Session 3592 Women Engineers: Preparing Them For The Workplace Elaine Seat University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee IntroductionThe engineering workplace is changing, and one of the changes is in the gender mix of technicalprofessionals. There are more women entering the engineering workforce, and with time, it isexpected that women will compose a greater percentage of the total of engineers. However,simply because there are more women graduate engineers doesn’t mean that they will remain inengineering for a career. A successful
combustion engines through Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations to improve fuel economy and emissions. He is currently a senior engineer in Combustion Research at Cummins Inc., where in addition to his primary role in developing future engine systems, he leads a planning team of Cummins engineers in organizing an after-school STEM Outreach Program at Girls Inc. to encourage girls to pursue STEM Careers. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Development and Implementation of K-12 STEM Outreach Programs in Industry and Academia: Successes, Challenges, and Lessons LearnedIntroductionAccording to the U.S. Department of Labor (2022), the number of job openings in STEM(science
production, renewable energy and clean water in the social, economic and geographic context of Midwest agriculture.Goal 2. Educate STEM graduate students for a range of research, research-related andentrepreneurial careers employing data-driven modeling at the FEWS nexus. • Objective 2.1. Train students in the effective use of systems modeling to understand the interactions among food production, renewable energy generation and water quality along with their business and policy contexts. • Objective 2.2. Improve decision science and analytics skills in FEWS researchers to improve their use of heterogeneous data from biological, hydrological, chemical, thermal, social and economic processes.Goal 3. Prepare STEM
, and 6) strong articulation agreements with regionalfour-year institutions. These elements focus on student success in transitioning from high schoolto college, student success in engineering education at Itasca and the four-year transferinstitution, and ultimately success in the engineering career. Funding for the six key elements ofthe program is a 50/50 combination of institutional money and grant and foundation support. Itasca Engineering Successful Program Prepare for Engineer and
opinions of student abilities, importance of specific skills, andavailability of university resources.IntroductionBeginning in the early 90’s, portfolios have gained popularity in academic settings and morerecently there has been a shift towards electronic portfolios (e-portfolio). “E-portfolios cansupport student advisement, career preparation, and credential documentation; sharing ofteaching philosophies and practices; department and program self-studies; and institutional andprogram accreditation processes.”1 In addition to student benefits, a variety of institutions haveimplemented e-portfolios for the added purpose of assessment and accreditation in support of“lifelong learning,” 2-5 a specific criteria for engineering accreditation through
women in engineering. • Do women express a loss of interest during their program? • Is there a chilly climate for women in the college? • Do women’s self-efficacy levels change during the program? • Do academic performance levels play a role in women’s retention in engineering? • Do women have adequate support structures in the college? • Does the structure of the academic program support career awareness in the first year?The first five research questions were initially investigated by a pilot women’s survey of thewomen currently enrolled in the College of Engineering at CU-Boulder.4 The present studyexpands on the previous study in the following directions. First, we obtained a larger moredemographically
Session 2332 CAMP IE—A Discipline-Specific Model for the Recruitment of Minorities into Engineering Veronica Hinton-Hudson and Brenda G. Hart University of Louisville, Louisville, KentuckyAbstractIn spite of progress made over the last 20 years, recruitment and retention of African Americanstudents remain a problem at most engineering schools. Many universities have developedprograms that seek to introduce pre-college students to the engineering profession early in theirhigh school careers. The University of Louisville is no exception. In collaboration with thelocal public
faculty interested in starting a new chapter, it is recommended to startsmall, find a committed core of interested graduate students and a faculty advisor, and solicitinitial startup funds from your school or college.Introduction The objective of this paper is to document the successes and struggles of the first ASEEStudent Chapter during its first five years. The first student chapter of ASEE was formed atPurdue University in the spring of 1993 (Hamaker, et al., 1993) with a three fold mission: (1) tomentor graduate students interested in engineering education, especially those consideringacademic careers, (2) to educate undergraduate students about graduate school, and (3) toencourage underrepresented groups such as women and minorities
University proposed a new approach forrecruiting Hispanic students into computing disciplines and careers through the HispanicComputer Brigade (HCB) initiative. By forming HCBs in two local high schools, we aimed toinspire and engage Hispanic students through IT service learning projects. The high schoolstudents began the program with a summer camp, continued to learn and engage computingthroughout the year with community service learning, and will end with a local competitionwhere students will showcase their computing projects with high school faculty, SJSU faculty,parents/guardians, and the community. Students are learning computer and programming skillsand processes in weekly meetings with the help of advisors and mentors.To support the Hispanic
explored.IntroductionA degree in Science, Technology, Engineering, or Mathematics (STEM) allows studentsan open door to a wide variety of successful career opportunities7. Students majoring inSTEM during their undergraduate tenure can go on to pursue graduate school, medicalschool, law school or work for top engineering companies and even the government. Thiscareer path would seem to be very attractive, yet the number of underrepresentedminorities who major in and graduate from these fields remains stagnant. According tothe National Science Foundation's Science Resources Statistics the number of bachelor ofscience degrees awarded in science and engineering to American Indian/Alaska Natives,Black (non-Hispanic), and Hispanic students in 1997 was 0.6%, 7.7% and
a ‘product’ at the conclusion of their summerinternships. Page 21.55.54Re-entry and career education program: The re-entry program is designed specific to the needsof young career scientists. In addition to examining issues associated with re-entry to the US,students participate in career decision making activities that help them evaluate their experiencein Japan as preparation for graduate school and identify next academic, international, or otherexperiential programs that can advance their personal and professional goals.Cross-cultural training: Throughout the summer, students engage in activities that are promptintentional reflections on
tobe engaged in technology, work in a teaming environment and take responsibilityfor quality control throughout all aspects of their job.Workers in the “new economy” must possess the ability to learn and to re-toolcontinually throughout a career. The traditional, vertically integrated institutionswhich used to provide training for employees within internal labor markets havenow eroded and are no longer functional. Alternative career pathways have to bebuilt outside of individual organizations, and establish across whole economicsectors and external labor markets, to help the workers of today and tomorrowmaster the new creative and technological challenge they will constantly face. Consequently, the way these knowledge and skill
-interactionsupport, iii) extra-curricular support, iv) peer-interaction support, v) professional developmentsupport, and vi) additional support. Lee et al. [3] then developed the STEM Student Perspectivesof Support Instrument (STEM-SPSI) to measure the perceptions of a student population inSTEM. The instrument includes twelve factors of student support (academic advising support,academic peer support, faculty support, STEM faculty connections, student affairs support, out-of-class engagement, STEM peer connections, general career development, cost-of-attendancesupport and planning, and diversity and inclusion).This work-in-progress paper describes the development of a survey to examine the connectionsbetween engineering identity and engineering student
, devaluation, andexclusion [7, 8]. A large number of students of minoritized genders also have healthchallenges and lack of psychological safety which makes them more likely to leave the field[7, 9].Oftentimes, studies on gender representations in STEM are focused on cisgender people,excluding nonbinary and transgender individuals [10, 11]. In this paper, we aim to ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Illinois–Indiana Section Conference Proceedingsunderstand and address the issues gender minority groups—including nonbinary andtransgender people—face while pursuing research careers in engineering, specifically, thefollowing research questions: • What are the obstacles for undergraduate students in
extensive experience in engineering education focusing on recruitment and retention of underrepresented and under resourced students and engineering pedagogy. Her work spans the areas of curriculum instruction and design, program design and evaluation, and the first-year college experience. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Case Study: Exploring the Influence of Home Environments on Tissue Engineering Summer Research Experiences for High School StudentsAbstractHigh school summer research internships assist in the development of STEM identity andinfluence the pursuit of STEM majors and careers, both important in the development of theUnited States STEM
behaviors into their own teaching.Dr. Karen E. Rambo-Hernandez, Texas A&M University Karen E. Rambo-Hernandez is an associate professor at Texas A & M University in the College of Edu- cation and Human Development in the department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture. In her research, she is interested in assessing the effect of curricular interventions on student career development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 How much does readiness matter? An examination of student persistence intention and engineering identity Syahrul Amin, Miriam Sanders, Aaron Kidd, Karen Rambo-Hernandez Texas A&M UniversityAbstractThis
mid and late-career periods with little guidance [5]. Compounding thisscenario is the fact that these same tenured faculty are often tasked with mentoringjunior faculty and graduate students with little training on how to do so effectively.These dynamics underscore the importance of universities providing meaningfulmentorship opportunities rooted in mentorship research and best practicesthroughout the faculty life cycle.This paper describes the formation of the Mentorship 360 (M360) facultymentorship initiative, which aims to address the challenges associated with faculty-to-faculty mentorship. M360 provides funding and support to launch or expandfaculty mentorship programs across the country. This work-in-progress papershares initial
process andtheir reflection of the experience. Evidence of the design process included observation notes, flowcharts,and design sketches. Students were provided the following prompts to guide their reflection: What did you learn from the module? How does this relate to the course learning goals? How does the module affect how you will conduct clinical observations in the future? What was your biggest accomplishment during the module? What would you do differently? Is there anything you wish that the module covered that we did not discuss? How does the module relate to your career and professional goals? How does the module relate to your civic and community engagement?Teams documented their design process using
Development in Homogeneous Women GroupsBackgroundGender diversity in management within engineering companies not only yields positiveperformance outcomes but also improves corporate social responsibility [1]. For women’s careeradvancement to upper leadership positions in engineering firms, they must be prepared with keyleadership competencies. In many engineering organizations, success in leadership andmanagement roles is described in masculine terms and associated with stereotypical malecharacteristics [2]. Engineering leadership and one’s engineering leadership identity are oftenportrayed as a masculine practice so that success in leadership in an engineering career oftenmeans that women should learn to lead through a socialized masculine
betweenengineering self-efficacy and value-expectancy for students on a pre-engineering track versusthose who are not. Building off this recognition, educators can also dynamically develop acurriculum that ensures all students understand how to apply engineering design and why it isapplicable in a range of situations, even if they don’t find much value in it or intend to pursueengineering.To begin achieving this end, the Engineering Design Value Expectancy Scale (EDVES) wascreated and resulted from the analysis of several tools already in existence: the Value-ExpectancySTEM Assessment Scale (VESAS), the Value-Expectancy Model of Motivation, Carberry’sDesign Self-Efficacy Instrument, and the STEM Career Interest Survey (STEM-CIS) [3-6]. Thiswork builds upon
desired mentorship programoutcomes. This mapping process is demonstrated with two case studies: one a mentoringprogram for incoming first-year students and a second for faculty at career transitions.1 IntroductionMentorship is grounded in the connection and relationship between individuals. Mentorship canprovide an individual with the basic understanding and learning outside of their own perspective.Through mentoring, individuals working with others may be able to increase their success andsatisfaction in themselves, their work, and their career. Beyond themselves, an individual mayalso develop an understanding of others by gaining insight into other’s different perspectives.Through the growth potential in mentoring, an individual may identify
Paper ID #38369Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers:Bringing it All TogetherMarisa K. Orr Marisa K. Orr is an Associate Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.”Haleh Brotherton Haleh Barmaki Brotherton is a PhD student in the Department of Engineering
our students. Thispaper will present the process we took to initiate this program, the next steps we plan for it, and adescription of the changes made to the courses. More information about the projects will bepublished on Engineering Unleashed in the coming year.Introduction:Some mid-career faculty become “burned out” with low levels of motivation and resources toexplore new areas as they are simultaneously overwhelmed with their academic responsibilitiesin teaching, research, and service in their institution. This two-year subcontract of theMentorship 360 program at Arizona State University sought to instill a new level ofentrepreneurial mindset (EM) into their career journey. Previous schools who have adopted EMinto their curriculum have
students. The study underscores theimportance of mentoring support during the crisis of a pandemic.IntroductionThe pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has severely affected the highereducation system since Spring 2020. In engineering fields, the outbreak disrupted faculty andstudents’ daily school routine, which typically includes in-person classes, laboratory research,and mentoring activities. Funded by the National Science Foundation (DGE-2031069; DGE-2051263), this research project investigated the life and educational challenges faculty andstudents in engineering fields encountered during the pandemic, and examined how mentoringactivities supported students’ academic, career, and mental health outcomes.We appreciate the invitation
the period of mandatory serviceto repay scholarships. This paper is mainly focused on the summer teaching internship and itsefficacy to motive students to pursue teaching career.Summer Teaching Internships To recruit high-performing STEM undergraduates into the MAT program, we havestarted a summer internship program in which students are employed as Teaching Interns atlocaland regional science museums, science institutes, and local STEM camps. The internsreceive training to lead group exercises, run classroom activities, and lead group tours. Theseexperiences help the students gain confidence in their abilities to teach, which we believe willencourage them to consider teaching as a career. Research shows that early
includes literature review, dataacquisition, analysis, evaluation, and findings in this study. Out of the findings comerecommendations for continuous improvement in the program design.In this paper, the new model and the research method are described, and results are presented forthe first three improvement cycles of the program. The data analysis shows improvement trendsand identifies findings for the program regarding student attainment of the co-op. It identifiesthat successful position acquisition is closely aligned with career-fair contacts and connectionsthrough students’ personal, professional, or Bell program networking. More findings arepresented, and future steps for the program design and the research study are recommended. Theresults
Paper ID #37113Developing Deeper Student Mentoring Relationships: BlackEngineering Faculty Translating their Mentee Experiences toStudents (Research)Sylvia L. Mendez (Professor/Chair) Dr. Sylvia Mendez is a Professor and Chair of the Department of Leadership, Research, and Foundations at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs. She is engaged in several National Science Foundation-sponsored collaborative research projects focused on broadening participation in STEM academia. Dr. Mendez’s research centers on the creation of optimal higher education policies and practices that advance faculty careers and student
Paper ID #37680WIP - 360 Coaching to Support Whole-Student Advising inthe First-YearStacy Tantum (Associate Professor of the Practice)Sophia T Santillan (Associate Professor of the Practice) (Duke University)Lupita Temiquel-McMillian (Assistant Dean) (Duke University)Jennifer Ganley © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work in Progress: 360 Coaching to Support Whole-Student Advising in the First-YearThis Work in Progress paper will describe efforts to integrate wellness and career advising intothe academic advising model for first-year
will havefundamentals presented in a prerecorded lecture, and problems with experiments will be assignedto further develop engineering tools in class. This will give the students the next set of tools theyneed to solve the project for that given module. In addition, the first weeks of the semester willserve as onboarding to college, with freshman success workshops and career developmentactivities continually being incorporated.The hypothesis is that this approach will take the course from a refresher course to a trueintroduction to engineering technology. It is anticipated that a higher-level math student will stayengaged through the projects, and the application of teams will enable them to assist lower-levelmath students in learning
successfully face academic and professional challenges, recently exacerbated by theCOVID-19 pandemic. The Freshman Year Innovator Experience proposes the development ofself-transformation skills in freshman mechanical engineering students to successfully faceacademic and professional challenges exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic while workingon two parallel projects of technical design innovation and academic career pathways. Theauthors will present the work in progress and preliminary results from a pilot implementation ofthe Freshman Year Innovator Experience. This project is funded by NSF award 2225247.IntroductionFreshman engineering students can have a hard time transitioning to college. The freshman yearis critical to the students’ academic