Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the ABET assessment coordinator for her department since 2008. Professor Bielefeldt is the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Exploring the Use of the Competing Values Framework in Engineering EducationAbstractThis study
Young, Cole, and Denton argued that “Even engineers, who havetraditionally been considered experts in technology, may not have the training or experiencenecessary to think about the social, political, and ethical implications of their work and so maynot be technologically literate” (p. 15). The papers presented at the 2016 conference (7 of the12), echo this recognition. Krupczak and Mina’s “An Exercise to Promote and Assess CriticalThinking in Sociotechnical Context” (2016a) is the most full and direct expression ofengineering students as a primary audience for TEL education. Working from the premise that“less attention has been given to examining if individuals trained as engineers actually possess abroad understanding of technology and are
per week. There are no course prerequisites. The redesigned fall 2019student learning outcomes for the course were to: (1) Gain awareness of the National Academyof Engineering Grand Challenges for Engineering, (2) Demonstrate an understanding ofengineering ethics, (3) Apply the design process to a National Academy of Engineering GrandChallenge, and (4) Develop/strengthen collaborative skills and abilities as part of a design team.Enrollment in large, introductory courses often fluctuates early in the semester. One-hundred andninety-six students were enrolled at the start of the course. Six withdrew in the first week; threeremained enrolled but completed only initial assignments or none at all. Table 1 displaysenrollment demographics of the
Social Class Include ethics, policy, and social justice [2,8] Give assignments and hold in-class discussions on ethical issues [8]same social class. Critical Theory: Feminist Critical Race Queer Theory
the University of Washington include introductory and honors courses in bioengi- neering, tissue and protein engineering lab courses, bioengineering ethics, leadership, and bioengineering capstone writing and design courses. She is committed to enhancing diversity and inclusivity in engineer- ing, and creating opportunities for undergraduate students to engage in K-12 educational outreach. Dr. Hendricks has over a decade of experience leading educational outreach and summer camp programs at both Duke University and the University of Washington. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Work-in-Progress: Reflection Enhances Student Engagement and Team Service Project
wavy fibers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Redesign of an Introduction to Mechanical Engineering Course to Keep Students Engaged and InterestedAbstractAn Introduction to Mechanical Engineering course is redesigned by integrating activities thatinvolve experimentation, exploration, analysis, and discovery. The course includes a briefintroduction of principal subject areas in the major and basic training with select software tools.Technical subjects are supplemented by presenting and discussing other important topicsincluding engineering ethics. Behaviors that promote future success such as class attendancealong with teamwork, communication, and other soft skills
of a model structure to earthquakes. Students will build an Caring 1. Students will appreciation of the societal understand impact of structural professional and engineering decisions ethical responsibilityFor each criterion, there is a standard to determine how well the criteria are met.For example for the Caring criteria 1, the standard is the hypothesis “ Can identify an
Paper ID #14697Exploring Interviews as Validity Evidence for the Engineering ProfessionalResponsibility AssessmentDr. Nathan E Canney, Seattle University Dr. Canney teaches civil engineering at Seattle University. His research focuses on engineering educa- tion, specifically the development of social responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and the role of the public in engineering decisions. Dr. Canney re- ceived bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stanford University with an emphasis
engineers deal with a wide variety of information at various steps of a project. Time constraints imposed on the design team as well the need for diverse information challenges design engineers. Diverse information ranges from abstract ideas in the conceptual design step to the smallest details in the detailed design, from checking patents for new ideas to avoid any infringing of existing patents and trade names. Because of this need, the ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) has articulated the importance of student outcomes to include “(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility”, and “(i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning.” [5] Design
, language and terminology for technical documents, preparing effective Page 26.1678.2figures and tables, interview development and structuring technical genres (e.g., reports,proposals, and memos). Furthermore, students were lectured on design topics ranging from needsidentification, development of design goals and criteria, use of Pugh and decision matrices, andthe iterative process. Several lectures also addressed the complex usability and ethical issuesassociated with designing devices for patients with disabilities.In an effort to provide students with hands-on experiences within the design process, multipleactivities were incorporated into the
to traditional approaches can increasestudents’ conceptual knowledge and their ability to transfer acquired knowledge to newersituations [1-3]. Furthermore, exposure to real-world challenges, especially when presented in anactive and practical learning environment increases both student interest and pedagogicaleffectiveness. The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) in its report, “Educating theEngineer of 2020,” contends that solving the Grand Challenges will require more than justproviding students with technical training. It argues that an engineering education must producegraduates who combine technical excellence with a multitude of other skills includingcommunication, teaming, ethical reasoning, and contextual analysis. Students
where learning may becompounded with new developments in electronic media. Sections 4 and 5 discuss theimportance of communications, ethics and accreditation which are important to have in aprogram competing in a global market. Section 6 provides suggestions, based on new trends and Page 26.337.3methodologies to meet the challenges in Pakistani engineering institutions having tremendousincrease in student enrollment. Section 7 summarizes the key points presented in the paper.2.0 Challenges of Teaching and LearningSeveral differences can be identified between the educational environments of developing andindustrialized countries such as
CreditsNumberMATH 141 Statistics I 3ELEC 343 Advanced Circuits Analysis 3ELEC 332 Industrial Power Electronics 3 GER 3SOET 377 Engineering Ethics 1MATH 364 Differential Equations 4 17Semester (6)SpringCourse Course Title CreditsNumberELEC 380 LAN/WAN Technology 3 ELEC 385 Electronic Communications I 3 ELEC 383 Power Transmission & Distribution 3 GER 3 Program Elective 3 SOET 348 Engineering
along with his Master’s of Science and Bachelor of Science from Purdue’s School of Civil Engineering. Justin is currently a Postdoctoral Researcher in the STEM Education Research Institute at IUPUI. Justin’s research interests include developing pedagogical strategies to improve STEM students’ ethical reasoning skills; exploring the role of empathy within design, innovation and sustainability; synthesizing the influence of societal and individual worldviews on decision-making; assessing STEM students’ learning in the spaces of design, ethics, and sustainability; and exploring the impact of pre-engineering curriculum on students’ abilities and career trajectories. c American Society for
current research focuses on three distinct but highly correlated areas – innovative design and entrepreneurship, engineering modeling, and global competency in engineering. She is currently associate editor for the AEE Journal.Dr. Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Distinguished Service Professor of industrial engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering education experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former Senior Editor of the Journal of Engineering
. Graduates are committed with lifelong learning, quality and safety. Graduates follow ethical principles and they contribute to the growth of the community.Typical employers are companies that manufacture steel, mining companies, dairy companies,beverage production, oil and gas service companies, and the airlines. Some of companies hiringgraduates are LAN, Gloria S.A., ABB S.A., SN/Power, and Maestranza Diesel SAC.The baccalaureate program in chemical engineering technology in this middle eastern industrialcollege is structured for a five-year duration consisting of a preparatory year, two specializationyears for the associate degree program followed by another two years for the BS degree program.The number of graduates has increased from 26 to
the individual learning outcome as possible. As previously mentioned, pre andpost questionnaires were used in previous iterations of this study. Additionally the newquestionnaires have been categorized into four categories: A. Communication, B.Teamwork, C. Ethics and Professionalism, and D. Leadership. These four new categorieswere selected as each category represents a desirable and employable work attribute. Thequestionnaire used a 5-point Likert scale in which 5 was ‘Strongly Agree’ and 1 was‘Strongly Disagree. The pre and post questionnaire questions can be found in the resultssection in Table 1 with a bar chart comparison of the results shown in Figure 2.3.2 Documentary/Instructional Videos with Post Questionnaire A video
University Xiaofeng Tang is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University. He worked as a postdoctoral fellow in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Eunjeong Park, The Ohio State UniversityAlexia Leonard, The Ohio State University Alexia Leonard is a second year PhD student in the Engineering Education program at The Ohio State University. She is currently working as a Graduate Teaching Associate for the First Year Engineering program within the Department of Engineering Education.Jack DeLanoDr. Kai Zhao, Florida State University Kai Zhao is a research faculty
and rulesProfessional engineering societies encourage professional licensure. They do this through policystatements and advocacy work. Two groups that are particularly relevant to civil engineers arethe American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and the National Society of ProfessionalEngineers (NSPE). Both groups have a code of ethics. A review of these codes reveals thatASCE and NSPE members are not ethically bound to be licensed; in fact neither code of ethicsdirectly mentions licensure [7], [8]. However, a review of policy statements from both groupsprovides more depth regarding professional engineering licensure in general and specifically forfaculty.ASCE Policy Statement 130 states that ASCE “supports and promotes the professional
importance of engineering College of Engineering ethics. 8. Describe the different engineering disciplines. College of Engineering 9. Develop an engineering entrepreneurship mindset. College of EngineeringLessons LearnedUNIV 1131 was taught for the first time in the fall 2018 semester. Over 1000 students weretaught in 35 sections. The class meetings included the content generally described above and, inparticular, devoted three class periods to departmental presentations and were given three classdays dedicated to design work for their team projects.Of the 35 engineering sections, UTA faculty taught 23. UTA drew from its strong industrypartnerships to support the remaining sections. Working engineers in the DFW area
2. Design and Conduct Experiments 3. Modern Engineering Tools 4. In-Depth Competence 5. Risk, Reliability and Uncertainty 6. Problem Formulation and Conceptual Analysis 7. Creative Design 8. Sustainability 9. Multimedia Breadth and Interactions 10. Societal Impact 11. Contemporary and Global Issues Professional Outcomes 12. Multi-disciplinary Teamwork 13. Professional and Ethical Responsibilities 14. Effective Communication 15. Lifelong Learning 16. Project Management 17. Business, Public
Pletta observed in The Engineering Profession, the objectives to which theengineering profession should aspire should be; Page 13.1197.6• To educate novices for the responsible practice of a specified professional art;• To transmit applicable existing knowledge after first “distilling” it for concise presentation;• To search for new knowledge that enhances the art involved;• To convey a sense of ethics and professionalism;• To motivate novices for public advocacy roles to protect the public health, safety, and welfare as well as the earth’s resources and its environment; and• To groom societal leaders for a technological
solving problems within their field of study; ‚ have the ability to gather and interpret relevant data (usually within their field of study) to inform judgments that include reflection on relevant social, scientific or ethical issues; ‚ can communicate information, ideas, problems and solutions to both specialist and non-specialist audiences; ‚ have developed those learning skills that are necessary for them to continue to undertake further study with a high degree of autonomy.Second cycle qualifications are awarded to students who: ‚ have demonstrated knowledge and understanding that is founded upon and extends and/or enhances that typically associated with the first cycle, and that provides a
including the Critical Path Method (CPM) and Program Evaluation and Review Techniques (PERT) For most of these topics we us the textbook Design of Devices and Systems, byMiddendorf & Engelman, Marcel Dekker, 1998, and have found it to be very effective. Wesupplement this with readings from Scientific American, The Wall Street Journal (case studies)and numerous other publications.Engineering professionalism segment of the Design I course A indicated above, the majority of this first of the two courses is devoted to engineeringdesign issues and the related tasks associated with Project Proposal production. We do however,devote significant time to ethics and to professional engineering registration. Our anchor for
apply engineering principles, procedures, and time management skills needed to solve complex, real-world problems. 3. To impart a sense of professional responsibility and work ethic in performing engineering tasks at a high level of expertise and accept the ethical responsibility to be accountable for the social and environmental impact of engineering practices. 4. To establish an educational environment in which students participate in inter- disciplinary activities, which will broaden their engineering education, help them develop professional interaction skills, and more effectively prepare students to work in today's integrated team environment. 5. To offer a curriculum that provides students an opportunity to become broadly educated
1 Session # 1630 Figure 1. The Gateway Web RepositoryThe Gateway Web Repository was designed to offer educators the ability to search anddownload learning resources in the areas of engineering curricula, professionaldevelopment, student mentoring and retention, and outcome-based assessment. In eachcategory, educators can find resources to support classroom activities as well as facultydevelopment and administrative tools. For example, a series of monographs on studentoral and written communication as well as course modules emphasizing ethics can befound on the Coalition's web site. Information on the Coalition’s various mentoring andsupport
. Paul R. Leiffer, LeTourneau University Paul R. Leiffer, Ph.D., P.E., is a professor in the School of Engineering and Engineering Technology and Chairman of the Engineering Department at LeTourneau University, where he has taught since 1979. He is the Co-developer of LeTourneau’s program in BioMedical Engineering. He received his B.S.E.E. from the State University of New York, Buffalo, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Drexel University. Prior to joining the faculty at LeTourneau, he was involved in cardiac cell research at the University of Kansas Medical Center. His professional interests include bioinstrumentation, engineering design, digital signal processing, and engineering ethics. Email: paulleiffer@letu.edu
objectives. Table 1. ABET EC 2000 Criterion 3 Outcomes 3 (paraphrased). Graduates must be able to ( have): a apply knowledge of math, science and engineering b(i) design and conduct experiments b(ii) analyze and interpret data c design a system, component or process d function on multidisciplinary teams e identify, formulate and solve eng. problems f understand ethical and professional responsibility g communicate effectively h understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global
Dynamics 33250:244 Intro Economic Analysis 3 4300:202 Intro to Mechanics of Solids 3 Elective : See Bulletin 4600:300 Thermodynamics 4 Humanities : 10 Cr 4600:321 Kinematics of Machines 33400:210 Humanities Western Tradition 4 4200:305 Materials Science 23600:120 Introduction to Ethics 3 4600:360 Engineering Analysis 3 Elective : See Bulletin 4600:315 Heat Transfer Process 3 Area Studies : 2 Cr 4400:320 Basic Electrical Engineering 4
partners in helping to assess all of the “softer skills” in EC 2000, such as these: (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams—teaching group/team communication strategies in classes; assessing the group processes involved in a team engineering project such as a senior design; or using personality inventories to learn to handle style conflicts (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility—including perhaps some of the excellent case studies now available on the web on engineering ethics, the codes of the different professional societies (such as NSPE, IEEE, and others) (g) an ability to communicate effectively—defining “effectively