Wyoming, he is now an Associate Professor, serving as the Director of the Cybersecurity Education and Research (CEDAR) Center and Lab, and the Co-Director of the Advanced Blockchain Research and Development Lab. He is a former hardware security architect and data scientist, having worked in both the semiconductor industry as well as several since-acquired startups. His research interests include Secure Distributed Systems, Security and Resilience of Autonomous Systems, Continuous and Adaptive Authentication, Cyber-Physical Systems and Applications, and Hardware-Level Security for Lightweight Agents. He and his students have published over 46 journal and conference publications. He is a senior member of the IEEE, ACM, and
]. Although the need to re-build the curriculum was identified based ondeficiencies, the desire to produce graduates equipped to impact society, or change agents,became the vision” [2].This qualitative study shares multiple teaching assistant and instructor perspectives regarding theimpact of the wholesale curriculum redesign, detail components of the newly created curriculum,and concludes with an exploration of a framework for addressing and managing the need tomaintain an evolving curriculum going forward. Due to the many impacting factors over the pastthree years, such as layered deployment of student success courses and the challenges of thepandemic, limited time will be spent exploring the previous curriculum or performance metriccomparisons
-related content when the project and documentation include the design,manufacturing or construction, or characterization of one or more systems, components, orexperimental processes using standards / codes.As part of the graduation check-out process to earn the certificate, a student must submit a formto one of the program coordinators. One page of this form relates to the senior capstone projector master’s thesis, and the form is completed in two stages. First, the student discusses theirtopic idea with their course instructor / advisor and then with one of the certificate programcoordinators. If approved, both faculty members sign the form with an initial title for the project.A written project proposal is included at this stage. Once the
collaborative research projects focused on broadening participation in STEM academia. Dr. Mendez’s research centers on the creation of optimal higher education policies and practices that advance faculty careers and student success, as well as the schooling experiences of Mexican-descent youth in the mid-20th century.Jennifer Tygret ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Improving University Postdoctoral Affairs Offices: Viewpoints from Engineering Postdoctoral Scholars of ColorAbstractAn instrumental case study (Stake, 1995) explores the perceptions and opinions of engineeringpostdoctoral scholars of color about ways to improve university postdoctoral affairs offices tobetter
able to develop an additional level of autonomy and self-motivationthrough their management and teaching of peers due to a lack of faculty involvement.In this study we seek to explore the effect of the peer mentoring experience on the mentorsthemselves and compare the outcomes for the peer mentors in traditional PBL engineeringcourses versus PBL engineering student organizations. Specifically, we pose the followingresearch questions:R1: How do the benefits and challenges for student peer mentors in engineering PBL coursescompare to those for peer mentors working in engineering PBL student organizations?R2: How does the peer mentoring experience influence a student peer mentor’s career aspirationsin engineering or academia?R3: How does the
and peers) is crucial to retention andpersistence for these STEM students.36,37Foreign-born blacks may initially distinguish themselves from native-born blacks, buteventually, the system itself imposes a black racial identity, thus forcing foreign-born blackstudents to “identify” with native-born black students. This occurs impart because race is theoverall determinant of underrepresented black minorities but is not always an effective groupingbased upon cultural distinction theory.14Barriers in STEMDespite their heterogeneous backgrounds, members of foreign-born and native-born blacksreport experiencing cultural or structural marginalization, peer racism, less equitable treatmentby faculty, and stereotyped perceptions that they lack academic
and Y. Amannejad, “Evidence-based Best Practices for First-year Blended Learning Implementation,” in Proceedings of 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 24-27, 2018.[9] H. Chang, F. W. Ngunjiri, and K. C. Hernandez. 2016. Collaborative Autoethnography. NY, NY: Routledge.[10] R. McCord, C. Hixson, E. L. Ingram, and L. D. McNair. 2014. Graduate student and faculty member: An exploration of career and personal decisions. In Proceedings of the 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Indianapolis, IN.[11] J. S. Cicek, P. K. Sheridan, L. A. Kuley, and R. Paul. (2017). Through ‘Collaborative Autoethnography’ Researchers Explore Their Role as Participants in Characterizing the Identities of
motivation and goal orientations (Multon et al., 1991; Usher et al.,2019; Zimmerman, 2000). Within the realm of STEM, if a student believes they can succeed intheir STEM classes, this refers to their sense of STEM self-efficacy. STEM self-efficacy hasbeen identified as a contributor of reluctance to pursue a STEM educational path or career(Borgen & Betz, 2008; van Aalderen-Smeets, van der Molen, Xenidou, 2018). According toBandura (1997), a strong sense of self-efficacy can enhance accomplishments and personal well-being in a multitude of different ways. This premise aligns with the research as self-efficacy hasemerged as an important predictor of academic outcomes such as motivation, major satisfaction,and goal orientations (Chen &
students who are already in Russian and American institutions.Possibilities and requirements for the education of high school students who would soonbecome adults and employees are explored and it was found that the individuals with highintercultural sensitivity and comfortable in global interactions were in high demand in theinternational labor market and can succeed in any kind of global business 2. Social and cultural Intercultural personality National Identity competencesAdolescence is the most favorable period for the development of an intercultural personalityand the global mind-set for a multicultural environment. Defining the place in the society is avery important factor that indicates personality development: I
of Virginia.Dr. Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University Meg Handley is an Associate Teaching professor and Director Undergraduate Programs for Engineering Leadership. Meg completed her PhD in Workforce Education at Penn State, where she focused on inter- personal behaviors and leadership for early-career engineers. She teaches engineering leadership and an engineering leader coaching course. Her research focuses on coaching skills, inclusive leadership, and career development.Dr. Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas, El Paso An Associate Professor at The University of Texas at El Paso, Dr. Meagan R. Kendall is a founding member of the Department of Engineering Education and Leadership. With a background in
Engineering Diversity (CEED), both at Virginia Tech. Lee’s research interests include co-curricular support, student success and retention, and diversity in STEM. Among his honors and awards, Lee received a 2012 NSF GRFP Award and an ASEE Appren- tice Faculty Grant Award in 2015. He received his Ph.D in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech, his M.S. in Industrial & Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech, and his B.S. in Industrial Engineering from Clemson University.Mr. Benjamin David Lutz, Virginia Tech Ben Lutz is a PhD student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His research in- terests include innovative pedagogies in engineering design, exploring student experiences within design
stories also provide insights into how experiences and context impact decisions to persistand finding one’s identity. As Tonso [19] indicates, the aspect of engineering identity isentwined in inclusion and diversity. Experiences of gender gap and exclusion in engineering forthese women, led to various ways of coping, building resilience and developing an identity ofbelonging. Nisha found a role-model in a female faculty member, whereas Thiennes respondedby staying self-motivated through connecting with peers, faculty and other university resources.The community mindedness instilled in Gloria’s early years provided the anchor for her topersist in her second attempt at engineering education. Amy realized that peers are a criticalresource to not
core engineering courses,regardless of their major, to graduate with a Bachelor of Science degree. An earlier ASEE paper[1] explored the basic pedagogy developed by the Air Force Academy’s Department of Electricaland Computer Engineering to overcome the inherent challenges of teaching non-engineers “toengineer.” This paper explores the measure of success for those efforts based on tangiblefeedback and assessment data. Furthermore, the paper specifically addresses a monumentalchallenge beyond educating the students: motivating them to care about their learning. Variousapproaches are discussed and solutions graded on their success or failure. A representativesyllabus is included at the end of this paper.IntroductionHistory is rife with famous
Paper ID #25939Board 104: Academic Pathways of Black Men and Women in Electrical andMechanical EngineeringDr. Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University Marisa K. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.”Dr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley
with similarities such as age, gender, major, andacademic abilities. Through a LLC community, students are able to encourage one anotherduring difficult classes and help each other gain a deeper understanding of classroom concepts.20This type of peer-to-peer interaction provides assistance with students’ academic and socialintegration. Unfortunately, an unintended consequence can be the formation of cliques, orsmaller communities within the already small community.The environment of certain LLCs also encourages other types of non-peer interaction. Facultyand staff members can be involved in activities for a LLC, thereby increasing students’ comfortlevel interacting with them. Research has shown that interactions between students and faculty
, especially for those who areinclined to join the industry workforce immediately after graduation. It could also be made atechnical elective for seniors under certain circumstances. • Any introduction of systems engineering at the undergraduate level needs to emphasize the importance of developing and exploring the “trade space” as part of the design process.The desired outcome from introducing SE into our curriculum would be an improved designapproach as observed during the capstone experience. Our objective is to inculcate the need tointroduce quantitative models during the concept selection phase, and for the students to do abetter job of exploring trade space aimed at optimizing design solutions.Two other aspects that came out of
used with0 indicating, “I will not be able to learn this no matter how much practice” and 10 indicating, “Ican become an expert at this if I practice a lot.”Each individual received two separate subscale scores (a General score and a Personal score) byadding the coded item values.The two separate subscales were designed to differentiate one’s generalized beliefs about certaincharacteristics in others and one’s personal beliefs about themselves. Previous research hasexplored perceptions of students with respect to an instructor’s mindset about students (Muenks etal., 2020), as well as research about faculty mindset about their students (Canning et al., 2019).This previous research highlighted that someone may hold different mindsets not only
implemented in colleges of engineering that disrupt the status quo regarding who gets to participate in engineering education as students and faculty members; and (3) increased participation and comfort among Black and Brown K– 12 students in pre-college engineering activities that signal to parents and young learners that an engineering career is an option for anyone. These outcomes map to three strategic pillars of the Year of Impact on Racial Equity.”Volunteers for the Year of Impact on Racial Equity were divided into three taskforces, eachfocusing on a distinct pillar: (1) student organizations at Colleges of Engineering and EngineeringTechnology, (2) faculty and administrators in Colleges of Engineering, and (3
navigate the curricular choices available [7], (2) students would need to explore the broaderfields of real-world electrical and computer engineering to building an understanding of theirrelevant career options [7], and (3) student feedback revealed a need and desire for professionalcommunication instruction earlier than the existing junior-level communication requirement [4].The resulting course is a unique fusion of career development, academic planning, professionalcommunications, extended campus orientation, and engineering design [7].ECE Discovery Studio was piloted during 2020-2021 academic year, a year ahead of the officialthreaded curriculum launch. Amid the backdrop of the global pandemic, the course pilot wasrestricted to an online
a text to educate students about global climate change. Bypre and post testing the students in the class, it was determined that the design of curriculum thatparticularly addressed global climate change helped the students understand global climatechange11.The goal of a college education is to prepare the individual for a career in their chosen field andthis includes the development of knowledge and skills that they will need to be competent whenhired. It also includes socializing students to be members of the professional community theyare preparing to be a part of. This includes learning values, beliefs, norms, and customs of theprofessional culture. When they are socialized into that culture they have created an identitywith the
), American Society ofMechanical Engineers (ASME)), EnvE activities are dispersed across an array of professionalsocieties. Key professional societies that EnvE faculty engage with often have a narrower focuson their particular research interests. A number of these groups are partners in the SPACESeffort (see Table 1). The Association of Environmental Engineering and Science Professors(AEESP) is comprised primarily of academics including faculty and graduate students. AmongAEESP members, 89% engage in research on water/wastewater, 26% on soil and sediment, 21%on energy, and 14% on air (on average, each respondent identified 1.7 topics among optionsprovided in a recent survey) [3].Table 1. Examples of EnvE Related Professional Organizations
administrators in healthcare journals and engineers inengineering journals indicate that the use of industrial engineering methods by interdisciplinaryteams is having a positive effect on the delivery of healthcare.8,9, 10,11This paper documents aspects of our fifteen year history of collaboration between MercerUniversity Department of Industrial Engineering and healthcare facilities in Georgia. It includesboth a summary of the successes and an exploration of the challenges faced as these relationshipswere built and sustained. The resulting lessons learned will, we believe, give valuable insightsand advice to faculty members and programs who are embarking on similar collaborations.Opportunities and SuccessesPartnerships with healthcare providers for
task or career will be positive; in the context of a career, it might bedescribed as whether an individual can meet goals or values in choosing a particular path. Third,interests - subject-matter relevant or otherwise - impact career choice and persistence. Finally,personal goals drive people to pursue certain paths. These can be categorized as performancegoals, learning goals or competency-based goals. In addition, there are institutional orenvironmental variables, including social support, expectations from others, and economicopportunities that influence career decisions [22]. Various reinforcing relationships exist betweenthese variables in the SCCT model, and variables can have an impact whether they are real orperceived.Within
development of faculty in developing and evaluating various engineering curriculum and courses at UPRM, applying the outcome-based educational framework. She has also incorporated theories on social cognitive career choices and student attrition mitigation to investigate the effectiveness of institutional interventions in increasing the retention and academic success of talented engineering students from economically disadvantaged families. She’s also involved in a project that explores the relationship between the institutional policies at UPRM and faculty and graduate students’ motivation to create good relationships between advisors and advisees. American c
subjects and themes for studentsuccess. Students need these skills, “to successfully face rigorous higher education coursework,career challenges, and a globally competitive workforce,” (Partnership for 21st Century Skills,2011, p. 1). Similarly, throughout the 21st century, innovation thinking, as an outcome ofinnovation education, has been a focus and is identified to involve creative thinking, criticalthinking, reflective thinking, and decision making (Nakano & Wechsler, 2018). As CL has beenfound to develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills in students (Laal & Ghodsi, 2011),by incorporating CL into a classroom setting, along with the benefits of transdisciplinarylearning identified by Bartholomew, Strimel, Swift, and
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Development and Impact of Research Efficacy in an Undergraduate Teaching Assistant Certification Class1. IntroductionResearch experiences and opportunities are growing in availability and significance forundergraduate students. Furthermore, undergraduate students can offer a distinct perspective anda unique form of assistance compared to graduate students and faculty. This also applies to theclassroom. Participation in research in the undergraduate years, shows to provide all engineeringstudent populations (including marginalized groups) to consider a job in the academic andresearch fields.At a mid-size minority serving institution, undergraduate students are highly encouraged
appreciation forinterpersonal and presentation skills, leadership, professional ethics, organizationaldynamics, product development, and statistical quality control; 2) Knowledge 2- InSpring, students attend alumni-led workshops on career development; 3) Experience- InSummer, students complete 12 weeks of employment where they will be able to realizeUPOP’s educational objectives; 4) Reflection 1- During the summer, students complete astructured journal that permits exploration of engineering teamwork, communication, andorganization; 5) Reflection 2- In Fall, students meet to discuss their experiences withother students and faculty. Assessment and evaluation of the new program includedactivity feedback surveys completed by students, ability self
. Congress Joint Economic Committee, 2012). It iscritical to provide high school students and the K-12 community of teachers and students withmultiple opportunities in STEM to learn about content, relevant courses and skills and careers.Additionally, technological literacy “is the ability to use, manage, assess, and understandtechnology” (Standards for Technological Literacy, p. 9) and further states that a technologicallyliterate person can understand a specific technology, its creation and evolution and the impact onsociety along with being capable of making an informed decision about the technology. Whilenot all students will pursue STEM fields, it is significant that students as future citizensunderstand engineering design and technologies
Page 22.1129.13faculty themselves experienced during their course of study.“I am also in a learning process in the MIT-Portugal Program, in this new engineering approach ofbringing together economic aspects, management, etc.”“Probably after they finished their curricular part, and I have no doubts, the students are better preparedfor issued of management than most of the teachers that are teaching them.”The findings underline that the program has a enormous impact on these junior faculty. Theyreport an observed “boost” in career opportunities, a drastic expansion of their scientificnetwork, and important new inputs in their research. Conversely, young faculty seem to be moreeager to explore and exploit the range of opportunities offered
. Engineering students who had completed the WGS 250course in Spring 2018 or 2019 but had not yet graduated (N = 7) were invited to one of two focusgroup sessions held in February, 2020. The invitation included a description of the study and anassurance of confidentiality.Informed consent was obtained from the study participants in writing before any questions wereposed. Discussions were facilitated by one author and a faculty colleague, neither of whom hadserved as an instructor for any WGS class. Focus group facilitators provided copies of the WGS250 reading list as a way of reminding participants of past course content and providingreference points for specific reading and authors. In keeping with best practices for focus groupinteractions