we are equipping them with knowledge that is applicable toequipment they interact with daily. In addition, they will have had a positive experience withengineering that will hopefully ignite an interest for further learning.1.0 IntroductionIn 2001 an outreach project was designed and implemented to provide kindergarten students withengineering technology experiences.1 In that project kindergarten students were introduced tocurrent, voltage, batteries, conductors and insulators. The project was not only a success withkindergarten students but also with 1 st grade students.The authors wanted to add another module to the kindergarten engineering curriculum. Thetopic of digital logic was decided upon. In an ASEE 2000 paper, Cooney and
probably “Benchmarks for Scientific Literacy,” part of the NSF-funded Project 2061 of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Mostrecently, in 2000, the Technology for All Americans project of the InternationalTechnology Education Association (ITEA) has produced “Standards for TechnologicalLiteracy: Content for the Study of Technology.” Of course, the engineering andtechnology standards have not been as widely accepted as the science and math ones,because the former subjects are less frequently formally part of the curriculum inAmerican schools, but they have been gaining some currency recently (see, for example,M.D. Burghardt, “Assessing Elementary School Design Portfolios,” The TechnologyTeacher 59, 2).A difficulty of this field
StateUniversity found that minorities, in particular, increased their laboratory performance in a hybridenvironment. Perhaps the most compelling argument can be made by Landers7 in his doctoralthesis where a large number and variations of hybrid courses were analyzed. He states (p. 61):“it appears that online instruction is more effective than traditional instruction when seekingknowledge and problem solving gains”. In creating a hybrid Senior Design offering, facultymembers would have more opportunities to make connections with the on-line material and theteam project.Many of the present lecture topics apply directly to the design and construction of an object orstructure and dissemination of knowledge (lists and facts). The teams that work on projects
, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Software Engineering in the School of Graduate and Professional Studies at The Pennsylvania State University. Prior to entering academia she worked in industry and government as a software and electronics engineer. Her research interests include problem solving in software and systems design, team learning, and project management. Page 22.838.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Improving Team Learning in Systems DesignAbstractA detailed statistical experiment to study the effect of the cognitive collaborative model (CCM
Engineering Topics to Freshmen Students Using Roomba Platform1. IntroductionThis paper describes integration of low-cost Roomba autonomous vacuum cleaner robotsinto Introduction to Engineering course offered by the Department of EngineeringScience at Sonoma State University. The main purpose of introducing Roomba platformis to teach and integrate introductory engineering concepts, such as numbering systems,microcontrollers, serial and parallel interfaces, sensor technologies, wireless technology,and high-level programming language, such as LabVIEW. Through his experiment, astheir final design project, teams of freshmen students were required to design their owncreative Roomba projects involving sound, light, sensors, and even
AC 2011-1287: INITIAL IMPACT OF A FIRST-YEAR DESIGN-BUILD-TEST-COMPETE COURSELeslie Olsen, University of Michigan Professor and Director, Technical Communication ProgramPeter D. Washabaugh, University of Michigan Arthur F. Thurnau Professor Associate Professor of Aerospace Engineering Director, Wilson Student Team Project Center Page 22.879.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Initial Impact of a First-Year Design-Build-Test-Compete Course March 11, 2011AbstractFor the past six years there
activities such as collection and analysis of data and publications as part of the National Science Foundation’s Science Partnerships Program as well as in the implementation of capstone projects at the Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Educa- tion (CIESE). Prior to joining CIESE he was a practicing chemical engineer on water treatments, envi- ronmental management systems and quality assurance. Chris received a BE in in Chemical Engineering from University of Guayaquil, an Environmental Technology Certificate from the Swedish International Development Agency, and a ME in Engineering Management from Stevens Institute of Technology. He’s currently pursuing a PhD in Financial Engineering at Stevens.Alice F
response theory methodology.Mary Lynn Brannon, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Mary Lynn Brannon, Instructional Support Specialist at the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at the Pennsylvania State University, has a Master of Arts Degree in Education and Human Development specializing in Educational Technology Leadership. Her work focuses on projects that measure and assess student perceptions of learning related to their experiences with engineering course innovations. She is a faculty development consultant with previous experience in instructional design and instructor of the Graduate Assistant Seminar for engineering teaching assistants.Elizabeth C. Kisenwether, Pennsylvania
Engineering from the University of Stuttgart, Germany in 1995.Peter L. Russell, Stevens Institute of Technology Peter Russell is an Industry Assistant Professor of Engineering and Science at Stevens Institute of Tech- nology. He earned a BFA, BARCH from the Rhode Island School of Design. Mr. Russell has extensive experience in the architectural profession. As an Assistant Professor, Mr. Russell is managing interdisci- plinary projects for both The Department of Energy and The Department of Defense. Page 22.1278.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 SE CAPSTONE
AC 2011-1211: SE CAPSTONE: INTEGRATING SYSTEMS ENGINEER-ING FUNDAMENTALS TO ENGINEERING CAPSTONE PROJECTS: EX-PERIENTIAL AND ACTIVESteven Corns, Missouri University of Science and TechnolotyCihan H. Dagli, Missouri University of Science & Technology Cihan Dagli is a Professor of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, and Affiliated Profes- sor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Missouri University of Science and Technology. He received BS and MS degrees in Industrial Engineering from the Middle East Technical University and a Ph.D. in Applied Operations Research in Large Scale Systems Design and Operation from the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom, where from 1976 to 1979 he was a British
- Introducing Multidisciplinary Capstone Design to the United States Coast Guard AcademyThe United States Coast Guard Academy (USCGA) is one of five Service Academies educatingand training generations of Military Officers. USCGA offers eight majors including fourengineering majors- Civil, Electrical and Computer, Mechanical and Naval Architectural andMarine Engineering. Each major has traditionally taught its own capstone design course, whichranged from a one-semester paper project to a two-semester project with a functional prototype.Multidisciplinary projects have been rare and collaboration on projects has usually been limitedto having cadets from other majors working as part of design teams, but usually being enrolled ina separate
Student creations 17 (12/12 – 12/16) Final Project Presentations (during Final Exam period) * In-lab group presentations and reports are due for the indicated modules on these dates.Lecture ContentThe lecture portion of the course was given on Tuesdays. The first lecture (Week 2above) provided basic orientation information for new ECE students. Lectures 2-5reviewed the role of creativity in science and engineering, the importance of innovationin the greatest engineering achievements of the 20th century12,13, neurological conceptsunderlying current understandings of creativity, convergent and divergent thoughtprocesses, the impacts of conventional education on creativity, relationships betweenintelligence and creativity, whether
promoting diversity and international education at UNI. He is also a recipient of 2011 UNI C.A.R.E Sustainability Award for the recognition of applied research and development of renewable energy appli- cations at UNI and Iowa in general. He was recognized as an Advisor of the Year Award nominee among eight other UNI faculty members in 2010-2011 academic year Leadership Award Ceremony. Pecen re- ceived a Milestone Award for outstanding mentoring of graduate students at UNI, and recognition from UNI Graduate College for acknowledging the milestone that has been achieved in successfully chair- ing 10 or more graduate student culminating projects, theses, or dissertations, in 2011 and 2005. He was also nominated for 2004
, which I termedskeptical reverence: a balance between seeing mathematics as an indispensible tool andunderstanding its limitations. I argued that this disposition was functional and necessary forengineers to carry out design and analysis effectively; the wrong level of reliance onmathematics—too much reverence or too much skepticism—would incur safety and economicrisks. Unanswered by this prior research was how these engineers developed their perspective onthe relationship between mathematics and engineering and this disposition of skepticalreverence. This question is taken up by the study reported here.This study was part of a larger project to investigate how engineers develop as problem solverswho apply mathematics effectively. I conjecture
individuals for whom they were written.The system was piloted during the fall semester of 2011 in a variety of courses ranging fromphilosophy to math and science to engineering and engineering technology. Two surveys weredeveloped, one for students and the other for faculty, to examine the effectiveness of the systemin meeting the goals of the project. The student response rate was about 15% (56 out of 368)while faculty response rate was 70% (7 out of 10).Overall, a majority of the students and faculty found the system to be beneficial. For themajority of faculty, the system saved time over previous methods of peer evaluation they hadused. This paper examines the features of the system in detail, discusses the student and facultysurvey results, looks
present research interest includes engineering education, manufacturing of nanomaterials, and their diversified applications in areas like biomedical en- gineering and alternative energy. He is the Co-inventor of award-winning (including 2011 R&D 100) Forcespinning [TM] technology.Dr. Robert A. Freeman, University of Texas, Pan AmericanDr. Dean Schneider, Texas Engineering Experiment Station Dean Schneider is an Associate Director Texas Center for Applied Technology of the Texas Engineering Experiment Station (TEES). TEES is the engineering research agency for the state of Texas and is a mem- ber of the Texas A&M University System. His projects, with a combined budget of more than $5 million, provide technical
such as PV Watts calculator; Page 25.504.3work with GIS maps depicting landscape slopes or temperature levels; sizing of inverters, wires,disconnects, over-current protection devices (OCPDs) and other components of PV Systemaccording to NEC guidelines; and performing economic analysis of the PV system.Student progress is assessed based on the mixture of homework assignments, tests and finalgroup design project. The final project involves application of all learned steps and techniques todesign a viable PV System in a teamwork environment, production of project report, andpreparation of a 15-20 minute PowerPoint presentation. Table 1 presents
offered as a first professional degree. It supports and augments therecommendations found in the NAE publication, Educating the Engineer of 2020.2The opportunity to provide an independent “outside-in” assessment of the scope and quality ofacademic programs worldwide is an idea whose time may be near. Consider, as an example, thefollowing press release “The University of Maryland’s A. James Clark School of Engineering,one of the premier engineering schools in the U.S., has earned accreditation for three of itsgraduate degree programs from the Project Management Institute (PMI®) and the PMI GlobalAccreditation Center for Project Management (GAC). The first engineering school to be soaccredited, the Clark School is also one of only three accredited
for his efforts on promoting diversity and international education at UNI. He is also a recipient of 2011 UNI C.A.R.E Sustainability Award for the recognition of applied research and development of renewable energy appli- cations at UNI and Iowa in general. He was recognized as an Advisor of the Year Award nominee among eight other UNI faculty members in 2010-2011 academic year Leadership Award Ceremony. Pecen re- ceived a Milestone Award for outstanding mentoring of graduate students at UNI, and recognition from UNI Graduate College for acknowledging the milestone that has been achieved in successfully chair- ing 10 or more graduate student culminating projects, theses, or dissertations, in 2011 and 2005. He
the students undertake three group project assignments intimber, concrete and steel respectively. In ARC311, Timber Design, Concrete Design andSteel Design are covered in that order. After students are finished with the lectures foreach material, a project is assigned. For each project they are presented with a volume orseries of volumes with a prescribed program (usually one that requires a mix of large andsmall structural spans). They are also provided with the relevant live load tables, snowload maps, some estimates of dead load, a chart with allowable spans for various systems,and any other background information that they might need. They are also given a list ofsteps to streamline the process.The students work in groups of 3-4. They may
10 8 6 4 2 0 9/19/2011 10/3/2011 10/17/2011 10/31/2011 11/14/2011 11/28/2011 12/12/2011 12/26/2011 Date Fig. 1. Homepage Views ET 332a Fall 2011Course instructors wishing to use multimedia should determine the project scope and resultingwork product and then select software tools that produce the best result with minimum additionaltraining and time investment. Instructors should experiment with various tool combinations todetermine what
resources system problem. In the intervening years, he continued work on large scale system based problems. He has expertise in model- ing architectures for complex engineering systems such as transportation, infrastructure, water resources, and energy distribution using computational intelligence techniques He is the Founder of the Missouri S&T’s system engineering graduate program. Dagli is the Director of the Smart Engineering Systems Laboratory and a Senior Investigator in the DoD Systems Engineering Research Center-URAC. He is an INCOSE Fellow 2008 and IIE Fellow 2009. He has been the PI, Co-PI, or Director of 46 research projects and grants totaling more than $29 million from federal, state, and industrial
”. ASEE Annual Conference 2001.[8] Arthur Haman, et al, “A student-centered solar photovoltaic installation project”. ASEE 2007.[9] UTPA Solar Radiation Lab link - http://www.nrel.gov/midc/utpa_srl/[10] NSF RET Grant: Research Experience for Teachers in emerging and Novel Engineering Technologies in the Rio Grande Valley. NSF Award CNS – 1132609. Page 25.1456.12
withnew devices for occupied space environmental control. Students are very motivated to createdevices that positively influence their learning environment. This paper presents details ofstudent projects which interface with the microgrid system. Details of the microgridinfrastructure are also presented and discussed.IntroductionEngineering technology students at Penn State - Berks are involved with an innovative andemerging technology in the area of indoor building energy distribution. With the help of industrypartners of the Emerge Alliance® consortium, an engineering laboratory/classroom has beenconverted to use a 24VDC system to power its lighting needs.1 The 24VDC power is distributedthroughout the room via conductors embedded in the support
myriad of factors produce extreme pressures on academic programs, and more broadly oncolleges and universities themselves. Institutions of Higher Education are increasingly beinglooked at to provide support for current students, to produce capable graduates, and to meet theneeds of the labor markets. In order to attempt to meet these daunting goals, various aspects ofthe academic curriculum will need to be adjusted and formalized.A recently completed NSF-funded project at Burlington County College, entitled “Institutional-Level Reform of an Engineering Technology Program.” sought to identify critical skills andcompetencies needed by industry (both technical and non-technical) and to examine the meansby which these competencies are incorporated
project manages the NCSU MAE State Energy Internship and Fellowship Program under the direction of Dr. Stephen Terry. To date, the program has 35 interns under the mentorship of energy engineers in both the private and public sectors. When available, Albers assists with energy assessments for both the program and the Industrial Assessment Center. Page 25.1102.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Recommending Hydrogen Fuel Cell Retrofits for Forklifts in Energy Audit Reports by Industrial Assessment CentersAbstractIndustrial Assessment Centers (IAC) are
provide a clear identification of specific steps that are taken to accomplish each goal. These are selected after the internal and external environmental scans are completed. Each objective and goal has a “champion” assigned to it. This is a person who insures that it gets accomplished. Examples of goals and objectives: Excellence in Teaching and Learning 1. Attract more students, including better prepared students and a more diverse population to the school. . Champion’s name________________________________ 2. Increase involvement in Project Lead the Way and similar programs. Champion’s
ismaterial neutral, the Small Scale Structures and Large Scale Structures courses are materialspecific. The Small Scale Structures course focuses on timber and single story steel framedbuildings. The Large Scale Structures course focuses on multi-story reinforced concrete andstructural steel framed buildings. Students learn the characteristics, advantages anddisadvantages of different structural systems, how to evaluate the different systems and how todevelop the preliminary structural designs of buildings. The courses also cover foundations,cladding and long span and high rise structures.The primary goal of this series is to give these students tools that will assist them in their careersas project leaders so they can better produce efficient