twospecific domains, viz., engineering leadership/project management, and career/business educa-tion); 2) the gathering and reporting of supporting data; 3) the application of relevant fundamen-tals from complexity theory; and 4) stimulating analogies about complex system behaviors andcomplex systems engineering principles. All this may influence a positive transformation in the“mindsights” of aspirants, students, teachers, professors, and college/university educators.IntroductionThis paper was initially conceived to evaluate the feasibility of free online education inenhancing anyone’s ability to establish their desired career while easing the requisite financialburden of having to go to college. This problem often arises either because of high
incorporating additional skills like self-reflection and emotionalintelligence into the engineering curriculum.IntroductionIt is generally known that soft skills are necessary to support a successful career. Employers havecontinually voiced concerns about college students not being ready for the demands of theworkplace in terms of their personal and team-based soft skills. As a result, we focused ourefforts to design and implement a set of soft skills modules that can be seamlessly integrated intothe technical curriculum. This paper focuses on development and delivery of such soft skillmodules at the high school level to help prepare students for college and careers.After receiving grant funding from the Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation, the cross
supplemental instruction sessionsstrategically designed to provide support in both their engineering and mathematics courses.These sessions were led by upper-level peer mentors. Students were connected with facultymentors in their discipline through lunches that the SSP faculty team provided each week. Theselunches helped reduce food insecurity while also providing an inviting atmosphere for interactionbetween peers and faculty. Lunches also offered an opportunity to have career discussions andbring in professional development speakers like student organization leaders and graduatestudents.At the start of the first quarter of their sophomore year, nineteen students were either still ontrack or just one quarter behind in their engineering curriculum
students do not utilize mental health support, they will need strong social supportfrom their peers, faculty, and staff to thrive [6]. Due to the unique role of faculty members in theacademic and social development of international students, understanding the students’ needsmay position faculty members to support the students better in the first semester and beyond.Providing opportunities for international students to engage in collaborative problem-solving,networking events, and seminars helps international students feel a sense of belonging [7].Moreover, in smaller programs where experienced faculty members can provide mentorship,career advice, professional guidance, and encouragement, international students enjoy and thrivein a fruitful
. Leadership must firmly embrace these practices to ensure commitment throughoutan organization and ensure success.Currently, many profitable companies are using Lean to become efficient global leaders;however, academic resources to prepare our future workforce are scarce for high school(secondary) and relatively few opportunities in college (post-secondary) institutions. These toolsare essential to our emerging workforce, yet we are failing to introduce them during cruciallearning opportunities to most secondary or post-secondary students. This paper explores howthese industry-tested tools can foster career exploration, industry collaboration, and workforcedevelopment. The Lean curriculum we are presenting, empowers learners to harness Lean toolsfor
140students who earned a bachelors or masters degree in a STEM-related field have been enrolled inclasses at one or more community colleges during their academic career at a four-year university.In addition, more women attend community colleges than four-year institutions, as indicated bythe U.S. Department of Education4. It has been shown that community colleges play animportant role in increasing the number of women in STEM disciplines and careers5.Citrus College is a 2-year college located in Glendora, CA, in Los Angeles County. The Fall2010 enrollment was 14,386 students. According to the Citrus College Fact Book6 about 54% ofthe students enrolled in classes at Citrus College are female. The percent enrollment of femalestudents in higher level
followed the first crew in successful triumphs. If we recallthe picture of those engineers they were all white men in white shirts, most with plastic pocketprotectors to hold rows of pens and pencils. This picture is slowly changing, as the field ofengineering progresses and evolves. Recent studies showed that there are more women engineersjoining the workforce every year, but still not enough to fulfill the gap. Engineering classroomsremains to be dominantly consisted of male students with a national ratio of six to one. Thefemale ratio at the college of engineering in Texas Tech University is much lower than nationalstatistics.Influential factors of lower interest in women preceding engineering careers are known as"environmental" factors, such
to increase mathematics, science and reading test scores for 8th grade girls.The program was designed to cultivate science, technology, engineering and mathematics(STEM) interest in young women by increasing their learning through critical thinking andproblem-solving applications to pursue engineering and science careers. The program’s focuswas on fifteen (15) Baltimore City School 8th grade girls who were preparing to enter BaltimoreCity High Schools. The intent of this program was to further the mission and goals of the fundingagencies education division and inspire minority women to pursue career paths in science,mathematics, computer science, engineering, education or seek professional employment. Duringthe four-week period the girls
companies’ guidance and assistance, the “real-world” projects have providedstudents with many useful tools for future careers in the Engineering profession. These includethe following: • Development of a high quality product definition • The ability to create a highly effective business case • Delivering effective stage-gate presentations • Creating designs for verification and validation • Go through design reviews with customers and other Engineers • Creating effective instruction manuals • Understanding risk management • Effective project management with planning creating solid action plansThe two projects successfully completed in one semester with the preparation during the fall.The projects have enhanced student team
for professional life and professional licensure. Undergraduate instruction inengineering ethics may take the form of stand-alone courses, topics within courses or seminars,and student life, e.g. expectations through honor codes and academic conduct. These experiencesshould facilitate career-long development of ethics knowledge and judgment.Rich resources exist for teaching engineering ethics. Technical societies provide many of theseresources especially as part of a defined course of professional study and as means to guide self-regulation of the profession. Many examples of codes of ethics have been developed to provideexplicit statements of and guides for ethical conduct, cf. [2]. Some of the codes are lengthywhile others are succinct
could radiation facilities in student research. Light sources such asconsist of sample preparation, spectroscopy dye lasers pumped by nitrogen lasers offer oscilloscope datainstrumentation, data science, interpretation, billing, and collection experience. A spectrometer from 450 nm to 700 nmreporting to clients. The sustainability aspect is discussed in offers visible alignment experience.terms of future synchrotron radiation projects in a start-up techcompany and student career training in materials science and III. SPECTROSCOPY DATA ANALYSISengineering, instrumentation, and AI-assisted data science
—STEM teaching, mobile laboratories, STEM equity, STEM exposureN. K. DeJarnette is with the School of Education (email: ndejarne@bridgeport.edu), R. S. Deeb wasformerly with the School of Engineering (email: rsdeeb@gmail.com) and J. M. Pallis is with the School ofEngineering (email: jpallis@bridgeport.edu), University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport CT.I. IntroductionEquity suggests that all children receive the same privileges and experiences, regardless of theirzip code. Equity in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) education is front andcenter in education today [1]. The 21st Century has birthed a technological age like nothing everseen before. Likewise, careers in STEM continue to grow around the globe and today’s globalpopulation is
information; 4) sendingapplications; and 5) enrolling. Later, Kotler and Fox [25] developed a seven-stage college choicemodel: 1) discovery of a desire to attend college; 2) research about college options; 3)application to college; 4) acceptance into college; 5) enrollment; 6) persistence; and 7)graduation.However, the choice of which college to attend is only half the battle – the student must alsodecide their college major or discipline. What motivates a student to decide on a career path?This is where existing academic literature on “broadening participation” in engineering splitsinto two segments – into student outreach and student recruitment – which is a significantfinding of this study that is discussed later in this paper. Just like college
howstudent self-beliefs influenced their experience with mental health during graduate school. Wealso found that graduate students’ perception of their experience is influenced by students’gender, nationality, and could influence student career trajectories. The results from our workhighlight the ongoing concerns with graduate school culture, and how it can disadvantage certaingroups. Further, this work can help identify student support mechanisms that can be instituted atthe individual, program, and college level to promote student retention and mental health.IntroductionMental health has become a particularly salient talking point in institutions of higher education[1]. Graduate students are identified as a unique population in academic
Indians entering STEM programs and careers [1], [2], [3].Many of these positions require at least an associate degree as well as a combination of higher-level academic coursework and industry work experience, among other skills. However, this typeof academic and skill preparation oftentimes excludes students who are typically underrepresentedin STEM.As institutions of higher education, community colleges play a crucial role in STEM pathways: in2012, community colleges enrolled nearly half of all U.S. undergraduates [4], and nearly half ofall students in the U.S. who receive STEM bachelor’s degrees complete some undergraduatetraining in community colleges [5]. Given their relative accessibility and affordability, communitycolleges are an important
. The programsreferenced in the literature included: The Invention Bootcamp, Career Advancement MentoringProgram for Young Entrepreneurs (CAMP-YES), Poder (i.e., Spanish for “to be able to” and“power”), Pathways to Innovation, #WatchMeCode and STEM-Inc. We discuss these programsand interventions in the following paragraphs.The Invention Boot CampThe Invention Boot Camp is a four-week interdisciplinary program that focuses on teachingentrepreneurship, innovation, and STEM skills in a college environment to underrepresentedhigh school students in STEM [38]. One benefit of this program is that it utilizes an equitablelens in the recruitment and application process by going into schools with a large percentage ofracially minoritized and low-income
. Doug Reeve P.Eng., University of Toronto Dr. Reeve was the founding Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) (2010-2018) at the University of Toronto. After a lengthy career as a consulting engineer he made development of personal capability central to his work with engineering students, undergraduate and graduate. In 2002 he established Leaders of Tomorrow, a student leadership development program that led to the establishment of ILead in 2010. In 2017, he was co-leader of the team that developed the OPTIONS Program (Opportunities for PhDs: Transitions, Industry Options, Networking and Skills) for engineering PhD students interested in careers outside the academy. He is a
engineering education as a nexus for improved science learning and STEM career awareness. This research and other collaborative efforts undergird a new Center for Research on STEM Teaching and Learning at Oklahoma State University.Adrienne Redmond, Oklahoma State University ADRIENNE REDMOND earned her B.S. in Elementary Education from Oklahoma State University in 2000 and her M.A. in Curriculum and Instruction in 2003. She is currently working on her Ph.D. in Professional Education with an emphasis in mathematics education at Oklahoma State University. She has taught mathematics methods courses at to elementary education majors
Centers for Exploration and New Discovery) program. QCCTechASCEND was a project funded under that program to encourage high school students(mostly seniors with some juniors) to consider careers in science, technology, engineering andmathematics (STEM). Located at a large urban community college, the QCC TechASCENDproject put particular emphasis on technology, but attracted participants considering or willing toconsider other STEM fields.Over the course of three school years, from October 2002 through June 2005, nearly 200 highschool students from 22 high schools participated. Each of the seven groups of participants camefor approximately 30 sessions, each two hours long, devoted to hands-on exploration related tooptics in general, lasers, fiber
development in architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) students. In February 2019, Andrea received the prestigious National Science Foundation CAREER award to re- search professional identity development processes in undergraduate AEC women. She has also received grants from East Coast Construction Services, Engineering Information Foundation, and the National Association of Home Builders. Dr. Ofori-Boadu was selected to participate in the 2019 QEM-NSF INCLUDES summit. In 2018, she was selected as a 2018 National Science Foundation - NC A & T ADVANCE IT Faculty Scholar. She also received the 2018 CoST Teaching Excellence Merit Award. Dr. Ofori-Boadu received both the 2017 NC A & T - CoST Rookie
retention is a challenge for all students, it isparticularly apparent for women and minority students whose representation in engineeringdecreases at every education and career milestone.1,2 As a result, women and minorities stillmake up a small fraction of those earning engineering degrees. At our institution, a publicuniversity in the state of Colorado, the undergraduate population is about 20% women and 8%underrepresented minorities (compared to 20% and 11% nationally). Moreover, only about 15%of practicing civil engineers in some subdisciplines, like structural engineering, are women.3 Incontrast, women now make up over 30% of lawyers and physicians, and over 70% ofpsychologists. Since no evidence exists that significant gender or racial
described at feministengineering.org. She received a CAREER award in 2010 and a PECASE award in 2012 for her project researching the stories of undergraduate engineering women and men of color and white women. She received ASEE-ERM’s best paper award for her CAREER research, and the Denice Denton Emerging Leader award from the Anita Borg Institute, both in 2013. She helped found, fund, and grow the PEER Collaborative, a peer mentoring group of early career and re- cently tenured faculty and research staff primarily evaluated based on their engineering education research productivity. She can be contacted by email at apawley@purdue.edu
Blackboards is a design-based learning experience in afterschool clubs and summercamps that challenges middle school students to solve real world problems. The program isimplemented in a primarily Hispanic, low-income community adjacent to Austin, Texas a citywith a strong, technology-based economy, and earned district-wide attention with early successin team-based competitions. Beyond Blackboards aims to enhance interest and understanding ofengineering, as well as positively influence education and career goals for participants, andultimately, the entire district. This study examines the effects of Beyond Blackboards on girls’ (atraditionally underrepresented group in engineering) attitudes surrounding engineering.Specifically, this study
Ralph Coats Roe Awards. She earned her PhD from the University of Michigan. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Designing good practices for recruitment, admissions and program structure of engineering outreach programs to increase access for marginalized and non-traditional higher education students (Evidence-based practice)AbstractEngineering outreach programs aimed at students in higher education play a key role inproviding pathways for students to access studies and careers in engineering. Marginalized andnon-traditional students may not have the resources to represent their skills, goals and fit in theparlance and format that best matches
held fellowships in Ethics of AI and Technology & Society organizations.James N. Magarian, Massachusetts Institute of Technology James Magarian, PhD, is a Sr. Lecturer and Associate Academic Director with the Gordon-MIT En- gineering Leadership (GEL) Program. He joined MIT and GEL after nearly a decade in industry as a mechanical engineer and engineering manager in aerospace/defense. His research focuses on engineering workforce formation and the education-careers transition.Dr. Alison Olechowski, University of Toronto Alison Olechowski is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineer- ing and the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice (ISTEP
. She also recently won the prestigious CAREER award from the U.S. National Science Foundation to study increasing the fairness of engineering assessments. In total, she has been on the leadership of more than $24 million dollars in research awards. Her research on evaluation of online learning (supported by two NSF awards #1544259,1935683, ) has resulted in more than 20 peer-reviewed conference and journal publications related to engineering learners in online courses. She was a FutureLearn Research Fellow from 2017-2019; a 2018 recipient of the FIE New Faculty Fellow Award and was the 2021 Program Chair for the Educational Research Methods Division of ASEE.Christopher Greg Brinton © American
Paper ID #36707Building a Leadership Toolkit: Underrepresented Students’ Development ofLeadership-Enabling Competencies through a Summer Research Experiencefor Undergraduates (REU) in Engineering EducationMs. Elizabeth Volpe, University of Florida Elizabeth is a doctoral student at the University of Florida. She is pursuing a Masters and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering as well as a certificate in engineering leadership. Her research interests involve leadership, the experiences of early career women in engineering and improving diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice within engineering education and the engineering workforce. She
Assistant Dean for Inclusive Excellence, she leads the Broadening Opportunity through Leadership and Diversity (BOLD) Center, overseeing efforts to attract and prepare students for the rigors of engineering study and careers, and to improve student performance and graduation rates. Appointed in January 2014, Miller comes to CU-Boulder from the National Science Foundation, where she worked in STEM education as a American Association for the Advancement of Science Fellow. Sarah believes that every child deserves an excellent education. She has worked in inner-city public schools, both as a teacher and as an administrator, and in the admissions office of Amherst College, where she earned a B.A. in Chemistry. She holds a PhD
neural engineering data and results, and ethical and responsible conduct of research in neural engineering, and the role of neuroethics in neural engineering. 2. Neural engineering best practices: Knowledge of oral and written communication of neural engineering knowledge and research, and innovation. 3. Connections to neural engineering industry and careers: Knowledge of industry’s role in neural engineering, careers in neural engineering, and careers in neuroethics.Conceptual Framework The design of this RET program is guided by sociocultural theories of learning,including: cognitive apprenticeship [6]; situated learning [7], [8]; distributed expertise [9], [10];and
mathematics andscience courses. They further add that these types of curricular reforms are already beingimplemented in some middle schools, are providing opportunities for students to see real lifeapplications of theoretical knowledge acquired in mathematics, physics and other subjects, andare exposing to opportunities in the engineering professions. Godwin et al.18 suggestimplementing the NGSS (Next Generation Science Standards), which explicitly includespractices and core ideas from engineering and technology to develop appropriate identities ofstudents, which can guide them in choosing and performing in their engineering careers. Martin et al. suggest mentoring students pro-actively19. Murphy et al. underline the needfor proactive