work in the evaluation data collected. It is important,however, that all sites function under the same framework (i.e. cross-camp collaboration, finalpresentations, etc).AcknowledgementsThis work is sponsored by NASA under it’s 2015 Competitive Program for Science Museums,Planetariums and NASA Visitors Centers Plus Other Opportunities (CP4SMPVC+). We wouldlike to thank the Principal Investigator Darlene Koenig for her leadership and exceptionalmanagement. We would also like to thank all the museums/science centers who have helpedexecute this program at their venues. Lastly, we would like to thank all the high school teachersand students who provided their valuable feedback as the IMEET camp participants.References[1] Basalyga, S. (2003
Recommendations for Increasing Engagement among Women in STEM.,” Journal of STEM Education: Innovations \& Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 92–97, 2017.[6] J. Bond, Y. Wang, C. S. Sankar, P. Raju, and Q. Le, “Female and minority students benefit from use of multimedia case studies,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 343–359, 2014.[7] P. et al Bell, Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. The National Academy Press, 2009.[8] D. Kilgore, C. J. Atman, K. Yasuhara, T. J. Barker, and A. Morozov, “Considering Context: A Study of First- Year Engineering Students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 321–334, 2007.[9] T. J. Puccinelli, M. E. Fitzpatrick, and G
array. (e) A Digital Image Processing unit uses algorithm(s) to process the image. (f) A processed image is generated.There are many methods and procedures for digital image processing. Some common imageprocessing operations include blurring, zooming, edge detection, face recognition, cropping, andmirroring.Digital image processing starts with how all humans visualize the world. We can categorizeimage processing in two parts, analog image processing and digital image processing. Analog Image Processing. Analog image processing deals with analog signals in a varying electrical signal. It takes place in a two dimensional analog signal. Traditional television image is an example of an analog image processing
, 31(1):21–32, 1961. [6] A. Collins. Cognitive apprenticeship. In R. Sawyer, editor, Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pages 47–60. Cambridge University Press, 2006. [7] D. Jackson. Software Abstractions: Logic, Language and Analysis. MIT Press, 2012. [8] D. Jonassen, M. Davidson, M. Collins, J. Campbell, and B. B. Haag. Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9, 1995. [9] S. Kumar and C. Wallace. Instruction in software project communication through guided inquiry and reflection. In Frontiers in Education (FIE). IEEE, 2014.[10] C. McDowell, L. Werner, H. E. Bullock, and J. Fernald. The impact of pair programming on student performance, perception
University of Washington and the Making Academic Change Happenpractitioners from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. The origin of our partnership occurredin the mid-2000’s when one individual from MACH and one individual from CERSE metthrough a different national project, and subsequently maintained a loose professionalconnection. When NSF encouraged MACH to submit a proposal focused on supporting changefor the RED program, MACH contacted CERSE and a joint proposal resulted. These first stagesof developing the partnership brought to light the expertise contributed by both groups: MACHas experts in change strategies, and CERSE as experts in qualitative research. Our initialexperiences suggested that we would work semi-collaboratively, with major
level of the learner.Cognition and Instruction, I, 451-463.14. Palincsar, A, S., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (1999). Designing collaborative contexts: Lessons fromthree research programs. In A. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive Perspectives on PeerLearning (pp. 151-177). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 15. King, A. (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In A. M. O’Donnell & A.King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 87-115). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.16. King, A. (1992). Faciliating elaborative learning through guided student-generatedquestioning. Educational Psychologist, 27, 111-126.17. Swan, M., & Pead, D
.[10]. P. Chu, FPGA Design by VHDL Examples: MicroBlaze MCS SoC edition, Wiley & Sons, 2017.[11]. P. Chu, FPGA Design by SystemVerilog Examples: MicroBlaze MCS SoC edition, Wiley & Sons, to be published in September 2018.[12]. J. Corbet, A. Rubini, and G. Kroah-Hartman, Linux Device Drivers: Where the Kernel Meets the Hardware, O'Reilly Media, 2005.[13]. Digilent, Arty FPGA Board Reference Manual, Digilent, 2017.[14]. S. Monk, Programming Arduino: Getting Started with Sketches, McGraw-Hill, 2011.[15]. R. Sass and A. G. Schmidt, Embedded Systems Design with Platform FPGAs: Principles and Practices, Morgan Kaufmann, 2010.[16]. S. Sheppard, et al., Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. Jossey
experiences focused on improving retention and graduation rate.Dr. Hossein Rahemi, Vaughn College of Aeronautics & Technology Dr. Hossein Rahemi is a professor and department chair of Engineering and Technology at Vaughn Col- lege of Aeronautics & Technology. He is the author of two books, Vaughn College Journal of Engineering and Technology (VCJET), numerous conference papers in the areas of solid mechanics, computational mechanics, vibration analysis, fracture mechanics and reliability analysis. He is also a principle investi- gator for the NSF S-STEM grant and the HIS-STEM grant and a student adviser for a number of technical papers in the areas of mechanics, robotics and industrial automation.Dr. Yougashwar
struggling students. These efforts help build the CEE Department as a place wherepositive change is happening and coupled with the research group’s efforts to disseminateknowledge, will lead the transformation of the College of Engineering.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underIUSE/PFE:RED Grant No. 1632053. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References 1. C.S. Slater, T.R. Chandrupatla, R.A. Dusseau, J. L. Schmalzel, (1996). “Development of multifunctional laboratories in a new engineering school,” ASEE Annual Conference and
Why is it Important for Your Building Project?” WorldBuild 365.3. Castro, G. and Poulos, S. J. (1977). “Factors Affecting Liquefaction and Cyclic Mobility”. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol 103, No. GT6, pp 501-516.4. Hooke, Harry. Rochester Institute of Technology (2011), “Use of Soil Behavior Demonstrations to Increase Student Engagement in a Soil Mechanics Course.” American Society of Engineering Education.5. Caverly, R., Fulmer, H., Santhanam, S., Singh, P., O’Brien, J., Jones, G., Char, E., Mercede, F., Weinsten, R., and Yost, J. (2010). “Project-based Freshman Engineering Experience: The Core Course,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.6. Li, J. and
Education MinorityScience and Engineering Improvement Program under Grant No. P120A140051. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Education.References[1] US Census Bureau, 2016 Census Data for Kern County.[2] US Census Bureau, 2017 Estimated Census Data Nationwide.[3] California Department of Education, Data and Statistics website. Data for Kern High School District.[4] N. Gorgievski and et al., "Tablet PC: A Preliminary Report on a Tool for Teaching Calculus," The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 95-102, 2005.[5] C. Lysy, C. A. Romney, J. P. Paniagua
classroom strategy to foster social responsibility," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 373-380, 2006.[9] K. Meyers and B. Mertz, "A large scale analysis of first-year engineering student essays on engineering interests," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Washington, D.C., 2011.[10] J. H. Pryor, K. Eagan, L. P. Blake, S. Hurtado, J. Berdan and M. Case, "The American Freshman: National Norms Fall 2012.," Cooperative Institutional Research Program at the Higher Education, Los Angeles, 2012.[11] N. A. o. Engineering, "Changing the conversation: Messages for improving public understanding of engineering," National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2008.[12] G. Hein and A. Kemppainen, "First-year
foundation engineering, unsaturated soil mechanics, geoenvironmental engineering, advanced soil mechanics, and soil dynamics. His expertise is in innovative levee testing and protection, bio-mediated ground improvement, sustainable infrastructure and geo-environmental area. He has been PI of more than fourteen major research grants from federal and state agencies with total funding amounts of $3.6 Million. Dr. Li is the author or co-author of more than 87 peer-reviewed published articles. He got numerous faculty excellence award and Richard S. Ladd Standards Development Award from ASTM.Dr. Jianjun Yin, Jackson State University Jianjun Yin, Ph.D, is Professor of Education in the Department of Elementary and Early Childhood
opposing preferences, or “balanced” within thedimension. For our study, we look at each dimension separately in correlations withperformance, self-efficacy, perceptions/attitudes, and problem solving strategies as we believethat this will allow us to understand if one dimension is more influential, and, if so, in whatrespect(s).The second study instrument, surveys, are typically Likert-type questions (on a scale from 1 to 5,strongly disagree to strongly agree, respectively), with some multiple choice, true / false, andoccasionally a short open response question. Questions are designed to evaluate student self-efficacy with respect to specific problems and concepts, attitudes, and problem-solvingstrategies.The surveys are administered after
improved their academic performance by 52%. The same research showed that thestudents were also significantly more engaged because of the content included in the course.These are substantial indicators of improvement. If this is level of improvement could be seenby all students using online or digital content, the results would show substantial progressthus making the research significant.These are main theoretical concepts that have been implemented into the IEDT curriculumbased on the literature review.3. Methodology3.1 The ProcessThis information was obtained using action research which is a specific variation ofEvaluation Research. McMillan and Schumacher21 state” Evaluation Research focuses on aparticular practice at a given site(s). The
work as an ME working at DOE Labs (Sandia/PNNL) over thelast 11 years. Never needed to use my PE stamp, etc.Pedagogy ImplicationsPrior to the study emphasis was placed on the identification and retrieval of standards.Influenced from industry responses and student work the curriculum has shifted to emphasize abroader understanding of standards and standardization. When presenting information tostudents emphasis is put on the understanding of why standards exist, how they are created andpotential avenues for finding or locating relevant standards outside of academia.Students in the course directly work with industry sponsors and are instructed by the facultymember to seek advice from their industry contact regarding the appropriate standard(s
EHWIC 3 EHWIC 2 EHWIC 1 EHWIC 0 S L MODE
university-level courses using student response systems. Learning, Media and Technology 2007;32(1):21-40.7. Van Dijk, L. A., Van Der Berg, G. C., & Van Keulen, H., Interactive lectures in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education 2001;26(1):15-28.8. Silliman, S. E., and McWilliams, L. H., Observations on benefits/limitations of an audience response system. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings 2004.9. Hake R. R., Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics 1998;66(1):64-74.10. Knight J.K., and Wood W.B., Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biology Education
Engineering (ICCAE), 2010 The 2nd International Conference on, vol.3, no., Page 26.1768.9 pp.356,359.[8] Koding | Say goodbye to your localhost and code in the cloud. Retrieved February 2, 2015, from https://koding.com/[9] Lifka, D., Foster, I., Mehringer, S., Parashar, M., Redfern, P., Stewart, C., & Tuecke, S. (2013). XSEDE cloud survey report. Technical report, National Science Foundation, USA.[10] Lohmosavi, V., Nejad, A.F., Hosseini, E.M. 2013. E-learning ecosystem based on service-oriented cloud computing architecture. Information and Knowledge Technology (IKT), 2013 5th Conference on , vol., no., pp.24,29, 28
; Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a non partisan research and educational institute/think tank, whose mission is to formulate and promote public policies to advance innovation and productivity, internationally, in the US and the US States www.itif.org35 ©2009 HP Confidential ©2009 COUNTRIES ALL OVER THE WORLD ARE BETTING ON THEIR S&E TALENT FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING DEGREES, 2004, AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL NEW DEGREES Notes: 1. 2003 for doctoral degrees in science and
Exercises Andinstructor has the opportunity to circulate and assess student Design Projects For First Year Engineering Students,” Proceedings ofprogress, or to address deeper issues that students may the 2001 Annual Conference.encounter. At the same time, students gain experience [7] Love, J. O., Freeman, S. F., Jaeger-Helton, K., and Whalen, R., “Noassessing their own work and build confidence in their ability Lab? No Shop? No Problem: Intentional Design of a First-yearto perform difficult laboratory skills. Another advantage of Engineering Learning Center with Enlightening Outcomes,” Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE
multidisciplinary hydroelectric generation design project,” in Proceedings of the 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June 15-18, 2014.[9] T. Bacquarta, S. Frisbee, E. Mitchell, L. Grigg, C. Coleb, C. Small, B. Sarkaref, "Multiple inorganic toxic substances contaminating the groundwater of Myingyan Township, Myanmar: arsenic, manganese, fluoride, iron, and uranium," Science of The Total Environment, vol. 517, pp. 232-245, 2015.[10] S. Frisbie, E. Mitchell, B. Sarkar, "Urgent need to reevaluate the latest World Health Organization guidelines for toxic inorganic substances in drinking water," Environmental Health, vol. 14, no. 1, 2015.
design project.In EXEP Cohort, students are registered for fall semester during summer orientation into thesame section of Algebra II, a First-Year CEAS Experience (ENGR 2100), and Introduction toEngineering Analysis (ENGR 1002). Depending on a student’s intended CEAS major, a fourthcourse – Engineering Graphics – or General Education course(s) are added to the schedule toattain full-time academic status, which is at least 12 credit hours. For the spring semester, afterthe EXEP students passed Algebra II with a grade of B or higher and are in Pre-Engineering orPre-Engineering Technology or Computer Science, they are registered into the same sections ofPrecalculus, Technical Communication, and General Chemistry I and Lab. Students add a CEASmajor
. Estimating the Prevalence of Limb Loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2008; 89(3):422‐9[2] N. Mathur, G. Paul, J. Irvine, M. Abuhelala, A. Buis and I. Glesk, "A Practical Design and Implementation of a Low-Cost Platform for Remote Monitoring of Lower Limb Health of Amputees in the Developing World," in IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 7440-7451, 2016[3] Neha Mathur; Ivan Glesk; Arjan Buis, “Issues in wearable mobile sensor platform for lower limb prosthetic users,” 2015 17th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), 2015, pp. 1 – 4[4] S. M. R. Islam, D. Kwak, M. H. Kabir, M. Hossain, and K. S. Kwak, "The Internet of Things for
• Exposure to computer architecture and organization, information management, networking and communication, operating systems, and parallel and distributed computing. • Reduced math and science requirements, per CS2013 guidelines • Faculty with doctoral degree responsible for improving program• IS and IT • Each has a required additional student outcome• IS • Faculty with doctoral degree responsible for improving program (Words might still change) 10 CAC 3/5 Revisions: TimelineDate(s) Event07/2016 Commission approved revised criteria10/2016 ABET’s CAD approved criteria for first
and P. McPherson, “What do employers want in terms of employee knowledge of technical standards and the process of standardization?,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2010.[4] A. S. Khan, A. Karim, and J. A. McClain, “The State of the Use of Standards in Engineering and Technology Education,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2013.[5] D. Katusic, P. Skocir, M. Kusek, G. Jezic, C. Ratti, and I. Bojic, “Hands-On Education about Standardization: Is That What Industry Expects?,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 133–144, May 2017.[6] M. G. Ivanovich, “Why can’t Johnny engineer? Infuse engineering education with reality.,” HPAC Engineering, vol. 73, no. 4, p. 7, 2001.[7] C.-G
of ECE Programs - The View from Students and Instructors, ”Mobile Hands-On STEM Education,” Proceedings of Proc. of ASEE 123rd Annual Conference & Exposition,ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, New Orleans, LA, June 26-29, 2016.June 2013. [18] Connor, K.A., Y. Astatke, C. J. Kim , M.F.[6] Huette, L. (2011, June), Connecting Theory and Chouikha, D. Newman, K. Gullie, A.A. Eldek, S. S.Practice: Laboratory-based Explorations of the NAE Devgan, A.R. Osareh, J. Attia, S. Zein-Sabatto, and D. L.Grand Challenges Paper presented at 2011 Annual Geddis, “Experimental Centric Pedagogy in Circuits andConference
exploring how to grow the mathematics program. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.number of camps and how to better integrate music in the (2015).program. By applying play theory and informal and non- [11] Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. Socialformal learning theory, the AVS Lab can host to have a cognitive career theory. In D. Brown (Ed.), Career choicemore significant impact on the San Antonio community. and development, Vol. 4, (pp. 255–311). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. (2002). [12] Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. Acknowledgement
Control ScreenThe manual control system is mainly designed for debugging purposes. The benefit of thissystem comes with event processing. In figure 5, the event list is shown. This allows the systemto respond to events triggered by inputs connected to the GPIM(s).The list contains a name and description of each event to aid the user as the event list willprobably have many events for an average size home. Adding and editing an event is verysimple using the built-in event editor. The system also has safeguards to prevent edit entrymistakes.The security tab, shown in figure 6, displays configuration parameters for the security system.Modeled after standard security systems, the security interface features multiple user codes withlogging
the Graduate Education of Scientists and Engineers,” Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, National Academy Press, 1995. 3. Holden, C., “Careers ‘95: The Future of the Ph.D.,” Science, vol. 270, 1995, pp. 121-146. 4. Morley R. L., Havick J. J., and May G. S., “An Evaluation of the Georgia Tech Summer Undergraduate Program of Research in Electrical Engineering for Minorities,” Journal Of Engineering Education, pp. 321-325, July 1998. 5. 2005-2006 Annual Report Card, The Governors office of Student Achievement, State of Georgia: http://reportcard2006.gaosa.org/k12 6. May, G.S. and Chubin, D.E., “A Retrospective on Undergraduate Engineering Success for Under- represented