  Introduction to AutoCad® o Drew a 3D fan blade with the assistance of the instructor and video tutorials.  Term Project: Design of a windmill fan blade system o Designed an optimal (least expensive) windmill blade system capable of producing 100 mW of power under a 5 m/s design wind velocity
Conference Session
Computing & Information Technology Division Technical Session
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joshua Levi Weese, Kansas State University; Russell Feldhausen, Kansas State University; Nathan H. Bean
Tagged Divisions
Computing & Information Technology
). Computational Thinking : A Digital Age Skill for Everyone. Learning & Leading with Technology, 5191, 20-23.3. Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing Computational Thinking to K-12: What is Involved and What is the Role of the Computer Science Education Community ? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48-54.4. Bean, N., Weese, J. L., Feldhausen, R., & Bell, R. (2015). Starting From Scratch: Developing a Pre-Service Teacher Program in Computational Thinking. Frontiers in Education.5. Bell, R. S. (2014). Low Overhead Methods for Improving Capacity and Outcomes in Computer Science. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University.6. Bennett, V., Ioannidou, A., Repenning, A., Kyu Han, K., & Basawapatna, A. (2011
Conference Session
Classroom Practice III: Student-Centered Instruction
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hayden Fennell, Purdue University Polytechnic Institute; Camilo Vieira, Purdue University; Genisson Silva Coutinho, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia da Bahia; Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette; R. Edwin García, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Engineering Education Annual Conference. Austin, TX. (2009).2 Blikstein, P. Assessing open-ended scientific computer modeling in engineering education: the role of representations. In Proceedings of the 117th American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference. Louisville, KY. (2010).3 Papert, S. Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. (Da Capo Press, 1993).4 Sherin, B. L. A comparison of programming languages and algebraic notation as expressive languages for physics. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 6, 1-61 (2001).5 Jonassen, D., Cho, Y. H. & Wexler, C. Facilitating problem-solving tranfer in physics. In Proceedings of the 115th American Society
Conference Session
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Evaluation: Impact of Curriculum for PreK-12 Engineering Education
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lana Plumanns M.Sc., RWTH Aachen University; Sebastian Reuter P.E., RWTH Aachen University; Kristina Lena Lahl, RWTH Aachen University; Rene Vossen, RWTH Aachen University; Sabina Jeschke, RWTH Aachen University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division
., Hees F., Jeschke S.: Hands on Robotics. Concept of a Student Laboratory on the Basis of anExperience-Oriented Learning Model. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and NewLearning Technologies, In: EDULEARN 2010, 5-7 July 2010, IATED, pp. 6047-6057, Barcelona, Spain.[7] Stehling, V., Schuster, K., Richert, A. & Jeschke, S. Access All Areas: Designing a hands-on roboticscourse for visually impaired high school students, in Proceedings of the International Conference on HumanComputer Interaction (HCI 2015); 1-8 August, Los Angeles, USA.[8] Mubin, O., Stevens, C.J., Shahid, S., Mahmud, A.A., and Jian-Jie, D. A Review of the Applicability ofRobots in Education (2013). Online: http://roila.org/wp-content/uploads/2013
Conference Session
Emerging Computing and Information Technologies II
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yujian Fu P.E., Alabama A&M University; Md Hossain Shuvo, Alabama A&M University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Computing & Information Technology
graph for path testing testingb. TachoTestThis test has been done to test the consistency between the expected moving distance and theactual moving using the EV3’s default odometer data. This test purposed to find the drift in theEV3 servo motors. The code snippet is depicted in the following figure. Fig 10: Tacho Test for Robot Control System © American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 2016 ASEE Southeast Section ConferenceAll the test tests cases are written using Robotium and JUnit. The main class of Robotium Solo is used for testing which offers
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rebecca Komarek, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daria A. Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado, Boulder
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
- 2016-2017/#outcomes on January 24, 2016. 5. Gilmartin, S., Shartrand, A., Chen, H., Estrada, C., & Sheppard, S. (2014). U.S.-Based Entrepreneurship Programs for Undergraduate Engineers: Scope, Development, Goals, and Pedagogies. Epicenter Technical Brief 1. Stanford, CA and Hadley, MA: National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation. 6. Duval-Couetil, N., Reed-Rhoads, T. & Haghighi, S. (2012). Engineering students and entrepreneurship education: Involvement, attitudes and outcomes. International Journal of Engineering Education 28(2), 425-435. 7. Forbes, M., Bielefeldt, A., and Sullivan, J. (2015) The choice opportunity disparity: Exploring curricular choice opportunities
Conference Session
College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session III: Collaboration
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Waddah Akili, Iowa State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
College Industry Partnerships
their hands dirty  Trained to work as individuals. No experience working in teams  Do not have the desire and/or the skills to do their own search or learn on their ownTable 2. An Industry Perception of Weaknesses in New Graduates of Gulf Region’s Eng.CollegesTo try to understand today’s state of engineering education in the Region, it is important to cometo grip with the challenge that the Region’s pre-university educational systems are facing today.Pre-University Education in the Gulf Region: The most significant change in the pre-universitysystems occurred in the decades of the 70’s and 80’s, as a direct result of the substantial wealthderived from oil revenues, which have found its way to the Region. Public schools, in
Conference Session
Integrating Systems Engineering into the Capstone Project
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Vigyan Jackson Chandra, Eastern Kentucky University
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering, Systems Engineering
TechnologyIndustry Association (CompTIA), which develops vendor-neutral professional certificationslinked with various Information Technology (IT) areas, recommends a seven-step process27for tackling computer/network related issues. Here, it has been adapted for the capstoneprocess as follows, with different project phases added in parenthesis, linking it with theEngineering is Elementary (EiE)28 design process: (1) Problem identification and information gathering: What, who, where, when, why, constrains, assumptions (“Ask” phase) (2) Formulate a theory to establish probable cause(s) of the problem (“Imagine” phase) (3) Identify suitable ways of testing the theory, and if not confirmed generate a new one (“Imagine” phase) (4
Conference Session
Writing and Communication I
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Brad Jerald Henderson, University of California - Davis
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
structure.3S3 = A = B2 pass | B5 pass = (VP(Mn 1) * (Xo)s) + Vt pass * LP(Mn) | [(Xo)s)] + ([Vaux] * Vt)pass + (Mv * VP(Nc))(4) Over the next 150 years, many other pyramids were built —undoubtedly ourfirst civil works, built with the manual labor of thousands of people [many of whom,regrettably, were slaves].S4 = B2 pass = [LP(Mv 1)]F ... Mn 1 * Mn 2 * (No)s + Vt pass ... [Mv 2 * X’ - Mn 3 * Na]E * VP(Mv 3)]E = B2 = [LP(Mv 1]F ... ((Mn 1 * Mn 2 * ((No)s) or [Mv 2 * X’ - Mn 3 * Na]) + (Vt pass * VP(Mv 3)) = Over the next 150 years, many other pyramids—undoubtedly our first civil works— were built, built with the manual labor of thousands of people [many of whom, regrettably, were slaves].(5