challenge junior students to learn CT as a newset of concepts , and help senior students to revisit the CT-related concepts they have alreadylearned.The limitation of this project is that this project only used students’ time-on-task informationfrom different courses. In the future, the authors plan to get students’ feedback toward theirexperience and the perceived usefulness of CT concepts from student survey(s).To download the CT course module we have designed, please visit:https://bit.ly/3bfxohR.6 AcknowledgementWe would like to thank all the students and teachers who participated in this project. Thismaterial is based upon work supported by the Center of Teaching Excellence Summer PedagogyDevelopment Award of University of North Carolina
distributions for work station assembly times and time to failure Deterministic and stochastic modeling, and system simulation, e.g., queueing theory Figure 1. A virtual system built in SimioWe have developed a drill manufacturing system in Unity. The virtual system was used in thestatics and probability courses and the plan was to
Technology Management from Indiana State University with a specialization in Construction Management. He joined academia in 2014. His research focus is on contract administration on heavy civil projects, as well as on construction education. His teaching areas include 1. introduction to the built environment and construction management, 2. construction materials and methods, 3. construction equipment, 4. building construction cost estimating, 5. heavy civil construc- tion cost estimating, 6. project planning, scheduling, and control, 7. temporary structures, and 8. contract changes and claims. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 COVID-19 and
– Student outcome 3 – an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences ABET Criteria 3 – Student outcome 5 – an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectivesWhat are Professional Communication Skills?In this paper, we define professional communication skills as distinct from the writing of labreports and technical documents. Professional communication skills include the proper use ofemail, written and spoken communication in between team members working on a project,creating and curating a professional presence online (like Linked-In), teamwork, consensusbuilding, and
, and avoiding situational analysis are also very important for theoverall argument.In the example presented in this paper, the students are challenged to handle a business conflictthat requires them to report to their managers with an action plan. The decision-making modelfollows a modified version of the structure proposed by Hatipkarasulu and Gunhan for a job offerscenario [17]. The decision-making process has three major stages: the event (noted as "theoffer/challenge" by Hatipkarasulu and Gunhan [17]), the dilemma, and the decision. Thismodified model can be adapted for different scenarios and can be extended for furtherdiscussions.THE SCENARIO AND FRAMEWORKUsing the modified model, the example in this paper is built on a straightforward
curriculum. This information will allow for evaluation and planning of curricularchanges to improve the design instruction across the curriculum. A future study will report onthe specific curricular changes made as a result of these efforts.References[1] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020 | ABET.”https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/ (accessed Jan. 27, 2021).[2] R. Graham, “Global state of the art in engineering education - March 2018,” p. 170.[3] S. May, “Engineering Design Process,” NASA, Jul. 17, 2017.http://www.nasa.gov/audience/foreducators/best/edp.html (accessed Mar. 05, 2021).[4] “MITESD_051JF12_Lec02.pdf.” Accessed: Mar. 05
planning activities that give students the opportunity to design fordiverse users to introducing students to methods and materials from other disciplines. Toimprove the DEI knowledge of educators, participants shared learning experiences includinginformal training events and reading groups and provided materials and time to colleagues toensure representation in course readings and presentations.Even though there have been efforts to improve DEI in engineering education [9], [14], theseefforts have mainly focused on student representation and retention. By also developingapproaches to educating students about the impacts of DEI on the engineering design process,students would become more aware of the potential impacts, whether positive or negative
5Evaluating multiple MSOL Proposing and evaluating multiple solutionssolutions against each otherConsidering materials and MTRL Testing, exploring properties of materials,their properties and connecting these to design problemSystems Thinking SYST Considering how component parts of a system work together and over timeDeveloping models and MODL Developing a plan before building or testingprototypes a prototype before scaling up; includes
; Considerations The E-CADEMY program, has shown promise in exposing diverse middle and highschool students to engineering careers and practices while increasing their interest andconfidence in pursuing engineering as a future profession. Given the age of the program, there isno data on success rate of students matriculating through higher education, although over half ofthe graduating seniors to date have chosen an engineering career path by applying to anengineering program at a post-secondary institution. Post-secondary data collection is a part offuture study plans. Key considerations from the first four years of this program include ensuring keypartnerships are established with organizations like the National Society of Black Engineering
Learning Method,” Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 30(3), 2017, pp. 192- 199. 7. J. Eccles and A. Wigfield, “Motivational beliefs, values, and goals,” Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 2002, pp. 109-132.Appendix - Mini-Project Economic Analysis GuidanceInclude a table along the lines of the following that shows how the cost per part changesdepending on the production quantity. I have made up numbers for the costs below; includemore cost items and the best cost estimates you can find. State your planned quantity, theproduction cost/part, and the price/part that you would charge the university recruiting office. Quantity 1 10 100 1000 10,000 100,000
component within the UAV simulator, whose main function is to prepare the plans andpath for UAVs, send control signals to UAVs, and communicate with UAVs for data exchange.There are several GCS software such as QGroundControl, UGCS, and MAVProxy, which havedifferent capabilities of communication protocol support and autopilot support. Besides, some ofthem have been used to implement attacks and exploit vulnerabilities of UAV communicationprotocol [19], which would be useful for the development of our laboratory exercise.To be more specific, the UAV simulator that we propose to develop mainly consists of two modesof simulation discussed above, SITL and HITL. Figure 1 illustrates how modules integrate andcommunicate to enable simulation in both cases
linkages inorder to firmly establish appropriate factors of safety for all mechanical elements. Thedevelopment of a more realistic control yoke to receive pilot inputs is also being researched andconsidered. In addition, the computer interfaces for proper signal communications requiresadditional work. The primary focus of this final phase is the development and execution of a testand validation plan to ensure that the system is providing a reasonably accurate simulation of theactual flight experience. This will require subsystem testing as well as integrated systems testingto faithfully reproduce vehicular dynamics for a variety of aircraft types.INTRODUCTIONA decade ago, virtual reality was a relatively unexplored technology that was expensive
withstudents about one’s own struggles to forge a stronger connection [13]. Our teaching tips haveoperated as discussion points for the BME department’s action plans to promote more inclusiveteaching and culture.Impact on RQ2. How might we better prepare engineering graduates for practice?The pandemic and attention to racial disparities have illuminated the relationship betweendiversity and inclusion efforts and the broader goals of better preparing students for practice. Forexample, the online/virtual aspect of the pandemic has highlighted the importance of peer socialnetworks to support learning and motivation. It has been a challenge to establish these networksin the online/virtual environment, which has prompted departments to create study
predictive effect on team assignmentperformance. Finally, the transition to remote learning (in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic)had a negative effect on student performance, and this negative consequence disproportionatelyaffected students who were already poor performers.IntroductionThe ability to work in teams has long been recognized as a critical skill for all engineeringgraduates as reflected in accreditation criteria specified by ABET [1]. Criterion 3, studentoutcome number 5 states that students must have: “An ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives.”As a result, there have been
. 9Individual value propositions are blended into team value propositions, and teams present oncustomer discovery (primary and secondary research), financials, a technology roadmap, aventure plan, and final presentation comprising all their previous work. This approachunderscores the process approach as students build the final presentation throughout thesemester. Using a process approach allows them to refine their final presentation and helps thembuild confidence in their presentation skills.All presentations are evaluated via the Google Survey tool, which offers immediate feedback(see Figure 7). Students receive numerical feedback as well as comments from classmates andinstructors. Students also upload their files so the writing instructor can coach
of the model offered opportunities to explicitly definestakeholders as well as to illuminate and discuss both the recourses provided and the valuegained by each of the various stakeholders through the engagement project deliverables andprocess.IntroductionCommunity-engaged learning or service-learning is the integration of academic learning withwork that supports the greater good within local or global communities in order to enhance theacademic learning, address needs within the community, and to give students broader learningopportunities about themselves and society at large. Within engineering, the pedagogy is oftenused in design or project-based experiences where a physical deliverable, software program,design, or plan is produced as a
program accomplished its goal: (1) The post-program survey indicates thatthe participants were very happy about the summer program and believed that it would help themin their future study at MTSU and (2) The retention rate of the participants was 100% in Fall2020, clearly showing the benefit of the summer program. The grant we got for the summerproject was for one year only, but we plan to seek additional funding from the TBR and othersources to continue the summer program in the coming years. This is to increase the sample sizeand better verify the true benefits of our program, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic.All participants of the summer program participated in the research activities remotely over theInternet. Although remote delivery
in engineering literature is self-plagiarism. These results 10suggest that engineering students may need more explicit and robust instruction inpublishing ethics and scientific integrity. Equipped with this knowledge, engineeringlibrarians can plan for focused scholarly communication training, alone or incollaboration with other library departments. Due to their expert knowledge ofengineering sources and literature, engineering librarians are well positioned tocontribute to the scholarly communication system practice by the engineering scientistsand graduate students. While undergraduate students do not conduct and publishresearch as often as graduate
need to be inserted after printingOne student chose a headphone mount for his project. He wanted to design a headphone mountthat can be magnetically mounted to a computer case. He had been planning on buying one butwas dissatisfied by their formfactor and overcomplication. The ones that he was looking at weretypically bulky and couldn’t be easily mounted to a case. As such he wanted to design somethingthat was relatively small, could easily hold the weight of headphones, and would magneticallymount to the front of his computer case.In the next task, students were asked to draw your 3D part in CAD program. The rough draft isshown in Figure 2 drawn by Autodesk Inventor. Figure 2. Original
to collaborate toaccomplish the research goals by analyzing research and identifying significant results to guideyear 4’s activities.DisseminationIn line with our original dissemination plan, the research team has made presentations to severalcommunities of interest, including researchers interested more broadly in engineering education(presenting our Year 2 grantees’ poster at the ASEE conference) and engineering education in aninternational context (at the Frontiers In Education conference), as well as more specificallythose researchers interested in diversity in engineering education (presented at the CoNECDconference). In Summer 2020, one of our undergraduate researchers disseminated researchfindings by presenting a poster to a group of
lot of planning, resources and time allocation.Implications for PracticeResults from this study clearly indicated that faculty members who integrate active learning into theirteaching believed that active learning improved students and increased student engagement andmotivation. As pedagogical beliefs have been proven to be significantly impacting teaching behavior [15],faculty professional developments could focus on changing instructor beliefs about active learning. Onceconvinced about the effectiveness of alternative approaches to traditional teaching, faculty memberswould be more open to trying various active learning strategies.The fact that collaborative learning and problem-based learning were the most commonly usedapproaches and the
to the Dean for Strategic Plan Implementation at Virginia Tech. He is also Director of Research of the Academy for Global Engineering at Virginia Tech and is affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering education can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive, tends to leverage large-scale institutional, state, or national data sets, and considers the intersection between policy and organizational contexts. He has B.S., M.S., and M.U.E.P. degrees from the University of Virginia and a Ph.D. in Higher Education from Pennsylvania State University.Mr. Kazuki Hori, Virginia Tech Kazuki Hori is a doctoral
-analysis software packages.These systems are part of a network being developed to meetour needs that require capabilities beyond those of the microbased systems. The student use of these systems and softwarewill be limited mostly to upper division classes. They do,however, provide excellent teaching tools for use at alllevels of instruction. Current examples are our IBM 4341 DEC11/34 and Data·General Nova systems. 3) Experimental/research systems dedicated to expanding the current technology base while providing the capabilities for new applications development. In defining our needs in this manner and as a result ofcareful planning, the requisite areas of overlap b~tweenlevels and their
presented, were invited to answerquestions. For class periods when neither tapes nor lectures were presented, avariety of activities were planned. These included small group dis-cussion, demonstrations, lab experiments, a panel discussion and exams.In addition, students were required to work in small groups on projectsrelated to novel and innovative uses of wood as an engineering material.Students were occasionally given short periods of time to work on pro-jects during class time, but were expected to do the major portion oftheir projects as homework. The last two class periods were set asidefor project reports. Students were required to submit a written projectreport at the end of the semester. Those students not enrolled forcredit were
into multiple classrooms and multiple schools in the district. This would havethe added benefit of providing an opportunity for these college students to volunteer and servethe community using their chosen major. It would give them the opportunity to share theirpassion for engineering and instill those concepts into future engineers.5. Benefits for Kindergarten Teacher and Engineering ProfessorBenefits for the engineering professor included both professional development and involvementin community service. The professional development plan for tenure and promotion atMinnesota State University, Mankato outlines five key areas in which faculty members areexpected to grow and contribute. Community service falls within one of these areas and
programs seeking to fulfill ABET criteria.5. Future EnhancementsThrough collaboration with the Iron Range Engineering (IRE) program and pending continuationof funding from the National Science Foundation, we plan to award approximately fourscholarships per year to IRE students. Although granting MSU engineering degrees, the IREprogram and its students are physically located in northern Minnesota at Mesabi Range College.These four scholarship recipients will be fully integrated into our MAX Scholars cohort. Theywill attend weekly seminars via interactive video feed and will participate in interdisciplinaryteams. For example, a team working on a project and presentation would consist of 3 students inMankato and 1 student in IRE. The team members
such as grade inflation, excesstime planning and grading for the instructor, perceived fairness in when or to whom it is offered,lowering of academic standards, and a belief that during a semester a student has ampleopportunity to achieve the grade they truly deserve. A further contention is that extra creditassignments can induce a moral hazard (Wilson, 2002). In this situation the fear is that byoffering students extra credit they perceive less risk in performing poorly and will not study asthoroughly, as they will have the option to make points up in the future. The proponents of extracredit tout its ability to give students a second chance, rectify an exam which may have been toodifficult, or explore topics in further detail than scheduled
ConferenceRepresentative Sample KTSII Test Results for Senior Design Project StudentsResults from KTSII test for one particular semester for a particular course section of students inthe Senior Design project class are discussed next. It should be pointed out that the results arerepresentative of results from past tests but several more tests in future semesters are planned toincrease the rigor of the results and inferences from those results.The results in Figure 3 below are for a group of 30 students in a particular semester section of theSenior Design Project course who took the KTSII test. The results are shown by a team-wisebreakdown for team dynamics purposes besides composite results for the whole class. TEAM A TEAM B TEAM C TEAM D
the effort to recognize the challengesengineering programs face and plan to make those changes to achieve excellence. ABET4are in charge of accrediting Universities against a list of criteria and they have raised thestandards. A program developed in 2002 created the Center for the Advancement ofScholarship on Engineering Education (CASEE5) which is also an important group indictating excellence in engineering education. They define what should be taught inengineering and define excellence in education in terms of its effectiveness, engagementand efficiency. The Millennium Project6 at the University of Michigan studies the futureof American Universities providing a joined effort with creative students, faculty andbeyond campus to develop new
has been 4.6, and two journal and four conference papers have been published as adirect result of these courses. Furthermore, several of the most talented students continued theirstay at NDSU and enrolled in the graduate program. A future aspect of this integrated researchand coursework plan is to extend this concept to include other courses outside of the area ofelectromagnetics and work with other faculty within and outside of the ECE Department.Results from this broader research integration will be presented in a future paper.What Goals Should Our Course Have?Some outcomes that we expect are that: (i) students will be able to analyze and design thedevices studied in the course, (ii) they will have the background to work with related but