) 2. Attention to detail (1-10 points) 3. Use of provided material(s) (1-10 points) 4. Oral presentation (1-25 points) 5. Enthusiasm (1-10 points) 6. Reason for participation (1-10 points) 7. Bonus points (Judge must state reason) (1-10 points) Students constructing their projectsEach grade level is awarded prizes for first, second and third place. Prizes awarded include toolboxes, tools, toy construction equipment, hats, pizza coupons, and gift cards. Then all the firstplace winners are judged to determine first, second and third overall. The prizes for overallwinners have been $100, $75, and $50 U. S. savings bonds
kits that are never truly tackled within science instruction classroom experience.References1. Barger, M., Gilbert, R., Little, R., et al, Teaching Elementary School Teachers Basic Engineering Concepts. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2007.2. Engstrom, D., AC 2008-641: Invention, Innovation, and Inquiry—Engineering Design for Children. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2008.3. Etheredge, S., et al., To Pop or Not to Pop: Elementary Teachers Explore Engineering Design with Pop-up Books. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. 2005.4. NRC, National Research Council., National Academy of Sciences. National Science Education Standards
/paper.pdf5. Hoar, Robert H., “The College Algebra E-tutor”, Teaching with Technology today, Volume 8, Number 9: June 27, 20026. “Interactive College Algebra: A Web-Based Course, Student Guide with Student CD”, M2 Presswire; Nov 3, 20097. Hauk, Shandy, Powers, Robert A. , Safer, Alan, and Segalla, Angelo, “A comparison of web-based and paper and pencil homework on student performance in college algebra”, at http://hopper.unco.edu/hauk/segalla/WBWquan_060307.pdf8. Hagerty, Gary and Smith, S, “Using The Web-Based Interactive Software Aleks To Enhance College Algebra”, Page 15.317.14 Mathematics and Computer
, and problem solving skills.Although the goal of the SGER JagBot project was to design and build a tour guide robot, themain result was enhancement of engineering and computer science education at the University ofSouth Alabama.6. References[1] Fritsch WB J, Sagerer G. “Bringing it all together: Integration to study embodied interaction with a robotcompanion.” In: AISB 2005 Symposium – Robot Companions: Hard Problems and Open Challenges in Robot-Human Interaction; 2005.[2] Pineau J, Montemerlo M, Pollack M, Roy N and Thrun S. “Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes:Challenges and results.” Special issue on Socially Interactive Robots, Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 2003; 42:271-281.[3] Birgit G, Matthias H, and Rolf S
theseprojects and exposes students to Principles of Development of Appropriate and SustainableTechnologies. The redesign of the device to control costs and with end-user feedback is avaluable lesson for students, which cannot be taught in traditional engineering classes butthrough such Experiential Learning courses. The benefits to students include learning the designprocess, learning about traditions and constraints in developing countries, developing devicesthat will be beneficial to a large number of end users, and the joy derived from lending a helpinghand to people around the globe.Bibliography1 Dewey, J. Experience and Education, NY, Collier, 19382 Weil, S. and McGill, I. A Framework for Making Sense of Experiential Learning In S. Weil and I
. Keating, T. G. Stanford, A. L. McHenry, E. M. DeLoatch, D. R. Depew, N. Latif, G. R. Bertoline, S. J. Tricamo, H. J. Palmer, K. Gonzalez-Landis, E. Segner, J. P. Tidwell, D. H. Quick, J. M. Snellenberger, R. N. Olson, J. O’Brien, L. A. Hammon, J. Spencer, J. Sargent, “Enabling a Strong U.S. Engineering Workforce for Leadership of Technology Development and Innovation in Industry: Critical Skill- Sets for Early Career Development Leading to the Professional Master of Engineering,” Proceedings of the 2006 National Meeting of ASEE, Chicago, IL, June, 2006.5. Dunlap, D. D., D. A. Keating, T. G. Stanford, A. L. McHenry, E. M. DeLoatch, P. Y. Lee, D. R. Depew, G. R. Bertoline, M. J. Dyrenfurth, S. J. Tricamo, I. T. Davis, J. P
. Page 15.607.9References1. Titman, S. and Martin, J.D. (2007) Valuation, Pearson Addison Wesley, Boston.2. Newnan, D.G.; Lavelle, J.P.; and Eschenbach, T.G. (2009) Engineering Economic Analysis, 10th edition, Oxford University Press, New York.3. Sullivan, W.G.; Wicks, E.M.; and Koelling, C.P. (2009) Engineering Economy, 14th edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.4. Hartman, J.C. (2007) Engineering Economy and the Decision-Making Process, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.5. Park, C.S. (2007) Contemporary Engineering Economic Analysis, 4th edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.6. Blank, L.T. and Tarquin, A.J. (2005) Engineering Economy, 6th edition, McGraw Hill, Boston.7. Canada, J.R
authors would like to thank the orchestra of The College of New Jersey and its conductorDr. Philip Tate for their collaboration and support. This work was supported by the NationalScience Foundation under Grant No. 0855973.References1. Holley, K. A, 2009. Understanding Interdisciplinary Challenges and Opportunities in Higher Education, ASHE Higher Education Report, 35(2), 1-129.2. Klein, J.T. 1990. Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press. Page 15.166.143. Moran, J. 2002. Interdisciplinarity, New York: Routledge4. Rhoten, D., and Pfirman, S. 2007. Women in
2007.8. C. Elliott, V. Vijayakumar, W. Zink and R. Hansen, National Instruments LabVIEW: AProgramming Environment for Laboratory Automation and Measurement, Journal of the Associationfor Laboratory Automation, Volume 12, Issue 1, February 2007.9. R. Krishnan, A. Bharadwaj, and P. Materu, Computer aided design of Electrical machine forvariable speed applications, IEEE Trans. Ind.Electron., vol. 35, no. 4, Nov. 1988.10. S. Linke, J. Torgeson, and J. Au, An interactive computer-graphics program to aid instruction inelectric machinery, IEEE Comput. Applicat.Power, July 1989.11. N. Kehtarnavaz and N. Kim, LabVIEW Programming Environment, Digital Signal ProcessingSystem-Level Design Using LabVIEW, 2005.12. N. Kehtarnavaz and N. Kim, Getting Familiar
AC 2010-408: INTEGRATING COMPUTER PROGRAMMING TECHNOLOGIESINTO THE INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUMJorge Valenzuela, Auburn University Jorge Valenzuela received his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in the year 2000. He is currently an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Auburn University. His recent research involves stochastic models for the evaluation of production costs and optimization of electric power generation. He teaches courses on Operations Research and Information Technology.Jeffrey Smith, Auburn University Jeffrey S. Smith is Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Auburn University. Prior to
paradigm.Bibliography1. Brickell, J. L., Porter, D. B., Reynolds, M. F., and Cosgrove, R. D. Assigning Students to Groups forEngineering Design Projects: A Comparison of Five Methods. July 1994 Journal of Engineering Education, pp.259-262.2. Seat, E., and Lord, S. Enabling Effective Engineering Teams: A Program for Teaching Interaction Skills.October 1999 Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 385-390.3. Haag, S. Teaming Backlash: Reframing Female Engineering Students. Proceedings, 2000 ASEE Conference,St. Louis, MO, June 18-21, 2000.4. Kanter, E. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: skewed sex ratios and responses in tokenwomen. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965-990.5. Cohen, L.L., & Swim, J.K. (1995). The differential impact of
paper.Specifically, for each of the programs’ learning objectives the students had to identify anddescribe an experience (or collection of experiences) and examine how the experience(s) ledthem to accomplish the objective. For those learning objectives not met, the students describedhow their experiences fell short of meeting the objective. In addition, students had to describehow the course is likely to impact their future and their professional careers.Assessment of the CourseIn addition to the assessment of the students by the faculty, an assessment of the course by thestudents was undertaken. The exact assessment tools used varied from year to year given thenumerous faculty involved and the varied venues for the course. In total, three different types
on their support of student learning.More importantly the techniques were found to be quite easy to adapt and required minimalpreparation before teaching, in fact the day-to-day teaching was fun! Gone were the days ofputting one self to sleep at the board and on top of all of this, they were so easy a “caveperson”could do it! Page 15.1390.12Bibliography1. Vygotsky, L. S. Thought and Language, Cambridge Massachusetts, The M.I.T., 19622. Von Glaserfield, E. Learning as a constructive activity. In C. Janvier (Ed.),Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics, Hillsdale New Jersey, 19873. James H. Fetzer Journal
). Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century, National Academy Press.4. ABET, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, Baltimore, Md.: Engineering Accreditation Commission, http://abet.org/, accessed on Jan. 20, 2011.5. ABEEK, Accreditation Criteria for Engineering Education in Korea, http://www.abeek.or.kr/htmls_kr/en/index.jsp, accessed Jan. 20, 2011.6. Felder, R.M. and R. Brent (2003). "Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria,” Journal of Engineering Education, 92 (1), pp. 7-25, 2003.7. Chang, S. (2004). “Science and Engineering Education in Korea,” Educating the Engineer for the 21st Century, Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Global Engineering
great scenarios were presented(kidnappings, etc.). For homework, each student individually was then assigned to seriously re-search what technology would be needed, develop cost estimates, and describe how (s)he wouldallocate the resources, and why. With rare exception, these reports were exceedingly well done.A few students weighed morality as an important consideration (e.g., addicted son gets the least).A Socratic discussion of critical care technology was interspersed with an explanation of bio-potentials (EKG, EMG, EEG), their sources and their clinical value. A lecture on the basis ofand use of life-support and/or rehabilitation technology in end-of-life situations followed. Thisthen led to a presentation on three seminal legal cases
, vol. 29, no. 6, pp 935-946, Dec. 2010.4. National Science Foundation. (2011, January 18). General Science and Engineering Indicators of the Digest ofKey Science and Engineering Indicators 2008. [Online], Available:http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/digest08/pages/figure8.htm5. A. Dohm and L. Shniper, “Occupational Employment Projections to 2016,” Bureau of Labor Statistics, MonthlyLabor Review Online, vol. 130, no. 11, pp 86-125, Nov. 2007.6. R. Fry. (2011, January 18). Recent Changes in the Entry of Hispanic and White Youth into College,’’ PewHispanic Center, Nov. 2005. [Online]. Available: pewhispanic.org/reports/report.php?ReportID=567. M. Yilmaz, J. Ren, S. Custer, J. Coleman, “Hands-On Summer Camp to Attract K-12 Students to EngineeringFields
TRIZ. Inventive Thinking Through TRIZ. 2nd ed., Orloff, M. A., Berlin : Springer-Verlag, 2006.9. Use of TRIZ in the design curriculum. E. Riven, V. Fey. s.l. : Innovations in Engineering Education, ABETAnnual Meeting Proc., 1996.10. DS18B20 datasheet. [Online] http://pdfserv.maxim-ic.com/en/ds/DS18B20.pdf.11. Some correlates of creativity in engineering personnel. McDermid, C. 1, s.l. : J. Applied Psychology, 1995,Vol. 49, pp. 14-19.12. Teaching axiomatic design to engineers—Theory, applications and software, C.A. Brown, J. ManufacturingSystems Vol. 24, 3 186-195, 2005.13. Teaching and assessing engineering design: A review of the research, S. Campbell and C.L. Colbeck, ASEEAnnual Conf. Proc., 199814. Assessing general creativity and creative
isstill active. If this command is not sent, the MP2000 will unlock its keyboard continuously forapproximately 30 seconds.In addition, the Visual Basic program is required to send an update packet every 300milliseconds. This packet is sent in the format: obj1value + obj2value + Sp byte + verify byte +0x0d. The Verify Byte is a result of byte calculation of the bytes before the Verify Byte. In thiscase, these bytes consist of obj1value, obj2value and Sp byte. In order to calculate the value ofthe Verify Byte, the sum of the previous bytes is found. Then, the 2’s Complement Rule isapplied to the sum of the bytes which is then passed through a modulus of 128. The formulacalculates the correct value for the Verify Byte which is used by the MP2000
Fellow as team partner: Mean Mean Change1) How successful is your Fellow at exposing students to 3.9 4.0 2.6% engineering principles in a lesson plan(s)2) How successful is your Fellow at leading students through the 3.6 3.7 2.7% lesson plan process3) How successful is your Fellow at engaging the class in 3.3 3.8 15% discussions4) How successful is your Fellow at classroom management 3.4 3.3 -2.9%5) How skilled is your Fellow at helping you find
leaders are engaged students with very highpotential and credibility among faculties and students. The team members concentratedon the following issues of the project: Acquaintance with objectives and methodologies. Agreement on scale(s) of streets and city blocks within the model. Definition of overall construction practice (including rough decisions about materials, technologies, and so forth). Electrical engineers investigated the technologies required for the illumination. Computer Science students discussed and decided about the computer technologies and I/O interface(s). Architects, civil and Architectural engineering engineers established guidelines for physical construction of the
contribute to global deflection of a structure. Use U Castigliaano’s method d to calculatee redundant forces and ddeflection off a structure. Perform simpple beam and d 2-D solid stress s analyses with a commmercial FE EM code. Compare C resu ults of analyttical, experim mental, and numerical aanalyses of sttructures. Use U both stress and deflecction predicttions to speccify the desiggn of a struccture. Two T alternatiive suspendeed conveyor systems havve been desiggned to transsfer prrocessed maaterial in a reecycling plan
, The Physics Teacher, 30, 141– Page 22.142.11 158.[15] Jacobi, A., Martin, J., Mitchell, J. & Newell, T. (2003), A concept inventory for heat transfer. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education, Boulder, CO, November 5-8, T3D-12-16.[16] Krause, S., Decker, J.C., & Griffin, R. (2003). Using a materials concept inventory to assess conceptual gain in introductory materials engineering courses. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education, Boulder, CO, November 5-8, T3D-7-11.[17] Lister, R. (2008). After the gold rush: Toward sustainable scholarship in computing, in
. Procedural Knowledge V. Advanced Knowledge & Analytical Skills VI. Project-Based Knowledge VII. Professional Engineering Knowledge and Practices Taxonomic Unit(s) Problem-Solving Task Gained Knowledge or Skill (Taxa)• Reading and understanding problem • Knowledge and understanding I, II & III statement of basic concepts• Identifying relevant concepts• Selecting engineering and • Applying basic mathematical I & II mathematical symbols for system
, PR. T4A/14-19. 22. Esparragoza, I.E., Friess, A. and Larrondo-Petrie, M. (2008). Developing Assessment Tools for International Experiences in Engineering Education. ASEE Annual Conference. Pittsburgh, PA. 23. Barak, M. and Doppelt, Y. (2000). Using Portfolios To Enhance Creative Thinking. Journal of Technology Studies, 26(2), 16-25. 24. Huyk, M., Bryant, K. and Ferguson, D. (2009). The Impact of Reflections in the Service Learning and Other Undergraduate Team Project Learning. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference. AC 2009-1032. 25. King, P. M., Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting
& Measurement, Vol. 2, pp. 14-19, March 1999.1. Beckwith et al. (1993). Fundamentals of Mechanical Measurement, Addison Wesley.22. L. Cristaldi, A. Ferrero and V. Piuri. Programmable Instruments, Virtual Instruments, and Distributed Measurement Systems. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement, Vol. 2, pp. 20-27, Sept.1999.23. E. Doebelin (2004). Measurement Systems; Applications and Design, 5th ed., McGraw Hill, New York.24. A. Eadie. The Undergraduate Teaching of Measurement and Instrumentation. Engineering Science and Education, pp. 109-113, June 1997.25. A. S. Eadie. E.A. Knight, and I.J. Kemp. Work-based Learning in Instrumentation. Measurement and Control, Vol. 31, pp. 137-140, 1998.26. C.D. Johnson (2003). Process
Corporation. Electric Boat – The Encore E by Nauticraft. Accessed on January 3,2011. http://www.nauticraft.com/?page=encoree&s=2&s2=1&s3=3[10] Lear Boats. LEAR 204. Accessed on January 11, 2011.http://www.lear-electric-boats.com/Lear204.htm[11] Jean-François Affolter, Taras Wankewycz, Jeff Davison. Compact Hydrogen Fuel CellSolution for Recreational Fishing Boats. International Conference on Ecologic Vehicles &Renewable Energies, 2007. Accessed on January 9, 2011.http://www.horizonfuelcell.com/file/recreation_report.pdf[12] ELECTRIC BOATS A – Z. Accessed on January 7, 2011.http://www.solarnavigator.net/electric_boats.htm Page 22.202.16[13
. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecology systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of Child Development, Vol. 6, Page 22.225.11 (pp. 187-249). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1993). The ecology of cognitive development: research models and fugitive findings. In R. Wozniak & K. Fisher (Eds.), Development in context: acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 3-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.6. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. (1993). Nature-Nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: a bioecological model, Psychological Review, 101, 568-586.7. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P.A
Learned course. Two former,distinguished NASA engineers/managers review and critique more than 30 aerospaceengineering examples in the classroom. Through the use of case histories such as Apollo 13 andthe Space Shuttle Challenger “Normalization of Deviance” concept2 to lesser-known examplesfrom archives throughout the Agency, NASA engineers learn first hand from these highlyexperienced thought leaders who were there since the 1960’s, and worked through difficult featsand challenges to acquire invaluable experience.The goal of the SSD course is to examine the root causes of aerospace-specific mishaps, and theapplicable lessons that can be derived from these historical incidents. The majority of spacemishaps can be traced to easily recognizable and
standard. The document provides interesting and important background material related to Content match Background the standard. The grade level of this material is appropriate for this task or else I can easily adapt Object match Grade level the materials in this document to my grade level. I can use a non-textual component(s); e.g., figures, tables, images, videos orSituational match Non-textuals graphics, etc.Situational match Examples I can use the real-world examples provided in the
access to typical laboratorymaterials to use during the construction of their design projects, whatever they may be. Iknow for a fact that this acquired knowledge of fluid machinery will aid them greatly intheir upper level engineering classes, especially fluid dynamics. Page 15.93.10References: 1. Rice, J., T. M. Bayles, G. Russ, and J. Ross, “Preparing Freshmen for Future Energy Issues”, Paper AC 2007-1748 published in the 2007 ASEE proceedings and presented in the Hands-on & Real World Studies Session in The Freshman Programs Division Session. 2. Carletta, J., Bayles T.M., Kalveram, K., Khorbotly, S., Macnab, C