77 college students chose to continue to the next more demanding firstcourse intended for CS majors, CS61A.Research MethodsFormative, mixed-method research was conducted to test out the effectiveness of Beauty and Joyof Computing (BJC) curriculum as implemented in UC Berkeley’s CS10, in attracting historicallyunderrepresented students. To gain a comprehensive analysis into the socio-curriculareffectiveness of the BJC curriculum as the first class in a student’s CS trajectory, it wasbenchmarked against CS61A—the first class for majors, and increasingly, for non-majors aswell.Survey instruments were developed to measure participants’ self-reported efficacy along severaldimensions. To determine the role of identity and self efficacy; as well as
of leadership identity, and, second, theywould be more likely to view themselves as a leader (Komives et al., 2005). The assumption thenis that the recognition required to view oneself as exercising leadership, regardless of position,requires both self-efficacy and sense of confidence built from developing competence inengineering knowledge and skills, as well as a strong sense of belonging in the community ofpractice. This sense of self-efficacy around engineering leadership then propels students into thefinal two stages of leadership identity development—generativity and synthesis—where theyhave assumed leadership roles and are now concerned with mentoring and preparing newstudents for entry into the engineering community of practice. At
the building of confidence in conducting research 65. These instruments have been developed by an external evaluator and will be collected by PI.• Course evaluations: The standard questionnaire administered by Rowan will be collected by the course instructor and will serve to provide student feedback on the experiments. Data will be collected by PI.• Surveys of K-12 educators and other partners: Reflective journals and surveys that measure teachers’ self-efficacy, concerns on adoption of the modules, and their students’ career aspirations towards engineering and perceived impact on students’ knowledge and attitudes will be administered. These instruments have been tested and validated by INSPIRE (external evaluator) and
comprised of over 92,000 residents with aschool-age population of 18,000 students, in building STEM capacity through transformativechange. As a community engagement, empowerment, and self-efficacy strategy, STEM-UpTMintends to indirectly impact a long-term return on investment on traditional academicperformance measures. Such a large-scale undertaking is a unique approach to STEM educationawareness. To accomplish this undertaking, STEM-UpTM seeks to drives transformative changeby leveraging the existing cultural richness of the community toward STEM.In its design, STEM-UpTM relies on the parents and teachers as STEM Ambassadors, who areinformed with the tools and resources to change the apprehensions and negativities associatedwith math and science
andprepare them for advanced careers in science or engineering fields. Furthermore, this journalisticapproach aims to transform STEM learning by tying together all aspects of the recognizedaptitude achievement tests, including reading, English composition, science, and mathematics,along with promoting the understanding of technology and engineering practices. Page 25.1059.3 Techniques for capturing the effectiveness in building technological self-efficacy andinspiring the future generation of scientists and engineers are proposed for future evaluationthrough the inclusion of online surveys and interactive features for students to post
was previously with the University of Kentucky, Lexington, in a similar position from 1996 to 1999. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of belonging, self-efficacy, and other non-cognitive factors on success and persistence. She is also managing director of Coming Alongside, a non-profit environmental health services organization.Prof. Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, MankatoDr. Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of WashingtonProf. Diane Carlson Jones Ph.D, University of WashingtonDr. Tamara Floyd-Smith, Tuskegee University Tamara Floyd-Smith is a Professor of Chemical Engineering, 3M Scholar and Adjunct Professor of Ma- terials Science and Engineering at Tuskegee University.Dr
students' knowledge of abstractphysics concepts. A quasi-experimental study also found that the integration of AR movies intoonline teaching activities for physics enhanced students' comprehension of fundamentalprinciples [14]. Similarly, an intervention by Cai et al. [15] showed that AR in physicsclassrooms can increase students' self-efficacy by improving their understanding, higher-levelcognitive skills, knowledge application, and communication.Several AR applications have focused on learning vectors in the context of 3D geometry [16],electric forces [4], gravitational forces [1], as well as other physical forces and their Cartesiancomponents [17]. The study discussed herein details an AR app known as Vectors in Space [18]that was developed by
, and self-efficacy with conducting research and working on a research team and in a lab. • Skills: writing scientific papers, making oral presentations, and conducting observations in the lab or field. • Attitudes and Behaviors: working in a scientific community and feelings of creativity, independence, and responsibility around working on scientific projects.This survey instrument is shown in the literature to accurately validate a research experienceprogram for undergraduates in STEM [20]. A copy of the survey questions is provided in theAppendix section and listed as instrument A4. The survey was administered only once after theresearch experience. Despite pairing 8 students with mentors for the research
courses, students were incentivized witha nominal amount of extra credit for the course in which they were recruited. All studentscompleted an electronic survey online and outside of class. Surveys were collected withidentifying information so that duplicates could be removed before aggregating data for analysis.All results were cross-sectional. In the survey, students reported their perceptions of variousitems related to engagement, belonging, effort, peer harassment, task value, self-efficacy, TA andfaculty interactions, and other measures of course achievement as well as multiple demographicitems.InstrumentsThe part of the study reported in this paper focuses on a five primary engagement variables andfour demographic measures (gender, race
. Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences have shown to improve STEMretention and science identity [7], [8], [9]. Rather than identifying a small selective number ofstudents to work in a laboratory doing undergraduate research, the CURE model exposes anentire lecture or lecture plus lab course to research providing research experiences to all students.EM has shown to enhance student learning through supporting individual agency and self-efficacy leading to retention and persistence in STEM fields [10]. The Network for TeachingEntrepreneurship (NFTE) defines EM as: Entrepreneurial mindset is simply the way an entrepreneur thinks and acts. It’s a set of characteristics, behaviors and skills that drive action. A person with an
Publications where the primary focus of Publications where the primary focus of the the research was K-12 students, faculty, research was undergraduate or graduate students practicing clinicians or non-college or university students Research was conducted in the United States or Research specific to a university outside of the in Canada United States or Canada Focus of publication is empathy, component of Focus of publication is not empathy, and if it empathy described by the framework, or which includes empathy is more about measuring mention how to develop/foster/imbue empathy empathy than its development or learning Include
Could Leave As Many As 2.1 Million Jobs Unfilled By 2030, Deloitte and The Manufacturing Institute Study Finds, https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/about-deloitte/articles/press-releases/deloitte- manufacturing-skills-gap.html, accessed on February 5, 2022.[3] Weaver, A., & Osterman, P. 2017. Skill demands and mismatch in US manufacturing. ILR Review, 70(2), 275-307.[4] Blotnicky, K., Franz-Odendaal, T., French, F., & Joy, P. (2018). A study of the correlation between STEM career knowledge, mathematics self-efficacy, career interests, and career activities on the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career among middle school students. International journal of STEM education, 5(1), 1–15.[5] Ramezany, Ali. 2017. Critical
. Reid, K. J., and Cooney, E. M., “Implementing rubrics as part of an assessment plan”. TheInternational Journal of Engineering Education, 24(5), 893-900, 2008.4. Schaffer, S. P., Chen, X., Zhu, X., and Oakes, W. C., “Self‐efficacy for cross‐disciplinarylearning in project‐based teams”. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 82-94, 2012.5. Ulrich, V., “Rating Capstone Design Students on an Industrial Scale”. In 2008 ASEE AnnualConference, Pittsburg, PA, June 22-25, 2008. (pp. 13-1018).6. Felder, R. M., and Brent, R., “Designing and teaching courses to satisfy the ABETengineering criteria”. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 7-25, 2003.7. Osman, A., Yahya, A. A., and Kamal, M. B., “A benchmark collection for mapping programeducational
earlier study showed a strong positivecorrelation between instructor review and peer review in a biomedical engineering laboratory,suggesting peer review could be an effective form of feedback [1]. Peer review also resulted in theperceived improvement of students’ ability to critique. Additionally, the use of co-created rubricsis an inclusive teaching practice that can improve confidence and self-efficacy. It speeds up futuredetailed feedback, as the students and instructors have a similar understanding about the elementsof the rubric and may enhance self-regulated learning [2]. Finally, standards-based grading shiftsthe primary objective to individual learning and achievement, removes distraction from low-importance errors and reduces the
. Freire studied theconcept of empowerment in school environments and educational settings 50 years ago[19]. Hefound that an educational system can either liberate marginalized students or maintain systems ofoppression that fail to give students a voice and opportunity to control their educational destiny.Intrapersonal student empowerment is predicted by equitable power use, positive teacher-studentrelationships, and a sense of community in the classroom[20]. Empowering students entailsbuilding their self-efficacy, agency in their learning, and resilience in schools[21].Inclusive refers to classrooms or school settings where educators are aware of and responsive tothe ways that students are marginalized by our current education system and
education and Work, 23(5):439–449, 2010. [5] Andreas Hirschi. Callings and work engagement: moderated mediation model of work meaningfulness, occupational identity, and occupational self-efficacy. Journal of counseling psychology, 59(3):479, 2012. [6] Elisabeth Hovdhaugen. Working while studying: The impact of term-time employment on dropout rates. Journal of Education and Work, 28(6):631–651, 2015. [7] Ligui Lin, Xuejing Cai, and Jun Yin. Effects of mentoring on work engagement: Work meaningfulness as a mediator. International Journal of Training and Development, 25(2):183–199, 2021. [8] Michael F Steger, Bryan J Dik, and Ryan D Duffy. Measuring meaningful work: The work and meaning inventory (WAMI). Journal of career Assessment
-college STEM students.OverviewUnderrepresented groups in STEM gives a benefit to pre-college STEM education initiativesusing PBL as a tool for at learning and scientific innovation. Mentorship provides opportunityfor accessibility, increase self-efficacy and STEM degree completion of learners. In STEMprofessions, the mentorship practices allow for a transformative STEM interdisciplinary mindsetfor industry careers. For students in the STEM fields, mentoring is essential for matriculation,retention, and graduation. Mentoring in STEM promotes the formation of a STEM identity andoffers knowledge of industry trends, technical expertise, and professional networking. Mentoringprovides STEM students with setting goals and expectations, building
% drop in the mean scorefrom 2019 to 2020 (t-test, 𝑝 ≪ 0. 001). Figure 5: the distribution of scores in the multiple choice concept inventory tests 2 2 (𝑛19 = 131 , 𝑛20 = 99 , 𝑓 = (1\σ 2π) 𝑒𝑥𝑝(− (𝑥 − µ) \2σ ). Furthermore we measure students’ motivation and attitudes towards learning by adoptingportions of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) that was administeredtowards the end of each semester [10]. The survey included multiple items related to intrinsicand extrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, task value, and peer learning. Please see the appendix fora list of items in our survey. Figure 6
one’sattitude/motivation, self-efficacy, and experience with technology. How a student views andvalues their education will influence how seriously they interact with an online course [3]. For anonline class, it is up to the student to participate in class and interact with the course.Student engagement can be enhanced by improved instructional techniques. Methods ofteaching can be broken down into four categories; instructor centered, interactive,individualized, and experiential [4]. Instructor centered learning primarily involves one-waycommunication from the instructor to the students. Questions from instructor to the whole classis also a form of an instructor centered strategy; this method primarily facilitates passive learningfor the student which
integration provided students with laboratory experiences in a purelytheoretical course, allowing them to gain the comprehensive hands-on skills required ofengineers.It is believed that active lab experiences such as these would increase student self-efficacy andstudent engagement and confidence. This would also enhance the feeling that students belong inthe EE discipline and increase student retention. The results also show that the integration of HiHlaboratory experiences contributes to the improvement of multiple ABET student learningoutcomes. The method used to expand the laboratory experience should be applicable to otherdisciplines as well. References:[1] H. R. Myler, “Early Electrical
, “Embracing Ambiguity: A Framework for Promoting IterativeDesign Thinking Approaches in Engineering and Design Curricula,” ASEE 124th AnnualConference & Exposition, Jun 25-28, 2017, Columbus, OH[13] J. Hertz, “Confidently Uncomfortable: First-year Student Ambiguity Tolerance and Self-efficacy on Open-ended Design Problems,” ASEE 125th Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun24-27, 2018, Salt Lake City, UT[14] E. Dringenberg and R. E. H. Wertz, “How do first-year engineering students experienceambiguity in engineering design problems: The development of a self-report instrument,” 2016ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana,https://doi.org/10.18260/p.25474[15] R.L. Tauritz, “How to handle knowledge uncertainty: learning and
expectations in U.S. undergraduate civil engineering programs,” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 79–89, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1080/22054952.2020.1720434.[26] R. A. Revelo Alonso, “Engineering familia: The role of a professional organization in the development of engineering identities of Latina/o undergraduates,” Ph.D., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States -- Illinois, 2015. Accessed: Mar. 07, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://search.proquest.com/docview/1748662367/abstract/67E260FA87274C15PQ/1[27] D. Verdin and A. Godwin, “EXPLORING LATINA FIRST-GENERATION COLLEGE STUDENTS’ MULTIPLE IDENTITIES, SELF-EFFICACY, AND INSTITUTIONAL INTEGRATION TO INFORM
institution’s recruitment, retention, and graduation rates such asEPICS (Engineering Projects in Community Service, started at Purdue University and now anational program), SLICE (Service-Learning Integrated throughout a College of Engineering) atUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell, and the Global Perspective Program at WorcesterPolytechnic Institute [3]. Researchers from four different institutions—Michigan TechnologicalUniversity, Tufts University, University of Colorado Boulder, and James Madison Universityconducted a longitudinal study to measure the impacts of service learning on engineeringstudents’ learning using five indicators, i.e. self-efficacy, motivation and retention, engineeridentity, attitudes on learning, cultural competency and mental
experiences to assist students with choosing an intended major [1]. The commonfirst-year experience provides students with a place to explore and address their misconceptionsabout the engineering profession and its disciplines, a setting which student motivations becometangled with those of the department and faculty.MUSIC model of academic motivationMotivation theories attempt to explain the relationships between beliefs, values, and goals withrespect to action. A number of motivational theories are related to the student themselves such asSelf-Determination Theory [5], Expectancy-Value Theory [12, 13] or Self-Efficacy [14]. In thisstudy, the MUSIC model of academic motivation [4] was used to measure student motivation inthe FYE courses. The MUSIC
toperform online collaborative learning, in which students were engaged in deep discussion withtheir peers and each student was provided with a specific task through e-mail with expectationfor improving their students’ technical and conceptual knowledge [7]. Bohorquez and Toft-Nielsen designed a problem-oriented medical electronics laboratory, where collaborativelearning was adopted with the intentions of improving the expertise, self-efficacy andcraftsmanship skills of biomedical engineering students. Their implementation yieldedsatisfactory results and demonstrated the effectiveness of their collaborative learning strategies[8]. Dong and Guo incorporated Collaborative Project-Based Learning (CPBL) into theirComputer Networking course for
courses: Effects on self- regulatory self-efficacy, mood, stress, and sleep quality,” J. Am. Coll. Heal., vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 433–442, 2010.[26] M. Scheidt et al., “Validity evidence for the SUCCESS survey: Measuring non-cognitive and affective traits of engineering and computing students,” 2018, p. 28.[27] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006.[28] A. Chiesa, “The difficulty of defining mindfulness: Current thought and critical issues,” Mindfulness (N. Y)., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 255–268, 2013.[29] S. Sauer et al., “Assessment of mindfulness: Review on state of the art,” Mindfulness (N. Y)., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 3–17, 2013.[30
of measuring impacts of theiruniversity Makerspace "through engineering design self-efficacy, retention in the engineeringmajor; and idea generation ability."Halverson and Sheridan31 in their comparative case study on different Makerspace invokedwork by Papert and Dewey as the theoretical underpinning of the Maker movement and itsrelation with education.Figure 4. Educational and developmental theoryEducational and developmental theoryThe allusion to the theories of thinking and development in the academic research literatureencourages our inquiry into these theories and how they are and can potentially be related tothe educational aspects of Makerspaces. Figure 4 shows these connections in the form of aconcept map.Papert’s32 theories on
serve community interests and to developcareer awareness. Lima1 describes key components of service-learning as: service for thecommon good, academic content, reciprocity, mutual learning, and reflection. Thus, effectivelearning can be accomplished through action, interaction, and reflection.Research has shown that well-designed service-learning experiences have a positive impact onlearning and developmental outcomes for students2,3,4. Astin et al (2000) provides acomprehensive study that shows participation in service positively impacts student academicperformance, self-efficacy, leadership, choice of career, and service participation aftergraduation3. Their report indicates that the positive effects of service-learning are strongly
anycorrelations between student learning styles, self-efficacy, attitudes/perceptions, andperformance in an undergraduate material balances course, in an effort to better understand ourstudent population and provide a basis for curricular development. We categorized the learningstyles engaged by exam problems of five instructors in their presentation and solution. While wediscovered several instances where students of one learning style preference either outperformedor underperformed relative to others, we made an even more interesting observation whilecategorizing the learning styles exploited by exam problems of different instructors. In mostcases, there was little variation between the learning styles exploited by individual instructorsover the course
betweendisciplines can open up new pathways to creative solutions to emerging problems. Moreover,being a critical part of a larger project promotes interdependence among the players onmultidisciplinary teams, which tends to develop the self efficacy of the individual in terms oftheir own ability to contribute, recognizing the contribution of others, and the ability to “speakthe language” of the other members and even make contributions in their domain.1The emphasis of the project was on the engineering design process within a multidisciplinaryteam, while the technical scope was designed to be a vehicle for this process while introducingtechnical concepts that the students would study in depth later in their programs. The technicalscope was therefore