Paper ID #6261Nuclear Workforce Development Scholarships and Enhancements ProgramPhase I: Outreach and RecruitingDr. Hayrettin B Karayaka, Western Carolina University Hayrettin Bora Karayaka, PhD Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering Western Carolina University Department of Engineering and Technology Belk Building 339 Cullowhee, NC 28723 Bora Karayaka is an Electrical Engineering faculty at Kimmel School, Western Carolina University. With his over ten years of industry experience, he has extensive experience in project management, and a clear understanding of deadlines, industry requirements, safety and
(eitherimplicitly or explicitly) that the public does not understand or appreciate engineering becausethey are uninformed or misinformed and that, consequently, the provision of more information(in the form of scientific literacy or the benefits of engineering) will lead to increasedunderstanding and support for engineering. In that way, such initiatives are enactments of thedeficit model. The deficit model (DM) is a term from the field of Science and TechnologyStudies (STS) used to describe initiatives/projects that are based upon a belief in the public’slack of knowledge and scientific literacy and seek to remedy it by providing more, and correct,information. However, a large body of literature has now identified significant problems with thedeficit
Paper ID #6352Three Training Programs for Preparing Undergraduates to Conduct ResearchDr. Susan L. Burkett, University of Alabama Dr. Susan L. Burkett earned the B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the Univer- sity of Missouri in Columbia, Missouri in 1985, 1987, and 1992, respectively. She joined the University of Alabama in 2008 as the Alabama Power Foundation Endowed Professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering. From 2005 to 2007, she served as program director at the National Science Foundation in the Division of Undergraduate Education. She has funded research projects with the National
and engage students while bringingreal-world context to the classroom. Students can extend the concepts and theories from class byworking with robots in lab or as part of a project or competition. Robots can be used as ateaching tool across the educational spectrum.Related LiteratureA review of the Engineering Education literature reveals that robots have been and continue tobe used as teaching tools in Kindergarten-12 (K-12) and undergraduate engineering curriculums.In K-12 environments it can be seen that robots are predominantly used to teach concepts andtheories related to Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics or STEM as it iscommonly referred to in the literature 2-8. In the realm of undergraduate engineering we find
projects focused on enhancing institutional capacity to foster environments that recruit, retain, develop, and compensate a thriving faculty. Her scholarship focuses on organizational environments and faculty pathway experiences. She serves on the editorial board of the Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Case Study: Impediments to achieving systemic changes to support diversity, equity, and inclusion in the engineering professoriateAbstractCurrent diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in engineering colleges largely focus onsystemic changes to improve the recruitment of women of Black, Hispanic, and Native Americanethnic
, OntarioAbstractSurveys of bioengineering facilities within the bioeconomy highlight a limited diffusion ofsocio-technical knowledge and expertise about new innovations at the pilot and demonstrationscales, compared to technical knowledge. To improve on this, it is critical to develop awarenessamong new technology developers about different stakeholders within the bioeconomy, as wellas about the non-technical impacts of their work within a broader context. This paper describes aworkshop with graduate bioengineering researchers. The use of system mapping tools forimproving socio-technical knowledge diffusion at their bioengineering institute are evaluated.Participants were asked to describe the impacts of their research projects on non-technicalstakeholders using
evaluate the use of AIthroughout the experimentation process, including the literature search, interpretation of pastwork, data analysis, and manuscript review.This project seeks to advance AI literacy across diverse educational contexts and to provide aninstructional opportunity to establish an equitable understanding about the application of AI,regardless of the level of an individual’s prior exposure. The materials will be designed to beapplicable in any course where students pair research with quantitative data analysis. This work-in-progress paper presents the theoretical models and existing research that will inform thecreation of the AI literacy learning outcomes and framework. This paper uses research on AIliteracy and competencies across
Engineering Education, and the Associate Department Head for Inclusive Research and Education in Mechanical Engineering. She is also a co-founder of Black in Engineering. Her research involves the quantification and integration of human-centered considerations in engineering systems and/or the design process. Her research program has received funding from the National Science Foundation, Procter & Gamble, the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, and many others. Her projects that involved the intersection of diversity and mechanical engineering have been featured in media sources including National Geographic, NBC’s Today Show, Essence Magazine, Reuters, National Public Radio and many others. A highly sought
PlanningAbstract In the Fall of 2023, a team of STEM Librarians initiated a year-long research project,funded by their library, to examine students’ perceptions of their own information literacy skillsand assess their actual competencies. The study focused on both undergraduate and graduateSTEM students through an online survey designed to capture retrospective and targetedquestions regarding key areas such as information retrieval, evaluating sources, thinkingcritically, and citing accurately. The survey contained forty-three questions and was structuredinto eight sections: demographics, general information literacy perception, information sources,information seeking/retrieval, evaluating sources, critical thinking, citation management
. Engineering design 7. Entrepreneurship 8. Experimenting and testing 9. Individual learning 10. Intercultural understanding 11. Question posing 12. Spoken communication 13. Systems thinking 14. Written communicationIn their work, [10] analyzed survey data from nearly 1,600 alumni of a STEM-centric highereducation institution outside of the US and derived a list of methods of teaching and learning(e.g., lecture or project), matching them to the development of each skill based on surveyresponses. They also matched each method of teaching and learning to forms of teaching andlearning as formulated by [11] (e.g., receiving directions from an instructor or working withothers). This effort allows the matching of a 21st century skill to
. (2020), whichfocused on how emotional awareness and empathy can foster inclusive learning environments. Theauthors argued that developing students' emotional intelligence can improve their collaborative skills ingroup projects and help them navigate diverse teams more effectively. The methodologies employed across the papers varied widely, reflecting the interdisciplinarynature of research on inclusive engineering education. Many studies adopted qualitative approaches toexplore the experiences and perspectives of students and educators. For example, Stansberry et al. (2023)used a systematic mapping study to synthesize existing research on place- and land-based learning. Theirmethodology involved analyzing trends and patterns across a
appropriately challenged and supported in theirjourney to construct meaningful knowledge. This combined approach not only deepensunderstanding but also creates an inclusive, equitable classroom environment where everystudent can thrive. By blending differentiation with inquiry, educators empower students to takeownership of their learning and succeed at their own pace which is an essential skill to teachstudents early on in STEM education, where diverse learners must grasp abstract and complexconcepts. Figure 3 – Clicker projected in class accompanying the simulation shown in Figure 2. Students can use the embedded hyperlink on PhET logo or use their phone camera to scan the QR code to access the simulation and answer the clicker. Simulation by PhET
use of active learning, recognizing “that true learning resultsfrom doing things and reflecting on the outcomes, not from passively receiving information.” [1,p. 111] In design education specifically, Project-Based Learning (PBL) has become the de factostandard approach of active learning across engineering curricula [2]. Its success, however,depends on student motivation - without it, students may struggle to engage fully, potentiallylimiting the positive outcomes of the pedagogy.The key feature of active learning is that it is learner-centred and therefore places moreresponsibility on the student than teacher-centred methods. Past research has described severalbarriers to student engagement with innovative active learning approaches
Engineering Technology Students Acquisition of theEngineering IdentityAbstractThis paper presents a work in progress (WIP) for an NSF project examining first-generation (FG)engineering technology (ET) students, focusing on their academic performance, development ofengineering identity, and utilization of social capital in comparison to continuing generation(CG) peers. This project employs a two-phase mixed methods approach. It will evaluate theacademic performance of FG versus CG engineering students while leveraging the theoreticalframeworks of engineering identity development [1] and social capital [2] to explore theirexperiences. The project's aim is to inform the design of a comprehensive program that enhancessupport for engineering technology
any negative experiences surrounding group research [8].Hyldegård [8] conducted a study on group experiences during information-seekingand determined that the ISP model applies in several areas in a group setting.When using the ISP model to examine group based research, it is important toconsider group dynamics and behavior.According to Hyldegård [8], interviews, observations, and project analysis, led theresearcher to the conclusion that the “turning point” resulting from grappling withfrustration did not fully evolve in the group setting. A combination of group andindividual learning experiences helps to provide a variety of opportunities forstudents to work through all the stages of the ISP.MethodologyThe current investigation is part of
undergraduate requiredmechanical engineering curriculum if a program has not done so. The benefits of having this requiredcourse include extending the students’ knowledge in using a powerful tool to solve a variety ofcomplex engineering problems, applying the computer tool for the capstone design project and othercourse projects, and bridging the gap between academic education and industrial work. IntroductionIn early human history, parents or elderly assumed the role of teacher to the youngsters for life skills.In later human history, teaching became a profession of educated people. Teaching scope has evolvedin conjunction with the changes of the tools used in various durations. If we were technical
Covid responses. The authors all taught problem-based or project-based coursesand quickly gravitated towards each other around the strong preference to continue thisapproach, independent of course delivery mode (i.e., face-to-face or distance). As part of thistransition, we focused on how we could continue to foster our students’ interactions with coursematerial, instructors, and their peers. We used collaborative technology to facilitate studentengagement once we began remote learning. During this transition, the University and college initiated student and faculty surveys tocapture lessons from the student’s overall experience. The authors decided to develop a secondsurvey that was administered to their own classes. Several of the
the idea ofsustainable development and ecological civilization, the ultimate goal of the greenengineering concept is to achieve common development of human social economyand ecological environmental protection[1]. ECUST launched the project of cultivatingengineering ethics in 2016, focusing on strengthening the green development conceptof graduate students[2]. In addition, School of Chemical Engineering of ECUSTlaunched a new round of textbook update at the end of 2016. When revising thecontent, it focused on improving the content of courses involving high energyconsumption and pollution, adding professional courses that popularize the content ofclean production, as well as offering courses on the history of science and technologyand the
could be through theuse of a generator that is connected to the wheels of the wheelchair. As the wheels spin, thegenerator converts the mechanical energy into electricity, which can then be stored in a battery orused directly to power the seat heaters.In the late sixteenth century the more conventional looking wheelchair was adapted with a self-propelled chair being manufactured in 1655 [1]. The wheelchair then began to have a largerpurpose for medical needs. Slowly wheelchairs began being electrically powered. Similar to howwe wanted to approach our project, we examined a report about a group of researchers that wereable to generate electricity using the chain and wheels on bicycles. The group created a generatorat the base of the gears on the
arebetter grounded in the evidence and offer the clarity needed for design calculations.In addition to literature review, this paper reports novel finite element analysis of key failure,showing that large fillet radii do not compromise key strength, which is complex and dominatedby shear. Because tight fillet radii weaken the shaft, larger fillet radii are recommended. Thosepoints would lead to shafts that are more economical to produce and less likely to undergo fatiguefailure, without compromising key strength.IntroductionThis project arose due to difficulties with teaching and learning design of keyed joints in thecontext of a project-centered machine design course; that context is worth describing here. In thiscourse, students do a project in
is the advisor for the Chico State student chapter of ASME, the Tau Beta Pi Engineering Honor Society, and the Alternative Energy Club.Michael Kotar (Professor of Education, Emeritus)JoAna Brooks © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Applying an Entrepreneurial Mindset to Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences in STEMCourse-based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CURE) can provide every student in theclassroom with an authentic learning experience. The Cultivating a Culture of EntrepreneurialMindset and Undergraduate Research (CEMUR) project at California State University, Chico(Chico State
futuresettings, as well as a safe environment in which to explore, make mistakes, and discuss theramifications of various decisions in authentic contexts. Ultimately the goal is to better prepareyoung engineers to tackle current and future challenges that have tended to be underemphasizedin traditional engineering curricula.The overall research question for this project is “In what ways can experiential, game-basedapproaches to engineering ethics improve students' ethical reasoning skills?” The authors havedeveloped a suite of game-based ethical interventions for use in undergraduate engineeringclassrooms (virtual or otherwise) that incorporate different mechanisms of play and timescales andprovide students with multiple opportunities and ways to engage
number of manufacturing andprocessing industries are involved in the delivery of the program. The workshops aredesigned to introduce students to college life, involve them in hands-on activities, andencourage them to pursue science and engineering careers. Our goal is to make theactivities undertaken by this project an integral part of the recruiting and training effortsand expand them to reach a larger geographical area and a higher number ofunderrepresented students. The paper will describe the program and present the results ofsummer 2003 workshops. IntroductionThe current US workforce is comprised of 77% White, 4% Asian, and 19% Minority.According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the National
Paper ID #36968Board 402: The Importance of Career Competencies for Engineering Stu-dentsDr. Karen L. Webber, University of Georgia Karen Webber, is Professor Emeritus of Higher Education in the McBee Institute of Higher Education at The University of Georgia and the PI of the NSF-funded project related to this proposal. Professor Webber’s research includes a variety of issues related to postsecondary institution and student success including undergraduate research, gender studies, institutional research and data analytics in higher edu- cation.Amy Stich, University of Georgia Associate ProfessorMatthew Grandstaff
the change described in this paper, the primary advantage (low noise)and the main disadvantage (efficiency), both being relevant in follow-up classes were nothighlighted.2.1.3 Analog IC designThe project component in the follow-up analog IC design class also requires the design of a LDOidentical to Fig. 2b. The design constraints are specified in the context of analog ICs. Theinput-output voltage, load current, and output voltage error constrains are tighter. DC load andline regulation, noise suppression requirements, and transient response constraints are alsospecified. Since the design is in the context of analog IC design, size and noise requirements areimportant constraints.2.1.4 Power electronics and power electronics labPower
to commit as much time to their project,and scheduling of the rotations before the program began did not showcase exciting experimentsin the individual labs. The current program incorporates flexible group lab visits, where studentsor mentors invite the group based on ongoing lab activities. In addition, participants flourishedwith flexibility, and often spent more time in other labs given their level of interest on a specificproject.Modifications were also made to the application to encourage non-traditional students to apply.Students were given the option of uploading a Statement of Purpose in written format oruploading a short audio/video file describing their research interests and experience, their goalsbeyond earning a baccalaureate
guidance as to what training is necessary for future engineers to meet thisdemand. This study gathers data from literature, industry perspectives and current educationalpractice to help establish suitable learning objectives for training undergraduate engineers to beprepared for solar project development. In general, results suggest that students be trained tounderstand the complete workflow of concepts related to design of photovoltaic systemsincluding solar positioning, the solar resource and irradiance data sources, design of aphotovoltaic system from both a solar resource and an electrical perspective and performingcalculations to model or support validation of photovoltaic systems. Professionals alsohighlighted the importance of discussing
and MQTT implementation. Hands-on experiments using ArduinoWiFi1010 board and grove sensors are designed to help deepen students’ understanding fordeveloping a small-scale IoT system as well. The term project of building an IoT-enabled smartHeating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) will be introduced. Instructor observationsand anecdotal student feedback on the course design and delivery are presented as well. Lessonslearned will be discussed and modifications are proposed for future improvement.IntroductionThe Internet of things (IoT) technology connects millions and billions of physical objectswith sensors and actuators, processing ability, software and other technologies, to exchange datawith each other over the Internet, resulting
of creating alearning environment that helps students develop their skills in programming courses[5, 10].Additionally, studies have reported the need of effective learning environments and pedagogicaltechniques to improve students’ performance[11, 12]Commonly used methods have been suggested to include environments with project-basedlearning, introduce pair programming, use language-independent courses, or provide practiceopportunities in courses [13, 14]. However, the literature suggests that one good way to buildstudents' ability and enhance their learning is by allowing them to practice more questionsoutside of the coursework [15]. However, providing more practice chances comes with itsnuances. For example, mostly such options are left to
Paper ID #39265Measuring Biomedical Engineers’ Self-Efficacy in Generating and SolvingProvocative Questions about SurgeryMr. Nathan Zhang, Vanderbilt University Nathan Zhang is a undergraduate studying biomedical engineering at Vanderbilt University working on biomedical engineering education in conjunction with the Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineer- ing.Dr. Stacy S. Klein-Gardner, Vanderbilt University Dr. Stacy Klein-Gardner serves as an Adjunct Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Vanderbilt Univer- sity. She is the co-PI and co-Director of the NSF-funded Engineering For Us All (e4usa) project. She is