(N=10)participating in an NSF-funded Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) program at alarge research university. Positive learning outcomes gains pertained to communication skills,validation of career path, experimentation skills, valuing cross-disciplinary expertise and lifelonglearning, and gaining confidence in working independently. Low ranked learning outcomespertained to (a) leadership skills, (b) project management skills, (c) understanding ethical issues,and (d) identifying problems. Further, qualitative data analysis revealed that undergraduateresearchers faced a number of challenges and frustrations pertinent to (a) scheduling, (b) timemanagement, (c) running experiments with limited familiarity to instruments and
preparation seminar and in the majordesign experience courses. Additional assessments are done with the Fundamentals ofEngineering exam, an oral examination conducted by the members of the Industrial AdvisoryCouncil, and an extensive written and oral exit survey.Although their learning outcomes vary, all of the engineering programs at the university assessstudents for ABET criteria 3 a to k. However, there is no uniform time during students’ study forassessing students for the professional outcomes (MDE outcomes 4, 6 to 10 and 12). Forexample, some programs assess students for ethics in regular courses throughout the curriculum,some use sophomore professional seminars, others do this assessment with juniors inprofessional seminars, some programs wait
administered at thebeginning of the course to compile baseline information on students. The second survey wasadministered at the end of the course as a point of comparison. This survey included elaborateinformation such as the reason the student choose this program, academic background, workexperience, hobbies, short term and long term goals, expectations from the lab, area in which thestudent hopes to improve and the student’s perception of an ideal mentor. The students were alsoasked to rate themselves in various skills such as research skills, writing, presentation, softwareknowledge, hardware knowledge, website creation, leadership, professional ethics, mentoringskills, etc. To get a fair idea of the schedule of the student, the survey included
professional ethics. Since 1975, Dr. Pappas has consulted on a wide variety of topics including management skills, technical and scientific writing, public speaking, interpersonal communications, sexual harassment prevention, employee relations, creative thinking, diversity, and conflict negotiation. Page 14.331.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Cognitive Processes Instruction in an Undergraduate Engineering Design Course SequenceI. Introduction Critical to effective and innovative design are the intentional thinking practices that gointo the analysis
Pertaining to Engineering Education." She is also a member of the Middle Tennessee Chapter of the Society for Technical Communication (past president and senior member), the National Council of Teachers of English, and the Association of Professional Communication Consultants.Marilyn Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology Marilyn A. Dyrud has taught in the Communication Department of Oregon Institute of Technology since 1983 and regularly teaches courses in technical and business writing, public speaking, rhetoric, and ethics. She is active in ASEE as a member of the ETD Board and compiler of the annual “Engineering Technology Education Bibliography.” A past chair of the Pacific
desired needs or able to communicateeffectively. However, effective programmatic responses to the replies to these questions may bedifficult unless we can point to the specific course or courses responsible for any deficiencies. Itmay also be too late if, for example, an understanding of professional and ethical responsibilitywas supposed to be addressed in a sophomore design course taken four or more years ago by thestudent responding to a survey. Therefore as part of a comprehensive assessment program(which includes feedback from all our constituents), our Department has instituted a course-by-course assessment process. On a rotating basis (so as not to overwhelm the students) allundergraduate courses in the Department are surveyed every two
designed in soil mechanics Character - Identify personal passions (5) an ability to recognize ethical and explain basic concepts in Develop professional and a plan for professional professional responsibilities in engineering leadership; analyze issues in development plan; analyze development situations and make informed judgments, which professional ethics; and explain ethics cases from ASCE; track - Fulfill commitments in a must consider the impact of engineering the importance of professional number of students involved in timely manner
professionals. When asked what specific skills were important as a follow up question,the respondents highlighted that the most important skills could be identified as timemanagement, work ethic, mathematical skills, business and accounting skills, team work, peopleskills and communication skills.It was interesting to observe that the management level industry professionals credited theimportance of the above STEM success necessities and skills to the interaction that is requiredeither directly or indirectly with the customer / end consumer. While direct supervisors seemedto be more focused on the streamlining and efficiency aspects of the skills they associated withsuccess in a STEM profession.The biggest and most common weakness in STEM students
, knowledge of changes in student attitudes were sought as a response to a coursedeveloped for first year engineering (FYE) majors [12]. This course, Engineering and Society,contains elements that are common among FYE courses such as the study of engineeringdisciplines, ethics, and a team-based design project, yet it uniquely focuses on the connectionsamong engineering/technology and society and the development of technology within a societalcontext. This allows us to integrate ethics and the engineering design experience with thetechnology and society content, which provides a platform for analyzing current technologicalsystems and exposes students to the breadth and diversity of engineering. Aside from meetingABET and University-level outcomes
● Clear conclusion stated interaction between living and non-living materials and systems.(c) Design a system, component, or ● Final design meets or exceeds client-specified criteria process to meet desired needs within ● The design evaluation considers environmental, ethical, health, realistic constraints such as economic, safety, regulatory constraints environmental, social, political, ● The design evaluation considers manufacturability, sustainability, ethical, health and safety, social, political, and economic constraints manufacturability, and sustainability(d) Function on multidisciplinary and ● Positive peer evaluations diverse teams and provide leadership
curriculum modules that for a broad range of students. Finally, he shared theEducational Outcomes expected of all accredited engineering programs (per ABET [4]), as apoint of reference: participants were encouraged to also think beyond technical skillrequirements and to consider other skills that are part of science, technology, engineering &mathematics (STEM) curricula such as teamwork, consideration of ethical/societal issues, andmore.At this point, the industry participants and academic participants were split into break-outsessions to focus on delineating their needs, before coming back together as a large group beforelunch.Industry Break-out: SummaryThe industry “room” brainstormed and focused on shared key “Abilities,” “Skills” and
a hands-on demonstration ofthe problem and solution combination.Course #4 – Cpr E 234 Legal, Professional, and Ethical Issues in Cyber SystemsThis course is not a prerequisite or a co-requisite in the core three series of the cyber securityfoundational courses. It can be taken at any point in the degree program. However, we havefound students hungry to take cyber security courses early in their academic career and thatsecond and third year students are primarily found in the course. The course emphasizes legal,ethical, and professional issues in cyber systems that extend beyond the technical issues coveredin Cpr E 230, Cpr E 231, and Cpr E 331. It covers topics such as privacy, government regulation,and compliance as applied to professional
Engineering Education, 2018 Develop and Test an Interdisciplinary Course of Sustainable Urban Design and Technology Innovation Xiaojing Yuan, Bruce Race University of Houston, xyuan@uh.eduAbstractArchitecture and engineering technology students are entering professions that demandinnovation and interdisciplinary leadership. Community policies, building codes, professionalorganizations’ ethics, and emerging business models are shifting. Urban development policy andbuilding practices are emphasizing climate and people friendly cities. Cities are pursuing policiesfor new and existing development to meet aggressive greenhouse gas (GHG) energy, waste, andwater targets
perspective on how individual professions studytheir engineering education profession as it relates to diversity and inclusiveness. Each year, thenominations resulted in five or six finalists arising from different divisions which included the K-12 and Pre-College Engineering, First Year Programs, Liberal Education/Engineering andSociety, Mechanical Engineering, Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation, andMultidisciplinary Engineering Divisions in 2015, the Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering,Educational Research and Methods, Engineering Ethics, Women in Engineering Division and thePacific Southwest Section in 2016, and the Aerospace Division, Diversity Committee, LiberalEducation/Engineering & Society Division, Mathematics Division, and
. Although they are mostly working outside of theinstitutional setting, especially as they work to establish alternative space and practices outside ofthe dominant discourse, the work and motivations of both feminist hacker collectives and opensource science hardware communities have implications for thinking through how to organizeand enact real-world change in terms of pedagogy, design, and more deeply weaving ethics andexplicit value-systems into engineering education and practice.In a previous paper, we sought lessons for change in engineering education from movements notonly within science and technology cultures, but also within higher education institutionalsettings. Prior higher education change movements we examined include the efforts to
architecture students conceptualize knowledge and design. To date, the study has been designed and has gained approval to proceed from our ethics review board. Three pilot interviews have been conducted and these have been used to adjust the research design and widen the parameters for the sample group. The research team secured ethics approval for the proposed changes. This paper describes the overall design of the study and what was learned from the pilot interviews.IntroductionHow do students interpret the act of creation and how does their understanding change over time?We aim to understand students’ experiences of design in civil engineering and architecture. Wewant to understand how students interpret creating, and we want
; • Explain the characteristics of effective team behavior2. Be familiar with and be able to apply the engineering and the importance of teamwork in an engineeringdesign process; environment. 3. Work on a team effectively to solve problems, • Collaborate effectively to solve problems, completecomplete projects, and make presentations; projects, and present findings and results. 4. Design and assemble simple projects; • Explain the interdisciplinary nature of solving5. Explain the importance of having high ethical complex engineering problems. standards; • Demonstrate the global significance of specific6
a certain extent; however, they are less common andtraditionally used in engineering design or ethics courses6, 7, 15. The main reason for this is thatethics and design require context and complexity in order to properly demonstrate the disorderand unrestrained environment of real-world problems. With specific regards to ethics, casestudies can show a student that being a good person does not necessarily mean analyzing anethical issue will be easy for them9. With respect to engineering design, case studies provide amore realistic problem: students may have missing information, a broader scope to consider, orpotential issues arising from a certain situation.Engineering science coursesThere is equal value in incorporating case studies into
or handheldgaming systems. Students, working in small teams, are expected to integrate a microprocessorwith various peripheral devices such as storage, input, sensors, and display devices into aportable embedded platform. These projects follow design constraints that are encountered inindustry such as use model, cost, power, and portability. Moreover, students are expected todevelop team management skills, presentation skills, and critical design processes, as well asstudy and implement human-machine interaction.In addition to the project work, these courses have weekly lectures related to engineeringpractice. Topics include the history of computer engineering, the electronics development cycle,professional ethics, multidisciplinary team
my own time to understand more or more of the topic than I learned in class so once you do that you can formulate a better idea of it.”Other traits were mentioned throughout the interviews that suggest that having certain traits, suchas being open-minded or flexible or having a strong work ethic or desire to succeed, makepromotion to engaged thinking much easier. Further, while the trait of confidence was rarelyexplicitly discussed, the way in which each student talked about his or her project throughout thesummer exhibited a perceivable growth in confidence that cannot be easily captured with a fewshort quotes, but nonetheless contributed to a likely increased tendency to utilize engagedthinking.Transitional (engagement inducing
their research with theirclassmates.In the program, 14 leadership capabilities are taught and developed through lectures, case studyand labs augmented by a weekly guest speaker. Students are introduced to assessmenttechniques such as Myers-Briggs, Thomas-Kilmann and DISC, taught classic, contemporary andexperiential theories on transformational and transactional leadership, sources of power, ethics,followership, leading from the middle, influence without authority, team dynamics and otherthemes.With this foundation, vocabulary and awareness of the field of leadership, students are given a"share your leadership story” assignment due at the end of their final semester. They select anengineering leader of interest, someone renown in a field
as project manager and mentoring first-year engineering students. I have a lot of drive to uphold integrity and ethics in my work and actions, and I hope to be in a position where I can empower the disenfranchised and underprivileged.Mr. Thomas Atcheson WareDr. Diane L. Foucar-Szocki, College of Education James Madison University Dr. Foucar-Szocki is Professor of Learning, Technology and Leadership Education at James Madison University and Coordinator of Grants, Contracts and Special Projects in the College of Education. She holds degrees from San Diego State University, SUNY, College at Buffalo and Syracuse University.Dr. Justin J Henriques, James Madison University
engineeringprogram under consideration, CTT members created a one-sentence statement for each programlearning, based on descriptions in the BOK2 document (Figure 2). Each program learning Page 26.1599.7outcome statement begins with an action verb and is both specific and measurable. Foundational Outcomes 1. Mathematics - Apply knowledge of mathematics (through differential equations) to civil engineering problems. 2. Natural sciences - Apply knowledge of natural science (calculus-based physics, chemistry, and an elective) to civil engineering problems. 3. Humanities - Recognize and incorporate aesthetic, ethical, historical, and other human considerations into the
, and family structure. Our program has demonstrated past success in addressingissues important to the field and accreditation boards, such as functioning on multidisciplinaryteams, understanding ethical responsibilities, developing a sense of the global and societalcontext of STEM work, and supporting the idea of life-long learning.1-4In the eight years since the program was founded, it has grown and developed considerably.Structural changes throughout these years include adding distance students in an off-campusprogram 280 miles away, broadening the program to include multiple science majors, funding ahalf-time graduate assistant, and staffing changes in the faculty mentors. Program improvementshave included annual retreats for scholars
themes, real world examples, and new topics such as sustainability. The rationalefor implementing the cases within a traditional laboratory was to determine if the cases impactedstudent engagement; helped students to see the link between laboratory exercises and real worldapplications; increased student’s critical thinking levels above the lower levels of Bloom’sTaxonomy of knowledge and comprehension for their experimental data; and improved thequality of student laboratory reports. The new cases developed addressed: 1) E-waste to teachenvironmental ethics and statistical analysis of data, 2) the 2014 Duke Coal Ash Spill inDanville, VA to teach physical and chemical water quality and treatment; 3) a Confined AnimalFeeding Operations water
) assets are important to a company’s valuation and its stakeholders • Employ methods to protect valuable trade secret and confidential information IP assets • Use trademarks, industrial designs, and copyrights to protect brand value • Describe how to file patents Resolving Ethical Issues • Assess, and later reassess, your position on an ethics scale • Define ethics in the context of professional settings • Explain why ethical behavior and the trust it engenders are essential for all engineers especially entrepreneurial engineers • Analyze ethical dilemma case studies and explain who resolved them and how • Apply three methods for resolving ethical dilemmas Generating new ideas based on societal needs and business opportunities • Differentiate
16 4. Multi-Disciplinary Teams 8 5. Solve Engineering Problems 23 6. Professional & Ethical Responsibility 10 7. Communicate 13 8. Impact of Engineering Solutions 13 9. Lifelong Learning 13 10. Knowledge of Contemporary Issues 13 11. Modern Engineering Tools 13
minimumstandards that must be incorporated into your program outcomes. These standards are specifiedin the Criterion 3 a-k outcomes and include requirements for math, science, lifelong learning,engineering design, professional responsibility, ethics, and contemporary issues. Theserequirements are not trivial.Program: Then I will simply adopt the Criterion 3 a-k as my program outcomes.Expert: Using the Criterion 3 a-k outcomes without modification is probably acceptable but isdefinitely unwise. This practice sends the message that there is nothing special about yourprogram; that you have not given your educational outcomes much thought; and that you arewilling to let an outside agency dictate what you expect your students to accomplish. It is betterto
technical reports. 11. Teamwork: Work effectively in teams, including structure individual and joint accountability; assign roles, responsibilities, and tasks; monitor progress; meet deadlines; and integrate individual contributions into a final deliverable. 12. Ethics in the Lab: Behave with highest ethical standards, including reporting information objectively and interacting with integrity. 13. Sensory Awareness: Use the human senses to gather information and to make sound engineering judgments in formulating conclusions about real-world problems.Introducing Design of Experiments in Engineering CurriculaTaking into consideration the above mentioned fundamental objectives and the experience ofintroductory physics
, which assessment measures touse, and how we should make revisions to develop our program.Criterion 3, of ABET’s 2007 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs1, lists 11 desirableoutcomes lettered (a) thru (k). Outcome (c), specifically deals with engineering design, statingthat graduating students should have: “an ability to design a system, component, or process tomeet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political,ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability”Criterion 4 goes on to list three subject areas: “(a) one year of a combination of college levelmathematics and basic sciences (some with experimental experience) appropriate to thediscipline, (b) one and one-half