better problem solvers. This is as important for liberal arts students as it is for engineers. • Students will gain some technological literacy. Literacy is an important goal of the liberal arts education. Students need to understand and appreciate the modern world to be able to make informed decisions about critical issues. • Students who understand the big ideas of engineering (for example, recognizing real-world constraints, trade-offs, and considerations of economics, environment and safety) may later understand their own discipline better.Others agree that engineering should be a component of the liberal arts education. UnionCollege has a curriculum, called Converging Technologies, which integrates the arts
very relational. How can we prioritize very meaningful relationships over projects that come and go? And how do we base (projects) on our very local cultures and ways of knowing?I n this passage, the student underscores how discussions on decolonization within humanitarian engineering class often remain confined to improving power imbalances and relationships between community members and HE practitioners. However, these initiatives tend to be top-down or centralized changes across the sector, which fall short of addressing the goals of decolonization as articulated in Indigenous studies. Indigenous studies emphasize dismantling central control as an integral piece of decolonization, making this
witharduous challenges.[2] Furthermore, the inclusion of capstone projects has shown improvement inteamwork dynamics, the ability to develop leadership skills within an independently-leadproject.[3] Thermodynamics, heat transfer, and fluid mechanics are critical courses that are coveredin engineering degree programs. The theory and knowledge gained by students in each of thesecourses culminates in the thermo-fluid design capstone. This curriculum expects students to bringtheir combined aforementioned knowledge and technical skills to develop and produce a workingsystem as part of a team collaboration that meets the needs of their respective customers. Theimportance of such courses and projects is to introduce students to the environment that they
Assistant Dean for Inclusive Excellence, she leads the Broadening Opportunity through Leadership and Diversity (BOLD) Center, overseeing efforts to attract and prepare students for the rigors of engineering study and careers, and to improve student performance and graduation rates. Appointed in January 2014, Miller comes to CU-Boulder from the National Science Foundation, where she worked in STEM education as a American Association for the Advancement of Science Fellow. Sarah believes that every child deserves an excellent education. She has worked in inner-city public schools, both as a teacher and as an administrator, and in the admissions office of Amherst College, where she earned a B.A. in Chemistry. She holds a PhD
Session 2793 Self-reported Instrument for Measuring Student Learning Outcomes Theresa L. Jones The University of Texas at AustinAbstractProject PROCEED is dedicated towards providing more hands-on and project-centeredclassroom learning opportunities in the mechanical engineering department at TheUniversity of Texas at Austin. One of the challenges of PROCEED is assessing its impacton student learning. We have been developing and piloting an instrument for assessinghow well these PROCEED courses are satisfying the departmental student learningoutcomes. Based upon an assessment instrument used by
, and possibly a lecture or two on possible scenarios if the issue is not solved. At the end of the course the group papers are graded and returned to the group. A copy is kept on file to share with interested individuals.VI. ConclusionWe have shown that a popular, credible, yearlong course can be developed that helps to educatenon-technologists to make smart decisions regarding technology in their lives and careers. Theoverall course has been extremely successful in meeting its overarching goals. It has beenoffered continually for thirteen years and is scheduled for a fourteenth. It has survived two majortop to bottom revisions of the university’s Core curriculum and it is still viewed as instillingessential integrative
collection, analysis, and drafting of this document, is pursuing a doctoral degree in Engineering Education. The author also shares many of the same or similar disabilities with those who were interviewed. Although this alignment was unintentional, it ended up being an integral aspect of the interview process that allowed for greater comfortability and vulnerability in interviews. We believe that this aspect of shared identity amongst the researcher and students helped foster richness in the data and a deepened understanding of student experiences during analysis. The second author holds identities as a disabled white cisgender woman, tenure-track engineering professor, and engineering education researcher
integrating ethics throughout our curriculum.] SulzerOrthopedics (later Centerpulse Orthopedics, later acquired by Zimmer Holdings) recalled 25,000of its Inter-Op® acetabular caps in December 2000 with approximately 17,500 having beenimplanted47. Later reports showed the scope of the problem to be more than 30,000 devices withmore than 20,000 implanted50. More than 2700 revision surgeries were needed as a result49-51 ofa manufacturing process error that occurred after Sulzer brought the process to manufacture thecups in-house. A mineral oil based lubricant had accidentally contaminated the machine coolantand the acetabular cups during CNC machining (subsequent cleaning operations did not detectthe contamination). The mineral oil on the cup prevented
, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 2018.[4] Lin, C., Verma, A., "Clarifications of Rule 2 in Teaching Geometric Dimensioning andTolerancing," Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii,2007.[5] Waldorf, D. J., Georgeou, T. M., "Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T)Integration Throughout a Manufacturing Engineering Curriculum," Proceedings of the ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016.[6] Paige, M. A., Fu, K., "Spatial Demonstration Tools for Teaching Geometric Dimensioningand Tolerancing (GD&T) to First-Year Undergraduate Engineering Students," Proceedings ofthe ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[7] Sriraman, V., De Leon, J., "Teaching
changes to requirements of accreditation [19] andprofessional formation development [20].Giacomin [16] citing Von Hippel [21], discusses the economic benefits of human-centreddesigning, however, Niles et al. [22], [23], have found that engineering students seem tostruggle with and resist social context and engagement with public welfare concerns andsocial consciousness in engineering– which are factors relevant to their engagement withhuman-centred designing.This paper stands with these ongoing calls for the engagement and integration of such notionsin a civil engineering curriculum, and so we propose a psychology-informed approach. Thisis to facilitate these integrations, but with the intention of bypassing the possible resistance –by
AC 2009-2517: CALCULATION OF THE GENERAL IMPEDANCE BETWEENADJACENT NODES OF INFINITE UNIFORM N-DIMENSIONAL RESISTIVE,INDUCTIVE, OR CAPACITIVE LATTICESPeter Osterberg, University of Portland Dr. Osterberg is an associate professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in the School of Engineering at the University of Portland (Portland, OR). He has been on the faculty since 1996. He received his Ph.D. from MIT in 1995. Between 1978 and 1991, Dr. Osterberg worked for Texas Instruments, GTE and Digital Equipment Corporation. His research interests include MEMS, Nanoelectronics, Signals and Systems, and Analog and Digital VLSI Integrated Circuits.Aziz Inan, University
campuses with a more diverse student population. Using the promotion of the ITOW workshop as a model we will examine whatone can do when trying to introduce a new idea (i.e. workshop, program, etc.) to anacademic body such as an engineering faculty. In this paper we describe the process ofimplementation of ITOW by facilitators on three different college campuses, the impacton those campuses, and document implementation problems and solutions. Two of thecampuses are majority institutions and the third is a minority institution. We will comparethe experiences of each of the facilitators and discuss the problems each campus faced inrunning a workshop of this nature and how these issues were resolved. The initialresponse to a workshop of this
consumption rate ( VDO2 , L O2/min) to the totalair flow rate ( VD , L/min), and molar oxygen compositions of the inspired and expired air ( yOin2and yOout2 ): VDO2 = VD in yOin2 − VD out yOout2 (1)An analogous component balance can be written for carbon dioxide, nitrogen and water.Nitrogen is known to be inert, so that the net rate of transfer with the body is zero. The gasexchange data ( V out , yOout2 , yCO out 2 ) are reported at BTPS (Body Temperature and Pressure,Saturated) conditions. Since the ambient temperature and humidity conditions are different, thematerial
growth 5. MET graduates in the SOT Graduate Program 6. Efficiency of MET Department operations 7. MET’s use of classroom technology 8. Statewide Technology issues 9. Alumni and industry relations 10. Integrate continuous improvement process into all areas of MET Department.Establishing a time line for continuous improvement initiatives. From Fall 1995 through Fall Page 5.288.21998, the continuous improvement committee maintained a planning calendar of the MechanicalEngineering Technology department’s continuous improvement projects. While it wasmaintained the calendar helped to focus attention on projects and
to do STEMoutreach by giving presentations and demonstrations using an interactive humanoid robotthrough community events and school visits.A simple drag-and-drop graphical programming interface called Choregraphe that came with theNao robot made it possible for students without much programming experience to put togethersimple demonstrations. Over the years, different components like music, dance moves,impersonation, simple dialogues, storytelling, interactive games, etc. have been added to acollection of demonstrations which engaged the audients especially the school-aged-children.In the fall semesters of recent years, the Nao outreaches were integrated with the freshmen teamdesign projects conducted in another course: EGR101 Introduction
, “Research as Guide for Curriculum Development: an Example from Introductory Electricity. Part 1: Investigation of Student Understanding,” Am. J. Phys., 60 (11), pp. 994-1013.5. Linder, C. J., Hillhouse, G., 1996, “Teaching by Conceptual Exploration,” Phys. Teach., 34, pp. 332-338.6. Laws, P. W., 1997, “Millikan Lecture 1996: Promoting Active Learning Based on Physics Education Research in Introductory Physics Courses,” Am. J. Phys. 65 (1), pp. 14-21. Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education7. Thacker, B., Kim, E., Trefz, K., Lea, S. M., 1994, “Comparing
from the students. The seniors’ response varied from dislike toenjoyment. The freshmen reported in increased interest in engineering due to the interaction withthe seniors.MethodologyThe overall goals for this teaming effort were: 1. Provide the seniors an opportunity to practice team leadership skills 2. Have seniors apply design tools learned in class to an actual problem 3. Meet the senior writing across the curriculum requirement through the project report 4. Provide the freshmen with upper classmen contact on a project 5. Expose freshmen to the design processAt week six the freshmen were introduced to their final project and divided into teams so thateach senior could be assigned as the team leader. The freshmen were
for technology in assessment (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 459). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).[12] Osmundson, E., Chung, G. K. W. K., Herl, H. E., & Klein, D. C. D. (1999). Concept mapping in the classroom: A tool for examining the development of students’ conceptual understandings. (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 507). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).[13] Baker, E. L., Chung, G., Dennis, R., Herl, H. E., Klein, D., and Schacter, J. (1996). Measurement of Learning Across Five Areas of Cognitive Competency: Design of an Integrated Simulation Approach to
and Diversity Impacts across Three Engineering Research Centers," in Frontiers in Education Conference, Cincinnati, OH, 2019.[5] D. M. Pai, R. G. Liles, C. Lambeth, P. N. Kumta,, H. S. Borovetz, S. K. Pixley and J. Sankar, "Bootstrapping a new graduate curriculum through an Engineering Research Center," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, B.C. Canada, 2011.[6] P. Hirsch, D. Kelso, B. Shwom, J. Troy and J. Wal, "Redefining Communication Education for Engineers: How the NSF/VaNTH ERC is Experimenting with a New Approach," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Albuquerque, NM, 2011.[7] T. Dahlberg, T. Barnes, A. Rorrer and E. Powell, "Improving retention and graduate recruitment through immersive
astudent reaches the junior level of an undergraduate curriculum, it is practically a certainty that thestudent will graduate with a bachelor’s degree. Unfortunately, that is not the case at PFW. A reviewof institutional data regarding the graduation rates of rising juniors in the College of ETCS from2006 to 2015 reveals that only 27.5% of new juniors completed their degrees in two years; 58%completed their degrees in three years; 64% in four years; 72% in five years; and 82% in six years.The ranges of percentages within the college and the corresponding weighted averages are shownin Table 1. Some of these students get discouraged and quit altogether. Therefore, the significanceof this project is that it will shorten the time it takes students to
Paper ID #11983Leadership, Management, and Diversity: Missed Opportunities within Stu-dent Design Competition TeamsDr. Susan E. Walden, University of Oklahoma Dr. Susan E. Walden is the founding Director of the Research Institute for STEM Education (RISE) and an associate research professor in the Dean’s office of the College of Engineering (CoE). She is also a founding member of the Sooner Engineering Education (SEED) Center.Ms. Cindy E Foor, University of Oklahoma Cindy E. Foor is the Associate Director/Research Associate for the Research Institute for STEM Ed- ucation (RISE) at the University of Oklahoma. Her
way of determining aconcept’s importance.Keywords: cognitive domain, mental models, undergraduate engineeringIntroductionLearning is an integral part of our lives. Each one of us learns the same things differently based onour preferred way of learning. We can learn by building mental models; through feelings,emotions, attitudes; and by physical movements. Based on this, the domains of learning are broadlycategorized as cognitive (knowledge), affective (attitudes), and psychomotor (skills) [1]. Eachdomain of learning focuses on one of three ways the brain can be engaged in learning. Thecognitive domain is focused on mental processes or thinking, the affective domain focuses onfeelings, attitudes, and behaviors, and the psychomotor domain
nomeasurable differences in testing performances among the three classes, but a positivecorrelation was demonstrated between better homework or quiz grades and testing grades.Copies of example of quizzes and an example project are provided. The results from studentsurveys indicate fairly strong support for the quizzes over homework and the use of a websiteover a more tradition format for the course. However, almost 25% of the students prefer a moretradition course format of weekly homework and writing on the board. IntroductionThe ultimate skill to be learned in an undergraduate engineering curriculum is “problemsolving.” Since essentially all engineering (and science) classes are limited to a narrowdiscipline
AC 2012-3634: CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, AND INGENUITY SUMMERENRICHMENT PROGRAM: ASSESSMENT FROM A MULTI-INSTITUTIONALCOLLABORATIONDr. Andrew L Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University Andrew Gerhart, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of mechanical engineering at Lawrence Technological University. He is actively involved in ASEE, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, the En- gineering Society of Detroit, and the Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network. He serves as Faculty Advisor for the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Student Chapter at LTU, as Chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee, and as Chair of LTU/KEEN Entrepreneurial Course Modifi- cation.Dr. Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence
Online Engineering Education: A Comprehensive Review Wael Ibrahim, Rasha Morsi ECPI College of Technology/Norfolk State UniversityAbstractDevelopment and assessment of synchronous and asynchronous distance learning curricula is anever growing research due to the new emerging virtual universities. Recent reports confirm thefast growth in online education at an even higher rate than anticipated by educational institutions.The suitability of online learning to engineering disciplines however has been questioned. Thispaper researches online degree granting institutions and attempts to gain an insight in the growthof online education and its correlation with engineering
electric energy use at the residence with both an energy audit and direct measurement. They measured, or used the manufacturer’s specifications to estimate, power requirements of specific appliances in the home and estimated the duty cycle of each load from a 2-week survey completed by the ranger. They also measured AC current flowing into the house and integrated over time to estimate total energy consumption in the home.The interns also needed data on the generators’ duty cycles and diesel fuel consumption at EspaLagoon to compare life cycle costs of the existing and proposed systems. The park rangersupplied fifteen months of generator data, and the interns calculated an average duty cycle of 4.7hours per
developed and calibrated Monte Carlo simulations of free-molecular aerodynamics to determine drag effects in ELEO orbits. An example of non-technicalinvolvement is business students who organized events to promote campus awareness of ELEO-Sat. Moreover, the senior capstone course involves local high school students consideringSTEM careers through outreach programming including participation in high altitude balloonprojects. Similarly, the project provides outreach opportunities to local elementary schools usingspace science curriculums developed by Taylor University elementary education majors.Working on projects like ELEO-Sat equips students from many disciplines with skills they needfor the future. Collaboration between non-capstone students
Capstone Design Manual. A tentative table of contents is as follows:0. Introduction to the Manual: An ASEE 2004 National Conference paper, describing the effortof internationalizing the capstone design course.*1. Introduction to Capstone Design: This lecture describes the conceptual difference betweendesign analysis and synthesis, the process approach and system integration approach to teachingand learning mechanical design, and the expectation and outcome of the course.2. Design team organization and dynamics: Design team can be organized by personality andtemperament, or by random drawing. Team members play different roles in a synergetic way toproduce the successful design.*3. Collecting information for design and protecting intellectual
Thermo-Fluids and High Speed Aerodynamics for the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Depart- ment at ASU. His interests include student pathways and motivations into engineering and developing lab-based curriculum. Recently, he has developed an interest in non-traditional modes of content delivery including online classes and flipped classrooms. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Redesign of the Introduction to Engineering Course and its Impact on Students’ Knowledge and Application of the Engineering Design ProcessAbstractThis evidence-based practice paper describes the changes made to a 2-credit introduction toengineering course at Arizona State University to teach the
the different types ofapplications that can be generated. Visual C++ supports Windows applications, DLLs, andconsole-mode applications, to name just a few.Visual C++ 6.0 is currently used in the C/C++ programming curriculum in the ComputerEngineering Technology Department at the University of Memphis. The department has chosenthis product to teach C and C++ programming for three major reasons: 1) it is a professional andmodern C/C++ programming application platform that is an industry standard, 2) it is relativelyeasy to use and its rich set of features and tools can be taught in parallel with C/C++programming concepts and techniques, and 3) it supports console-mode programming.Visual C++’s console-mode support makes it an ideal application