stakeholders and other professionals. In developing a portfolio of initiatives toaddress the overarching project goals, the City Council has identified an opportunity to utilize avacant city block in a low-income area with an ethnically and racially diverse population todevelop and construct an urban natural enclave, including walking trails and community foodgarden spaces. As the project engineer you plan to approach this initiative by forming a projectadvisory team comprising a variety of community stakeholders and a range of interdisciplinaryprofessionals. After your initial round of interviews, you have invited some of the stakeholders toa group meeting. Your goals in facilitating this first meeting are: 1) through the group discussionyou want to
course content inmore depth because of the communication assignments. While C-I course faculty indicated thatchanging their course objectives and lesson plans to include more work on communication skillshad initially increased time spent on course preparation, they also indicated that because of thedual benefits of improved communication skills and improved understanding of engineeringconcepts, the extra work was worth the effort.At this time, the culture of the College of Engineering was beginning to value and embrace theseprogrammatic changes. The program grew because of successful efforts at faculty buy-in, aswell as positive assessments of the program by students. The program was built from faculty'sgrass-roots perceptions of student needs
, tape, paper, and felt.I was not the primary teacher for this project; I had come in to help for the day and videotape thestudents’ work for our research on elementary students’ engineering design. I was familiar withmany of the students, as they had participated in Novel Engineering units the prior year. Inparticular, I remembered Caroline and Amelia, who had been paired together previously. In theirearlier project in 4th grade, the girls had engaged in extensive brainstorming and made detaileddrawings of their design, but spent too much time planning. When they finally started building,their classmates had taken many of the materials they wanted and they ran out of time to finishtheir prototype. When they presented their unfinished project to
recognize and follow this process, 8 usedthe incorrect governing equations while only 1 did not have any governing equation.Per Richard Felder 18 , “creating a course to achieve specified outcomes requires effort in threedomains: planning, instruction and assessement/evaluation”. It is apparent to the author that theinstructional process may need to include emphasis on time required to acquire publications. Hadstudents been warned sufficiently of lead times to acquire publications to validation of theirFigure 5: Juxtaposition of traditional FEM method as adapted from Hyperworks’ student manualwith analytical solutions from Mathematica (denoted by rounded rectangles with the double bor-der). The analytical solutions provide critical information to
. And the third group con-centrated on quality of life and future plans for the region. In addition to that, all of the groupswere asked to compare their results with their home countries in terms of any major differ-ences or even similarities. The results were presented and discussed in class during one of theearly live sessions. Hereby the students simultaneously gained knowledge about their futuredestination and challenged their personal understanding about their own cultural background.Furthermore, they were introduced into the home countries of their future classmates. Anoth-er activity in this course part was dominated by several discussions about the essence of theengineering profession, necessary competences for successful careers in
MIT.3Mr. DeWitt requests more effort should be madeteaching concepts to young students. Mr. DeWitt’s realization came when he noticed his studentsmissed key concepts although they were attending well planned lectures and completing assignedbook reading. To remedy this, he engaged students with a different style of teaching that madethe subject less intimidating and more fun. American astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson mentions a similar problem during a speechgiven to the American Association of Physics Teachers.4He also highlighted the significance ofeducators relating to their students during lecture. For example, teachers can engage the studentsby making references about pop culture and relating it to the lecture. Much like what
refer to the ship as the “Babel at sea”; 29 crew membersstruggled to understand each other and the captain. As Squires notes, lack of a common languagemay have contributed to the confusion regarding evacuation procedures.29Pollution IssuesA more serious ethical consideration is the substantial environmental pollution wrought by cruiseships. Although several US states (Alaska, Maine, Washington, and California) have restricteddischarges within their coastlines and the International Maritime Organization (IMO) forbidsdumping of plastics in oceans, there is currently no comprehensive international plan for dealingwith what is becoming an increasingly vexing problem. “Beyond three nautical miles, there arevery, very few rules,” notes a Seattle
phenomenographic work is typically established through rigorous development andexecution of data collection and analysis methods11,24,25,29–31. In data collection, quality isensuring that the interview attains as comprehensive and accurate account of the participant’sunderstanding and experience of the phenomenon as possible, without introducing any elementof the interviewer’s own views related to the phenomenon. This is accomplished throughbracketing the interviewer’s perspective11,24,31, empathic engagement with the participant25,32,and detailed planning related to interview structure and questions11,24,31. In data analysis, qualityis ensuring that findings derive solely from and accurately represent the data, and that results areapplicable and
beeninterrupted by Kristen who holds her hand up and begins to talk about the solution rather than theproblem. The teacher reminds Kristen that she has moved on to the solution, and that they needto focus on the problem. Then Alyssa chimes in with a succinct summary of one of the aspects ofthe problem at hand. teacher: Yes? Kristen: We could do like this, we could make a basket and then like a basket that looks like kind of a little… in a rock basket that has their picture so they know that it’s theirs. teacher: Well, you’re getting into the plan stage, but I just want to know what their problem is. Yes? Alyssa: They
did cause him to slow down, which he believed was beneficial. Helooked at the figures and spent more time with the text. Like the others, he claimed that note-taking enabled him to find material in the text more easily. He tried problems on his own first,attending to his process, rather than reading through the examples.Chris claimed that the notes helped him “have a plan heading into the problem.” His notesincluded various strategies gleaned from the examples. He also learned how to approachproblems more effectively. Chris was focused on the homework. While reading and note-takinghelped him learn concepts, he stated the examples “mainly help with my understanding of how tosolve the homework problems.”Chris appeared to struggle with
humanitarian approach toengineering. Each team was asked to: Identify a problem, and frame it in a way that it can be solved; Propose and evaluate several possible solutions before selecting one; Write a problem statement; Identify what is not known, decide on a methodology for learning more; Write an annotated bibliography; Conduct the research and develop a viable solution; Assess the pros and cons of the chosen solution vis à vis other solutions; Develop an assessment plan for the solution; Write a project report and design a project poster Present the project, explaining the problem and how the approach effectively addresses the problem.Although the task is challenging
in online socialcollaborative learning. The instructor set up a learning environment via the Facebook platform toenable students to discuss their Engineering Science topic at anytime, anywhere within theperiod of the lesson plan. Subsequently, the distribution of roles, learning tasks andmetacognitive learning activities to promote and enhance the students’ flexibility and constructknowledge through reflection and metacognition occurred through online learning. Salmon [3]revealed that the instructor has to develop relevant activities that can promote interaction andreflective thinking in the classroom in order to enhance the growth of students’ subjectknowledge via online learning.2.0 BACKGROUND TO THE STUDYThis paper describes the methods
to develop and prototype a remote wireless network to collect environmentaldata in an extreme weather environment. The project consisted of mechanical design ofpackaging, electrical design of the system and sensors and the software design of the databasesand user interfaces. The main risk was the scale of the company; it was a small privately-ownedfirm with limited resources, very tight budgets, and thin operational margins. The companystated it needed to make the product commercially available after the end of the academic year tobe profitable. The company's business plan stressed rapid time to market and to provide ease ofuse of the system to the final customer. For a successful project from the company's perspective,a working solution
thestrategy, and then detailing its research base.Pre-writing. Pre-writing tasks provide opportunities for students to consider what they know anddon’t know about a topic, to organize their writing, and to plan their approach to writing [36, 38,39]. It includes all activities that culminate in a piece of writing: minute papers, reflections,assigned readings and responses, prelab assignments and discussions, and documenting theexperiment itself.Multimodal writing. This form of writing means incorporating multiple modes, such as images,audio, video, and text, and following discipline-specific or genre conventions [40]. Withinengineering genres, this commonly means interpreting tables and figures that display data orresults.Feedback and revision
determining relevant content on students. One activity (“pre-draft” in Table 3) guided student creation of the content, as students were asked to make therubrics themselves for the new assignment. Specifically, they were given a rubric, like Figure 1,and asked to fill in the description box for each feature. The student-created rubrics were thenused by the TAs when grading and by peer review partners when providing feedback. Having thestudents decide for themselves what constitutes the focal features of the rubric, like precise andaccurate use of concepts or professional style, encouraged them to reflect on the assigned genreand build genre flexibility (the first writing learning goal). Introducing planning processes, i.e.the “pre-draft
researchers who were part of the larger project to teach K-2 teachers about integratingSTEM and CT into their classrooms. Specifically, the teachers learned about the PictureSTEMcurriculum, which was developed by the authors and others to integrate STEM with literacy ingrades K-2. The curriculum is described in the following paragraph. Following the PD theteachers were given the supplies needed to implement the curriculum. During the school year,the teachers worked closely with each other before and during implementation to help each otherwith understanding of the curriculum and how it would be implemented, planning for anddesigning classroom management strategies, and to offer other support as needed. During thefollowing summer, in their second year
, inspired by service learning pedagogies [25], we continually ask our students toformulate plans for future action based on their experiences. In short, we ask students: “What?So What? Now What?”MethodsTo explore student capacities for building their own self-concept, learning to develop meaningfuland rewarding relationships, and maturing their capacity for deep learning, we relied on existingwork for the development of self-authorship in the intrapersonal, interpersonal and cognitivedomains, synthesized into a rubric (see Table III).We selected four students who had completed our series of seminar courses, three of whom wereengineering majors, to trace longitudinally, comparing their reflections at the end of the programto earlier work in their
students in ourcourse. Through these case studies, we would also like to provide a compelling example of howtightly bound the ethical choices are to the design and implementation decisions of a mobileapplication that is developed for social good.5.1 Combating obesity in young adolescentsObesity has become a major public health issue in most countries around the world. In addition,adolescent obesity is increasing at an alarming rate all over the world. Many attempts have beenmade to address this issue that ranges from doing exercise to following a diet plan to playinggames. While the existence of the above works indicates the past and ongoing efforts to combatadolescent obesity, they are clearly not enough since it is still rising. Researchers
, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] G. M. Rogers and J. K. Sando, “Stepping Ahead: An Assessment Plan Development Guide,”Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, Indiana, 1996.[2] M. J. Allen, Assessing Academic Programs in Higher Education. John Wiley & Sons, 2007.National Academy of Engineering Committee on the Engineer of 2020 Phase I, “The engineer of2020: Visions of engineering in the new century,” National Academy of Engineering,Washington, D.C., 2004.[3] T. Curran, C. Doyle, E. Cummins, K. McDonnell, and N. Holden, “Enhancing the first yearlearning experience for biosystems engineering
to the students, Jenn, Janet, and Harold all recognized that the impact ofthese visits was limited; ideally, the English professor should be more integrated and involved.To increase the impact of writing instruction in the course, for the next academic year (2017-2018), Jenn was embedded within both the junior and senior-level project courses. Workingclosely with the two project course professors, Jenn contributed to course planning, led specificcourse sessions on writing and communication, and provided formative and summative feedbackon student work. After receiving feedback on her involvement, Jenn, Janet, and Harold madeadjustments to Jenn’s role in the second semester, providing more time for Jenn to work one-on-one with students and
gave advice on communication andwriting structure and integration into engineering education practices. The articulation ofscaffolding – “It should be an area of focus with planned progressions in various writing styles:project report, research paper, memo, etc.” – showed faculty conceptualize the progression ofwriting learning [19]. However, this conception focused on learning “how” to perform particularengineering documents rather than the higher level critical thinking skill of rhetoric –understanding why there are genre distinctions, and how to determine these underlying “valuesystems” to adjust writing for future unfamiliar genres. This is a far more valuable skill thanlearning how to write a memo report, because it develops a learner’s
participate in the senior design course (CEE 486). The seniordesign project at UA encompasses a comprehensive land development plan involving engineeringroles of due diligence, drainage, traffic circulation, water, wastewater, structural, and geotechnicalanalysis. Students work in teams of five to seven people per project and within each team studentsselect a civil engineering sub-discipline role based on their interest. The teams are partnered with alocal engineering firm whose role is to support students throughout their projects through mentor-ship and, in many cases, serve as ‘clients’ for student projects. The senior design project requiresstudents to produce engineering design plans for their development, compile a comprehensivewritten report
of the program. Several of these mentions were rather ordinary. Alejandro recalledmeeting a man from the United States and talking with him about life and their plans. Kevindescribed meeting locals and discussing sports or comparing their city to Kevin’s home city.Steven reflected on conversations about stereotypes and history with locals. Ben expressed adesire to interact with locals and then described two successful encounters: one about sports andone about U.S. politics. Finally, James described meeting people in bars and meeting a “certifiedcommunist” among other locals. James reflected on his interactions with various non-programparticipants throughout the trip: For me, the most lasting value of RSAP comes down to the countless
to know more people I have classes with. I'm actually being able to get in groups with people that I know actually do their job, which helps tremendously. I’m in 202 right now, and I think this is the first time that I've had a group that everybody actually shows up.Throughout Sean’s military service he grew an expectation of what he believed working in ateam should be like. He believes that his student peers do not meet that expectation and, due tothis belief, he sees them as subpar. Because of his opinions of civilians, Sean spends his timefocused on his studies and his civilian job, but not on social activities with peers. Noted above,he comments on two years into his plan of study being the first time his entire team has
primarily on disaster preparedness planning, inclusion, and capacity-building activities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #29629Dr. Jamie Vickery, Center for the Study of Disasters and Extreme Events, Oklahoma State University Jamie Vickery is a research associate at the Natural Hazards Center within the Institute of Behavioral Science and a postdoctoral fellow at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. She is also an af- filiate with the Center for the Study of Disasters and Extreme Events at Oklahoma State University. Her research interests focus on hazard risk
committee to examine the feasibility of using aninternal credentialing system, rather than licensure, as the principal means of validatingfulfillment of the CEBOK [35]. In response, the task committee developed a concept forawarding specialty certification as a post-licensure credential to individual civil engineeringprofessionals who attain the undergraduate and post-graduate engineering education, mentoredexperience, and self-development outcomes specified in the CEBOK. Details of the taskcommittee’s proposal are provided in [34]. In July 2019, the ASCE Board responded favorablyto the task committee’s interim report and authorized them to finalize the proposal, including thedevelopment of business and implementation plans for the proposed
DEVICES USED BY STUDENTS TO READ ETEXTBOOK DEVICES Responses Percent Laptop 154 89.5 Desktop Computer 49 28.5 Tablet 27 15.7 Phone 22 12.8We were not surprised the majority of students used laptops and desktop computers to read theireTextbooks. Given the nature of the eTextbook format, larger screens make sense. Students didread on mobile devices, however, meaning that vendors need to be aware of and plan forresponsive design and mobile-friendly eTextbooks when making
Code of Ethics [19] requires engineers to“endeavor in good faith to include diverse perspectives, in the planning and performance of theirprofessional services.” Without respectful listening, an engineer will not be aware of thesediverse perspectives. The quality of understanding that is achieved during communication mayvary based on who is being listened to and how one perceives the importance of the other person[20,21]. This idea is acknowledged in IEEE’s Ethically Aligned Design [22]: “stakeholderengagement and deliberative processes can be effective when… more powerful actors participatewith an awareness of their own power and make a commitment to listen with humility, curiosity,and open-mindedness” (p. 84). Further, listening is the first