. She was previously a member of the student support staff for the Virginia Tech Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity where she served as an instructor for the first-year professional development seminar and as co- ordinator for the summer bridge program. Her research interests include equity in engineering education, middle-years of engineering, and engineering student support.Mrs. Janice Leshay Hall, Florida International University Janice is a postdoctoral researcher at Virginia Tech. Her research centers on diversity equity and inclusion with a focus on broadening the participation of historically underrepresented groups in the engineering workforce. Specifically, she examines theArtre Reginald
addition, we had informal conversationsabout the work that was occurring and how the chapter is run. Extensive fieldnotes were taken torecord these experiences and interactions.ResultsImpacts on StudentsEWB membership typically begins in universities, and students are often drawn to the servicelearning opportunity through activity fairs, club showcases, or similar campus-wide,extra-curricular events. As an organization reliant on its volunteers, a major goal is to impactstudents in such ways that they continue on as either faculty or professional members. For reasonswe will explore elsewhere, cultivating and sustaining faculty and professional members isparticularly challenging, given the realities of tenure and promotion expectations in the
for manystudents. Especially as experiential learning becomes increasingly prevalent in curriculum designand further emphasized as an important educational tool, engineering technology is beginning togain traction as both a career path and a field of study, particularly among those seeking to spendless time in the classroom. For instance, in 2014, there were over 34,000 students who graduatedwith 2-year engineering technology degrees, versus 4,409 students who graduated with 2-yearengineering degrees, even though the number of graduates with 4-year engineering degreesremained substantially higher than those with 4-year engineering technology degrees [1].As this growth continues, it is increasingly evident that more research needs to be done
liberal arts subjects such subjects as calculus,physics, chemistry, and other general education requirements dominate the first year engineeringcurriculum, leaving students with very little exposure to engineering and a lack of opportunityfor seeing engineering as a dynamic field. In order to increase engineering exposure, to improveretention, and make a connection between the first year courses to engineering practice, wecreated an interactive project-based engineering design course, called Engineering Exploration,at Rutgers University – School of Engineering (RU-SOE) as a replacement to the traditionalfirst-year introductory course.9,10 The traditional course is an attendance based lecture typecourse that surveys the engineering majors. We
Paper ID #24863ADVANCE Women’s Leadership at The University of DelawareDr. Heather Doty, University of Delaware Heather Doty is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Delaware (UD). Dr. Doty teaches undergraduate courses in thermodynamics, statics, dynamics, and technical communication and conducts research on gender in the academic STEM workforce. She is co-PI on UD’s NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation grant, which aims to recruit, retain, and advance women STEM faculty at UD. Dr. Doty is faculty advisor to UD’s Women in Engineering Graduate Student Steering Committee.Dr. Shawna Vican
throughconversations with the department industrial advisory board, discussions with employers ofprogram graduates, and alumni. This anecdotal evidence was combined with general industrytrends well documented in the industry press and the personal experience of the faculty todetermine the needs of the curriculum. As all IT programs operate in slightly different areas ofthe overall field, the trends noted may or may not be applicable to other institutions andprograms.Incumbent CurriculumThe basic philosophy and structure of the program have remained consistent since its founding in1996. Consistent with a baccalaureate program, students take a general education sequence thatincludes liberal arts, written and oral communications, and math and science. Students
engagement and motivation, and self-regulation.Dr. Angela Minichiello, Utah State University Angela (Angie) Minichiello is a military veteran, licensed mechanical engineer, and associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. Her research examines issues of access, equity, and identity in the formation of engineers and a diverse, transdisciplinary 21st century engineering workforce. Angie received an NSF CAREER award in 2021 for her work with student veterans and service members in engineering.Dr. Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University Dr. Oenardi Lawanto is a professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University, USA. He received his B.S.E.E. from Iowa
the camp’s agendato give students the information directly so that they feel empowered to speak with their teachersand guidance counselors themselves about course choices. Each day, camp attendees learned a few engineering fundamentals through an engagingpresentation by the University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin) faculty and students, then sawthese concepts come to life through guided hands-on activities. In collaboration with the UTAustin Youth Engagement Center, we were able to increase the participation of students whoidentify with groups that have been historically excluded from engineering. Two camps were run(one in Houston and one in Austin) in collaboration with Project Explore in Houston independentschool district (ISD), and
Paper ID #18260Work in Progress: Do Students Really Understand Design Constraints? ABaseline StudyDr. J. Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University Dr. Hylton is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Ohio Northern University. He pre- viously completed his graduate studies in Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, where he con- ducted research in both the School of Mechanical Engineering and the School of Engineering Education. Prior to Purdue, he completed his undergraduate work at the University of Tulsa, also in Mechanical En- gineering. He currently teaches first-year engineering courses as well as
students attribute to it. A component of course quality is thedelivery or presentation of the course content. This study focused on developing strategies toimprove this aspect of course quality. Often in engineering, instructors focus more on what theybelieve is good for the students (and they are often correct), but do not adequately take intoaccount the students’ point of view on the instructional delivery methods and the entireeducational experience. This often results in gaps or mismatches between student expectationsand learning preferences, and faculty expectations and teaching preferences. Stedinger [1] illustrates how these gaps can be overcome if faculty members helpstudents to better articulate what is working and not working for
waswell aware of the need to develop a program around an engineering science and not around aspecific given technology.The exploratory committee felt that these opportunities available to a student graduating with aBS in robotics engineering needed to be in two areas. The first required area of opportunity forgraduating students must be with industry. Does industry see the need, and does it also value anddesire to hire students who possess such a bachelor degree? Lawrence Tech found that inconsulting with its industry advisory board members, and also with numerous representativesfrom industry who were not on the school’s industry advisory board that there was anoverwhelming interest in graduates with such a degree. These industry contacts were
graduates pursue professionallicensure, while NCEES data shows that percentages in the mid-teens are more common formechanical and electrical engineering graduates. Civil engineering programs have consistentlyhad a licensed practice focus, because that is where their graduates seek careers. Mechanical andelectrical engineering programs have generally moved much more toward an industry focus asthat is where the vast majority of their graduates seek careers. 2013-14 PE Exam Takers by Discipline 25,000 23,537 20,000 14,700 15,000 10,000 5,000 4,034
the curricula of mechanical engineering and related programs have an urgentneed to enhance students’ comprehension of ‘how things are made and work,’ e.g., theknowledge and skills needed to design and efficiently produce products via high-performancesystems.2A stated objective of the IMECE’s Advanced Manufacturing theme is to “increase cooperationacross multiple disciplines.” This paper attempts to foster such cooperation and illustrate the spanof topics related to manufacturing that would enhance mechanical engineering education asrelated to advanced manufacturing. Enhancing manufacturing content is doubly important as alarge percentage of graduates from mechanical engineering education programs enter careerswithin the manufacturing
, and (iii) creating many more stakeholders.4What are the standards skillsets that all graduates must know?In 2003, a group of industry engineers and educators formed Standards in Education Task Forcewithin IEEE to find the knowledge and skillset in standards that engineers and technologistsmust acquire before graduation. The process included faculty and student surveys to identify thecurrent state of standards education. The task force made the following recommendation:4 1. Engineering and technology graduates should receive a comprehensive introduction on standards. This includes information on how standards are developed, how they impact the development of product, process, or service and how they benefit a country’s economy
evidence collected, from student artifacts, writtenreflections, class observations, etc. (see Table 1) points to system maps as an effectiveintervention that lies at the intersection of design and social justice.From the faculty perspective one of the most valuable aspects of having student teams createsystem maps is the side conversations that occur. As mentioned previously, the course is taughtin a flipped classroom modality so students work on their system maps during class, enablingrich conversations between faculty members and the design teams. These conversations serve asopportunities to illustrate to students how their engineering work recreates existing social issues.For example, one team wanted to build a system to test water in
institutionalsupport provided to Black graduate students in STEM and the impact of those (or the lack of those)on the students.Each member of our research team was involved in data collection and/or data analysis activities.Along with the faculty leads, our team includes four doctoral researchers and one post-doctoralscholar. Among them are two Black women, one Latinx researcher, and two Women of Color.One of the graduate student researchers is studying counseling psychology, one getting theirdegree in linguistics, and the others are in engineering education. Within our team, one of ourgraduate researchers holds the same professional and racial identity as the co-constructors (i.e., aBlack doctoral student in a STEM program). All other members of our team
Education, member and chair of the International Education Committee, and elected member of Leadership Organizing Physics Education Research Council. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Factors Influencing the Choice of the Industrial Engineering Undergraduate ProgramAbstractChoosing a career is one of the most important decisions a person makes. The literature reportsvarious investigations of the factors comprising students' career decisions, including educationaland career aspirations, socioeconomic status, ability, parental encouragement, college attributes,and financial limitations. Some
STEM gateway course design strategies, which integrate the evidence-based pedagogies, the student engagement, interaction, collaboration, and assessment, arepresented. The findings of this study will inform instructors and administrators on how to designeffective and engaging online STEM courses at HBCUs. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Related WorkEvidence-Based PedagogiesTeaching is an art of encouraging students to become active learners and awakening theirenthusiasm to explore and absorb new knowledge and skills. On the other hand, learning is adynamic process in which both the teacher and students should actively participate, exchangeviews, and ask/answer questions in an engaging atmosphere [7
works that arereviewed and criticized in a public way among them, On the other hand, even thoughcivil engineering students are also evaluated individually, there is a slight group work insubjects that require laboratories, an activity that is reflected in the reduction of theaverage of individualism as opposed to architecture students.From the results of table 3, we obtain interesting data since the means between bothstudy groups are close to each other, thus there is no significant difference in terms ofindividualism and even though both careers are still on the higher side of the spectrum,there is a greater similarity. These results may be due to how these students had theireducation during the pandemic, being students who had most of their
, and helped critique pitches during pitchpractice. Each of the outside individuals who served as subject matter experts and/or mentorsdonated their time.The university staff consisted of a managing director, a student program director, a studentintern, an advisor, a media consultant, an assessment specialist, and a faculty mentor. Themanaging director is a staff member in engineering who co-runs the support facility that housesthe program. Her role is dedicated to Catalyze CU on a part-time basis. She works to provideconnection to the other entrepreneurial initiatives on campus, aligns university and communitypartners, sets the program direction, and runs administrative tasks through the university such aspayroll, providing the grant funding
named the Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor for Teaching Excellence in 2007, and was awarded the College Faculty Excellence Award in 2009. Furthermore, he is the recipient of the ASCE Committee on Student Services Certificate for Exemplary Services in 2000, has served as the Faculty Advisor of Syracuse University’s Chapter of ASCE for more than a decade, and was named recipient of the ASCE Faculty Advisor Reward Program from 2001 to 2003. Lui has been a long-time member of the American Society of Civil Engi- neers (ASCE), and has served on a number of ASCE publications, technical, and educational committees. He was the Associate Editor (from 1994 to 1997) and later the Book Editor (from 1997 to 2000) for
, and levels of teaching. Nowadays, electrical engineering (EE) classesare part of the core curriculum of several other majors such as: mechanical engineering,mechanical engineering technology, computer network and system administration,surveying engineering, among others. Modern technologies are interdisciplinary andoften require knowledge of several engineering fields. Students graduating from thesemajors must have at least a basic understanding of electrical engineering principles, sincethey will be working with electronic systems and devices in their careers. The studentscan be motivated by seeing how the EE principles apply to specific and relevant problemsin their own field.Most of us face the challenge of teaching both non-majors and
deliverables.End of • Design Memo Meeting (DMM) Student teams meet with the expert to discuss design strategy.Week 1 o Initial run parameters Upon approval of strategy and parameters, students are given a o Experimental strategy username and password to access the Virtual Laboratory Project.End of • Update Memo Meeting Student teams meet with expert to discuss progress, issues, andWeek 2 o Progress to date receive feedback.End of • Final Recipe Teams deliver a 10-15 minute oral presentation to the expert, 2Week 3 • Final Report other faculty members, and the other students in the laboratory
chemical engineering graduate student interested inunderstanding how students learn chemical engineering concepts and developing tools to supportstudents’ understanding of these concepts. Her perspective on how students navigate theintroductory chemical engineering MEB course is informed by evidence from literature and herpersonal experience as an undergraduate student (in the same chemical engineering program).Godwin is an associate professor in engineering education and chemical engineering. Her workfocuses on how diverse students develop identities as engineers and how they experience theengineering education ecosystem from high school, through college, to their early careers. Herwork focuses on multiple identities of becoming an engineer and
course, organizing the chosen contents of the course, and planning the course schedule. Atthe improvement stage, the proposed course is improved, reviewed and evaluated by expertsfrom both the construction industry and academia through an in-depth feedback process. Fromthis systematically developed sustainable construction course, students in construction programscan learn basic knowledge of sustainability and the importance of sustainable design andconstruction. They will be exposed to different sustainable building rating systems such asLeadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), collaborative skills amongconstruction participants and the advantages and pitfalls of sustainable construction. In addition,these sustainable construction
) and treating, building, and designing for them accordingly23.The empathy characteristic is critical when it comes to team function and interactions betweenteam members; each teammate must be aware of the inputs and contributions of each person andensure that people are felt valued and appreciated to improve team dynamics. All four concepts: self-motivated, ambiguity readiness, passionate social connection, andempathy are related to the consideration of vulnerability as a cue to be studied to understand thepower of first storytelling moments.METHODSParticipants: The participants in the study consisted of 16 male and female graduate students rangingin age from 20-31, from a West Coast university, enrolled in one elective, graduate
andelectromagnetics, and at least one engineering chemistry course. Finally, all freshman take threetwo-hour engineering courses that are designed to prepare students with a diverse set of skills aswell as to ensure that they can make the best possible decision when choosing engineeringmajors. From an extra-curricular standpoint, the students are given multiple opportunities to learnabout the different engineering disciplines and how they relate to different industry sectors. Infact, many students fall into the trap of directly relating their desire for a specific engineeringmajor to the industry sector that is really driving their interest. For example, a student may havean interest in a career with NASA so they immediately gravitate to aerospace
Paper ID #29305Implementation of a Civil Engineering High-Impact Learning Practice(HILP) Requirement in Support of ASCE Body of Knowledge (BOK) Out-comesDr. Kelly Brumbelow, Texas A&M University Dr. Kelly Brumbelow is an Associate Professor in the Zachry Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering and the Director of Interdisciplinary Engineering Program Development at Texas A&M Uni- versity. He has been a faculty member at Texas A&M since 2002, where his technical specialty is water resources engineering, planning, and management. Prior to this position, he completed his undergraduate and graduate
direct the questioning. In addition, and referring to Lincoln andGuba14, persistent observation adds salience to a study; it helps the researcher to identifyrelevancies and atypical cases. Students were observed in their institutional settings and in twoengineering classes. Lastly, documents were reviewed at each institution that helped theresearchers understand the experiences of the female students.In addition, peer debriefing was used to provide an external check of the inquiry process, todiscover our own biases, clarify interpretations, and discuss possible future directions. Finally,the respondents had the opportunity to review their transcripts and provide or refine theinformation. This member checking technique is described by Lincoln and
Engineering and other faculty/ Engineer administrators interns Current Employers engineering Accreditation students leadersFigure 2. Members of and stakeholders in the engineering community can draw onand benefit from the EBOK.With an eye to the future, the Engineering BOK:1. Offers prospective engineering students, their parents, their teachers/ advisors, andthe general public, a glimpse of the importance of engineering (e.g., guiding principlesin Appendix B); indicates the breadth of knowledge and skills