), and awritten self-reflection exercise will be used to evaluate student learning both formatively andsummatively.San Antonio College: San Antonio College (SAC) is the only community college among thecollaborating institutions, and will work alongside UT San Antonio to emulate the NSF STEPfunded collaboration between Wright State University and Sinclair Community College. In sodoing, SAC will pilot their own version of EGR 101 and make corresponding changes to themath prerequisite requirements for core engineering courses. SAC will establish the laboratory,develop the course materials, and change the curriculum during year one. The SACimplementation of EGR 101 will be developed concomitantly with UTSA, and offered to a groupof approximately 25
beginning ofcollege, generally believed they knew everything there was to know about college. As aconsequence many of these entering engineer freshmen did not put in the time to learn thematerial in their classes until they hit the first quizzes or midterm and suddenly realized that theyhave a lot of learning to make up to be on top of the class material.After the first two years of the Academic Success Program, the evaluations reflected a deficiencyin the program. The students reported that the Academic Success class did not help them withtheir academics. The students had not learned or been inspired by the time management helps,nor a series of videos on “How to get an A”, to take the time to learn the class material. Thestudents, in general, did
. Page 1.169.6 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings This project began in March 1994 and it reflects a new approach to the instruction of Aircraft Design inthe Department of Aerospace Engineering, Mechanics and Engineering Science (AeMES) at the University ofFlorida. It crosses the traditional boundaries between semesters, disciplines and years of education from juniorto graduate level. Built around the SAE Heavy-Lift Aircraft Design Competition entry, this experiment inteaching design has multiple goals: • expose the students to the broad aspects of the design discipline, from the product requirements through conceptual and detailed design, to testing and utilization
and non-attendees with TOEFL score < 540, and differences wereanalyzed by two-way crosstabulation (chi-squared analysis).Of the five learning activities, females indicated significantly higher rates of printing notesprovided by the instructor (73.6% of females, compared to 62.3% of males; p=0.03) and takingtheir own handwritten notes during class lectures (81.1% of females, compared to 67.6% ofmales; p<0.01). These elevated study habit tendencies may be reflections of the core reasons thatfemale students experience greater academic achievement than male students. Differencesbetween male and female students in attending class lectures, working together with otherstudents on homework assignments, and reading textbooks were not
rival and collaborator the Polytechnic Institute of Brooklynxi. The collaborativerelationship proved important, when in 1973, NYU decided to eliminate its engineeringprogram. This decision was not a reflection on the programs in engineering, but rather apoorly conceived notion about the future of engineering in an economic downturn, by theUniversity’s administration. Most of the faculty and labs were transferred over to thePolytechnic Institute of Brooklyn and the name was changed to the Polytechnic Instituteof New York (PINY). NYU, the first Guggenheim School, became the only program tofail to continue to the present day. However, a perceived need by NYU to reengage inengineering has led to the transferring of PINY to NYU being given the
process. Arguably, this process is a large part of engineering, but it’s not the whole picture.≠ Bailey and Gainsberg: One limitation of this study is that it does not encourage engineers to significantly reflect on their practice and why they do certain things, it is more objective. The voice of engineers does not significantly appear to factor in. The study does not aim to suggest improvements to the education of engineers; it simply reports that engineers learn some things in a university setting and some through practice. It does not question those norms.≠ Collin’s work is mainly limited in scope, just considering workplace learning in Finland.≠ A limitation of the study of Korte, et al., is that it just focused on new engineers. It did use
National Science Foundation's Directorate ofUndergraduate Education's STEM Talent Expansion Program Grant No. DUE-0431642. Anyopinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.The authors wish to acknowledge the other team members instrumental in planning andexecuting the data collection and processing: Susan E. Walden, Jeanette Davidson, DeborahTrytten, Teri J. Murphy, and Teri Reed-Rhoads; current and former senior personnel - RosaCintron, Paul Rocha, Francey Freeman, Lisa Schmidt, Kimberly Rutland, Tony Lee, MayraOlivares, and Claudia Morales; current and former graduate and undergraduate students - TiffanyDavis
conceived problems not yet faced, but looming on the horizon;issues in the news; issues facing the Coast Guard on a daily basis and issues being discussed inthe current module in the class lectures.When presented with the course’s new outline, the other E&CE section members enthusiasticallyagreed with the course’s new direction. The course changes were submitted to the Academy’sCurriculum committee and then the Academic Council who both approved the changesbeginning the fall semester of 2004. To reflect the course’s new direction, in the fall of 2005 thecourse name was changed to “Introduction to Electrical and Computer Engineering” (IECE).Appendix C includes an overview of the new course’s lesson plans.FeedbackDuring the three semesters since
[43, 47]: Page 11.288.10• Long term effort,• Technical assistance, as well as support networks,• Collegial atmosphere in which teachers share views and experiences,• Opportunities for reflection on one’s own practice,• Focus on teaching for understanding through personal learning experiences, and• Professional development grounded in classroom practice.The teaching of science should be centered on inquiry-based strategies that incorporate thesolution of real world problems. The integrative nature of science and engineering lies in thefact that engineering and design also provides a systematic approach to problem solving in a realworld
learningcapabilities for the student and may be able to find new research opportunities. Communitymembers learn about engineering capabilities and better understand the university. Service isprovided to the underserved or for the common good of the community and benefits the students,faculty, the department, the local community, the institution, and the private sector15. Note thatone important fact about service learning is the reflection component done by the student. It hasbeen shown that over 65% of the students recognize the civic engagement portion of service-learning as a critical part of their education12.Today engineering curriculum lags behind other disciplines in offering service learningprograms12. This is unfortunate, because it is an effective
have existed degrees of biases due to the lackof privacy felt by respondents by having a relatively small student population.Unlike the study performed by Puerzer and Rooney7, this study did not have the advantage ofrespondents with a normalized perspective as that of alumni. This study involved sensitive Page 11.130.6topics current to the respondent, so it was considered possible that the respondent might be morebiased without the advantage of reflective perspective. For instance, a respondent in the secondyear-of-study may have believed he/she was prepared for research, but that respondent wouldperhaps believe that he/she was not prepared at
anincreasingly essential skill for engineers. This requires not only knowledge of statisticalconcepts related to DOE, but also the ability to integrate this methodology with fundamentalengineering principles toward designing and understanding experiments. However, currentengineering curriculums have not fully adapted to this need in the engineering industry. In the1970s and 1980s, the absence of sound statistical methods in the engineering work place led to acrisis in US industry where a large percentage of the market share went overseas. This crisis wasfirst reflected in the manufacture of automobiles and then in the process-oriented manufacture ofintegrated circuits.1,2 Only with the industrial investment towards quality, largely through the
, http://www.hkbu.edu.hk/~ppp/cpr/toc.html.6. Galileo Galilei , "Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences" (1638) ,translated by Henry Crew & Alfonso de Salvio, William Andrew Publ., Norwich, New York, U.S.A., http://www.williamandrew.com/pdf/TwoSciences.pdf7. von Glasersfeld Ernst, "A constructivist approach to experiential foundations of mathematical concepts", (In S.Hills, ed.), History and philosophy of science in science education. Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, 1992, 551-571.8. Dubinsky Ed. "Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking," In (D. Tall, ed.), Advanced Page 11.1263.15
competition is added to the simulation with significantrewards for the top competitors.Pre-packaged simulation curricula for use in the technology entrepreneurship classroom come ina wide range of options. In some ways, they reflect the variety of approaches to teachingentrepreneurship discussed in this paper. That is, some simulations use the business plan as thecenterpiece, requiring students use live data to gather, collate, and present information aboutmarkets, industries, and customers within the context of a business plan. Other simulations focuson small business settings, where students are required actually to make decisions aboutmerchandise mix, pricing, cost allocation, and other core business decisions.Some of the leading technology
02-03 07-08 12-13Figure 1. TAMUS URM STEM Enrollment from Fall 1992-2016. Data taken from NSF WebAMP survey.As with the URM STEM enrollment data, the URM STEM BS degree data in Figure 2 are alsocyclic as a reflection of the student pool of eligible majors. With few exceptions, growth hascontinued as enrollment has continued to increase. The degree data appear to have more dipssince the time to degree completion varies according to how quickly the students move throughtheir degree plans. Some students may postpone their studies for a year or two and then return tocomplete their degrees once they experience the benefit of a degree in the workforce. TAMUS URM STEM Bachelor Degrees 1,400 1,200 1,000
research accommodation and support from allthe organizations involved. Students from the author’s Engineering Geology, Rock Mechanics,Soil Mechanics I and II, Soil Engineering, Foundation Engineering classes, in particular James,Hannah, Bradley, Jaden, Jacob and Sung are all gratefully appreciated for providing their coursefeedback on a memorable learning, discussions and invaluable teaching experience. The findings,opinions expressed in this article does not reflect any organization’s endorsement. It purelycomes from the author’s motivation to better help teach and learn soil mechanics and engineeringwith intuition, insight, personal observations and experience, some remote and maybe evenremotely wild connections and/or cognitive
can be processed inonly one of two ways (addition and subtraction) at the most fundamental level, regardless ofthe device that processes it, be it electronic or biological. If so, we can infer that no matterhow a computing device processes information structurally, the duality in basic computationwill most likely manifest itself at higher-level device-dependent processes as well. Anotherreason for similarities may be that the design and use of electronic computing devices areimposed by biological computing agents that control them. As a result, the mind’s use ofelectronic computing devices should reflect how it does its own computing. This may be whymodeling is common to both electronic and biological computing because the thinkingprocess
Plan Review and Annual Business Forum Committees. In addition, she has served on the Charlottesville Business Innovation Council and as a founding Director for the Business Growth Network. She also served on the board of the Division of Professional Affairs Advisory Council for the American Association of Petroleum Geologists. Known for her candor and high ethical standards, positive energy and astute people skills, she has become a valued resource for business incubator programs throughout Virginia and her success as a business consultant is reflected in the successful outcomes of her clients. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Social Mechanisms of Supporting
graduates interviewed as part of thelarger study.Case 1: MarthaThe case of Martha (civil engineering) illustrates a seamless university-to-work transition. Althoughher transition experience was not necessarily typical of the selected graduates, her case reflects onepole along a wide spectrum of experiences. She represents high achieving students with a plethoraof opportunities derived partly from their native abilities and partly from social connections. Marthawas well-prepared for her transition, having started her job search in the summer before graduating.She compiled a list of 25 companies aligned with her interests, and submitted 15 applications thatresulted in ten interviews and eight job offers. But the offer she ultimately accepted was not
make sure that my next quarter goes a lot better. The biggest thing is learning from your mistakes. I did that a lot, a lot of reflecting and seeing how I can improve as a student and how to improve as a male in general and making the best out of the situation. I made sure I was active here [in college] in organizations and stuff and that kind of helped me a lot with my major and I just didn’t want to have my experience here be that I really just was here just for classes and not much else. I think a lot of times students come in and get tied up in school and the time goes by so fast then you don’t really have much else to look on besides the work in the classroom and not saying there’s nothing
active learning interventions and the prevalence of flipped classrooms have increasedin recent years (Koretsky et al. 2015). While still not universally accepted, some studies suggestthat both active learning interventions and flipped class approaches can increase student learningand performance (Freeman et al. 2014; O’Flaherty and Phillips 2015). Active learninginterventions can be generally defined as any instructional method that engages students in thelearning process (Prince 2004). Several core elements of active learning include student activity,student participation in the learning process, student reflection on ideas presented in the coursecurriculum, and regular assessment by students concerning their degree of understanding andhandling
andStarbucks applications. Most of the interviewees touted the efficiency of these mobile paymentapplications, as well as the targeting of deals and customer rewards as attractive features, butwhen asked why they do not use these applications their answers ranged from inconvenience,uncertainty regarding the benefits of the payment platform, and mistrust of the platformregarding privacy of their personal information. It is noteworthy, that the privacy of personalinformation is a factor that encourages adoption in the NFC platform, but discourages adoptionof online mobile payment platforms. This is reflected in Figure 5 which shows that adopters ofNFC payment and cash payments are more sensitive towards disclosure of PII with a scoresignificantly above
provided a way to reflect and improve the program. Ourwork developed similar conclusions. In a survey done to characterize programs collaborating withindustry partners across the country, it was noted that in most cases these collaborations lead tosuccess, but warrant further discussion and investigation 3 . Industry-academia collaborations alsofind a place in accreditation guidelines which makes it even more attractive to both academic andindustry partners 4 . Similar observations and experiences have been discussed in additional priorwork as well 5,6,7,8 , echoing many of the conclusions reached in our present work.Many of the academia-industry collaborations revolve around the senior design or capstoneproject experience, where an industry
whenplaced within the context that considers the professor’s specific objectives, the complexity ofthe subject matter, the physical setting of the classroom, and the capabilities of the learners.The challenge is to choose a suitable method at the appropriate time. Understanding the prosand cons of the lecture method is a helpful starting point.Lectures have a number of characteristics that does make them, for the right subject matter,desirable in the classroom (14) .It does, to a great extent, depend on the abilities andexperience of the lecturer. An able and committed lecturer can accomplish the following: 1. Relate the material proficiently and effectively, in a manner that reflects lecturer’s personal conviction and grasp of the subject