the problem. Research has shown that this technique prepares studentsfor future learning allowing them to learn more from subsequent lectures or reading. 4,17,18However, during the first implementation of this new curriculum, students were prompted togenerate ideas about the problem solution using from the following two questions: What do youknow that will help you solve this problem? What do you need to know to solve this problem?Surprising to us, students were giving answers in paragraph form rather than using morecommon problem solving approaches. This prompted the biomedical engineering domain experton the team to reflect on his own problem solving method for transport problems. From thisexplicit reflection, the domain expert made his own
bybeing involved with design. All of the faculty/staff interviews were audio recorded, and fourwere transcribed and coded for key insights.iThese insights were then used to develop a pair of surveys to gather feedback from students whohad been involved in the Design Certificate Program and DFA: one survey for alumni and onefor current undergraduates. The surveys were essentially identical in the sections that collecteddemographic information, the students’ experiences with design, and what benefits they felt theyhad received from design at Northwestern, but the alumni survey also included a section thatasked alumni to reflect on the skills they gained from being involved with these design programsand how their design experiences affected their
wherestudents may be of different demographics than those they will ultimately design for. Upongraduation, students will be expected to design solutions for handicapped or elderly individualswho are from a completely different background 3,29.Within the context of engineering design, the term “empathetic design” has emerged as animmersive design experience meant to help designers understand the needs of the end-user.Empathetic design is defined by Battarbee 30 as the ability of an engineer to immerse themselvesin the lives, environments, attitudes, experiences, and dreams of end users. Further, thisimmersive experience should be reflected in the design requirements 31. This experience is oftenrecommended in various user-centered design
pseudonyms), was much slower than the class norm (e.g., in labprogramming assignments), and two students appeared to particularly excel. By the end of terminterviews, the professor and other students could pick out who in particular was struggling andslow, as could Isaac himself, who reflected “I just don’t think I have the brain for programming.”This happened, in spite of the fact that programming in the professional world is rarely a timedactivity with “winners” easily noticed, and in spite of the fact that the students with whom hecompared himself arguably did not belong in an introductory programming class. Specifically,two out of the five students arrived through non-traditional pathways (a second bachelor’sdegree, a community college transfer
through experience and reflection, 39 throughencountering different ways of knowing. There is no room for critical thinking and reflectiveaction. 40 Most important, lifelong learning is foremost about a love of and passion for learningitself, rather than focusing exclusively on the discrete knowledge that is acquired. As Deweywrote “The most important attitude that can be formed is that of desire to go on learning. Ifimpetus in this direction is weakened instead of being intensified, something much more thanmere lack of preparation takes place” (48). 41 With these reductionist misconceptions aboutknowledge and learning, it is clear that a concept like lifelong learning didn’t stand a chance.Many of these omissions are in fact related—one needs
, or reliance on the prospective member to take initiative toparticipate. Earlier work identified the fallacy of the open recruiting narrative.20 Formalrecruitment procedures are by-passed in favor of network friendships, excluding those who donot have high levels of cultural and social capital. Even though teams recruited at college ofengineering-wide events, they continued to be populated primarily by white male ME studentswith pre-existing friendships and other connections. Due to the effects of homophily andtransitivity (explained earlier), both team membership and leadership were limited to a cadre ofstudents with high social capital.19, 20 The survey results presented here reflect the samehomogenizing influences.Persistence barriers
described was not incentivized by agency or ERDCfunding of the UPRM. The origin of the initiative was federal government policy tostrive for a workforce with demographics reflective of the national population orreflective of the demographics of the population of engineers and scientists. Laws,policy, executive orders and regulations encouraged recruitment strategies for allgovernment organizations to ameliorate the disparity that exists for underrepresentedgroups in any government organization. A compilation of the metrics documentedthroughout the paper forms the framework for the partnership assessment. Table 10summarizes eight activities along with a metric for each activity and a column thatprovides the authors evaluation of the benefit (either
social impact-focused programs werethe most likely to emphasize organizational forms of leadership (although not to anextreme), possibly reflecting a broader systems view of engineering’s potentialcontribution to society.Cluster 3 – Influencing core curriculumThe third and final cluster that was observable included the two programs explicitlyfocused on engaging all engineering students in leadership education. This involvesfaculty buy-in and relationships with key administrators that are fundamentally differentto developing small, targeted programs using self-selection mechanisms to recruitparticipants. Given the focus on undergraduate students, both of these programs are usinga wider range of strategies: teaching mandatory courses on leadership
conduct quantitative and qualitative analysis on students’activity participation by asking students to reflect on their experiences and performing the sameanalysis that has been performed on the activities after the students complete their first semester.The authors are particularly interested in understanding if introducing students to Chickering’sstudent development theory will cause more diversity in students’ choices of what vectors theyparticipate in. The authors plan on expanding the submission form students use to report theirparticipation to include self-reporting of what vectors they believe they engaged in and an areafor students to comment and reflect on their experience.ConclusionStudent development in the first year is complex and
NTIDcommunity and faculty’s professional development plans. The Connectivity series at RIT issupporting the goals of the AdvanceRIT project by removing barriers to resources that supportcareer success and creating new interventions and resources.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants0811076 and #1209115. The researchers wishes to express their gratitude for the support of thisproject. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References1. Hill, C.; Corbett, C.; Rose, A., Why so few. American Association of University Women: Washington D.C
startup businesses. The paper discusses theevolution of the student group from the engineering economy course and the work of theentrepreneurship consulting group that is receiving much attention from program advisory boardmembers, startup businesses, and university leadership.DisclaimerThe views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect theofficial policy or position of the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Department of Defense, or the U.S.Government.Introduction and MotivationCompany executives from Alcoa, ADT, and Armstrong among representatives from othercompanies that serve on the Industrial & Professional Advisory Council (IPAC) and a ServiceEnterprise Engineering Advisory Board (SEE) in Industrial
reading or video assignments that prompted students to thinkabout concepts and strategies for success in what they read or watched, reflect on newknowledge they gained, and how these strategies applied to their own journey throughengineering education.The second hour of the lecture meeting was generally used to explore engineering careersand conceptual background and applications for the lab activities and design projects.Topics included measurements and error analysis, computational methods and analysiswith MATLAB, mechanical properties of materials, trusses and structures, fundamentalelectronics, sensors and signal conditioning, Arduino programming, and robotics andsimple control scenarios.All of the lab activities and design projects listed in
multinational projects in an introductoryengineering design course. This paper reports the preliminary findings from a survey based onthe Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) given to students before starting their participation inthe multinational projects. The data collected provides information in five constructs which are:interest/enjoyment, perceived competence, pressure/tension, perceived choice, andvalue/usefulness. These constructs provide a perception about students’ interests, belief, andfeelings about the international project that reflect their level of motivation and confidence tocarry on the tasks. The data is evaluated and considered in the development of the learningmodule to be incorporated before the project in the same course in the
and Jerusalem.3.2 Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and TechnologyThe Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at BYU currently has an enrollment of4000 students in five engineering and five technology programs. The college awardsapproximately 600 B.S., 100 M.S. and 20 Ph.D. degrees in a year. These degree totals reflect thedirection of the Board of Trustees that BYU remain predominantly an undergraduate institution.About half of the graduates go on to graduate school.The current college administration began to serve in May of 2005. It was natural that we tooksome time to identify strategic directions we felt would help prepare our students for success inthe 21st century and increase the visibility of the college.Concurrent with
variables such as gender, race, ethnicity, family’seducational background, and socioeconomic status. English et al. (2013) reported findings from a STEM-based lesson in whichstudents explored engineering concepts and principles pertaining to simple machines.The students clearly indicated how the machines were simulated by the materials. Thestudents were also able to reflect on different aspects of their design, especially onmaterial properties and how they affected stability. Allowing students to suggest ways toimprove their designs provided opportunities for further reflection in subsequent designprocesses. In general, students did not make explicit references to underlyingengineering and science principles, but they were able to link
spaces; is it the same or different?Our studyThis research project is investigating three very different universities with engineering programsthat have embraced the maker culture: University B, University A, and University C. Each ofthe spaces are different, reflecting the differences in the institutions. University B is first andforemost a technological institute with the majority of undergraduates majoring in engineering.Its maker space, housed within the Department of Mechanical Engineering, is operated by a 70person team comprising of 65 undergraduate volunteers and 5 non-student members. The makerspace comprises five rooms totaling 2,500 square feet that includes a rapid prototyping suitewith six 3D printers having various material
, demonstrate thecapability of mobile platform specially the Android platform which bear the testimony thatmobile platform can be made efficient in controlling robot.Preliminariesi. UMLUnified Modeling Language28 widely known as UML is a software engineering tool used formodeling software systems. Fundamentally it is used as a tool for analyzing, designing andimplementing software intensive systems. UML provides a visual representation of the systemwhich reflects the standard and interactive organization or system’s elements. From thebeginning till now, there are several versions of UML have been evolved and UML 2.0 is usedfor the modeling of our system. UML offers two types of system modeling, one is structural orstatic modeling which require the
other outcomes that resulted from offenses. Finally, the findings wereorganized into themes. Several steps were taken to ensure the quality of the findings. First, after thetranscriptions were produced, the audio recordings were checked against the transcripts to verifythe accuracy of the data. Second, transcripts were sent to participants to verify the accuracy ofcontent and meaning; no participants responded with changes to their transcriptions. Finally,because five researchers analyzed the data, and the five had various backgrounds andperspectives, the researchers reflected on their positionalities and subjectivities. This process ofbeing reflective helped them acknowledge who they were – and the biases they held – relative tothe
in the description of both cases—regardless of cultural and institutional differences—there are several common places between the two approaches to change presented in this paper(see Table 2 for a summary). There is a common motivation and goal, which is achievingexcellence in engineering education within the region and worldwide. Although each institutiondescribes its guideline principles in a different way, they all respond to the logic model suggestedby CORFO. Of note is that both leading engineering schools were aware of previous experiencesrelated to cultural change in engineering education and to the creation of university-basedentrepreneurship ecosystems. This awareness can be reflected in three major change strategiesconsidered from
deemedundesirable by the IABs: 1) the program was offered only in the summer sessions; 2) it requiredconsiderable academic supervisor oversight; 3) the internship grade was mostly determined bythe academic supervisor; and, 4) as a writing intensive course, some of the program requirementswere consuming students’ working hours in a manner that was inefficient. Specifically, theinterns had been required to prepare daily logs that painstakingly described the details of workengagement by the hour and an equally tedious, descriptive account of reflections of the studentson those activities. The summer-based, five-week long regimen could not permit the industry toaccomplish much of substance with an intern. The department’s industrial partners also had todeal
the role of mentors inattracting underrepresented students, previously constructed instruments from 12 in theirattitudinal study of CS in the Level Playing Field’s Summer Math and Science Honors Academy(SMASH) were used. Additional instruments were developed by the researchers to measurecultural competency. The survey uses a 5-point Likert scale (where 1 = Not Really, 3 = Neutraland 5 = Absolutely).Along with the surveys, interviews were conducted to get a deeper sense of the effectiveness ofthe BJC curriculum in attracting historically underrepresented students. These audio-recordedinterviews were conducted at the university with participants that either attended CS10, CS61A,or both. Furthermore, participants were carefully chosen to reflect
applicable to asignificant population of students and educators. Further, this case study is relevant toengineering education in that it centers around a classroom that is engaged in “application ofscientific knowledge to an engineering problem,” and NGSS frames this case study as anexample of its “vision of blending disciplinary core ideas, scientific and engineering practices,and crosscutting concepts.” Throughout this paper the authors examine and reflect on the purposes of science andengineering education as well as the ways in which large-scale science reforms (such as NGSS)attempt to address issues of access and equity that continue to persist in science and engineeringeducation. In future, the authors hope to analyze other NGSS case
QuestionsFollowing from this perspective, we aim to address the following questions: • How do representations of students by instructors function during a meeting in which instructors are working to determine grades for the course? More specifically: o How do the instructors position themselves and one another? o How do the instructors position students within categories that have consequences for success and lack of success? o How do these positionings reflect an instantiate particular ideologies and sets of values regarding calculus and its role in engineering?4. Research Context, Data, and MethodsOur research focuses on a the Access Program, a diversity-promoting program in
few days later and included the two itemsshe had requested. The salary was not quite the level Sarai had hoped for, but given her interestin remaining in the region and her success in receiving funding for both of her requests, shedecided against negotiating for a higher salary. All in all, the negotiation workshop had, in hereyes, paid off. Without it, she reflected, she would have just accepted the verbal offer withoutarticulating what else she needed to help her succeed in this new position.Administrative Level NegotiationsCase 3: College level budget negotiationState U had just hired a new provost. He was a biologist and one of his platforms was to launch anew STEM program. The university had, however, been weathering budget crises for
(3) face-to-face but taught in parallel with the online section. 600 500 400 300 Other 200 Reform 100 0Figure 2: Calculus I enrollment by semester.Total students “captured” by the reform project, as a percent of enrollment is shown in Figure 3.It appears to be stabilizing in the low to mid 70’s, which currently reflects the portion of calculusthat Boise State University has chosen to offer as honors, online, or face-to-face but parallel toonline. 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40
-intentional‘general distribution requirements’ of the university [that] are not necessarily tailored to meet theneeds of students”6 nor a thoughtfully comprised liberal core for holistically prepared engineers.Is this student response instigated and nurtured by a cultural devaluation of non-technicalcoursework that is reflected in minimal non-technical requirements filled with choice? Surely thepresence of faculty, advisors and deans unenthusiastic about the added value of exploration ofhumanities and social sciences topics impacts the climate of perception towards liberal educationin engineering colleges; programs that emphasize the integration of the humanities and socialsciences with engineering need faculty champions, broad and overt institutional
environment19.In more recent work, these benchmarks are replaced with engagement indicators that arecategorized into four themes: academic challenge, learning with peers, experiences with facultyand campus environment48. The course material delivery framework outlined in this paper 1focuses on some of these benchmarks including higher order learning, reflective and integrativelearning and learning strategies (all under the “academic challenge” theme).There have been several research efforts over the past many years to improve engagement inengineering classrooms. These include the use of a technology-centered classroom20, formationof learning
whichincluded (i) 6, (ii) 9, and (iii) 2 questions for each of the three sections. Comparatively, the end-term survey had 19 questions of (i) 11, (ii) 4, and (iii) 4 questions. All the original questionsfrom sections (i) and (iii) were maintained and supplemental questions were added. Section (ii)was modified to reflect class activities that had occurred since the mid-semester survey. Specificquestions will be discussed in greater detail in the following section analyzing student feedback.Summary of Student FeedbackEighteen of the twenty students enrolled in the DBE course consented to participate in theresearch study, sharing their assessment of this new curriculum. The remainder of this sectionaggregates both the responses from Likert scale rating
developing skills and understanding where the abilities and tools for learning gainedfrom various life stages (e.g., childhood) and various sources (e.g., schooling) provide a contextand resource for learning and performing in later life.8 Lifelong learning capability is seen whenan individual or group reflects on the current situation and resolves to address a problem, toshare an idea, or to do research and further study to gain a better understanding of the situation.Thus, lifelong learning happens serendipitously in the workplace, at home, and at play, as part ofdaily living.Some authors have written on the role of technology in lifelong learning. Idrus and Atansuggested that life-wide learning hinges on technology mediated communication
conflicts between members (and how these were resolved). ii. Team strategy: This component examined whether ECE students had a particular strategy to ensure they were successful at maintaining their microgrids, generating revenue, and successfully fending off (or minimizing the impact of) cyberattacks. iii. Team preparedness: This aspect focused on whether ECE students were prepared, knew the various elements of the Grid Game, and understood what different cyberattacks did to their systems. iv. Methodological issues: This section asked CJ students how they felt about doing handson research, any difficulties they experienced in observing and interviewing ECE students, and also reflections on what