engineering education) in 2017.Dr. Om Prakash Jain, Independent Consultant c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 A framework for nurturing a symbiotic relationship between faculty development and institution building in the Indian contextIntroduction Every reasonably large organization needs a core function of manufacturing or servicedelivery supported by various feeder functions such as strategic planning, sales and marketing,infrastructure management, and human resources. These functions are required to work inharmony so that the organization can build excellence in its core area of operation. Whilecorporate organizations have developed mature processes and programs for building
a water table experiment. The planned course evaluation and assessment ofstudent learning are presented. The course is taught at the University of California Davis inSpring Quarter 2017 for the first time.IntroductionMechanical and aerospace engineering are multi-disciplinary sciences. Many engineering topicsand the principles behind them are sophisticated, so that real-world applications have to be basedon theoretical concepts, numerical computer simulations, and experimental verification.Undergraduate students are usually presented with a lot of theory in their classes, but fewapplications, computer simulations and experiments and rarely all of these topics in acomprehensive, integrated course. In general, the engineering workforce is
presenting the findings in both oral and written form. The project wasinstrumental in teaching the value and importance of the following: (1) close interaction andpersonal relationships between students and instructor; (2) collaborative efforts and teamworkamong the students themselves; (3) organization and discipline; (4) time management andcommunication skills; (5) openness to research ideas and concepts; and (6) appreciation of theschool’s diverse curriculum. Finally, the overall goal was to encourage and teach the studentshow to think, plan, analyze, create, revise or improve what they create, and above all askquestions.IntroductionThis eight-week summer research project, also referred to as the Maybeck Chapel project, wasundertaken for the
ofcollaboration technologies. Although there has been great emphasis on developing collaborationcompetencies in the engineering curriculum, empirical evidence of successful strategies fordistributed team settings is scarce. As an attempt to fill this gap this study investigates theimpact of a scalable intervention in developing virtual collaboration skills. The intervention,based on instructional scaffolds embedded with collaboration technologies, is aimed atsupporting specific processes including planning, goal setting, clarifying goals and expectations,communication, coordination and progress monitoring. A quasi-experimental design was used toevaluate the impact of the intervention on student teamwork skills. Data from 278 graduate andundergraduate
from the studentworkforce as they near completion of their co-op regarding the effectiveness of and value addedby the training program. Particular emphasis is placed on relevance to their actual workexperience, and content and duration of each topic. Additionally, managers continuouslyimprove their training experience by varying the delivery method of the subject matter throughthe coursework (i.e., lecture, workshop, self-guided, web based as examples). At least six weeks prior to the start of a training cycle, a team meets to review the effectivenessof the prior training round as well as its relevance to the work planned for the incoming students.This participative approach includes the best
knowledge that converts ideas into successful products or processes. As a result, many of the same skills such as exploring, mentoring, planning, organizing, scheduling,controlling, communicating, and leading could be used in both careers with minor modification.Dealing with people is always difficult and requires great skill. This is especially true whendealing with students. Many students are in a class not by choice, but simply because it is arequirement for graduation. In some cases, these students are uninterested in the subject,unmotivated, and quite simply bored. However, relating the subject matter directly to real worldindustrial and consumer applications tend to spark their interest. Actual products involvingautomotive components, robotic
schools, online and newspaperadvertising, attendance at local college fairs, and postings through social media. Turnout for the eventwas anticipated to yield approximately 40 interested high school juniors and seniors with everyreasonable effort made to accommodate everyone wishing to attend. As project planning andconstruction progressed it became apparent that the event should be capped at 45 participants toeffectively accommodate the range and sequence of activities planned without excessive strain onresources.Locally, PMTM was the first of its kind and created such a buzz of excitement and interest that minimalrecruiting was necessary. Word of mouth from guidance departments at local and regional high schoolshelped push registration to 98
. Page 26.1459.5 Table 3. Statistical analysis comparing current cohort’s current (pre) and intended (post) frequency of STEM classroom practices Question Survey N Mean Std. Dev. P-value How often do you use (or plan to use) Pre 20 3.80 1.322 0.673 teacher-led lectures or discussion Post 16 3.63 1.088 How often do you use (or plan to use) Pre 20 2.00 0.918 0.033* student-led class discussions or Post 16 2.81 1.276 presentations How often do you have (or plan to Pre 20 4.25 0.911 0.865 have) students
plans for the future. A discussion on theconcept of a polytechnic institution, its definition, and transformative nature is included to clarifythe reasons behind this radical and somewhat unsettling approach to education reformation.IntroductionAcademic institutions of higher learning are facing many difficult challenges, includingdeclining enrollment trends, complaints about costs vs. value, curricular stagnation, and inabilityto adapt quickly to changing environments facing graduating students. Many researchers andauthors claim that the traditional educational methods and structure espoused by universities isoutdated and potentially restrictive to learners. 1, 2 The College of Technology at PurdueUniversity is dealing with these challenges
like to workon. Based on their interest, the students were subdivided into two teams: one toaddress the remediation of an acid mine drainage site and one to evaluate possiblehandling methods of flow-back water from fracking sites. The activities includedin the projects were an in depth literature review, prototype design, laboratoryassessment, economic analysis, environmental regulation evaluation, communityaction plan development and submission of a final design report. The objectivewas to assess if these activities could enable the students' to develop into aneffective interdisciplinary team and to address the potential lack of interest in coreSTEM classes. In addition to describing the students' key activities, we willdescribe issues faced
, the goals for the program are:GOAL A: Increase department diversity.The primary objective is to attract and retain traditionally underrepresented groups to engineering,especially women, and in effect, increase departmental diversity. In order to achieve this, the CECMdepartment plans to expose a wide range of groups to the civil engineering profession before theyenter Georgia Southern University by developing relationships with local high schools and communitycolleges. Additionally, the department will continue to host the “Camp Invention” summer camp, forgrades 1-6, and continue to provide faculty and students as mentors and judges for the AssociatedGeneral Contractors (AGC) Skills competition. Also critical to the achievement of the
interdisciplinary research within academic schools outside ofits engineering technology host program.This paper presents the formation and history of the partnership as well as an overview of initialinteractions and planning that lead to a large-scale collaborative effort between academia andindustry. Also detailed are the upfront commitments of academia and industry required tolaunch an open-ended project of this scale and the challenges associated with the dynamic natureof project scope, instructional delivery, timeline and budget. This examination includes a focuson the roles of faculty and industry participants during all stages of the project including pre-planning, budgeting, instruction, design, sourcing, procurement, implementation
throughlectures/lecture notes in an attempt to transfer all the factual material within a prescribed time.Since the legacy course suffered from the sin of coverage, we knew our course needed to beredesigned as logically derived from the results sought, not inferred from the methods, books,and activities with which we are most comfortable. This way, curriculum lays out the mosteffective ways of achieving specific results.We believe that the most effective curricular design is “backward”. Backward design arose intandem with the concept of learning standards, and it is widely viewed as a practical process forusing standards to guide the development of a course. As a strategy for designing, planning, andsequencing curriculum and instruction, backward design
types of research activities the teams participated in, thecontent and focus of the professional development activities, and an overview of the developedlesson plans.1. IntroductionAs an aspect of the extensive K-12 outreach and extension activities of The Engineering Place inthe College of Engineering at NC State University the authors submitted and were awarded anNSF Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) Site[1] grant. The grant concept involves stratifiedlaboratory research teams working on aspects of NAE Engineering Grand Challenge[2]-focusedproblems including: sustainability (solar/renewable energy), health (biomechanics), security(computer network security), and joy of living (personalized learning). Each research teamincludes one
Paper ID #27877Inspiring the Next Generation: Lessons Learned from the National SummerTransportation Institute ProgramDr. Yongping Zhang P.E., California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Dr. Yongping Zhang is an Assistant Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Cal Poly Pomona. He is also a registered Professional Engineer in Civil Engineering. Dr. Zhang currently serves on the Transportation Research Board’s Committee on Transportation Plan- ning Applications as well as Task Force on Understanding New Directions for the National Household Travel Survey Task Force. From 2009 to 2015, Dr. Zhang worked as
to participate in ‘teachingsquares’. In these ‘teaching squares’, the faculty members participated infacilitated discussions on class session planning, observed each other andcollected learning assessment data as evidence of attainment of studentlearning outcomes. In this paper, results from these interventions on theattainment of specific workshop outcomes among faculty includingimplementation of some best practices in teaching will be reported. Specificattitudes and misconceptions related to teaching among higher educationpractitioners in India will be discussed.BackgroundAll India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) dashboard [1] shows 3124approved engineering education institutions in India with a total faculty countof 338,193
additional teachers was also provided byindustry and Gene Haas Foundation. The industrial partners also contributed with complimentaryprofessional training and free computer-aided drafting and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) softwareto participating teachers and their schools. The program trained 29 teachers in the previous two summers. The teachers publishedtheir lesson plans and implemented in their classes with the new activities and knowledge thatthey have acquired during the training. Some teachers participated in a regional conference,guided and brought their students to different competitions, and won numerous awards includingthe first prize in robotics competition at the state level. Issues from the first summer was learntand rectified; the
Director of Institutional Research and Planning for the university. Partell received his doctoral degree in Political Science from Binghamton University in May 1999 and his bachelor’s de- gree from the State University of New York, College at Buffalo. In his role as Associate Dean, Partell is responsible for the Watson School’s academic programs and policies, academic support programs, cur- ricular planning, accreditation, space planning, and enrollment planning and management. Some of his accomplishments as Associate Dean include spearheading the graduate enrollment growth strategy that resulted in an increase in graduate enrollment of 400 students over a 4-year period, managed a $4 mil- lion teaching and graduate
. Participants employed multiple self-generated hands-on methods toestimate the volume of trash collected by molding the bags of trash into cylindrical, rectangular,and ellipsoid shapes to simplify the estimation of their volume. They then combined theirunderstanding of geometry and algebra with critical thinking to design their own methods forestimating the volume of the various types of trash collected.Participants also explored how to develop a business/financial plan for the operation of arecycling business in their community for the fictional purpose of submitting a proposal to thetribal government. The plan used profit and cost equations to analyze the trash data. Lessoncontent emphasized algebra and ratios, while instructional methods emphasized
, and the opportunity that these challenges presented for engineering and technologyeducation at BYU. Subsequent discussions used the principles taught in “Good to Great4” toformulate a plan for moving ahead in a direction aligned with our strengths and the universitymission. Additional activities aimed at encouraging faculty involvement included presentationsto the faculty, faculty workshops, and the involvement of key senior faculty members on acollege strategic initiatives committee.Strategic Planning Initiatives Advisory CommitteeA college committee was formed to direct the development of educational outcomes thatcharacterize graduates capable of meeting the opportunities and demands of engineering andtechnology in the 21st century. This
year, planning forthe course typically begins at the end of the previous spring semester. The process begins withstudents and faculty suggesting projects for the following year as the current year’s projects winddown. Project ideas are usually a mixture of continued research from former student work andnew applications for both the engineering department and industry partners. Any student orfaculty member in the program may submit a project idea. We also receive a few externalsubmissions from colleagues and business partners who are familiar with the courses. Duringthe summer, designated faculty coordinate with the proposed project sponsors to determineproject scope, technical complexity, resource requirements, sponsor support and availability
demonstrations of team communication skills and written assignments such as meetingminutes and agendas, project presentations in the form of a design review and test plan, and ateam final report. The students are seen applying course-supplied techniques in their teamprocess and design and test of their robotic solutions. The course is structured to allow for peer-reviewed writing assignments, professional development, and team skills coaching. The coursealso provides a convenient opportunity to discuss relevant professional issues such asprofessionalism, ethics, registration, and engineering societies. Student feedback on the coursehas been positive, and students carry enthusiasm into subsequent design sequence courses.IntroductionEngineering is a
well as their continued efforts to be asuccessful engineering student at Virginia Tech. During class time, the students are exposed to anumber of different speakers and activities that focus on leadership from a number of differentperspectives. Opportunities are available for the students to organize and lead events, givingthem first hand experience with planning programs and taking charge of a team. As in the firstyear seminar class, this course is also built around the theme that learning is both an individualand a collaborative process. The course topics for the second-year seminar course are listed inTable 2.The second-year course objectives are: • To foster achievement in second-year engineering students; • To enhance personal
, electronic devices, digital logic,power, electric machines, and often instrumentation and controls. The decision for which topicswill be chosen and developed for a compact electrical engineering course in a generalengineering program requires thorough understanding of the program and careful planning. Thispaper describes the planning and initial delivery experiences of a circuit analysis course in anewly-established general engineering program. The paper relates the program mission with thecurriculum structure and how the circuits course builds a foundation for advanced topics andconcentration areas such as bioprocess engineering. The paper also examines the valuablelessons learned from the impact of prerequisite knowledge on topic selection, math
roundsare used until an adequate group consensus is reached. This study utilized a questionnairedeveloped considering the individual input from a group of twelve practicing structural engineersand several academics from the Denver and Front Range Colorado area for an e-mail basedsurvey planned for a maximum of three rounds. The first two rounds of the survey were devotedto obtaining a distribution of respondee’s expectation for achievement levels to be reached by theaspiring structural engineer both upon completion of a masters-level program in structuralengineering and after five years of practice in the profession. If the results of Round 2 variedsignificantly from those of Round 1, the planned use of Round 3 was to conduct Round 3 in thesame
Computing Learning Activities with ScratchAbstractIn this paper we present a case study of 117 Colombian elementary grade students’ performanceand perceptions of a learning activity aiming to promote computational thinking guided by theCollege Board’s CS Principles and Scratch. The lesson plan was designed by the teacher as partof a three-day teacher professional development workshop within an advanced topics course fora master degree in engineering. As part of the workshop, participants were invited to implementtheir designs in their own classrooms and, together with the researchers, conduct classroomaction research. Workshop participants designed their own instruments and gathered data onstudents’ perceptions of the learning module and identified
covering about two weeks of instruction, so that faculty can pick and choose the modulesthey like to build a course that meets their needs. The curriculum modules are specificallydesigned to be discovery-based, and to illustrate real-world contemporary problems whoseengineering solutions benefit society. The projects are planned by faculty experts in such a waythat the underlying complex principles and concepts are made tractable for first-year students.IV. HOW ARE THE PROJECTS CREATED AND VETTED?Project submission is a three-stage process. First, the proposer submits a one-page summaryabstract. If accepted after a double-blind peer review, the proposer is invited to submit a moredetailed project proposal. If the detailed project proposal is
future directions and a section to which students writetheir comments on. The content of the lecture will be listed in the next section, followed by themethod and results of survey including student comments. In the last section, the effectivenessand outcomes of the lecture will be discussed based on the results followed by planned futurework. Page 25.850.4Lecture ContentThe microfluidics lecture was based on a presentation with 60 PowerPoint slides includingintroduction to microfluidics and scaling laws, basic theory, design methods, state-of-the-artapplications, current and projected market and career opportunities. The content covered
by Hispanic students. Thesefigures have basically remained steady since 1995.In an effort to address the growing issue of under-representation of Latinas in science,technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM), Estrella Mountain Community College andIntel Corporation collaborated to host a conference specifically aimed at closing the gender anddiversity gap in the STEM fields. Estrella Mountain, a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI),partnered with Intel to plan and design the Hermanas: Dise a Tu Futuro conference. IntelCorporation collaborates with educators in communities around the Valley to improve the qualityof STEM education by providing commitments of time, programs and resources to help studentsrealize their full potential.Hosted by
Session 3660 Improving Engineering Programs at Kuwait University Through Continuous Assessment: Preliminary Results Andreas Christoforou, Mohammad Al-Ansary, Ahmet Yigit Department of Mechanical Engineering College of Engineering and Petroleum Kuwait University P.O. Box 5969, Safat 13060 KuwaitAbstractThe initial stages of the implementation of continuous assessment plans for the engineeringprograms at Kuwait University have been completed. Assessment is conducted