results,” World Transactions on Engineering andTechnology Education, Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 12-18, January 2017.[2] N. Holstermann, D. Grube, and S. Bögeholz, “Hands-on Activities and Their Influence onStudents’ Interest” Research in Science Education, Vol. 40, pp. 743–757, November 2009,https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9142-0.[3] A. Hofstein and V.N. Lunetta (2004), “The laboratory in science education: Foundations forthe twenty-first century,” Research in Science Education, Vol. 88, pp. 28-54, December 2003,https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106.[4] L. Carlson,and J.F. Sullivan, “Hands-on Engineering: Learning by Doing in the IntegratedTeaching and Learning Program,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 15 No.1,pp. 20-31, 1999.[5
., D. Moore, M. Natishan, L. Schmidt, Shirley Vining Brown, C. Lathan, I. Goswami, and S. Mouring. 1999. “Faculty and Student Views on Engineering Student Team Effectiveness.” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 5 (4). https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v5.i4.50.Morin, Megan, and Richard Goldberg. 2022. “Work in Progress: Creating Micromoments to Develop a Student’s Entrepreneurial Mindset.” In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--41445.Motejlek, Jiri, and Esat Alpay. 2023. “The Retention of Information in Virtual Reality Based Engineering Simulations.” European Journal of Engineering Education, January, 1– 20. https
concentrated on particular disadvantaged populations, they become aninequity built into societal structure; that is, they constitute a structural inequity. In the case of themarket for used cars, much has been done since the 1970’s to mitigate structural inequity, and wecan certainly learn from them in addressing inequities in the transfer student market.2.1 Expert Verification and HistoryA major contributing factor to information asymmetry in the used car market is the fact that carsare highly complex mechanical structures, making it exceedingly difficult for non-experts to assesstheir quality. One method buyers have for dealing with this is through expert verification, namely,by having a trained mechanic inspect a car prior to purchasing it.We
] "Just-in-Time Teaching (JiTT)," V. U. C. f. Teaching, Ed., ed.[3] S. Simkins and M. Maier, Just-in-time Teaching: Across the Disciplines, Across the Academy. Stylus, 2010.[4] J. L. Riskowski, "Teaching undergraduate biomechanics with Just-in-Time Teaching," Sports Biomechanics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 168-179, 2015/04/03 2015, doi: 10.1080/14763141.2015.1030686.[5] M. Prince, "Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223-231, 2004, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x.[6] R. M. Felder, R. Brent, and B. A. Oakley, Teaching and Learning STEM : A Practical Guide. Newark, UNITED STATES: John Wiley &
graduates.References[1] M. C. Paretti, J. D. Ford, S. Howe, D. A. Kotys-Schwartz, and R. Ott, “It’s a Context Gap, Not a Competency Gap: Understanding the Transition from Capstone Design to Industry,” 2021.[2] Z. S. Arsha, “An Undergraduate Internship/Project on Industry Academia Linkage and the Identification of Skills Gaps of the Graduating Engineering Students at Tertiary Level Education,” Independent University, Bangladesh, 2023.[3] M. Mora, Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Agency in Professional Socialization: Evidence From a Capstone Design Lab. State University of New York at Albany, 2019.[4] W. M. Butler, “The Impact of Simulation-Based Learning in Aircraft Design on Aerospace Student Preparedness for Engineering Practice: A Mixed
. Buckner, "A non-traditonal approach to an assembly language course." Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 22.1 (2006): 179-186.[5]Imamura, Kosuke. "Assembly language is more than a teaching tool." Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 20, no. 2 (2004): 49-54.[6]Little, R. Rainey, and Mark K. Smotherman. "Assembly language courses in transition." ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 20, no. 1 (1988): 95-99.[7]Chmiel, Ryan, and Michael C. Loui. "Debugging: from novice to expert." ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 36, no. 1 (2004): 17-21.[8]Adolph, Karen E., and Kari S. Kretch. "Gibson’s theory of perceptual learning." International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences 10 (2015): 127-134.[9]Fincher, Sally, Johan Jeuring, Craig S. Miller, Peter
dialoguearound diversity and social justice,” in The Art of Effective Facilitation, L. M. Landreman, Ed.New York, NY, USA: Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2013, pp. 135-150.[6] E. A. Cech, “The (mis)framing of social justice: Why ideologies of depoliticization andmeritocracy hinder engineers’ ability to think about social injustices,” in Engineering Educationfor Social Justice. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 10, J. Lucena, Ed. Dordrecht,the Netherlands: Springer, 2013[7] R. Benjamin, Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge,UK: Polity, 2019.[8] S. U. Noble, Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York,NY, USA: NYU Press, 2018.[9] V. Eubanks, Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools
. References[1] A. C. Estrada and L. T. Brinton, “Tricks of the trade: Navigating teaching opportunities in the research-based engineering Ph.D.,” Proc. of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2017.[2] J. J. Pembridge and S. Cutler, “Assembling the ideal doctoral dissertation committee in engineering education,” Proc. of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2013.[3] S. Secules, “How to be a graduate student (before I forget): A collection of experiential wisdom,” Proc. of the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, June 2020.[4] H. B. Brotherton and M. K. Orr, “Overcoming perfectionism: My journey with the binary mindset,” Proc. of the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference
, such as a pre-and-post course skillsassessment, can be implemented in the future to address this shortcoming. Additionally, an even Page 22.1397.12closer interaction between lecture and laboratory seems to be required; perhaps only one course,in a mixed lecture-lab classroom should be implemented. As indicated by the student feedbackand by design the presented course does well to help closes the gap between college educationand BME professional practice.References1. Lee J. S., Biomedical Engineering Entrepreneurship. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. 20102. Semmlow, J. L., Biosignal and Medical Image Processing, CRC
: Globalization, Localization, and Individualization, Springer, 2005.7. Posnick-Goodwin, S., “Meet Generation Z,” California Educator, February 2010, p. 8.8. Wells, D., Ed., Manufacturing Education for the 21st Century, Vol. 1 Curricula 2002 Report, SME, 2002.9. Harasim, L., Hitz, R.S, Teles, L., and M. Turoff, Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online, The MIT Press, 1995.10. Tsay, M. and M. Brady, “A case study of cooperative learning and communication pedagogy: Does working in teams make a difference?” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 10, No. 2, June 2010.11. Mourtos, N.J., “The Nuts and Bolts of Cooperative Learning in Engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, Jan
to answer (43)In addition, information about the students’ major, year in program, graduate degree(s) beingconsidered, and participation in undergraduate research was also collected. These will beoutlined and discussed further as part of the study results.B. Data CollectionData were collected via an online survey administered through a commercial web interface.Faculty or administrators from each of the participating institutions sent survey invitationsthrough undergraduate student listservs with a link to the survey. This link directed participantsto another website with the questionnaire. To ensure student responses remained protected,survey information could only be viewed by the research team.. As an incentive, students whocompleted
, Wind and Solar Power Systems, CRC Press, 1999.12. T. Currin, The Capstone Design Course and Its failure to serve as an effective outcome assessment tool,Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.13. R. Pecen, and M. Timmerman, A Hands-on Renewable Energy Based Laboratory for Power Quality Education”Session 1333, Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.14. K.C. Davis, Enhancing Communication Skills in Senior Design Capstone Projects, Proceedings of the 2002ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition15. R. M. Ford, and C. S. Coulston, Design for Electrical and Computer Engineers, McGraw Hill, 2008.16. E. O’Neill-Carrillo, E. Marrero, and A. Irrizarry-Rivera, Integrated Experiences in Power Engineering courses
Youngman, J.A, and C.J. Egelhoff, “Best Practices in Recruiting and Persistence of Underrepresented Minorities in Engineering: A 2002 Snapshot,” Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO, 5-8 November, 2003.17 Goodman, Irene F. et al, 2002, "Final Report of the Women's Experiences in College Engineering (WECE) Project," Goodman Research Group, Inc., Cambridge, MA19 May, Gary S. and Daryl E. Chubin, “A Retrospective on Undergraduate Engineering Success for Underrepresented Minority Students,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.83, No.1, 2003.18 Jacquez, Ricardo B.; Garland, Jeanne; King, J. Phillip; Auzenne, Michele; Peralta, Steven; Rubio, Hilario “The Minority Engineering Transfer and Articulation (META) program: Building stronger
Page 22.1316.14 different audiences when talking about their work or a problem? Are they able to listen to others and effectively incorporate input? Can they communicate their ideas to multiple audiences in the many modes they need to?References 1. Atman, Cynthia J., Deborah Kilgore, and Ann F. McKenna. 2008. Characterizing Design Learning Through the Use of Language: A Mixed-methods Study of Engineering Designers. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 97(3): 309-326. 2. Atman, Cynthia J., Sheri D. Sheppard, Jennifer Turns, Robin S. Adams, Lorraine N. Fleming, Reed Stevens, Ruth A. Streveler, Karl A. Smith, Ronald L. Miller, Larry J. Leifer, Ken Yasuhara, and Dennis Lund. 2010. Enabling
Relay League, 2003 [17] Rumley, S. (1995). “A Precision Two-tone RF Generator for IMD Measurements”, QEX, April/May, pp. 6-12 [18] Rumley, S, op. cit., p.8 [19] Tenma, RF Signal Generator 72-585, Retrieved January 18, 2011, from the World Wide Web: http://www.newark.com/tenma/72-585/rf-signal-generator-frequency-450mhz/dp/66F3578 [20] Portland State University, Engineering Notebooks, Retrieved January 18, 2011, from the World Wide Web: http://web.cecs.pdx.edu/~warren/Capstone/index.cgi?PAGE=engineering_notebook [21] Blackboard, A Global Learning System, Retrieved January 18, 2011, from the World Wide Web: http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Blackboard+Learning+System [22] MSProject, Project Management Software, Retrieved
IntensificationProcess intensification was identified by the NSF as early as 1993 as a specific area in whichresearch endeavors should be concentrated to meet the needs of the chemical industry;1 almostone hundred archival articles were published on process intensification topics in 2008.2 Thenumber of such articles identified using the term "process intensification' in SciFinder Scholar in2009 and 2010 are 103 and 95, respectively.Benefits of process intensification activities include:3,4 1) novel or enhanced products; 2)improved chemistry; 3) enhanced safety; 4) improved processing; 5) energy and environmentalbenefits; 6) capital cost reduction; and 7) low inventories. Key to the endeavor is an ability toidentify the limitation(s) in a process, and knowledge
Engineers National Survey about Engineering: Are Women More or Less Likely Than Men to Be Retained in Engineering after College?” SWE Magazine 53(4): 22-25.2. Hewlett, S., Luce, C., Servon,L., Sherbin, L., Shiller, P., Sosnovich, E., Sumberg, K. (2008), The Athena Factor: Reversing the Brain Drain in Science, Engineering, and Technology, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review.3. Foust-Cummings, H., Sabattini, L., Carter, N., 2008, Women in Technology: Maximizing Talent, Minimizing Barriers, New York: Catalyst. Retrieved January 11, 2011 from www.catalyst.org.4. Anita Borg Institute (2009), “Recruitment, Retention and Advancement of Technical Women”, 2009 Technical Executive Forum. Retrieved January 11, 2011 from http
to trisect the entirecamp experience into pre-camp, camp and post-camp components.Pre-campAlthough making money is not the goal of most robotics camps, organizers must still collectmoney and must distribute those funds to meet the needs of the camp. This reality leads to thefirst decision. Is your summer robotic program(s) going to be operated by a not-for-profit entity,or is it being conducted to earn revenue? Revenue generating types of camps, a for-profitorganization, will include different planning, budgeting, and taxation concerns not discussed hereand our recommendation is to organize your camp within a not-for-profit structure. Either way,there are two general avenues for funds that camp organizers can pursue to assist in financing
measure these responses. Future studies should examine therecruitment policies of engineering students, in order to increase female and minorityrepresentation in the program. Also future studies can discuss if there are any differencesbetween the experiences of the international student versus domestic students in the engineeringfield. Additionally, analysis by gender can also be done to better understand specific experiencesof students in engineering majors. Page 22.288.13 References1 Zidney, A. L., Bennett, J. S., Shahid, A., & Bauer, K.W. (2002). Faculty perspective regarding theundergraduate
electronic communication, weshow clips from Frontline‟s documentary Digital Nation.13 This video explores the concept ofmultitasking and other issues associated with our digital-heavy culture. This discussion is used asa starting point to have the students think about the concept of focusing on a topic. At this point, we have spent approximately an hour-and-a-half on material leading up to the catapult. Instead of delving straight into calculations, we have the students build a catapult from plans and parts that we provide. The catapult is largely constructed from foam core; therefore, we spend 5 to 10 minutes discussing techniques for working with the
Avila, Polytechnic University, David Irwin, University of Massachusetts Amherst, “Pervasive Outlet-level Energy Data Monitoring and Archiving”, AGMUS Research Symposium, September 2010, San Juan, Puerto Rico, SACNAS Conference, Anaheim, CA, 20104) Francisco Palou, Polytechnic University, David S. Touretzky, Carnegie Mellon University, “Tekkotsu Support For The Calliope Robot”, AGMUS Research Symposium, September 2010, San Juan, Puerto Rico, SACNAS Conference, Anaheim, CA, 20105) Katherine Calderon, University of Puerto Rico, Humacau Campus, Devashis Dejumdar, Jackson State University, “Probing the Cation-π Interaction of Metals (Ca++, Mg++) and Ammonium (NH4+) Ions with Benzene and two Model Amino Acids”, AGMUS Research Symposium
://www.advance.latech.edu) and our OWISE Graduate Student Seminars focus on re-packaging these resources for a graduate student audience(http://www.latech.edu/coes/owise_seminar).In addition to the materials developed for this project, there are other excellent resources. Theseinclude the ADVANCE Portal (www.portal.advance.vt.edu), which contains materials developedby and posted on ADVANCE project websites across the country, and the WEPAN KnowledgeCenter (http://www.wepanknowledgecenter.org), another excellent source of material, researchreports, initiatives and organizations pertinent to women in STEM. The National Academy ofEngineering’s Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CASEE), in conjunctionwith the Society of Women Engineers (SWE)’s
job pyramid that started with manufacturing jobs in the 80’s and 90’s. CAD/CAM graduates will increasingly have to compete with skilled and lower paid workers from countries like China, India and the developing world.• An Expansive Curriculum: A stand-alone program will need to have opportunities to expand the curriculum to allow specialization. The current curriculum through the proposed technical electives already to some extent captures alternatives. However, there is room for additional courses that would both compliment and supplement the current experience. These would be in the following areas: o Product Lifecycle Management (PLM): Exposure to the setup and use of a Product Data Management system would be
. Liebler, R. J. “The five-minute quiz.” Journal of Accounting Education 2003, 261-265.2. Mahwhinney, V.; Bostow, D.; Laws, D.; Blumenfeld, G.; Hopkins, B. “A Comparison of Students Studying-Behavior Produced by Daily, Weekly, and Three-Week Testing Schedules,” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,1971, 257-264.3. Carney, A.; Fry, S. W.; Gabriele, R. V.; Ballard, M. “Reeling in the Big Fish: Changing Pedagogy to Encouragethe Completion of Reading Assignments.” College Teaching, 2008, 56 (4), 195-200.4. Sappington, J.; Kinsey, K.; Munsayac, K. “Two Studies of Reading Compliance Among College Students.”Teaching of Psychology, 2002, 29 (4), 272-274.5. Kugel, P. “Improving Learning Without Improving Teaching,” Computer Science Education 1989, 145-152.6
meaningswith engineering, and how educational experiences may need to be designed and assessed toaddress the complete (and varying) meaning(s) of the concept.In this paper, we present portions of a larger research project motivated in part by the researchquestion: What is the set of concepts, ideas, approaches, tools, methods, and philosophies that could be included as the “necessary knowledge of sustainability” for all engineering students?Our approaches to answering the research question include three parts: (1) an in-depth collectionand analysis of published descriptions of sustainable engineering in practice, in research, and ineducational innovation; (2) a set of interviews conducted with undergraduate students at
, S., and Freeman, R., 2007, “Challenge- Based Instruction: The VaNTH Biomechanics Learning Modules,” Advances in Engineering Education, pp. 1-30. 2. McKenna, A., Walsh, J., Parsek, M., and Birol, G. , 2002, “Assessing Challenge-Based Instruction in Biomedical Engineering,” Proceeding of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference, pp. 12783-12795. 3. LaPorte, James, 1995, "Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking." Journal of Technology Education, pp. 1-7. 4. Freeman, R., & Vasquez, H., & Fuentes, A., 2010, “Development and Implementation of Challenge-based Instruction in Statics and Dynamics,”, AC 2010-2141, Proceeding of the 2010 ASEE Annual Conference 5. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K