in common models of learning.A Critique of Outcomes-Based EducationThe above offers several possible critiques of outcomes-based education. In the spirit ofHabermas’ discourse ethics, the point is not to assert outcomes are bad per se, but rather torecognize that the limitations of a system that has become extremely prevalent in education areoften ignored. For example, when ABET adopted outcomes-based evaluation with EC-2000 thefocus become on continual quality improvement. This framework was well understood byengineers and thus readily accessible to engineering educators. In this case the quality that isbeing improved in the ABET process are the defined student learning outcomes that eachprogram is responsible for assessing and evaluating
different STEM disciplines, course pedagogies, academic levels, and needsindependent of each other. However, using only an emergent approach to coding would haveobscured the topical inadequacies of our modules. Therefore, we conducted a literature reviewon the most common categorization of data science concepts and techniques. Despite theevolving nature of data science as an academic discipline, we found general trends of datascience concepts and techniques common across disciplines. These general trends werecategorized into six broad categories: (1) data acquisition, (2) data quality issues, (3) data useand visualization, (4) machine learning, (5) data ethics, privacy, and security, and (6)miscellaneous. Table 2 summarizes the coding scheme and
affinities foralgorithmic thinking, abstraction, problem decomposition, and producing solutions that can bedone by information-processing agents. This is concerning since few (if any) of the definitionsfor computational thinking mention anything vaguely sociopolitical, such as ethics, social justice,cultural competency [7], or global competency [8].1 Even though computational thinkers areexpected to shift between varying levels of abstraction [10], the omissions imply thatsociopolitical concerns are auxiliary to thinking computationally and, potentially, to being acomputer scientist. If computational thinking is as central to computing pedagogy as researcherssuggest, then there should be concern that the assimilation of students into
defined parameters similar to those given in theirassignments and exams, they become flustered when pushed beyond those comfort zones. Somehave argued that this kind of curriculum not only fails to foster creativity, it actually stiflesingenuity1, inhibiting innovation to solve the world’s greatest problemsWe sought to reverse this negative association between creativity and engineering education bymotivating a large engineering class with a combination of Ethic of Care2,3,4 andentrepreneurship. Ethic of Care is a concept grounded on value-guided practices to meet theneeds of those receiving the care, within a framework of justice and rights5. By incorporating awider view of stakeholders and their relationships in the engineering design process
Leadership Skills and Incorporation of a New Leadership CourseAbstractAs one part of a larger required leadership curriculum, a new course covering leadership modelsand practices was developed and administered. The course addresses many of the aspects of theentrepreneurial mindset including communication, teamwork, leadership, ethics and ethicaldecision-making, opportunity recognition, persistence, creativity, innovation, creative problemsolving, and critical thinking. Through in-class activities and games, as well as assignedcollaborative work, the course explores the various theories on leadership including relational,shared, global, and organizational models. Along with these models, integrity, character,diversity
projected 17% STEM growth inemployment in next 10 years compared to 9.8% for non-STEM fields13. There are now morestrategic efforts in engineering to address society problems, liberal arts literacy, the “big ideas”,innovation and entrepreneurship, and interdisciplinary studies related to engineering (calledSTEAM by including the ARTS). Some large engineering schools in their strategic plans arenow including growth in these areas to impact society (e.g. Purdue, Iowa, Texas A & M).2.0 Unique Vision and Calling for SCU Liberal Art SchoolsA few sectors of the STEM market and associated salary may be weak and connected to weakSTEM skills, work ethic, and too many product engineer type graduates looking for high payingjobs but who are unprepared to
. Her training is in nineteenth-century literature, but for the past 9 years she has taught engineering ethics, first-year en- gineering courses, and humanities for engineers. She has also worked with students and colleagues to develop role-playing games teaching engineering within its complex humanistic context. NOTE: this paper has co-authors.Dr. Leslie Dodson, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Leslie Dodson is a Faculty Teaching Fellow in Undergraduate Studies at WPI. She received her PhD from the University of Colorado-Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science, ATLAS Institute. Her current research interests focus on the intersections of international development, human-centered de- sign and
] proposed that students’ epistemic practice in SSI are understood through bothargumentation and informal reasoning [6], [13]. Based on an intensive literature review, Sadler [6]concluded that it is hard to assess the quality of student argumentation only by logical reasoningbecause in SSI contexts, everyday life experiences, moral and ethical beliefs, values, and cultureaffect students’ argumentation practices. Duschl also points out that student argumentation in SSIis a reasoning strategy that involves the general reasoning domain of informal logic as well ascritical thinking [10].In most recent research concerning argumentation, Toulmin’s model [14] was adopted as a usefultool to understand logical reasoning of argumentation. However, Toulmin’s
of the ADVANCE Leadership Team, the URI President's Commission on the Status of Women, and coordinates the Work/Life Committee at URI.Lynn Pasquerella, University of Rhode Island Page 11.143.1 Lynn Pasquerella is the Interim Vice Provost for Gradaute Studies, Research and Outreach, Professor of Philosophy, and recent Chair of the Institutional Review Board at the University of Rhode Island. In addition, she is a Fellow in the John Hazen White Sr. Center for Ethics and Public Service and was a professor of medical ethics for two years, from 1993–95, in the Brown© American Society for Engineering
Failure 11) Teamwork2) Models 7) Creativity 12) Ethics in the Lab3) Experiment 8) Psychomotor 13) Sensory Awareness4) Data Analysis 9) Safety5) Design 10) CommunicationA near-term action item identified by the colloquy attendees was to, “Validate the…learningobjectives…and note any new issues or challenges related to achieving them.” 6 The remainderof this paper describes a study done at Virginia Tech seeking to validate the learning objectivesand to explore issues and challenges associated with them.MethodsThe set of objectives is intended to apply to any
concepts, professional practice topics (such as teamwork, ethics, and projectmanagement), and a robot project. The second course, ICEE 1020, was taught in five one-hourlectures and one two-hour lab session per week and included statics, mechanics of materials,materials science, and engineering economics.In an “ideal” environment (all students beginning in fall semester at the same math level, allstudents highly motivated to learn engineering, and no transfer students), these freshman courses Page 15.210.2could probably be taught successfully. In practice, the six-credit freshman courses presentedseveral problems: ≠ Because there were no admission
needed to besuccessful engineers.Outcomes for Objective D: Students will be introduced to the following issues through theirundergraduate education in this department and will gain:D-1 an ability to work in teams to solve multi-faceted problemsD-2 an ability to understand and contribute to the challenges of a rapidly changing societyD-3 an understanding of ethical and societal responsibilities of professional engineersD-4 an understanding of the need for lifelong learning and continuing professional educationThe department educational objectives also relates to ABET's Criterion 3 a-k “Program Outcomeand Assessment"1. The relationships are summarized in Table 1.Outcomes Assessment ProcessThe program outcomes are mainly achieved through the
of Louisville, where case studies are used in a first year course titled Introductionto Engineering.Case studies require students to synthesize the facts and engineering principles they havelearned, and combine them with their broader education in the arts, humanities, and sciences.Case studies tie together technical, ethical, and procedural aspects of engineering and requirestudents to undertake higher order thinking in order to synthesize the relevant issues. As a result,the case studies integrate ethics and procedural/professional issues into courses. In the case of afirst year course, case studies introduce the engineering profession.Case studies used in this first year course have included some basic design case studies regardinglocal
study, “The Engineer of2020,” emphasizes the need for engineers to have professional skills including strongcommunication skills, leadership skills, and the ability to make good decisions, a strong moralcompass, ethics, and cultural awareness. 3Employers of UMaine MET graduates value the same skills. In 2001 the MET programresponded to employer expectations by developing a new course, MET 100 Introduction toMechanical Engineering Technology. This course gives first semester students opportunities tolearn teamwork and professionalism skills they can apply in internships and in their careers. Theprogram also increased the number of individual and team project-based curriculum elementsmimicking professional tasks. For example, students in the
professionals no longerafford to merely play the role of innovators without taking into consideration the big picture orchanging scenario as society’s needs change in utilization of inventions and innovations. In theacademic setting, professionals do acquire solid technical education, logical thought process,good work ethics, and computer literacy. In Hissey’s research,1 they miss out several importantprofessional skills. These include: written and oral communication aptitude, marketing-relatedknowledge, and familiarity with business and financial matters. Above all, Hissey points out thatthe higher level traits of identifying corporate/societal necessities and healthy personal attitudesare missing in working professionals. The academic organizations
weighing its repercussions on human-machine dynamics. It sets the stage forfuture AEI research, emphasizing the significance of interdisciplinary studies to bring in a trulyhuman-centric and accountable AI paradigm. The research question at hand is: Can GenerativeAI, enriched by cross-disciplinary insights, take an intuitive leap to discern human emotions,driving us towards a more empathetic and ethical AI future?IntroductionThe evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in recent decades has been nothing short ofremarkable, marking a paradigm shift in how machines emulate tasks traditionally performed byhumans. Take, for example, OpenAI’s ChatGPT, which has become a paradigm of AI’scapabilities in mimicking human-like conversational skills
Paper ID #42156The Power of Place: A Critical Examination of Engineering Enculturation &Identity FormationDr. Timothy Duane Reedy, University of Maryland, College ParkDr. David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park David is the director of the Science, Technology and Society program at the University of Maryland, College Park. He works with STEM majors on the ethical and social dimensions of science and technology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Power of Place: A Critical Examination of Engineering Enculturation and Identity FormationAbstract
member of a knowledge in broader public, policy, professional and communication of a and historical, Competencies principles and then science principles and then apply that the experiment for practice, user needs, multidisciplinary team mechanics. social impact, or ethical conduct project to technical
ethics emphasize theresponsibility of engineers to consider the “safety, health, and welfare of the public” [2,3].Regulations, standards, laboratory practices, etc. reflect the importance of safety in engineeringwork. Also, the negative consequences associated with safety-related failures such as accidentsand product defects make such issues a priority for industry. Creating a safety culture isdifficult. It involves the performance of proper actions and the avoidance of improper actions.Any definition of safety must specify what is considered proper, what is considered improper,and what is an acceptable degree of risk.In engineering education, practical safety concerns are necessarily part of laboratory courses andsafety concepts are often
University, Syracuse, NY. Registered Professional Engineer (Ohio). Robinson’s teaching approach comes from an amalgam of academic, industrial (Bell Labs), governmental (VA) and clinical experiences, plus an interest in science and ethics from his undergraduate days.Ms. Loretta Driskel, Clarkson University Since the late 1990’s my passion has been to create engaging, diverse teaching and learning experiences for students and faculty. As the senior instructional designer at Clarkson University, I have presented at conferences such as the Online Learning Consortium and I have presented at a wide variety of other venues including ADEIL; Sloan-C International Online Learning; Sloan-C Blending Learning; eLearning Consortium of
about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in en- gineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Ms. Leslie Nolen, American Society of Civil Engineers Leslie Nolen, CAE, serves as director, educational activities for the American Society of Civil Engineers. She brings over 20 years of association management experience to her work with ASCE’s Committee on Education on issues of importance to the undergraduate and graduate level education of civil engineers. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Civil
contradictions that arise in students’education surrounding ethics, including how engineering instructors often allude to theimportance of ethics in engineering practice but then avoid explicit discussion of ethical mattersthat arise in the context of students’ coursework. This type of contradiction served as a catalystfor our thinking about some of the other ways in which engineering students receive and copewith conflicting messaging across their educational experience, especially where implicitpractices regularly contravene explicit messages. As with the hidden curriculum scholarship inengineering education generally, we are interested in how implicit messaging undermines effortsto create more inclusive, more authentic educational experiences
, 5 ethics, etc.). The other activities in that third instance were modeled on a class that had been well-received by students but had not been optimized to support doctoral students. ● Wave 2-Pivot. The fourth instance marked a new direction; a direction in which the student selected readings played a role in 100% of the learning experience. Responding to comments that the engagement with the student-selected readings in instance 3 had promise but was too fast; in instance 4, engagements with the student-selected readings were distributed over the entire 10-week term. In addition, instance 4 featured 12 analysis questions (each coupled with conceptual readings) that were applied to the student-selected
Paper ID #37226Engineering or Physical Sciences: How to Choose? An Exploration of HowFirst-Year University Students Choose between Studying the PhysicalSciences and EngineeringDr. Janna Rosales, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada Janna Rosales works at the crossroads of the sciences and humanities, where she explores the intent, values, and needs that go into the decisions we make about technology. She teaches ethics and profes- sionalism in the Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science at Memorial University of Newfoundland. She collaborates with the Memorial University-based MetaKettle Project, which studies the
) papersincluded the term “social justice,” compared to 49 in 2015 [8]. Although mentioned, socialjustice was not the primary focus of the majority of these articles. Bielefeldt interviewed 1,268faculty who embed ethics and societal impact issues in their classes and found that 27% of thesurveyed faculty integrate social justice/poverty topics into their teaching [8]. The facultyinterviewed believed that teaching social justice topics was insufficient in their programs,although no broad consensus exists on what level would be sufficient.In general, the literature demonstrate that two primary approaches have been used to integratesocial justice into the engineering curricula: one approach dedicates a single course that focuseson teaching engineering ethics
et al. [20], the recent non-traditional approaches of gamification [21], behavioralaspects [22], multidisciplinary techniques [23], and ethical aspects [24].AI Education. AI is a challenging topic for beginners to learn due to complex fundamentaltheories (e.g., machine learning, game theory) [25]. In order to motivate learners and help themlearn, researchers proposed several methods to teach AI to students including the cumulative wayto teach AI components [26], the use of games [25, 27–29], emotional intelligence [30], andconsideration of ethical aspects [31, 32]Cybersecurity and AI Education. In terms of the studies that consider both cybersecurity andAI education, there exists only one study in the literature. Farahmand [33] shared the
solidunderstanding of professional and ethical responsibilities.Civil Engineering Program Learning OutcomesThe program learning outcomes set to help graduates of the civil engineering program to gaincompetence, and to apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering. The plan wasdesigned to enable students to gain the skills to design and conduct experimental testing,simulate, analyze, and interpret data and can design a system to meet the set needs withinrealistic boundaries such as environmental, social, economic, political, ethical, health and safety,and sustainability. Students are expected to have the capacity to work effectively onmultidisciplinary teams, to develop the skills to classify, articulate, and solve engineeringdiscrete problems
and/or improving things [6]-[7]. In particular, wedraw upon Lucas and Hanson’s [7] habits of mind framework that identifies and describes sixengineering habits of mind and seven learning habits of mind for their potential to informinstructional practices and learning cultures across pre-kindergarten to post-secondary contexts.We used both habits of mind – engineering and learning – for what they both afforded. Forexample, learning habits of mind include Ethical Consideration, the concern for the impact ofengineering on people and the environment, which is not captured by engineering habits of mindbut remains a value important to the field of engineering [8-9].ASEE [10] has described HoM as one component that leads to the development of
-wide learning outcome called information fluency, where students willdemonstrate an ability to “define a specific need for information; then locate, evaluate, and applythe needed information efficiently and ethically.” This institution-wide outcome would be usedas an indicator of performance in ABET EAC Student Outcome 7.In the 2016-17 academic year, an institution-wide assessment found the assessment scored forstudents in the Mechanical Engineering program were below the benchmark for informationfluency. In response, the Mechanical Engineering faculty collaborated with the campusengineering librarian to develop instruction in information literacy in the appropriate courseswithin the curriculum. Information literacy modules were developed and