Conference Session

Manufacturing Lab Experience

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Can Saygin

software such as AutoCAD and Mastercam. The hardware and softwarearchitectures are shown in Figures 2 and 3, respectively. Remote Clients (a) (b) Internet Ethernet Applications Robot Server Part Buffers

Collection

1998 Annual Conference

Authors

Robert Batson

quality assurancefunction, especially when participating in the development of new products, processes, or systems.ASQ’s Body of Knowledge for the CQE exam 2 uses the following first and second-level groupings:1. General Knowledge, Conduct, and Ethics2. Quality Practices and Applications A. Human Resource Management B. Quality Planning C. Quality Systems D. Supplier Management E. Quality Audit F. Cost of Quality G. Continuous Improvement Tools3. Statistical Principles and Applications A. Terms and Concepts B. Distributions C. Statistical Inference Page 3.51.2 D. Correlation and Regression

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 2

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ziliang Zhou, California Baptist University; Xiuhua Si, California Baptist University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

responses:I have a good understanding of the concept of specific heat.The student responses are tabulated below. Table 2 Student responses to the survey question Likert scale responses pre-lab post-lab A strongly agree 21 33 B agree 24 19 C neutral 10 3 D disagree 0 0 E strongly disagree 0 0 sum 55 55 agree % (A+B)/sum 82% 95% improvement 13%The percentage of students agreeing with the survey

Conference Session

Status of CE Education: Today & Tomorrow

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth J. Fridley, University of Alabama

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

characteristic information forinitial comparative purposes, be misleading since they provide little insight into the variation anddistributions of the credit hours. To provide a more descriptive presentation of the credit hourrequirements in today’s curricula, simple plots are provided for each data set. Figure 1 providesa summary of the total credit hours required for degree. Figure 1(a) provides the percentage ofprograms requiring various total credit hours and Figure 1(b) illustrates the cumulativepercentage of programs requiring the same various total credit hours. The most commonrequirement is 128 total credit hours with the next most common being 132 total hours. Figures2-6 provide similar presentations of the credit hour requirements for

Collection

1998 Annual Conference

Authors

Majdi Najm

first conceived, this module wassupposed to provide the basis for the class project, that is, to analyze the way MODOT plans andmanages projects and to recommend improvements to this process. Once the class started,however, the students wanted to focus on a topic that would be of better use to them as Armyofficers, and thus the topic of the class project changed.Figure 2. a) Screen for Overview Module b) Screen from Case Study ModuleThe class chose the following project goal: to write a how-to manual that can assist Army projectmanagers in the development of a project management plan for a typical Army constructionproject. The class was divided into groups or functional teams, each focusing on a phase of the projectlife cycle

Collection

2024 South East Section Meeting

Authors

Gafar Abbas Elamin P.E., The Citadel; Nathan John Washuta P.E., The Citadel; James Righter, The Citadel; Kevin Skenes, The Citadel

66.84 D 79.12 C Average 91.41 A 73.33 C 82.37 B STDEV 0.00 13.22 6.61Figure 1 compares the students’ grade distribution based on group and individual assignments.The figure also shows the effect of the combination of both assignments in adjusting and assign-ing the final overall grade for each student on the team based on his/her actual contribution to theproject. The team consisted of four students. When the grade was assigned based on the group 2024 ASEE Southeastern Section Conferenceassignments, all students received an “A” grade. However

Conference Session

Inclusive Dialogues and Adaptations in Engineering Education: Navigating Uncertainty and Leveraging AI for Student Success

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stewart Thomas, Bucknell University; Sarah Appelhans, Lafayette College; Michael S Thompson, Bucknell University; Rebecca Thomas, Bucknell University; Philip Asare, University of Toronto; Alan Cheville, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

engineer. Students who value a “good”course grade as a perceived achievement, may therefore internalize these activities as importantbeings and doings.To counter such a perception, the grading scheme shown in Fig. 4(b) was implemented. In thismodel, faculty selected areas relevant to being an engineer and used these to assess across allcourse activities. Each assignment or exam yielded a set of grades as opposed to a single value,that are weighted and contribute to the final grade. In other words, a single homeworkassignment may have aspects of Engagement, Knowledge and Concepts, Engineering Skills,Communication, etc., that are evaluated and weighted, as opposed to contributing solely to a“Homework” category. In implementing this model, all

Collection

2007 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Nhut Tan Ho

graduate from the Department, b) definingthe level of proficiency for each, and c) comparing the existing curriculum with theidentified requirements and recommending ways to integrate new requirements into thecurriculum. The CDIO Syllabus was customized for the Department and was revisedwith inputs from the Department’s faculty and MEAB members (see Appendix). TheSyllabus was used as the basis to design a survey for key stakeholders, who are localindustry leaders, MEAB members, faculty, new and older alumni, and current students. Figure 3: Benchmarking Results Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Annual Conference Copyright © 2007, American Society for

Collection

2010 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Josh Coffman; Joseph J. Rencis; Daniel J. Jensen; Ashland O. Brown; Jiancheng Liu; Kristen Kaufman; Christina White

8independent reviewers. Each reviewer independently evaluated each quiz. Independentreviewers were provided the Independent Reviewer Multiple-Choice Quiz Question AssessmentForm, in Appendix B, to record their evaluation. This assessment form is almost identical to theMultiple-Choice Quiz Question Checklist Form in Figure 1. One difference between the twoforms is that the checklist form items are written as questions and the assessment form items arewritten as statements. A second difference is that each item in the checklist form is evaluated ona 1 to 5 Likert Scale. The independent reviewer uses the Likert Scale to evaluate how well thequiz satisfies each assessment form statement. The scale used was as follows: (1) not at all, (2)needs improvement

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark David Bedillion, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Mohamed Hakeem Mohamed Nizar, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology: Department of Mechanical Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

fortwo and three mass systems, a single mass system was chosen for in-class implementation forsimplicity. Two and three mass virtual models are more appropriate for a senior level controlsystems or vibrations elective, and we plan to introduce the virtual laboratories into those classesin 2015. Page 26.1703.4We have also completed a model of the ECP-505 inverted pendulum for use in a senior levelcontrol systems course 38 . The ECP design is unlike other inverted pendulum models in that the (a) ECP rectilinear stage 37 (b) Simulink model of ECP rectilinear stage Figure 1: ECP-210 rectilinear stage and

Conference Session

Assessment of K-12 Engineering Programs and Issues

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Taryn Bayles, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Tania Monterastelli, University of Maryland, Baltimore County

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

how math helps solve problems in science and engineering has 6. My knowledge of science and engineering fields hasFigure 11. Student Reponses to Changes in their Interest, Attitude, and Confidence Levels Increased Decreased Stayed the Same A = 2004-5 B = 2005-6 C = 2006-7 D = 2007-8 100

Conference Session

ET Design Projects

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Harry Fox

outcomes described above. The presentation is organized intocourse aspects - first semester, course aspects – second semester, and course evaluation.Course Aspects – First Semester The course was originally developed in 1998 as a single spring-semester course but wasrevised in the 2000-2001 academic year to a two-semester sequence: Senior Design A and SeniorDesign B. In the fall semester of their final year students take the lecture course Senior DesignA, during which the planning and preparation of the robotics project take place. In the followingspring semester students take the lecture-laboratory course Senior Design B, during which the

Collection

1996 Annual Conference

Authors

Gordon W. Couturier

software selected was GroupSystems, by The University of Arizona and VentanaCorporation and LOTUS Notes. GroupSystems and LOTUS Notes are installed on eight 486 IBMmicrocomputer networked together on a Novell Ethernet. These computers are installed in a formalmeeting room equipped with an overhead projector (attached to the facilitator’s computer), screen andcopyboard (a white board that allows you to seize, by computer, anything written on it). GroupSystemsconsists of the following tools for facilitating group meetings and brainstorming sessions: a. Meeting Manager - supports session leader and group by initiating activities, accessing files, printing reports, and saving session reports. b. Agenda - assists in planning and

Conference Session

Curriculum Development and Assessment in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vincent Wilczynski, Yale University; Isabella M. Quagliato, Yale University: School of Engineering & Applied Science

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Figure 2. Similar analysis is also provided atthe course level that documents the contributions of each individual course to the attainment ofStudent Outcomes.The program level analysis results from data collected from each course within the curriculum.A common spreadsheet, displayed in Appendix B, is used in each of the program’s requiredcourses and serves as the starting point for the assessment system. The course instructor usesthis spreadsheet to: 1. record individual performance for all students for each assigned course exercise 2. assign a “weighting factor” to each exercise to indicate that specific assignment’s value Page 24.118.6

Conference Session

Future Career and Professional Success for Graduate Students

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University; Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

survey research discussed in this article addresses agap in the literature by developing a quantitative approach to graduate student identitydevelopment in engineering, education, and engineering education. We explore graduatestudents’ perceptions of their multiple roles today and in the future, focusing on a) the actualroles they currently hold, b) the roles they desire to hold now and in the future, and c) the rolesthey believe they are expected to hold now and in the future.TerminologyThroughout this research key terms were used with distinct definitions in mind. First, the termidentity is used in terms of who a person is in the professional sense. For example, for graduatestudents and professoriate, identity often includes the roles of

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Berrisford Boothe; Todd Watkins; John Ochs

Session 2554 Creating a Truly Multidisciplinary Entrepreneurial Educational Environment John B. Ochs, Todd A. Watkins and Berrisford W Boothe Department of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics/Economics Department/Department of Arts and Architecture Lehigh University, Bethlehem PA 18015-3085AbstractIn our age of technological growth and change, the role of the engineer has evolved from lonespecialist to team player, from internally focused to globally aware, from reactionary toentrepreneur. The entrepreneur has created much of our social wealth. The characteristics of

Conference Session

Computed Simulation and Animation

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Vivek Venkatesh; Nawwaf Kharma

concrete realizations of the concepts presented in the lecture (and the text book),but also demand that students utilize these ideas in design projects, which require creativethought, organization, decision-making, team work, practical skills, and an appreciation of thevalue of testing and verification. Assessment of students learning include pen and paper exams, pen and paper take-homeassignments, practical lab assignments and projects, as well as pen and paper midterm and finalexams, held under controlled conditions. These methods aim to measure (a) students’understanding of the theoretical concepts, (b) students’ ability to use these concepts to solveproblems, (c) students’ ability to carry out circuit analysis and synthesis

Collection

2013 GSW

Authors

Amen I. Omoragbon; Gary J. Coleman; Lex Gonzalez; Brandon Watters; Bernd Chudoba

Friday Morning Session 2- Student Feasibility Study of a Thrust Vector Control TransportAmen I. Omoragbon, Gary J. Coleman, Lex Gonzalez, Brandon Watters, Bernd Chudoba Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX AbstractThrust Vectored Control (TVC) has the potential to advance the design of commercial transports.This research evaluates the feasibility of a TVC commercial transport concept in three phases;(1) thrust vectoring technology review, (2) parametric sizing of a TVC transport, and (3) stabilityand control (S&

Collection

2015 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Danai Chasaki

to identify a match using Matlab or image matching software.d) Check the list of certificates in a web browser and identify bogus ones.e) Setup rogue access point, make unsuspecting user connect to it, and monitor traffic.Two examples of lab exercises: a) WEP password cracking, and b) Fingerprint analysis areshown below. Spring 2015 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 10-11, 2015 Villanova UniversityCont..! XX:XX:XX:XX Spring 2015 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 10-11, 2015 Villanova UniversityIV. Interdisciplinary AspectsWe collaborate with experienced instructors from both the math and chemistry departments andwe host two guest lectures. A math professor talks about password complexity and how

Conference Session

Formation and Development of Engineers

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dina Verdin, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus; Carlos Luis Perez, Arizona State University; Sharona Krinsky, California State University, Los Angeles; Emily L. Allen, California State University, Los Angeles

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

Paper ID #37892Examining Engineering Students’ Shift in Mindsets Over the Course of aSemester: A Longitudinal StudyDr. Dina Verdin, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus Dina Verd´ın, PhD is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. She graduated from San Jos´e State University with a BS in Industrial Systems Engineering and from Purdue University with an MS in Industrial Engineering and PhD in Engineering Education. Her research interest focuses on changing the deficit base perspective of first-generation col- lege students by providing asset

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Technical Session 2: Experiential Learning in Biomedical Engineering

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sabia Zehra Abidi, Rice University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

. How did thisinterdisciplinary learning experience affect your ability to engage with the curriculum?Open-Ended Reflection Question B (Debrief): What went well? What didn’t go so well? Whatwill you do differently next time?3.4 Data AnalysisWe analyzed the qualitative data for repeated responses among student experiences. For this, weused a thematic analysis approach as described by [31]. Briefly, student responses were reviewedin total. The most common responses were classified into 3 main themes with subthematic areaslisted. Four to six student quotes supporting each theme have been provided enabling readers toindependently assess appropriateness of described themes [32].4. ResultsQualitative analysis of student quotes led to identification

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 11: Program Descriptions and Learning Analytics

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura Cruz Castro, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Tiantian Li, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Leyla Ciner; Kerrie Douglas, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Christopher Brinton, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

% international, 11% Asian, 5% of two or more races, 5% Hispanic/Latino, 4% Black orAfrican American, and 1% Other.The course's final grade corresponded to a letter grade (A, B, C, D, or F), with a plus or minusindicating the student's achievement level. In 2019, these courses were hybrid (online and in-person), in which smaller portions of the course with approximately 25 students were able to goto the classroom in person once a week. Thus, during any given class period, some of thestudents could attend the lecture with the instructor in the classroom while others were using astreaming device. Because of the hybrid nature of the course and the number of studentsregistered, students and instructors alike were accessing the LMS continuously.In this study

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nhut Ho, California State University, Northridge; Robert Ryan, California State University, Northridge

from faculty, the 2001 ABET review, theMinority Engineering Program, industry, alumni, graduating seniors, and otherstakeholders, have sought to impart design concepts and related computational tools atthe lower division to improve student preparation for the senior design capstone courseand their future careers. These changes resulted in a mechanical design sequence ofcourses (shown in Figure 1) that comprise of the freshman orientation course ME101, theone-year sophomore design sequence ME286AB, the junior-level machine design courseME330, and a year of senior design. In this paper, this sequence will be referred to as thedesign-stem sequence. ME101 Intro ME286A ME286B ME330 ME486A/B to

Conference Session

Diversity and Inclusion

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emily E. Liptow, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Michelle H. Bardini, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Noah Robert Krigel, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Monica Lauren Singer, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Coleen Carrigan, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Report NSF 15- 311. Arlington, VA. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.3. Mann, Allison and Thomas A. DiPrete (2013). Trends in Gender Segregation in the Choice of Science and Engineering Majors. Social Science Research 42(6), 1519–1541.4. Settles, I. , Cortina L. , Malley, J. , Stewart, A. (2006). The Climate for Women in Academic Science: The Good, the Bad, and the Changeable. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(1), 47-585. Seron, C., Silbey, S. S., Cech, E., & Rubineau, B. (2016). Persistence Is Cultural: Professional Socialization and the Reproduction of Sex Segregation. Work and Occupations, 43(2), 178-214.6. Leskin E. , Cortina L. , Kabat D. (2011) “Gender Harassment: Broadening our Understanding of Sex

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kath Xu, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Dawn Wendell, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Andrea S. Walsh, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. 1999: n. pag. ​The Tech​. Web. 26 Jan. 2017. .Boyce, Mary C., Penny Chisholm, Edward F. Crawley, Lorna J. Gibson, Karen K. Gleason, Nancy A. Lynch, and John B. Vander Sande. ​Report of the School of Engineering​. Rep. N.p.: n.p., n.d. ​Report of the School of Engineering​. Committee on Women Faculty in the School of Engineering at MIT, Mar. 2002. Web. 26 Jan. 2017. .Caltech. "Fall Enrollment 2016-17." Office of the Registrar. Caltech, n.d. Web. 11 Feb. 2017. .Chin, Caroline, and Kamilla Tekiela. ​The Status of Undergraduate Women at MIT​. Rep. N.p., Feb. 2016. Web. 26 Jan. 2017. .Clance, Pauline R. "The Imposter Phenomenon in High Achieving Women: Dynamics and Therapeutic Intervention." ​Psychology and

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ivan Cardoso Monsão, PPGM-UFBA/BiLab-Business and Innovation Lab; Jes Fiais Cerqueira P.E., Federal University of Bahia (Brazil); Augusto Cesar Pinto Loureiro da Costa, Universidade Federal da Bahia; Jose Siqueira Dias, University of Campinas

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

during meetings and presentations of project results to customers or visitors. Anotheropportunity to practice both oral and written communication is during entrepreneurship orinnovation contests, where the students have to present their projects to a panel which willexamine their technical and economic feasibility. The judges on the panel are usuallyentrepreneurs, engineers, angel investors and venture capitalists. The training and experience ofmaking a presentation at such events are important because the analysis, criticism andsuggestions provided by these professionals are extremely valuable. The judges make use ofmethods and procedures used in their professional activities in the real world.Aladdin effectW. B. Arthur, in his book The Nature

Conference Session

Experiences in Engineering Community Engagement

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Farzana Ansari, University of California, Berkeley; Jennifer Wang, University of California, Berkeley; Ryan Shelby, University of California, Berkeley; Eli Patten, University of California, Berkeley; Lisa A Pruitt, University of California, Berkeley

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

, teamwork and other professionalskills, and are forced to learn “on the job.”2,11-13 Skills outlined by ABET criteria further reflectthe necessity for integrating such attributes in engineering education, including: (a) an ability toapply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; (b) an ability to design and conductexperiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data; (c) an ability to design a system,component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic,environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability;(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams; (e) an ability to identify, formulate, andsolve engineering problems; (f) an understanding of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Julie Dyke Ford, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology; Susannah Howe, Smith College; Daria A. Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado Boulder; Robin Ott, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

, "2019-2020 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs," ABET, Baltimore, MD2018, Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2019-2020/, Accessed on: 25 January 2021.[8] D. Davis, S. Beyerlein, O. Harrison, P. Thompson, M. S. Trevisan, and B. Mount, "A Conceptual Model for Capstone Engineering Design Performance and Assessment," in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago, IL, 2006, p. Session 1237.[9] D. C. Davis, K. Gentili, M. S. Trevisan, R. K. Christianson, and J. F. McCauley, "Measuring Learing Outcomes for Engineering Design Education," in American Society for

Conference Session

Assessment Methods

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Harpal Dhillon, Excelsior College; Sohail Anwar, Pennsylvania State University-Altoona College

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

/technology/ekrmann.html)8. Berge, Z., and Myers, B., Evaluating Computer Mediated Communication Courses in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol 23, No.A, pp 431- 450, (2000).9. Palomba, C.A., and Banta, T.W., Assessment Essentials, San Francisco: Josey Bass, 1999.10. Clark, R.E., Evaluation Distance Learning Technology. Paper for United States Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, 1989.11. Graham, C., Cogiltay, K., Cramer, J. Lim, B., and Duffy, T.M., Teaching in a Web Based Distance Learning Environment: An Evaluation Based on Four Courses. CRLT Technical Report No 13-00, Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Research on Learning and Technology, 2000.12. Graham, C., Duffy, T.M., Gramer, J

Conference Session

Manufacturing Education Curriculum II

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Farrow, University of Tennessee-Martin

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

student must describe a process in depth or compare andcontrast two processes. The weighting scheme for all course components is shown in Table 3. Table 3. Weighting of Course Components Component Component Weight In-Class Exercises 10% Lab Activities 25% Exam I. 15% Exam II. 15% Exam III. 15% Comprehensive Final Exam 20%A standard ten-point grading scheme is used where 90 to 100 = A, 80 to 89 = B, and so forth.The