campusculture [9], [10]. In these studies, campus culture considered (1) classroom experiences, (2)faculty-staff relationship, (3) institutional support services, (4) peer interactions, (5) studenteffort to learn, (6) goal development and management, and (7) institutional commitment. As aresult, we integrated these components of campus culture into our understanding of institutionalclimate to ground our data collection approach and provide a helpful framework for uncoveringways in which institutional climate can impact how a Black HBCU undergraduate engineering orcomputing student navigates their post-graduate planning and decision-making.Identity and SuccessUnderstanding how an institution’s culture and climate support students’ personal identities is
theirschool, including AP courses, dual enrollment, and well-informed teachers and counselors. Thisdifference will be explored further in future work, as well as the experiences of students whotransferred to Virginia Tech from community colleges.Next StepsBased on the findings from Phase 1, we used snowball sampling to identify participants forPhase 2. We are currently conducting interviews with individuals that students identified asinfluential in their choice of major. In addition, in each community the high school principal,guidance counselors, teachers, personnel from other local education institutions (e.g., Governor’sschools, career and technical schools, community colleges), the director of education, andrelevant members of town government
in many educational institutions. The purpose of thismixed method study was two-fold. First, the researchers examined faculty member’s reactions toworking in a culturally diverse environment. Secondly, the researchers wanted to uncover bestpractices or strategies that might improve cultural awareness in workforce development in termsof navigating daily life within an educational institution. This study delved into the experiencesfaculty members reported having in their workplace. The study involved 224 faculty membersacross various departments and career statuses working at a public coeducational researchinstitution in the United States of America. The survey and interview responses to apredetermined set of questions were analyzed in order
, an individual’s free response submission may be described by more than onecode, hence the (#) represents the frequency a theme appears across all respondents’ answers. 1. Which current affiliation applies to you? o Undergraduate Student (10) o Graduate Student (0) o Faculty Member (2) o Staff Member (0) o Administration (1) 2. What department affiliation applies to you? o Architecture (5) o Architectural Engineering (3) o City & Regional Planning (1) o Construction Management (0) o Landscape Architecture (4) 3. Are you a member of either the Student or Faculty Diversity, Equity & Inclusion committees? o Yes (3) o No (10) 4. Rate the
fully online or return to campus for a hybrid learningenvironment in the fall 2020 semester. Approximately 10 percent of students chose the fullyonline option for the fall 2020 semester. The university released safety guidelines for in-personand hybrid events, such as approval requirements for student organized events, maximumnumber of attendees, and restrictions on outside visitors. These guidelines were updatedthroughout the course of the semester as county guidelines changed.Data Collection Our research team comprised two graduate students and one faculty member. Theresearch team members each have research and work experiences related to student support andservices. The Institutional Review Board at this institution approved our study
students with an engineering family member or friendhad chosen engineering by their sophomore year in high school. Only 26% of the students whohad no engineering family member or friend had done so by that time. A disproportionateamount of African-Americans tend to select occupations and pursue careers in which they hadcontact with successful role models15. In addition to choosing engineering as a major in the firstplace, quality interactions with engineering faculty can have a significant impact on a student’sdecision to pursue graduate education, since such interaction provides the student with effectiverole models and mentors. Minority students perceive the status and environment of these rolemodels and use them to gauge how they themselves
were met resulted in faculty in this studychoosing to accept offers and stay within their respective institutions. Proactive and supportivementoring approaches were another way participants felt a sense of mattering. For example,Ashley noted how her mentoring of WOC faculty not only included attention to their careerdevelopment, but how they would balance their personal goals with professional goals, And I've had several that still come to me, "I'm going to make this decision," or, "Should I--" Even now in ADVANCE, I'm working with a faculty member who became an interim dean. She's like, "You're my mentor now," before she became interim dean. So anytime she has a career decision, she'll come to me. She just went up to
culture, and openminded. Other terms reflect typical career goals of faculty, including research, expertise, andambition. Terms like “not siloed” and non-technical suggest an emphasis on interdisciplinarycollaborations and the importance of human connections between colleagues beyond disciplinaryaffiliations.Terms used only for students indicate valuing the personal and professional growth of students,e.g., professional, motivation, achievement, challenge, and employment. Additional termshighlight the importance of respecting students and the student body for who they are, e.g.,flexible, grace, and multicultural. The differences between the terms that appear only for facultyor only for students emphasize the different nature of each group’s
both environmental and personality factors. The studyuses measures based on career theories such as Social Cognitive Career Theory, which has usedextensively to explore vocational choice in engineering. These theories will be supplementedwith measures of social influence and personality to explain disciplinary choices. In addition,this study considers the climate students are exposed to in the various engineering disciplines.IntroductionPrior research with the MIDFIELD database (a National Science Foundation fundedlongitudinal database containing records of undergraduate students at ten US institutions) hasconcluded that at an average of 57%, the rate of retention to eight semesters in engineering ishigh compared to other disciplines 1
defined EM as decisiveness (cognitive),accountability and resilience (behavioral), and finally humility and confidence (emotional) [14].In a similar way, students and faculty tend to define EM based upon one’s personality, which cango hand in hand with entrepreneurs' behavioral definition of EM. Faculty seem to define EM assomeone with a desire to grow (drive) as well as someone who understands the risks of everysituation [13]. In Laalo and Heinonen, students discussed how an EM involves someone who issupportive, courageous, social focused, and caring [28]. The commonality between faculty andbusiness students is that they both highlight the importance of social skills in an EM and give thesocial aspect of an EM as being one of its defining
us what we maybe already knew, but nevertheless needed to hear: students enterengineering education from diverse points of origin and continue through to careers that are aslikely beyond engineering as within it. However, a close reading of the report also reveals twovoices. On the one hand, there was the voice of educators and administrators eager to celebratethe fact that engineering can serve as rigorous preparation for a variety of future occupations. Onthe other hand, there was a smaller number of educators, including NAE staff members who,through their engagement with the literature on women and minorities in engineering educationsought to make the point that many students enter engineering with diverse backgrounds andpreparation in
engineering. Her research interests address a broad spectrum of educational topics, but her specialty is in how people learn problem solving skills.Hannah Christine Zierden, The Ohio State UniversityMr. Kevin Robert Wegman Kevin is a first year graduate student studying Nuclear Engineering. He graduated last fall with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering. Kevin has taught with the EEIC for the past three years, twice as a UTA and once as a GTA.Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Engineering Education Innovation Center and the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geodetic Engineering at The Ohio State Univer- sity. She earned her B.S. and M.S
Paper ID #38168What Do Engineering and Other STEM Faculty Need? Exploring the Nu-ancesof Psychological NeedsDr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non- cognitive aspects of the student experience on eDr. Jennifer J. VanAntwerp, Calvin University Jennifer J. VanAntwerp is a Professor of Engineering at Calvin University in Grand Rapids, Michigan. She earned an M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University
spentapplying these concepts. For the purpose of this article, we will utilize the terminology of blended learning and flipped classroominterchangeably.communities of inquiry that support engagement and collaboration.4 A community of inquiry,involving personal reflection and shared discourse, allows for the “fusion of critical and creativecognitive processes known as higher-order thinking”.5 Blended learning may be an appropriateteaching strategy for current and future generations of students. ii. Addressing the Unique Needs of Master’s StudentsUndergraduate and graduate students not only differ in their length of program but also in “age,maturity, self-discipline, and work experiences”.6 Based on personal observations and post-graduation statistics
Paper ID #18748An Exploration of Female Engineering Students’ Functional Roles in theContext of First-year Engineering CoursesMiss Juebei Chen, Shanghai Jiaotong University Juebei Chen is a graduate student at the Graduate School of Education in Shanghai Jiao Tong University. She obtained a B.Admin in business administration from Minzu University. Her current interest focuses on the cognitive development of engineering graduate and undergraduate students, the assessment of teaching and learning in graduate education.Dr. Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Jiabin Zhu is an Associate Professor at the Graduate School of
that class, and what I tried last year to do, which I was much more satisfied with personally, though my evaluations didn't change that dramatically, is to focus the entire class on a particular topic.”At some point in their careers, all three described using teaching workshops as a source forgathering information. Nathan and Fay reported attending these workshops more often whenthey were at an earlier stage in their careers. Fay was more involved in workshops for femalefaculty in engineering on an ongoing basis. Ted enjoyed attending teaching workshops and statedthat he continues to attend teaching and creative teaching workshops. Ted explained one of hisreasons for participating in workshops, saying “But [Faculty member
feel connected to the campus community, theyare more often retained and excel academically, creating a winning situation foreveryone. Faculty members with their main focus on research and grant writing, teaching,service and curriculum commitments, may not aware of all the best ways to advise a student.Therefore, it is important that faculty and academic advisors partner to explore effectivestrategies for advising. Academic advisors, working in conjunction with faculty, can develop ameans to track student progress toward graduation. Early review of student records and timelycommunication by faculty advisors is a proactive step towards graduation. Communicating oftenwith students can help simplify the senior check process.Data Collection and
-efficacy, belonging, and other non- cognitive aspects of the student experience on eSoyoung Kang, University of Washington Soyoung Kang (she/her) is an assistant teaching professor and Clary Family Foundation early career pro- fessor in the mechanical engineering department at the University of Washington (UW). She is also the executive director of the Engineering Innovation in Health (EIH) program that partners teams of multidis- ciplinary undergraduate and graduate students with health professionals to develop technical solutions to pressing health challenges. Dr. Kang works closely with faculty from across the UW to foster an ecosys- tem of training and support for students and to develop innovative teaching
development of student’s STEM identity which isparticularly influential for underrepresented students in STEM [15], [17], [18], [32]. “Therecognition of oneself as a scientist” [16] or an emerging STEM professional, promotes students’sense of belonging and builds their STEM identity [16]. STEM identity development can bepromoted through student engagement in undergraduate research, as well as curricular and co-curricular learning experiences [15], [32]. Additionally, having opportunities to engage with andbe acknowledged as a member of the STEM community by faculty, peers, and other STEMagents, in both professional and social spaces, is important [15], [17], [18]. Student’s exposureand ability to engage with STEM role models, mentors, and culturally
Engineering GSIs (Fall 2007) (a) EGSM respondents (graduate students only) (b)Figure 2. Comparison of Career Choices considered by (a) Fall 2007 CoE GSIs and (b) Fall 2007 graduatestudents who have participated in the EGSM program5.3.2 Responses of Former Mentors in AcademiaLecturers or tenured/tenure-track faculty respondents also indicated that the EGSM programinfluenced their teaching practices. One faculty member said, “My time as [an EGSM] was theonly time as a graduate student when I could discuss teaching
Paper ID #38358”It is So Exhausting to Constantly Have to Explain to People”: Exploringthe Effects of Faculty Interactions on Disabled StudentsMs. Rachel Figard, Arizona State University Rachel Figard is a graduate student in Engineering Education and Systems Design and Universal Experi- ence (UX) Design at Arizona State University.Dr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University Samantha Brunhaver, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor within The Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her primary areas of research include engineering ca- reer pathways and decision-making
Paper ID #34035Team Formation and Function Decisions and Student Roles on DiverseEngineering Design TeamsDr. David A. Copp, University of California, Irvine David A. Copp received the B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Arizona and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of California, Santa Barbara. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Teaching at the University of California, Irvine in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Prior to joining UCI, he was a Senior Member of the Technical Staff at Sandia National Laboratories and an adjunct
intersecting theories that lend themselves well to strategies for the “careand keeping” of graduate students. By considering the processes and mechanisms by whichgraduate students develop, faculty members can reform or revise their leadership practices(formally and informally) to better meet the needs of graduate students at various stages in theiracademic careers. Although these theories may seem disparate, they intersect and overlap in anacademic research group context. As we lead the attendees of this interactive panel workshopthrough the following activities, we ask them to reflect on how these theories impact how theymake decisions for their research group and how theory-guided decisions might help themimprove or plan for effective and productive
included general demographic data, including the student’s age, grade in school, raceor ethnicity, and gender. Students were also asked if they had a family member who is anengineer, and if so, to list the relationship of that family member to the student (i.e., mother, Page 14.1014.4father, brother, sister, aunt, uncle, etc.). If a student had a relative who is an engineer, thatstudent was asked to estimate how much influence that relative had on the student’s decision toexplore engineering as a career option. Student responses were compiled and are presented inthe results section of this paper.3.2 Student preferences for
asked respondents to indicate on a4-point Likert scale (1, “Not at all likely” to 4, “Very likely”) their likelihood of pursuing a positionafter obtaining their graduate degree. In particular, students were asked about their interest inpursuing a variety of careers including faculty positions: “How likely are you to pursue a positionas a university faculty member with an emphasis on teaching?” and “How likely are you to pursuea position as a university faculty member with an emphasis on research?” Other career trajectorieswere also assessed, including likelihood to pursue a position in industry, a start-up company,government, nonprofit organization, or a postdoctoral fellowship.Health: To evaluate mental and physical health, the surveys
College of Vanderbilt Univer- sity. Her teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in STEM education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of graduate students for diverse careers and the development of reliable and valid engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF Faculty Early Career (CAREER) and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) recipient.Mr. Paul Carrick Brunson, Paul Carrick Brunson AgencyMs. Nikitha Sambamurthy, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nikitha Sambamurthy is pursuing a Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research interests include: blended
integration of critical incident technique [10] andSchlossberg’s Transition Theory [11–13] to create “incident timelines” capable of examining thetransition of early career engineering education researchers into new faculty positions.Studying transitions is particularly difficult for several reasons, which is why it requires a novelapproach. First, asking questions after-the-fact may not elicit information about how people wereexperiencing a situation in the moment, as people often forget or distort events. Second, peoplemay be reluctant to share certain information, particularly in a situation where interviews wouldeither be conducted by another faculty member or a graduate student. Third, the significance ofan event can be misunderstood if not
Engineering Education, 2021Quality Mentorship Matters: An Innovative Approach to Supporting Student Success in Engineering Undergraduate ResearchIn this research study, the authors developed a new model of mentorship for faculty members toengage and support their group of students conducting undergraduate engineering research.Research efforts attest that mentoring undergraduate students is a critical role that can dramaticallyenhance student academic and personal outcomes. This finding is magnified in the context ofSTEM related disciplines, such as engineering, where efforts to pro-actively diversify theworkforce are taking shape. Yet, not every form of faculty-student mentorship is proven to beeffective, particularly when faculty conceal
prepared for teaching as junior faculty while submitting numerousproposals and supervising research, but also help them with their decision on whether to embarkon such a challenging career.1.1 Team-Teaching with a Faculty MemberTeam-teaching a course requires a commitment from the faculty member, the academia-trackdoctoral student, and the department. The idea is to experience the full spectrum of tasks andissues involved in teaching a course. Unlike the typical Teaching Assistantship, the doctoralstudent is responsible in all aspects of a class, including deciding on course material, lecturing,and preparing and grading homework and exams. There are a few examples of faculty mentoringprograms where a graduate student teaches an entire course, with
the Students for the Exploration and Development of Space (SEDS) and Biomedical Engineering Society (BMES) chapters. He is also an aca- demic success mentor who facilitates incoming university students in achieving educational fulfillment while encouraging involvement with undergraduate campus research.Mr. Steven Anthony Zusack, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Mechanical Engineering graduate. Current research includes design project of a 1G Spinning Space Station and Lunar Polar Ice Extraction for Moon Fueling Station. Aspirations of pursuing PhD in the field of Aerospace Engineering with a focus on Spacecraft Design. Currently working at NASA Johnson Space Center performing structural testing for