Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Course,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 17-28, Jan., 1997.11. Evans, D. L., McNeill, B. W., Beakley, G. C., “Design in Engineering Education: Past Views of Future Directions,” Engineering Education, pp. 517-522, July/Aug., 1990.12. Harris, T. A., Jacobs, H. R., “On Effective Methods to Teach Mechanical Design,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 343-349, Oct., 1995.13. Incropera, F. P., Fox, R. W., “Revising a Mechanical Engineering Curriculum: The Implementation Process,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 233-238, Jul., 1996.14. Jensen, D. D., “Using MSC-PATRAN for Pre and Post Processing for Specialized FEM Codes which are not in the
. Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Disagree Agree 1 2 3 4 5 Page 6.130.6 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationVI. Design Panel AssessmentOne of the most important and innovative activities developed for assessment was establishmentof a design panel to evaluate student design projects. The design panel
needs of the learner, either as an individual or as part of ateam. For example, a curriculum could be implemented based entirely aroundundertaking multiple projects, with fundamental information brought in just-in-time.Such a learning environment could be adapted to individual learner’s needs by providing3 For the details of Invention 2000, please see: http://www.olin.edu/news/news_stories/Invention2kf.html4 Partners are the group of about 25 students slated to join the curriculum design effort in the fall of 2001.These partners will work with faculty to create and test curriculum and then become part of the entering Page
laboratories on the main campus, where facilities were readily available, were usedon weekends. This was not a good arrangement for a number of reasons. First of all, the graduatelabs were competing with the undergraduate department for space. When undergraduates came tothe campus to use the lab facilities for remedial work or junior/senior research projects, theyfound that they were not available on Saturdays. Second, there were many competing events on Page 3.15.7campus on weekends, and parking was sometimes very difficult. Third, many students who werewilling to give up an evening or two during the semester for class, couldn’t (or wouldn’t) give
isrequired.Figure 1 illustrates the potential knowledge areas and skills relevant to an ecological engineeringcurriculum. The specific sequence of required course work and electives, and the strategy forfulfilling minimal requirements in a four, or perhaps five, year program need furtherinvestigation. The figure shows two paths of knowledge feeding into a capstone designexperience. Capstone design projects allow students to synthesize and apply knowledge gainedfrom their course work to solve real world problems in cooperation with local agencies,companies, and other academic programs. Projects for a capstone design course in ecologicalengineering could include wetland, stream and habitat restoration, mitigation of developmentprojects, and bioremediation
worth 10 credits. This module would have 75 hours of teaching/learning activitiesdivided according to the peculiarities of each module (as discussed below). It was recognized thatsome parts of the content in engineering require more time to be delivered and could not befragmented into Single Modules. Consequently, it was decided to have a choice of four types ofmodules, namely single, double, treble and quadruple modules with pro rata credit ratings. Thetotal number of credits for each academic year was recommended to be 120 made up from thecombination mentioned above. Therefore, the whole degree course would be worth 360 credits.It was stated that the four major activities for learning content are Lectures, Tutorials,Practical/Project
, using the DSK expansion headers for direct board-to-board connection. Theprototype served as a test vehicle for the development of the final laboratory station.Additionally, this prototype board was used to construct a low cost, variable frequency, precisionthree-phase power supply for use in our general electrical engineering courses. Implementationrequired only a small number of additional components and clearly demonstrated the utility of thisprototyping system, particularly in design projects. By using this prototyping system as afoundation, the students are able to undertake much more ambitious interfacing and signalprocessing design projects, without having to design the entire system from the ground up.The laboratory station retains all
Table 1 Principal Objectives of Chemical Engineering Design1. Students must experience the creation process of design and be able to apply it to synthesize and evaluate solutions to significant integrated problems.2. Students must recognize the need for, select values for and evaluate the impact of the specifications inherent in a process subject to process and project constraints.3. Students must develop the confidence to begin the creation of a solution to a problem even though the solution path is unknown and to use the discoveries along the path to continue the development.4. Students must be able to develop solutions without extensive computational support.5. Students must develop the confidence to work with the
reflection-in-action, the practitioner’sstance is particularly poignant. Schon argues that the practitioner’s values and views are, andshould be recognised as, necessary and unavoidable part of the solution-generating process.Of most interest to our argument in this paper is Schon’s [3] description of the culture of thereflective practicum: the environment in which skills and culture are transferred from practitionerto student: A reflective practicum must establish its own traditions, not only those associated with project types, formats, media, tools, and materials but also those embodying expectation for the interactions of coach and student. Its traditions must include its characteristic language, its repertoire of
institutions which make the state support for public universities dependent on the number of students rather than on the actual costs of running the programs of study (as before);• unattractive career prospects for university employees: academic staff, especially talented young people, are attracted by significantly higher salaries offered by private or even state- owned industrial or business enterprises;• bad shape of most Polish industrial companies resulting in a diminishing number of research and development projects supported by industry and little demand for staff training programs offered by the universities, but also affecting decisions of candidates to university studies.More information on changes in engineering
Swapana Subbarao Jerpoth, Rowan University Swapana S. Jerpoth received her B.Tech degree in Chemical Engineering from Priyadarshini Institute of Engineering and Technology, India in 2017, and her M.Tech degree in Petrochemical Engineering from Laxminarayan Institute of Technology, India in 2019. SMr. David Anthony Theuma, Rowan University I am a recent chemical engineering graduate of Rowan University looking for employment in the chemical manufacturing, project engineering, or engineering consulting industries. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #43351Sean Curtis, Rowan
only enhance problem-solving skills but also fosterinnovation and creativity in finding solutions to complex engineering problems. Engineers rarelywork in isolation in the professional environment. They are frequently part of multidisciplinaryteams where collaboration is vital for problem solving and project completion. In addition totechnical expertise, engineering demands strong interpersonal, leadership, and conflict-resolutionabilities. In the classroom, teamwork fosters the development of technical as well as soft skillsthat are essential for success in the workplace [1], [2]. Teamwork also exposes college studentsto diverse viewpoints and concepts, fostering creativity and ingenuity [3], [4]. It helps studentsappreciate the variety of
engineering problems for example. Two examples of an ICA are given inFigure 1. In total, there were 21 ICAs given throughout the semester in the traditional design. Inthe new design, that is currently being worked on, this will need to be reduced to about 15.The design of the course for the scope of this work had class time being consumed by lecturesand ICAs while the project, homework, and FYAs all being completed outside of class. Thisplaced a significant amount of unnecessary stress on new students who were alreadyoverwhelmed and overcommitted. This paper focuses on how the course was traditionally taughtin a fall semester and narrows in on how content was delivered and how ICAs were completed tobetter implement ICAs in the course redesign
Philosophy from OCMS, Oxford – Middlesex University, London. He was formerly a Research Tutor at OCMS, Oxford, and formerly a Research Fellow at the Oxford Centre for Hindu Studies, a Recognized Independent Centre of Oxford University. He is also the Founding Director of Samvada International Research Institute which offers consultancy services to institutions of research and higher education around the world on designing research tracks, research teaching and research projects. His first book The Integral Philosophy of Aurobindo: Hermeneutics and the Study of Religion was published by Routledge, Oxon in 2017. For more information, please visit: https://plaksha.edu.in/faculty-details/dr-brainerd-princeDr. Siddharth
solution should follow a specific format, such as filling specific fields in a table and/or preparing a presentation for 5 min to explain the solution. We used this kind of assignment in a Machine learning course. • For group project assignments, students are required to present either a research idea or a programming project. The presentation is presented in-person for on-site courses. In the case of online courses, two different approaches are available. The first approach involves organizing a Zoom meeting where students present their work and respond to questions. Alternatively, the second approach entails recording the presentation with their voices accompanying each slide. Other group
a Teaching Professor in the UCSD Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. His research and teaching are focused on course redesign, active learning, and project-based learning. He also co-directs a hands-on undergraduate research program called Engineers for Exploration, in which students apply their engineering knowledge to problems in exploration and conservation.Dr. Huihui Qi, University of California, San Diego Dr.Huihui Qi is an Associate Teaching Professor in the department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, at the University of California San Diego. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: Faculty Experiences and Learning Through
communication, cross-disciplinary communication, and material science. Each ofthese dimensions are presented through discourse among team members working on a humanaugmentation project with the aim of allowing students to consider how each of these dimensionsplays a role in a design project and a design team. To create that discourse for the problem-scoping dimension, as an example, the case studies found in open-access engineering casestudies libraries were appropriate for elementary students but not for the topic of problemscoping. As a result, the discourse was based on both accounts of professional engineers engagedin problem scoping found in design research and a collaboration with a professional engineer torefine aspects of how problem scoping
completing experiments related toelectric and electronic circuits. Most of these modules are combined with a computer that servesas an interface between the module and the user, providing a complete set of measurementinstruments such as voltmeters, current meters, signal sources, power supplies, etc.This work proposes an alternative for online students to perform the complete set of experimentsoutlined in the syllabus in a real-life environment, using actual components and instruments tomeasure realistic conditions, thereby enabling accurate data analysis. In this regard, online andface-to-face sections will complete the same labs, achieve the same learning outcomes, and beassessed similarly.Literature ReviewThere are multiple documented projects
engineer. This project uses Kotter’s change theory and Acker’s inequalityregimes to identify and examine signature practices and change strategies within and across sixexemplars. While previous executive summaries focused on the signature practices informed bythe interviews with faculty and staff, this year’s executive summary will characterize theinstitutional values and commitments to diversity, equity, and inclusion. This effort will informfuture efforts to understand the intent-to-impact gap by comparing the institution's values tostudent’s lived experiences.IntroductionSubstantial investments and programmatic efforts have been dedicated to advance diversity,equity, and inclusion (DEI) in STEM disciplines and organizations for underrepresented
students.On the other hand, some tools aim to reduce barriers to entry; for example, work by Weinhart etal. [19] provided comprehensive, easy to follow documentation for projects with differing levelof difficulty (i.e., simulation/code complexity).One strategy to develop beginner friendly tools is to use object-oriented coding and a high-levelinterface to interact with a low-level program, seen in Windows-Yule et al. [20] and Casas-Orozco et al., 2021 [21]. Utilizing Python to pass commands to LAMMPS greatly reduced thecomplexity and allows the user to focus on the problem they are simulating rather than syntax.Python’s advantages include dynamic types (i.e., the Python interpreter will automatically castdata into the correct type as it passes into a
socialresponsibility. Course creation and revisions incorporated EOP learning outcomes; many of theserevisions took effect in Autumn 2023. Additionally, one of the core courses of our proposedspecialization will be offered on a satellite campus beginning Spring 2024.The EOP framework provided the guiding principles for the proposed specialization. Theseprogrammatic elements balance student learning with community impacts while weavingSustainability, Intercultural Competence and Cultural Awareness into a core tenet of engineering.Further, the EOP mentorship program was instrumental in guiding the project participants increating buy-in from stakeholders across the university enterprise.IntroductionThere are many dimensions to sustainability, and our pedagogical
Texas at El Paso. He holds a Ph.D. degree in Computational Science Program. He has years of research experience in different projects in the field of image data mining, machine learning, deep learning, and computer simulation for industrial and healthcare applications. In addition, Dr. Rahman has taught various engineering courses in industrial and manufacturing engineering. His research area covers advanced quality technology, AI application in smart manufacturing, health care applications, computational intelligence/data analytics, and decision support systems.Christopher Colaw, Lockheed MartinProf. Tzu-liang Bill Tseng, University of Texas, El Paso Dr. Bill Tseng is a Professor and Chair of the Department of
in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Seattle University. She earned her PhD degree from University of Denver specializing in renewable energy and smart grids. Her research focus is on renewable energy integration into smart grids, ensuring efficient energy management and grid stability, aiming for a sustainable impact. She is a member of IEEE, ASEE and SWE and has worked on several NSF and NREL funded projects. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Teaching Digital Logic in the Quarter-Based EE CurriculumIntroductionCourses on digital logic are an essential part of all Electrical and Computer Engineeringcurricula. With the advent of FPGAs, the use of a
the curriculum and teaching in the freshman engineering program and the mechanical engineering program. She is also the Co-Director of the Grand Challenges Scholars Program (GCSP) at ASU. In this role, she focuses on student support and tracking, curriculum, program requirements, as well as programming for current students in GCSP. Dr. Zhu was also involved in the ASU ProMod project, the Engineering Projects in Community Service program, the Engineering Futures program, the Global Freshman Academy/Earned Admission/Universal Learner Courses Program, and the ASU Kern Project. She was a part of the team that designed a largely team and activity based online Introduction to Engineering course. She has also co-developed
thiswork and how these informed the design of the survey, including the reasoning behind usingself-efficacy measures. We will also present our early analysis of the validity of this tool and itsutility in measuring HCED learning. Findings from this paper cover data collected at thebeginning of the Fall 2023 semester. Future work will include pre/post comparison andlongitudinal analysis. Design is a central part of engineering and continues to play an important role inengineering undergraduate education [1]–[3]. Design projects have been positioned in thefreshman and senior years as cornerstone and capstone projects [1], [4]–[7]. Beyond thesedesign-focused courses, many engineering courses employ a project-based learning approach,often
Paper ID #43103 Arthur Hoskey is a Professor of Computer Systems at Farmingdale State College in New York. He received his Ph.D. in Computer Science from the City University of New York Graduate Center and received his B.A. in Psychology from the State University of New York at Purchase. Dr. Hoskey worked as a software engineer prior to starting his academic career. Dr. Hoskey’s primary line of research has been around innovative pedagogical methods. One line of research was a collaboration with faculty from multiple State University of New York colleges on a project to explore and develop a semi-standardized and accessible introduction to computer science course (SUNY IITG funded research), focused on teaching
biased based on the data used to train the program, which can lead to unfair or inaccuratefeedback. ChatGPT can unfortunately be vulnerable to causing security risks, which may lead todata breaches and sensitive information of students being leaked. With the rising popularity ofChatGPT, just like any other online resource, the over-reliance on it could lead to a decline inindependent problem-solving skills and critical thinking in an academic setting.This research project aims at understanding the students’ perspectives on the use of ChatGPT inengineering. This topic is relevant, timely, and important as ChatGPT as created sufficient stir ineducation. By exploring students’ experiences and perspectives, we aim to shed light on differentaspects
Paper ID #42216Developing a Team-Based Regulatory Framework for Mobility EngineeringProfessionalsMs. MAN LIANG, University of Maryland College Park Man Liang is a PhD student in Civil Engineering at the University of Maryland. She has over 3 years of working experience as a civil engineer conducting independent engineering designs for residential, commercial, institutional projects in the states of Ohio, Kentucky, Wisconsin, Texas, and etc. She specializes in site surveys, roadway engineering, pavement design, traffic analysis, site layout, site grading, sustainable stormwater management, utility connections, erosion and
this problem by keeping the evaluation team separate from the REU program’s leaders and faculty mentors, and by keeping students’ decisions to participate in the research confidential. · Confidentiality: In addition to typical protections, participants’ identities must also be kept confidential from their research mentors. Accordingly, we carefully deidentified the survey and interview data (e.g., when students mentioned their demographics or research projects). · Consent: Wylie proposed asking students to sign consent forms to participate in the study. The IRB judged that this was unnecessary because the data would be collected from the students anyway (for evaluation), so using those data for research fell
Paper ID #43899Stories of Appalachian Engineers: A Phenomenographical Study of AppalachianStudents’ Quest for Success in Undergraduate Engineering ProgramsMr. Matthew Sheppard, Clemson University I earned my B.S. in Industrial Engineering and my M.S. in Mechanical Engineering; both at Clemson University. I have several years’ experience as a Manufacturing Engineer supporting process improvements, machine design, and capital project management. Now, I have entered into the Engineering and Science Education PhD program at Clemson University in tandem with teaching hands-on engineering principles in an undergraduate