students’ self-reported motivation and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.Humanit Soc Sci Commun 8, 176 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00860-44. Dhawan S (2020) Online learning: a panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. J EducTechnol Syst 49(1):5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395209340185. Fatani TH (2020) Student satisfaction with videoconferencing teaching quality during theCOVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Educ 20(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02310-26. Kubelick, K, Gleason, R, Rains, J., Capstone During COVID-19: Medical DeviceDevelopment at Home to Solve Global Health Problems. Biomedical Engineering Education,Vol. 1, No. 1, January 2021 ( 2020) pp. 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-020-00035-87
. Should one or more of these systems produce an error, theentire turbine system will shut itself down and prevent further rotation until the maintenance teamhas corrected the error (s).Once the participants familiarized themselves with how the systems were linked, they completedtroubleshooting exercises. The turbine generated error codes during these exercises and displayedthem through the SCADA system. The participants would identify the error code to determinewhich portion of the turbine produced the error. They would then examine the physical systemsand troubleshoot the connections until they identified the precise issue. The participants completedthese exercises by utilizing multimeters and looking for visual and audio cues from the
. References:1. Moreno, S. E., Muller, C., Asera, R., Wyatt, L., & Epperson, J. (1999). Supporting minoritymathematics achievement: The Emerging Scholars Program at The University of Texas atAustin. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 5(1), 53-66.2. Budny, D. (1992). Mathematics bridge program. Proceedings of Frontiers in EducationTwenty-Second Annual Conference.3. Cancado, L., Reisel, J, & Walker, C. (2018). Impacts of a summer bridge program inengineering on student retention and graduation. Journal of STEM Education, 19(2), 26-31.4. Gleason, J., Boykin, K., Johnson, P., Bowen, L., Raju, D., & Slappey, C. (2010). Integratedengineering math-based summer bridge program for student retention. Advances in
, 2020. https://www.fastcompany.com/90515678/science-explains- why-unconscious-bias-training-wont-reduce-workplace-racism-heres-what-will (accessed May 31, 2021).[11] S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, R. A. Layton, and M. M. Camacho, “Beyond pipeline and pathways: Ecosystem metrics,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 32–56, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20250.
-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaBrodwin, E., & St. Fleur, N. (2021, February 19). FDA issues alert on ‘limitations’ of pulseoximeters, without explicit mention of racial bias. STAT News.https://www.statnews.com/2021/02/19/fda-issues-alert-on-limitations-of-pulse-oximeters-without-explicit-mention-of-racial-bi/Buolamwini, J., & Raji, I. D. (2019). Actionable auditing: Investigating the impact of publiclynaming biased performance results of commercial AI products. In Proceedings of the 2019Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and Society.Cech, E. A. (2014). Culture of disengagement in engineering education? Science, Technology, &Human Values, 39(1), 42–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913504305Claussen, S
National Science Foundation (NSF) Solicitationunder award number 2000568 in accordance with the NSF Advanced Technical Educationprogram.References 1. S. Malcolm and M. Feder, “Multiple STEM Pathways” in Barriers and Opportunities for 2-Year and 4-Year STEM Degrees. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2016, pp. 21-57. 2. ‘Institutional Self Evaluation Report in Support of Reaffirmation of Accreditation, Mt. San Antonio College, Walnut, 201
beunderstood.The engineering “rules” are not implicit nor isolated instances [14-16], they are legitimized andmade explicit through engineering education research which sets the parameters regardingwhat kind of engineering narrative matters. While there is a broad range of research thataddresses Latino/a/x students, the current approaches are devoid of the insider perspectivesand methodologies created by Latino/a/s individuals. This serves to further marginalizehistorically underrepresented students from engineering as hierarchical classifications placevalue on what kinds of knowledge are deemed worthy and which are not. This type ofengineering and research gatekeeping could potentially erase students of color different ways ofknowing and meaning-making
is the question." Routledge, 2009.[8] J. Sweller, P. Ayres, and S. Kalyuga. Cognitive Load Theory. Explorations in the learningsciences, instructional systems and performance technologies: Vol. 1., 2011.[9] Tang, Yan, Haiyan Bai, and Richard Catrambone. "Applying Deliberate Practice toFacilitate Schema Acquisition in Learning Introductory Mechanics." In 2021 ASEE Virtual AnnualConference Content Access. 2021.[10] Ericsson, K. Anders. "The influence of experience and deliberate practice on thedevelopment of superior expert performance." The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expertperformance 38, no. 685-705 (2006): 2-2.[11] Ericsson, K. Anders, Ralf T. Krampe, and Clemens Tesch-Römer. "The role of deliberatepractice in the
, USA.[3] R. Ge, H. Pan, Z. Lin, N. Gong, and J. Wang, “RF-Powered Battery-less Wireless SensorNetwork in Structure Monitoring,” IEEE 2016 International Electro-Information TechnologyConference (EIT'16), 2016, Grand Forks, ND, USA, pp. 547-552.[4] D. Chen, J. Edstrom, X. Chen, W. Jin, J. Wang, and N. Gong, “Data-Driven Low-Cost On-ChipMemory with Adaptive Power-Quality Trade-off for Mobile Video Streaming,” IEEE/ACMInternational Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design (ISLPED'16), 2016, San Francisco, CA,USA.[5] Y. He, S. Geng, X. Peng, L. Hou, X. Gao, and J. Wang, “Design of Outdoor Air QualityMonitoring System Based on ZigBee Wireless Sensor Network,” IEEE 13th International Conferenceon Solid -State and Integrated Circuit Technology
Science Education, Seattle, WA, USA, March 8-11, 2017, page 722, 2017.[3] Jeffrey S. Saltz, Neil I. Dewar, and Robert Heckman. Key concepts for a data science ethics curriculum. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA, February 21-24, 2018, pages 952–957, 2018.[4] Sushil K. Sharma and Joshua Sefchek. Teaching information systems security courses: A hands-on approach. Computers & Security, 26(4):290–299, 2007.[5] James Walden and Charles E. Frank. Secure software engineering teaching modules. In In Proceedings of the 3rd annual conference on Information security curriculum development InfoSecCD ’06, page 19–23. ACM, 2006.
Conference & Exposition Proceedings.[2] C. Rottmann, R. Sacks, and D. W. Reeve, "Engineering leadership: Grounding leadership theory in engineers' professional identities.," Leadership, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 351-373, 2015, doi: 10.1177/1742715014543581.[3] D. W. Reeve, C. Rottmann, and R. Sacks, "The ebb and flow of engineering leadership orientations," in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA, 2015, pp. 26.1519.1 - 26.1519.16, doi: 10.18260/p.24857. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/24857[4] M. Hurwitz and S. Hurwitz. (2017). Leadership is Half the Story: A fresh look at Followership, leadership and collaboration. University of Toronto Press[5] R
in South Korea Before and During COVID-19The goal of the National Science Foundation (NSF)’s International Research Experiences forStudents (IRES) program is to provide high quality educational experiences for small groups ofU.S. students through active research participation in collaboration with foreign researchers at aninternational site and provide students with international collaborative research training and apersonal network on which to build future collaborations.Interdisciplinary Research in Korea on Applied smart systems (IRiKA) is an NSF IRES Track Iprogram that commenced in 2019. During each year of the three-year program (2019 - 2021), acohort of 5 students selected from three participating U.S. institutions
population, and the specific parts chosen.8. Results and Discussion8.1 Graduate Student Study8.1.1 Graduate Student 1GS1 was meticulous in his engagement with the details of the prompt and materials. He readthrough the assignment and checked that every hardware component in the list was present. Hesaid that he had not worked with Arduino code in several years but he was able to understand thesetup code from its comments and talked through what each section meant and how he wouldmodify it for the project. GS1 spent much longer on the software code than the hardwarediagram but said there were not more than minor issues with clarity for either. A few softwarecomments were modified based on GS1’s feedback, in particular the section about
cooperative education: from experience to experiential learning," International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, no. 1, 2007.[6] J. Heywood, Chapter 5 Assessing Performance in Engineering Education: Examples Across Fifty Years of Practice in Assessing Competence in Professional Performance Across Disciplines and Professions, P. F. Wimmers and M. Mentkowski, Eds., Springer International Publishing, 2016.[7] D. Jackson, "Challenges and Strategies for Assessing Student Workplace Performance during Work-Integrated Learning," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 555-570, 2018.[8] P. Vuoskoski and S. Poikela, "Developing student assessment related to a work placement: A bridge between practice and
progression of interdisciplinary knowledge and competences. The figure shows the different steps which a student must experience in their development of more complex, interdisciplinary competences. With unistructural and multistructural knowledge regarding how to solve simple procedures and problems, students are able to move to more complicated or complex project settings. To further enhance interdisciplinary competences, [7]’s taxonomy of narrow and broad interdisciplinarity helps to provide a progression, enabling students to develop competences to deal with complex, broad interdisciplinary projects.Figure 1 is derived from the relational knowledge area of the SOLO taxonomy and outlines apotential path for progression including
) Publishing. London. United Kingdom. 2018.[6] Driscoll, M. P. Psychology of learning for instruction, 2nd ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.2000.[7] Newstetter, W. C., & Svinicki, M. D. “Learning theories for engineering education practice.”In Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 29-46). Cambridge University Press. 2015.[8] Jumaat, N. F., Tasir, Z., Halim, N. D. A., & Ashari, Z. M. “Project-based learning from constructivismpoint of view.” Advanced Science Letters, 23(8), 7904-7906. 2017.[9] Dalgarno, B. “Constructivist computer assisted learning: theory and techniques.” In Proceedings of theASCILITE96 conference (pp. 127-148). 1996.[10] Kerka, S. Constructivism, Workplace Learning, and Vocational Education. ERIC
, F., Bazzi, A., & Olivieri, S. (2016). A software defined radio platform with Raspberry Pi and Simulink. 2016 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) IEEE 398-402.4 Raspberry Pi Support from MATLAB, Part 1: Getting Started with MATLAB Support Package for Rasp- berry Pi Hardware https://www.mathworks.com/videos/install-the-MATLAB-support-pack- age- For-raspberry-pi-94266.html, retrieved 11/14/2022.5 Raspberry Pi Support from MATLAB, Part 2: Deploy MATLAB Algorithms on Raspberry Pi https://www.mathworks.com/support/search.html/videos/deploy-MATLAB-algorithms- on-raspberry-pi-1591965724601.html?fq%5B%5D=asset_type_name:video&fq%5B%5D=cate- gory:coder/index&pag=1
; Wittrock, M. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York: Longman. 3. Boudhraaa, S., Dortaa, T., Milovanovic, J. and Pierinia, D. (2021). Co-ideation critique unfolded: an exploratory study of a codesign studio ‘crit’ based on the students’ experience CODESIGN VOL. 17, NO. 2, 119–138 https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1572765 4. Fasli, M. and Hassanpour, B. (2017). Rotational critique system as a method of culture change in an architecture design studio: urban design studio as case study. Innovations in Education & Teaching International. Vol. 54 Issue 3, p194-205. 12p. 5. Gunday G., Gozde, C; and
any number of ideas, with a broad range of complexity and practicality as desired. This environment would also enable inter-disciplinary collaboration with other departments that share the lab.• Virtual Reality/Augmented Reality: Three different types of VR/AR technologies are prepared in the lab: (1) standalone VR systems, including three Meta Quest 2 VR headsets; (2) standalone AR systems, including three Microsoft HoloLens 2 AR headsets; and (3) a computer-tethered wireless VR walking system, including an HTC Vive Pro 2 VR headset, an HTC VIVE Wireless Adapter, an Alienware Aurora R13 desktop, and a KAT Walk Mini S professional VR treadmill. These VR/AR technologies, by establishing an immersive experience, enable
technology, public university in united states, Spring 2017.[2] M. Borrego, and S. Cutler, “Constructive alignment of interdisciplinary graduate curriculumin engineering and science: An analysis of successful IGERT proposals,” Journal of EngineeringEducation, 99(4), 355-369, 2010.[3] T. W. Hissey, “Education and Careers 2000: Enhanced Skills for Engineers,” Proceedings ofthe IEEE, 88(8), 1367-1370, 2000.[4] Brian L. Yoder, “Engineering by the Numbers” American Society for Engineering Education,https://www.asee.org/documents/papers-andpublications/publications/college-profiles/2017-Engineering-by-Numbers-Engineering-Statistics.pdf.
nature of the sandbox to reinforce their knowledge of and familiarity with topography andhydrology. AR Sandboxes are poised to play an increasingly important role in higher education,and are likely to become a standard tool in many disciplines in the years to come.[1] D. Jackson, H. Kaveh, J. Victoria, A. Walker, and N. Bursztyn, "Integrating an augmented reality sandbox challenge activity into a largeenrollment introductory geoscience lab for nonmajors produces no learning gains," Journal of geoscience education, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 237-248, 2019, doi: 10.1080/10899995.2019.1583786.[2] S. Giorgis, N. Mahlen, and K. Anne, "Instructor-Led Approach to Integrating an Augmented Reality Sandbox into a Large-Enrollment
peaks and valleys of undergraduateengineering education as experienced by individuals.REFERENCES[1] Interaction Design Foundation, “What are Customer Journey Maps?,” The Interaction Design Foundation. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/customer-journey- map[2] CoSchedule, “How to Make an Effective Customer Journey Map The Best Way,” CoSchedule Blog, Apr. 11, 2018. https://coschedule.com/blog/customer-journey-map- template (accessed Feb. 22, 2023).[3] M. Meyer and S. Marx, “Engineering Dropouts: A Qualitative Examination of Why Undergraduates Leave Engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 525–548, 2014, doi: 10.1002/jee.20054.[4] D. McGraw, “Expanding the Mind,” ASEE Prism, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 30–36
, Education, and Technology: Engineering Innovations for Global sustainability, SanJose, Costa Rica, July 2016.[8] A. Yousuf, A. Wong, and D. W. Edens, “Remote Circuit Design Labs with Analog Discovery,”2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, June 2013.[9] S. Abbasi, E. M. Kim, and T. F. Schubert, “Digilent Analog Discovery and Bench-topInstruments: A Comparison,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida.10.18260/1-2—32662, June 2019.[10] L.D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate EngineeringEducation,” Journal of Engineering Education, January 2005, Vol. 94, pp. 121 – 130.[11] R. Jinks, “Developing Experimental Skills in Engineering Undergraduates,” EngineeringScience and
at conferences which provide students with very valuable experience in research anddevelopment.REFERENCES[1] K. Ulrich, S. Eppinger, and M. Yang, Product Design and Development, 7th ed., McGraw-Hill Education, 2020.[2] https://catme.org/login/index
the program to include, feedback from faculty, UTAs andundergraduates on their experiences within the engineering classroom, more specifically, theirperceptions of the effectiveness of the embedded UTAs in fostering inclusive instructionalpractices, a sense of belonging and inclusion in the first-year engineering undergraduateclassroom.References[1] Report - S&E indicators 2018 | NSF - national science foundation. Available at:https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report/sections/higher-education-in-science-and-engineering/highlights (Accessed: 03 June 2023).[2] D. B. Luckie, B. W. Mancini, N. Abdallah, A. K. Kadouh, A. C. P. Ungkuldee, and A. A.Hare, “Undergraduate teaching assistants can provide support for reformed practices to
://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation- criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2023-2024/ (accessed May 22, 2023).[2] I. Izenberg, S. Marra, T. Mackesey, L. Kendrick, and J. Bernstein, “Industry Assessment of Multidisciplinary Teamwork Skills,” Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Minneapolis, MN.[3] R. Marino, M. Cross, D. Feinaur, J. McCusker, and J. Casale, “Including multi-disciplinary project awareness in first year introduction to engineering courses,” Paper presented at 2021 First-Year Engineering Experience, Virtual.[4] B. McPheron, W. Troy, and C. Baker, “Allowing Freshman Engineering students to encounter multiple disciplines: Discipline oriented labs in the
. From then on, every class session would consisted of material covered infused withdiscussion and input from students. The live transcript was enabled for all class period, and thechat was offered as medium to ask questions at all times. The students from Central Asia wereencouraged to participate more, when they were allowed to write their questions and replies on thechat. The class sessions was made more interactive through use of collaborative work on Googleslides and Jamboard, where students collaboratively worked on topics to provide the answers tothe prompts. During each class session students were distributed into breakout groups with specificprompts to discuss among themselves. The instructor(s) would visit the breakout rooms to
Paper ID #36449Implementation of Graphical Visualization Techniques andRobotics Labs in ‘Introduction to Engineering’ CourseAkbar M. Eslami (Professor)Chandra Bhushan Asthana (Associate Professor)Kuldeep S Rawat (M.D. Thorpe Endowed Professor & Dean) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comImplementation of Graphical Visualization Techniques and Robotics Labs in ‘Introduction to Engineering’ CourseAbstractThis paper discusses the development and implementation of two new topics, graphicalvisualization and robotics, in ‘introduction to engineering’ course. Sample of
InternationalConference on Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Sciences (ICIIBMS), IEEE, 2015, pp. 454-456.[4] Riofrio, J. A., & Northrup, S. G., “Teaching Undergraduate Introductory Course toMechatronics in the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Using Arduino” In Proceedings of the2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, June 2013, 10.18260/1-2—22539[5] Walter, W. W., & Southerton, T. G., “Teaching Robotics by Building Autonomous MobileRobots Using the Arduino” In Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Indianapolis, Indiana, June 2014. 10.18260/1-2--23103[6] Plaza, Pedro, Elio Sancristobal, German Carro, Manuel Blazquez, Félix García-Loro, SergioMartin, Clara Perez, and Manuel Castro. "Arduino as an