Graduate Research Assistant on the VT PEERS project studying middle school students regularly engaging in engineering activities. Drawing on previous experiences as a mathematics and engineering teacher, her current re- search interests include studying the disconnect between home and school, with a specific emphasis on prekindergarten students. She will continue to pursue these research interests in the coming years with the support of the NSF Graduate Research Fellowships Program. In addition, she dedicates her spare time to exhibiting at the Virginia Tech Science Festival and hosting several sessions for the Kindergarden-to- college (K2C) Initiative.Ms. Ashley R. Taylor, Virginia Tech Ashley Taylor is a doctoral
; but produced less than half thedegrees awarded to UC students. The UC are producing 2.5 times more degrees with half of thenumber of students enrolled [1].Research QuestionThe multiple phases of the research and critical lens used in the analysis provided a morecomplete understanding of the research question. The characteristics of the participants of thestudy allowed for the research question to be examined to understand the intersection of the firstgeneration status and gender. The hope is that understanding how women experienceundergraduate engineering programs at public state universities, the broadest impact onparticipation can be made. The goal of this project is to look at various stages of a woman’seducational journey in engineering
Systems Institute (CSI) at UWM. His research interests are renewable energy interface, energy storage, and microgrids. He has served as the primary investigator on several federal and industry funded research projects. Dr. Nasiri has published numerous technical journal and conference papers on related topics. He also seven patent disclosures. He is a co-author of the book ”Uninterruptible Power Supplies and Active Filters,” CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. Dr. Nasiri is currently an Editor of IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, Paper Review Chair for IEEE Trans- actions on Industry Applications, an Editor of Power Components and Systems, and Associate Editor of the International Journal of Power Electronics. He was the general
Engineering, NY, USA. In this role she supports and studies use of robotics in K-12 STEM education. Her other research interests include robotics, mechanical design, and biomechanics.Dr. Sheila Borges Rajguru, NYU’s Tandon School of Engineering Dr. Sheila Borges Rajguru is the Assistant Director of the Center for K-12 STEM Education, NYU Tan- don School of Engineering. As the Center’s STEAM educator and researcher she works with engineers and faculty to provide professional development to K-12 STEM teachers with a focus on social justice. She is currently Co-Principal Investigator on two NSF-grants that provide robotics/mechatronics PD to science, math, and technology teachers. In addition, she is the projects director of the
firm, and the director of Missouri’s Dam and Reservoir Safety Program. Since 1993, he has been at the University of Evansville, serving as department chair for the past 21 years. He continues to work as a consultant on projects involving the design and construction of new dams, modifications to existing dams, and the investigation of dam failures.Dr. Matthew Swenty P.E., Virginia Military Institute Matthew (Matt) Swenty obtained his Bachelors and Masters degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T and then worked as a bridge designer at the Missouri Department of Transportation. He returned to school to obtain his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech followed by research work at the Turner- Fairbank
, 2]. Training students to develop design thinking and skills will allow them to enterprofessional practice ready to participate in the challenge of infrastructure re-design. Indeed,ABET requires that students have “an ability to apply engineering design to producesolutions…” upon graduation [3]. Perhaps the most effective way to guide students indeveloping design skills is through engagement in real-world projects. Furthermore, providingauthentic design experiences in a supportive educational environment that encourages successcan build self-efficacy (one’s beliefs in their ability to achieve specific tasks), which in turn fuelsmotivation to succeed as an engineer [4]. Promoting engineering self-efficacy is a promisingstrategy for retaining
Paper ID #28862A Replicate Study: Adoption of a STEM Outreach Program in KuwaitMrs. Safia Malallah, Kansas State University Safia Malallah is a web developer, artist, and Ph.D. candidate at Kansas State University. She obtained her master’s degree in computer science from Montana State University in 2017. Her research is centered around metamorphic relations ranking for reducing testing costs in scientific software. Safia’s research interests expanded to include computer science education after observing the influence computer sci- ence has on her children. Her current research project is examining methods of teaching
Historically Black College/University (HBCU) and 2) a Predominantly WhiteInstitution (PWI). The study’s analysis examined microaggressions in the context ofundergraduate engineering programs at both sites, an HBCU and a PWI. The results suggestedthat a higher frequency of microaggressions took place at the PWI than the HBCU. The mostfrequently identified microaggressions included disjointed race and gender dialogue, hiddenlanguage, projected stereotypes, an ascription of intelligence, silence, and marginalization. Thepaper aims to increase awareness of the prevalence and varying types of microaggressionsexperienced between the sites. These results may influence policies and educational practices tomeet the needs of underrepresented minority students
undergraduate and graduate sections.The course content details are presented in Bakrania, et al. [16], but briefly described here forcontext. The original face-to-face course lectures were slide-based due to the highly visual natureof the content. Each lecture required students to read handouts and answer the providedquestions prior to lectures. The questions were collectively answered during the lectures andoften prompted discussions. The assignments relied heavily on students’ ability to reviewnanotechnology-related scientific journal papers and evaluate the outcomes. The assignmentsculminated into a term project where students selected an application area and presented theirresearch to the class. In the end, each student prepared a research proposal
designing and implementing technology-infused learning environments that provide youth an opportunity to learn about themselves, others, and to gain insight into interpersonal dynamics.Dr. Jessica Sperling, Duke University Dr. Sperling leads the Applied Research, Evaluation, & Engagement area of Duke University’s Social Science Research Institute.Megan Gray, Duke University Megan Gray is a Research Analyst in Evaluation and Engagement at Duke University’s Social Science Research Institute (SSRI). She serves as a project manager and researcher for both qualitative and quanti- tative evaluation and research efforts, in partnership with community-based programs as well as campus- based initiatives. Megan came to
for discussion prompts. The discussion prompts promoted repetition inlearning in that they allowed students to apply practical understanding for the second time. Toincrease a sense of community, discussion groups were limited to 30 students, which resulted in atotal of four discussion groups. In addition, in preparation for the team-based project (4 studentsper team), one person from each time was assigned to each discussion group. This modifiedapproach to the Jigsaw method [48] allowed students to gain a more wholistic perspective (of theentire class) in preparation for the team-based project.Third, this module culminated with a final team-based project. This final module project promotedrepetition in learning in that it allowed students to
SO2-1 1453 Ship Propulsion Design Propulson Plant Trade-off Submittal 7 3 7 0 2.00 13 10 0 0 2.57 4 2 10 0 1.63 0.188 environment, and vessel and crew/passenger safety. 1444 Ship Design/System Integration Crewing Submittal 10 7 0 0 2.59 4 19 0 0 2.17 0 0 16 0 1.00 0.794 1444 Ship Design/System Integration Final Project Report
developmentThis research is a part of a larger, 5-year study conducted to understand approaches toengineering integration in science curricula and classes. The research takes place within anNational Science Foundation funded project in which approximately 200 teachers of science ingrades 4–8 participate in develop engineering-based STEM integration curricular units forimplementation in their classrooms and later to be published online. Each summer, 50 teachersparticipate in a 3-week summer institute and then receive support through coaching andmentoring during the subsequent academic school year. In the summer workshops, teachersexplore engineering design and engineering practices through completing a variety of activities.An engineering education
it has twice the course content. The entire portfolio was due at a single date within thefirst month of classes.In Autumn 2017, a new training model was developed and implemented. Rather than having asingle portfolio, TAs were required to complete every assignment for the semester with a duedate two weeks before that topic was taught in the class. The main projected advantage of thenew model is that it ensured all TAs were personally familiar with every assignment rather thanrelying on them to look at the assignment and solution independently before class. Additionally,this new model was designed to alleviate issues with procrastination. In the past, if TAs waitedtoo long to start the portfolio, there may have been a huge spike in their
MS (1980) and DE (1983) degrees in industrial engineering from Texas A&M University. His educa- tion and research interests include project management, innovation and entrepreneurship, and embedded product/system development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Assessing the Effects of Authentic Experiential Learning Activities on Teacher Confidence with Engineering ConceptsAbstractThere is a growing concern in the US about the lack of student interest and aptitude inscience, technology, engineering and math (STEM) disciplines. Research indicates thatengineering and technology integration in K-12 improve students’ content understandingand skill development, understanding of
and engineering design and for increasing the diversity and inclusion of engineering education.Dr. Rucha Joshi, Purdue University, West Lafayette Rucha received her BS in Biotechnology from Kolhapur, India and thereafter came to Vanderbilt Uni- versity to work on her MS developing smart bio-materials for drug delivery applications. A biomedical engineer with expertise in biomaterials, tissue engineering, and drug delivery, Rucha is now pursuing post-doctoral research in biomedical engineering education. She is passionate about STEM pedagogy, design thinking, project-based learning and educational entrepreneurship.Prof. Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette Patrice M. Buzzanell is a Professor in
; student engineering identity development; institutional diversity and equity policy; history and theory of higher education.Dr. Erin E. Doran, Iowa State University Dr. Erin Doran is an Assistant Professor of Higher Education at Iowa State University.Dr. Sarah Rodriguez, Iowa State University Sarah Rodriguez, PhD, is an assistant professor of Higher Education at Iowa State University. Dr. Ro- driguez’s research addresses issues of equity, access, and retention for Latina/o students in the higher education pipeline, with a focus on the intersections of gender and race/ethnicity for Latinas in STEM. She has experience coordinating large-scale interdisciplinary research projects focused on engineering and other STEM
undergraduate courses in Mathematics, graduate courses in Education, and is a thesis advisor on the master and doctoral programs on education at the Tecnologico de Monterrey. Her main research areas are: models and modeling, use of technology to improve teaching and learning, gender issues in STEM education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 STEM-oriented students’ perception of the relevance of physicsAbstractWe present initial findings from an ongoing project regarding the factors that influencesecondary and high school students to pursue a professional engineering career. In this article,we offer data from the analysis of a questionnaire administered to high school students
Paper ID #21970The American Society of Civil Engineers’ Canon 8: Codifying Diversity asEthicsDr. Canek Moises Luna Phillips, Rice University Canek Phillips (P’urepecha) is a postdoctoral research associate at Rice University in the Brown School of Engineering. Canek’s research interests broadly relate to efforts to broaden participation in engineering. Currently, he is working on a project to improve mathematics education for visually impaired students.Dr. Yvette E. Pearson P.E., Rice University Dr. Yvette E. Pearson holds a B.S. in Civil Engineering and M.S. in Chemistry from Southern University and A&M College and a
project). The next section of this paperprovides a description of the indirect assessment of the course which includes both studentinterview and end-of-term survey data. Some observations and the future direction of thecourse are then presented, which include plans to flip this course for the 2019 offering. Lastlythe paper ends with some concluding remarks.Motivation for Course in Power Distribution Engineering and SmartGridsThough both transmission and distribution power systems are essential for safely and reliablydelivering electric power from central generation stations to consumers, industry and academiahave traditionally concentrated on advancing transmission technologies. However, the recentexplosion of distributed energy resources (DER
develop entrepreneurially-minded engineers, EEPs oftenleverage student-centered teaching practices (e.g., project-based learning, group discussion, pitchcompetitions, mentorship, and experiential learning) to instill entrepreneurship practices such asopportunity identification, customer discovery, validation and pivoting [6], [7].The growth of EEPs has also fueled research in the area. Researchers have explored a variety ofEEP aspects such as their impact on student career choices, attitudes, and retention [8]–[10];assessed learning outcomes [11]; and have presented different models for EEPs [12].Cumulatively, these studies have provided empirical support for the benefits of entrepreneurshipeducation in the professional development of
; engineering design decisions are consequential for the design and how it performsupon implementation. To use a spoon, the person may need to like the color; and the material ofthe blade must be strong enough for an endurance task. Because design decisions areconsequential, undergraduate engineering programs have a responsibility to prepare students asdecision makers.Capstone design courses allow undergraduate engineering students to experience open-endeddesign projects before starting their professional careers. As such, capstone serves as anopportunity to develop students’ ability to make decisions in an ill-structured setting. Typically,explicit instruction related to decision making includes an introduction to rationalistic tools, suchas decision
to rise.A number of existent research studies focused on exploring the learning outcomes ofengineering students after short-term international learning experiences. Such short-term experiences increased partially owing to the intense global competition and theimportance for engineering students to develop global competence [6] [7]. For instance,Bender (2009) interviewed 32 engineering students who participated in internationalresearch projects and found that these students have developed writing skills, problem-solving skills, independent skills and self-confidence [8]. Jesiek et al (2012) used theUniversal-Diverse Orientation instrument and measured international engineeringstudents’ openness to and appreciation of cultural diversity. Their
and served as chair of LED. When theTechnological Literacy Constituency Committee was formed in 2006, most of the officers of thenew group were also members of LED.In alignment with the new committee, there is a marked increase in numbers of papersmentioning “technological literacy” in 2005 and 2006. As interest in technological literacy grewwithin ASEE and, perhaps more significantly, in the National Academy of Engineering and theNational Science Foundation, the projects and goals of the two groups diverged, though theywere never in competition or estranged from each other. Their interests began to overlap moreextensively again when the constituent committee became the Technological and EngineeringLiteracy/Philosophy of Engineering (TELPhE
University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Dr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including the Rand Corporation, the American Association of Retired Persons, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Since 2004, she been a member of the NSF-funded MIDFIELD research project on engineering education; she has served as a Co-PI on three research projects, including one
engineering applications. No Talks about how Talks about how Talks more about the Talks about engineering Hands down, Evidence engineering cannot engineering helps potential for engineering to as a crucial element engineering is theProfessional Ability help those who are generally just by the help solve social/ towards finding solutions central source of in need projects that we do. environmental problems that to social problems. May solutions for social Uses examples of roads face society. This is
grow over the years, both technically as well as pedagogically. Currently he works in one of the most technically outstanding buildings in the region where he provides support to students, faculty, and staff in implementing technology inside and outside the classroom, researching new engineering education strategies as well as the technologies to support the 21st century classroom (online and face to face). He also has assisted both the campus as well as the local community in developing technology programs that highlight student skills development in ways that engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by showcasing how those skills impact the current project in real-world ways that people can
makers.In a paper touting the promise of maker spaces for education, Martin5 identifies three elements ofthe maker movement that are essential to consider in determining potential possible affordancesfor education: 1) digital tools, including rapid prototyping tools and low-cost microcontrollerplatforms, that characterize many making projects; 2) community infrastructure, including onlineresources and in-person spaces and events; and 3) maker mindset, aesthetic principles, a failure-positive approach, collaboration, and habits of mind that are commonplace within thecommunity. Similar to Martin’s “the maker mindset,” Kurti et al.,6 the authors of ThePhilosophy of Educational Makerspaces: Part 1 of Making an Educational Makerspace, identifythree
Paper ID #15901Android-Based Remote Robot Control SystemDr. Yujian Fu P.E., Alabama A&M University Dr. Yujian Fu is an associate professor of computer science department at Alabama A&M University. Her research interests fall in formal verification of cyber physical systems, behavioral analysis of mobile security, software architecture and design analysis of safety-critical and mission-critical systems. Her projects are supported by NSF, Air Force and DoD. She have several publications regarding to the research and educational projects.Mr. Md Hossain Shuvo, Alabama A&M University Graduate Student, Dept. of
only, Positive Flexure – Compression Zone in Flange and WebThe flanged beam models presented in Figure 4 appeared to be an effective teaching tool. By theend of the semester a majority of RC1 students were able to demonstrate a strong conceptualunderstanding of flexural analysis of flanged sections, beyond T-beams. This assessment is basedon reviewing students’ hand calculations for L-shaped and hollow-core square sections (in theterm project and final exam, respectively) that show their use of stress blocks developexpressions for concrete compression and steel tension forces. Figure 4. Physical Models for T-Beams at Nominal Flexure: (Prev. Pg.) Negative Moment, (Bot. Left) Positive Flexure – Compression Zone