College and a Bronze Tablet graduate of University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign where he received a Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering.Mr. William D. Schindel, ICTT System Sciences William D. Schindel is president of ICTT System Sciences, a systems engineering company, and devel- oper of the Systematica Methodology for model and pattern-based systems engineering. His 40-year engineering career began in mil/aero systems with IBM Federal Systems, Owego, NY, included ser- vice as a faculty member of Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and founding of three commercial systems-based enterprises. He has consulted on improvement of engineering processes within automotive, medical/health care, manufacturing
process, which is usually taught in lectures and formal, pre-defined labexperiences. However, it is not clear that a student’s success in lecture-based courses wouldpredict success in project-based courses. Thus, it is important to study the relationship betweenpotential performance predictors and actual performance. Not only will this allow for refinementof the selection criteria for such programs, but it will also serve to inform those who areeducating and advising potential applicants for these types of programs. Broadly, as engineeringdesign projects are core to early career success, this work could have implications for allengineering curricula. This paper examines the relationship between students’ performance intheir pre-engineering
environment, active and learner-centered professional development activities, and extensive time and resources to reflect onexisting pedagogical practices and making modifications to instructional approaches toimplement “best practices” in STEM instruction.3.0 Theoretical FrameworkWhile numerous efforts have been made to address the variety of problems currently facingSTEM education, such as improving workforce development, increasing the number of womenand underrepresented populations in STEM programs and careers, and implementing policies,supports, and processes to support enhanced STEM teaching and learning, many such efforts failto be adopted [14]. Often times, this is due to the lack of design and development of acomprehensive change strategy
complexities ofhealth care disease situations. While progressing through the three projects, the students becamemore independent and self-guided in their work, which was appreciated by many of the studentsin the course. Based upon the course evaluations, instructor evaluations, and the studentreflections, this course has had an effective impact on the students as they venture into a widerange of health care related careers and/ or as health care consumers themselves.References1. Soh, E.K., Kaur, A., Tham, M.P., and Chong, D.Y.R., Engineers in Hospital: An Immersive and Multi-Disciplinary Pedagogical Approach for Better Solutions, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, 20132. Kotche, M., Clinical Immersion
skills useful in engineering practice, such as the use of testand measurement equipment and certain software.One particularly useful skill set in electrical engineering, and for students interacting withelectrical equipment, is the use of electrical test and measurement equipment includingmultimeters, function generators, and oscilloscopes. Another skill valuable to a variety ofengineering disciplines is the ability to prototype and construct circuits3. Even if students don’tuse test and measurement equipment or prototyping in their future careers or senior designexperiences, it is valuable for these students to have an appreciation for how measurements areperformed to the limitations and sources of error associated with using equipment to
Leadership Program[7] Royal academic of engineering. Retrieved from http://www.raeng.org.uk/grants- and-prizes/schemes-for-students[8] Schuhmann, R. J. (2010). Engineering leadership education the search for definition and a curricular approach. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 11(3/4): 61-69.[9] Paul, R. & Falls, L. C. (2015). Mapping career success competencies to engineering leadership capabilities. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE, 1-6.[10] Bernard M. Gordon MIT engineering leadership program developing tomorrow’s engineering leaders. Retrieved from https://gelp.mit.edu/[11] Musselman, C. (2010). Leadership in engineering. Why is that important in engineering education? National Society of
emissions has increased. To approach this ‘era of sustainability’ (Buys et al. 2013, 123) and its global challenges such as food or water issues, environment, energy orinequality it is necessary to use the benefits and opportunities arising from the impacts ofglobalization and rapid technology advances.Engineering education needs to impart this knowledge. The defining problems of futureengineers’ careers will be rapid change, uncertainty and complexity (Mattiussi 2013, 1). Toprepare future engineers to manage these problems and participate in the movement to achievesustainability it is necessary to integrate concepts of sustainability into engineering education(Belu et al. 2016, 94, Boyle 2004, 147). Sustainability, in this context, means
interested in a topic for a long period of time.4,5 This couldrelate back to activities that can teach students basic engineering principles that they can usethroughout college and in their careers. The final component, caring, can also be broken downinto two components: academic caring and personal caring. Academic caring deals with studentsbelieving that their instructor cares about their academic success.4,5 The benefit of a gamifiedlearning environment is that feedback is given to students throughout their participation to letthem know if they are doing well, or what areas should be improved upon. Personal caring dealswith students believing that their instructor cares about their well-being.4,5 Instructors canexplain to students within the
strong factorin determining a student’s progression or non-progression to the subsequent course. Thesecond most common response indicated perceived importance of the degree for theirdesired future career. The third most popular answer was that they found their program ofstudy enjoyable. It is important to note that students were able to make multipleselections for this particular survey question. That said, while a large majority ofprogressing students were confident in their success in the program, only one studentreported the coursework being easy. Therefore, this confidence is likely not a product ofease of training but of something else internal, the most likely reason being good workethic. In addition, it may also be surmised that the
to unstructured problems like those they will experience in the realworld and can learn to develop solutions based on scientific, economic, and societal data.In an effort to address the need for a high quality K12 corrosion engineering curricula, wedeveloped and implemented the Corrosion Engineering Curriculum (CEC) based on theanticipated problem map shown in Figure 1. The CEC modules apply mathematics, materialscience, electro-chemical engineering, and engineering design concepts to corrosion issuesassociated vehicular corrosion (e.g. salt trucks). The CEC lessons also aim to inform studentsabout careers in corrosion engineering. Throughout the course of this research, the module was
California Institute of Technology, and is a Board Certified Environmental Engineer, a Professional Engineer (Louisiana), and was elected to the National Academy of Engineering in 2005 for the ”development of widely used approaches for the management of contaminated sediments”. His research is focused on the fate, transport, and management of contaminants in the environment and the sustainable management of water resources.Dr. Jill Hoffman, Museum of Texas Tech University As the Assistant Director for Visitor Experience, and the Helen DeVitt Jones Curator of Education—both for the Museum of Texas Tech University (TTU)— Jill also is a faculty member in the graduate Mu- seum Science program at TTU. Her museum career
even seek professional advice outside the scope of the MIH project. Thisstructure can be particularly useful for freshmen who might gain a mentor who pushes them to dotheir best and get involved with opportunities on campus early in their academic career. Theexperience of participating in MIH helps students develop their professional identity andconfidence, which can be especially valuable for students who struggle in the traditionalengineering classroom.The combination of the mentoring relationship with the open-ended, real-world problems shiftsthe focus of students from earning a specific grade to solving a problem. Because there is not asingle pre-determined answer, students learn how to break down problems into solvable chunks.Throughout
work. After getting an undergraduate degree from Claremont College in government and aPh.D. in political science at the University of Chicago, according to an article in the Los AngelesTimes (1996), Frankenfeld spent seven years applying for college teaching positions. When hedid not succeed in finding a college teaching position, he took a position with a Washingtonresearch firm where he was hired to “study the future of the automobile in Americantransportation.” He apparently gave up on an academic career. Before he took the position withthe research firm, he wrote two major articles: “Technological Citizenship: A NormativeFramework for Risk Studies” (Science, Technology, and Human Values, 1992) and “SimpleGifts: Complex Environmental
University majoring in Aerospace Engineering and Computational Mathematics. He is currently conducting research on How First-Year Engineering Stu- dents Develop Visualizations for Mathematical Models with Professor Kelsey Rodgers.Dr. Krishna Madhavan, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Krishna Madhavan is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education. In 2008 he was awarded an NSF CAREER award for learner-centric, adaptive cyber-tools and cyber-environments using learning analytics. He leads a major NSF-fundedprojectcalled Deep Insights Anytime, Anywhere (http://www.dia2.org) to characterize the impact of NSF and other federal investments in the area of STEM education. He also
. Throughout her academic career in Australia and Sin- gapore, she had developed a very strong interest in learning psychology and educational measurement. She then opted for a second Ph.D. in educational psychology, specialized in measurement, evaluation and assessment at University of Connecticut. She earned her second Ph.D. in 2010. Li has a unique cross- disciplinary educational and research background in mechatronics engineering, specialized in control and robotics, and educational psychology, specialized in statistical analysis and program evaluation.Dr. Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven Maria-Isabel Carnasciali is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the Tagliatela College of
the UGTFs reported having peer mentor positively impacted the amount of time spent on lecture- deepened content understanding and dynamics of their student group (the based activities greater confidence in their mastery remainder indicated no effect) · 100% reported that they were more · Only one respondent did not agree · 3 commenters indicated that some satisfied with the course outcomes that the program further prepared UGTFs needed improved content when using peer mentors them for their career mastery · 100% reported that their UGTFs · For each of the three
another stating “It is a boring topic”. Those students who listedBalloon Drop and Straw Tower / Book Holder felt that the activities were not practical and were too easy.For example, one student stated “It didn’t seem that we actually need to be an Engineer to solve thisproblem. Any person with brains could do it!” Finally, many of those categorized as Other listed “theoryconcepts” demonstrating that some students did not find theory valuable. Students who indicated that LabVIEW helped them the most, stated that they believed it was atool that they could use throughout their academic and engineering careers. For example, one studentstated that “LabVIEW because it will help us in the future” and anther stated that “LABVIEW was theimportant
,respectively). While the finite element module had a slightly lower score (Figure 2, question 8,average Likert score of 3.75), this may have been due to changes in specific finite elementsoftware while abroad and availability of specific software in India versus the United States. Figure 2. Average Likert scores from the post survey for questions related to student preparedness. Overall, the circumstance of meeting, living, and working with new peers in aninternational setting did not seem to cause personal or professional issues during the program.While it is difficult to make strong conclusions from such a small sample size (four students),variability in personality, career interests, and
that itcould be used to provide drinking water for households that have access to ocean water butlimited access to fresh water. The data collected as pairs of students engaged in the activity arebeing used to inform development of an interactive online simulation for a design activity that iscurrently being developed as a performance assessment that might be used formatively to guideinstructional decisions around engineering design.Background The vision for science education presented in the framework for the Next GenerationScience Standards (NGSS) (National Research Council [NRC], 2012) includes both science andengineering. The standards place equal emphasis on the need for preparing students for STEM-related careers and citizenship in
present our University’s efforts to contribute to this need by way of a hands-onactivity designed for high school students. The workshop was devised to achieve three primarygoals: 1) Encourage consideration of a career in electrical and computer engineering 2) Buildexcitement about the Internet-of-Things and provide students with a future technical focus and 3)Introduce students to the fundamental building blocks that make up the Internet-of-Things. Duringthis activity, students complete a project in which they first construct a circuit to read data from atemperature sensor using a microcontroller platform. The students then write software to transmitthat data over a short-range wireless network and then eventually to an Internet-connected
field of Engineering Technology Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Senior Capstone Project in Green Technologies: Study of Electromagnetic Braking as Prospective Enhancement of Friction-Based Automotive Braking System ABSTRACT Senior engineering projects are the capstone of students’ educational careers, being a proof of theskills and competencies acquired as well as an important tool to assess students’ knowledge in their fieldof study. Capstone design courses enable students to integrate theoretical knowledge with the practicalskills gained during their academic experience. Senior design
).Introduction and brief literature reviewThere is no doubt that capstone courses are very important players of the final program outcomesof an academic department, and the university as a whole. Capstone courses provide ultimateacademic experience to students at the exit of their academic career. Capstone courses build upon the learning outcomes from majority of the courses they take as undergraduate level.According to Tomorrow’s Professor Postings on Teaching and Learning (Stanford University)[1], "Introducing [undergraduate] students to content that could make a contribution to their fieldhas potential benefits to the students, faculty, institution, and discipline. From the studentperspective, completing a research project with even the potential for
], specifically geared towards Veteran students. A formerly validatedsurvey, the Engineering Professional Responsibility Assessment (EPRA) [18], was selected asthe initial survey. This survey was selected because it targets students in their first year, anextremely important period concerning Veteran student retention. The EPRA is a 65-itemmeasure of social responsibility that conceptualizes social responsibility into eight distinct butrelated constructs (see Table 1). The EPRA contains Likert-type items that range from 1(Strongly Disagree) to 7 (Strongly Agree) which was shortened to 1-5 Likert scale for this study.Examples of items from the EPRA include, “It is important to me personally to have a career thatinvolves helping people”, and “I feel an
studies have shown when undergraduate students are able to combine the fundamentaleducation they get in class with complemented research experience; students have flourished [2,3, 4]. The development of leaders follows the typical hierarchy; the upper classmen typically fillthe leadership positions, while the lower classmen and less experienced members are mentoredwhile working on the projects. This process provides opportunity to develop good leadershipskills and excellent communication skills, experiences that are required and strongly applicableto building a successful career in the aerospace industry [5].Mission of Rocket Propulsion LabSaint Louis University’s Rocket Propulsion Laboratory (RPL) is a Student Organizationinvolved in the
to guide student discussions on applications of CST in aviationand aerospace industries. Leading debriefings also helps students to be better prepared to besuccessful in aviation and aerospace careers. In the Moon Ball student leader report, a summaryof lessons learned illustrates the effectiveness of the activities as a way to learn CST: “The feedback from the participants indicated that many lessons were learned from the Moon Ball game. Routines and procedures are important so people know what to expect, and are therefore more likely to be successful. Good discussion and planning helps progress, and working with a group is helpful for new ideas. It is difficult to work within an interdependent system because
School of Engineering Education. She is the recipient of a 2012 NSF CAREER award, which examines how engineering students approach innovation. She serves on the editorial boards of Science Education and the Journal of Pre-College Engineering Educa- tion (JPEER). She received a B.S.E with distinction in Engineering in 2009 and a B.S. degree in Physics Education in 1999. Her M.A. and Ph.D. degrees are in Science Education from Arizona State University earned in 2002 and 2008, respectively.Dr. Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Alejandra Magana is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer and Information Technology and an affiliated faculty at the School
year at NCAT (DOE-sponsored). Our objective is tocontribute to improving the performance of the students to match the advanced technology in theUS.Our target this time will be elementary and middle school students and their teachers, since it isknown that students' attitudes towards mathematics and science develop at a young age andbecome embedded by middle school. In order to encourage young students to pursue careers inscience, technology, engineering, and mathematics, NCAT will develop a program for K-5students and their teachers. This engineering outreach program will be implemented inpredominately minority elementary schools in the Guilford school area. This work will aim toimprove students' attitudes towards mathematics and science at a
and retention.Dr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and associate professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program and in the Chemical & Biological Engineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutionizing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer Post- doctoral Fellow and a 2018 NSF CAREER awardee in engineering education research. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions
Innovative Intervention to Infuse Diversity and Inclusion in a Statics CourseAbstractEngineering educators strive to prepare their students for success in the engineering workforce.Increasingly, many career paths will require engineering graduates to work in multidisciplinaryteams with individuals possessing a diversity of skill sets, backgrounds, and identities. Therefore,it is important not only for future engineers to have the opportunity to work in teams as students,but also to have specific instruction that teaches them about teamwork skills and the valuediversity and inclusion bring to engineering practice. Furthermore, it is important that thisinstruction occurs throughout their engineering coursework, giving
Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA, he was an Adjunct Professor in the Computer Science Electrical Engineering department at the University of Missouri – Kansas City. Before beginning his academic career, he spent 31 years in industry as a manager and software developer and consultant.Dr. Molly A. McVey, University of Kansas Dr. Molly A. McVey is a post-doctoral teaching fellow at the University of Kansas School of Engineering where she works with faculty to incorporate evidence-based and student-centered teaching methods, and to research the impacts of changes made to teaching on student learning and success. Dr. McVey earned her Ph.D in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Kansas.Christopher Patrick