describe the challenges, lessons learned, and results of the program for its firstyear and a half of existence. The primary challenge was known before the project began: onlyone school is within an hour’s drive of the four-year institution. The other four schools are threeto four hours distant. In spite of this, strong collaborations and interactions are occurringbetween the schools. The paper will describe participation in high school recruitment,presentations in classrooms, student feedback from class room visits, and the advantages ofbeing available at a table in the student union so that students can come by and ask questions.The paper will also discuss the changes that have taken place in the community colleges to bettersupport their programs
—what engages and captivates the audience?This paper explores motivational, attitudinal, and influential aspects of storytelling with anentrepreneurial streak and specific focus on the vulnerable introductory phase of studentresponses during classroom design challenges. What motivates students and the way they begintheir projects or start-ups are considered during the opening phases of each class, duringclassroom dynamics and during the introduction of an entrepreneuring story. Stories areexamined and informed by previous work. Storytelling is defined and measured by fourconcepts: self-motivated, ambiguity readiness level, passionate social connections, and empathy.A series of planned prompts alongside classroom work geared towards student
Bernard Van Wie has been teaching for 30 years, first as a graduate student at the University of Oklahoma, and then as a professor at Washington State University. Over the past 15 years, he has devoted himself to developing novel teaching approaches that include components of cooperative/collaborative, hands-on, active, and problem/project-based learning (CHAPL) environments.Dr. Gary Robert Brown, Portland State UniversityDr. Olusola O. Adesope, Washington State University, Pullman Olusola O. Adesope is an Assistant Professor of educational psychology at Washington State University, Pullman. His research is at the intersection of educational psychology, learning sciences, and instructional design and technology. His recent
-year engineering educa- tional environment through the use of collaborative learning, problem-based and project-based learning, classroom interaction, and multiple representations of concepts.Dr. Scott Sink, Ohio State University Scott Sink, Ph.D., P.E., teaches in industrial and systems engineering from the Ohio State University. He is Director, LeanSigma Certification, College of Engineering, Integrated Systems Engineering, the Ohio State University. He was VP, Business Process Improvement and Reengineering, at MDS and ESI, Toronto, 1997-2007, and [rofessor, ISE, and Director, the Virginia Quality and Productivity Center, Vir- ginia Tech, 1984-1997. He was also Associate Professor, IEM, and Director, Oklahoma
AC 2012-5085: RESPONSES TO AN UNFAMILIAR THING: HOW LEARN-ING ABOUT A STRUCTURAL SCULPTURE CAN MAKE IT MORE AP-PEALINGDr. Charles E. Riley, Oregon Institute of Technology Charles Riley has a background in transportation structures and structural mechanics. He teaches across the curriculum from the interdisciplinary freshman experience through the mechanics sequence, project management, structural design, and into the senior capstone. His interests in engineering education are varied, but are ultimately focused on excellence in the classroom and student retention (both retaining them in the program and having them retain information!).Dr. Sean St.Clair, Oregon Institute of Technology Sean St.Clair is an Associate
immediately graded and the comments on homework problems wereposted in the university course management system (Moodle, for student feedback). Teamsworked together on major projects. At the end of the semester each team presented their projectand submitted a written report. There was a midterm exam and a final comprehensive exam.Thus the course was a combination of passive and active learning. Page 25.1224.8Case 2: Thermal Design of Heat Exchangers using Adobe Connect SoftwareEnrollment in this mode of instruction was limited to two students as mentioned in the previoussection. Due to the small number of students enrolled through Adobe Connect, it
): the review process may involve comments or review from technical managers and legal staff ii) For more general audiences (like a trade show exhibit): the review may involve technical managers, marketing, and corporate communications staffsc) Are there any copyright issues involved? i) Will an entire product/article itself need to be copyrighted? If so, how do you do this? ii) Is any other copyright material used that needs to be acknowledged?d) Determine the business strategy for the project/subject from a big picture point of view i) Communication activity or publication should support this strategy ii) Factors to consider include: (1) Timing of public release if announcing
VLSI Design 3 MATH11 Calculus and Analytic Geometry 4 CPE449A Senior Project part A 1 MATH21 Linear Algebra 3 CPE449B Senior Project part B 3 MATH21 Calculus and Analytic Geometry 4 CPE460 Introduction to Robotics 3 MATH22 Discrete Structures 3 CPE471 Computer Comm. I: System 3 MATH30 Differential Equations 3 CPE473 Local Area Networks 3 MATH31 Numerical Methods 3 CPE489 Software Engineering 3 MATH32 Probability and
support in many universities forinterdisciplinary, cross-school collaboration. Northwestern University switched to this approachin a major reform of its undergraduate engineering curriculum: as part of its “Engineering First”program6, it required freshman to take a new course called Engineering Design andCommunication (EDC).In this course, taught over two quarters, approximately 380 students in 24 sections study thedesign process along with the communication process, while working on conceptual designprojects for real clients 7,8,9. In the first quarter, teams design a variety of World Wide Webprojects for local clients at the university or in the community. In the second quarter, studentswork on projects from a variety of disciplines, using the
Session 3663 Theoretical Foundations for the Foundation Coalition Core Competencies Jeffrey Froyd, Karen Frair Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology/University of AlabamaAbstractThe Foundation Coalition was funded in 1993 as the fifth coalition in the National ScienceFoundation's Engineering Education Coalitions Program, and is currently in the seventhyear of a ten-year project. The member institutions have changed since its formation andnow include Arizona State University, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Texas A&MUniversity, Texas A&M University - Kingsville, the University
Session 3663 Theoretical Foundations for the Foundation Coalition Core Competencies Jeffrey Froyd, Karen Frair Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology/University of AlabamaAbstractThe Foundation Coalition was funded in 1993 as the fifth coalition in the National ScienceFoundation's Engineering Education Coalitions Program, and is currently in the seventhyear of a ten-year project. The member institutions have changed since its formation andnow include Arizona State University, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Texas A&MUniversity, Texas A&M University - Kingsville, the University
authors. Second, our work points outthat the details involved in multimedia development may be critical to the effectiveness of theproduct. In particular, it is critical to build a strong correlation not only between your courseobjectives and the media, but also between the students’ objectives (possibly simple survival)and the media. Finally, the suite of assessment techniques we have shown appear to work quitewell and are also available by contacting the authors.This project continues to evolve at USAFA. We are in the process of developing moreinteractive versions of the modules. These will eventually become commercially available foruse in mechanics of materials courses.5. AcknowledgmentsThe authors wish to acknowledge the support of the MSC
made the ability to work in teams andto communicate effectively with technical and non-technical people a fundamental jobrequirement. These “softer” skills are now no less important than technical skills. Applicants canbe reasonably certain that they will be evaluated for these skills in the hiring process.Secondly, all the technology roles and functions are now tightly directed to meet the businessobjectives. R&D and new product investments are made only after careful analysis is done on thepotential value of the work relative to the cost of development and the business risks involved.Because of the greater cost pressure from customers and the earnings pressure from investors, thelevel of high-risk, high-return projects must be carefully
Session 1526 On Laboratory Development for a Curriculum in Particle Technology Rajesh N. Dave, Jonathan Luke, Robert Pfeffer, Doris Yacoub, Ian S. Fischer, Anthony D. Rosato New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102AbstractThis paper discusses the development of laboratory facilities for use with an on going NSF-CRCD project that will establish a three-course concentration in particle technology at NJIT,offered across the engineering curriculum. The main objective of the NSF funded project is toaddress the urgent need for undergraduate and graduate education in this vital field
. Custom-designed assessment instruments were found toproduce valuable information as to the effectiveness of adding a design component and mayshow the strengths and weaknesses of the course instruction (Cahill, Eisley, and Guarino, 1995).Also, during the project, Professor Guarino developed an interesting hypothesis for the creationof learning modules, that the number of target concepts (i.e. engineering science concepts to belearned) should be equal to the number of changeable design elements (i.e. parts, or componentsin the mechanical system).Professor Guarino prepared a follow-on proposal entitled “Design-Based Engineering Educationon the Internet” which was subsequently funded by the Idaho State Board of Education in 1996,under the Technology
undergraduate research in STEM. She also collaborates with the local Community College to improve graduation and transfer rates. Lastly, she is currently the Principal Investigator of the Research-Oriented Learning Experiences Engineering program and the Latinidad STEM Mentoring Program, both funded by the National Science Foundation.Patricia Nicole Delgado, New Mexico State University I am a first-year Ph.D. student at New Mexico State University in the department of Curriculum and Instruction. I currently work on a sponsored project that supports Latinx undergraduate sophomore, junior, and senior-level students in developing research, technical, interpersonal, academic, and professional skills that are transferable in
and project management from industry and government settings.Dr. Jessica Koehler, Wake Forest University Dr. Jessica Koehler is the Senior Research Scholar for the Wake Forest University Program for Leadership and Character in the Professional schools. In her role she also supports with the development and assessment of character and ethics education in the engineering program.William N. Crowe, Wake Forest University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Enhancing Knowledge Surveys with an Intellectual Humility ScaleAbstractAs engineering education and related research evolve, it is also important for assessment toolsand research
Mechanical Engineering, Biomechanics, Motion Analysis, Finite Element Analysis, Mechanical Medical Devices Design. Highly interested in Higher Education Curriculum Design, Academic Leadership, and teaching and classroom innovation. Courses taught: Intro to Engineering, Statics, Dynamics, Mechanics of Materials, Mechanical Vibrations, Intro to CAD (SolidWorks), Senior Design Project, Numerical Methods, Intro to Biomechanics.Dr. Luis U. Medina Uzcategui, Universidad Austral de Chile Dr. Medina, a Doctor in Engineering holder, currently serves as an academic at the University of Austral de Chile (UACh), specializing in instrumentation, measurement, and mechanical systems dynamics. He is also the coordinator of the Innovation
-Mines (PM) Engineering Ethics rubric [7]. This rubric assesses 5 attributes:recognition of the dilemma; information; analysis complexity and depth; perspectives; andresolution. This rubric was specifically developed to create a framework for educators to assessstudents’ level of ethical achievement and understanding. Using this rubric, the project teamnoted lower-than-expected performance for recognition of the dilemma in the evaluation ofapproximately 114 student submissions. The average scores for these submissions were in therange of 2-3 (on a scale from 1 to 5). These scores correspond to evaluations of students as beingable to identify problems (but only inferring it is an ethical dilemma) or recognizing obviousdilemmas (but failing to
ofsessions on different components of the design process. A recent example of this morecomprehensive partnership occurred for an upper-level design course with a focus onaccessibility. C-SED partnered with the course instructor to make curricular decisions regardingtopics, sequence, and learning objectives, and to facilitate a series of eight sessions addressingdifferent aspects of the design process. The course used the socially engaged design processmodel, developed by C-SED, as a framework for the course design project, focused ondeveloping solutions for accessibility challenges faced by communities with hearingimpairments.C-SED facilitators guided students through eight 80-minute design sessions, covering differentphases of the socially engaged
Paper ID #41461Board 33: Enhancing Self-Efficacy Among Transportation Engineering UndergraduatesUsing Hands-On Pedagogy.Mr. Adebayo Iyanuoluwa Olude, Morgan State University Adebayo Olude is a doctoral student and research assistant at Morgan State University’s Department of Civil Engineering in Baltimore, Maryland. Adebayo formerly worked as a Graduate Research Assistant at Eastern Mediterranean University in North Cyprus, where he earned his master’s degree in civil engineering. He also worked as a project Analyst with AgileP3 after graduating with a Bachelor of Engineering (B.Eng) in civil engineering from Covenant
Paper ID #43597Board 408: Toward Building a Human-Computer Coding Partnership: UsingMachine Learning to Analyze Short-Answer Explanations to ConceptuallyChallenging QuestionsHarpreet Auby, Tufts University Harpreet is a graduate student in Chemical Engineering and STEM Education. He works with Dr. Milo Koretsky and helps study the role of learning assistants in the classroom as well as machine learning applications within educational research and evaluation. He is also involved in projects studying the uptake of the Concept Warehouse. His research interests include chemical engineering education, learning sciences, and
projects or ideas with various degrees of guidance andfreedom using the resources available within the community [13]. Studies of qualitative natureindicate that this structure can be associated with positive learning experiences, because it allowspeople to develop their technical and design knowledge, explore solutions to problems, anddevelop a working proficiency with tools and equipment used for creating and prototyping [14],[15]. In the current literature, however, there are few quantitative studies that provide large-scaleevidence of the impacts of makerspace in learning [2], [3], [16], potentially because there is noframework that enables such an assessment.To address this gap and create an instrument that effectively measures the learning
that experiments form a key part of the engineeringway of knowing.Laboratories and the Engineering CurriculumLaboratories are one of three major modes through which engineering education is deliveredalong with engineering theory which is often delivered through lecture and assignments, anddesign projects. These modes are not all together distinct as will be seen by considering anexample. A course in fluid mechanics will present theory related to pumps and flow in pipes.Learning is often evaluated by analytical problems with one correct solution. On the other hand,a design project may use the same ideas in the service of creating a drinking-water system, or afire-fighting robot. Such projects have many possible solutions and involve criteria
ErrorsHaving been edited since the original draft publication (Sottile, 2023), the first ethics scenariopresented respondents with a scenario featuring the issue of concealment of errors. Thequantitative portion of the first scenario prompt was: Please consider the following scenario when answering questions on this screen: Imagine that you are a junior engineer working under the direction of a senior licensed professional engineer (P.E.) with many years of experience in bridge design. During a late- stage design review, significant concerns were expressed about the team’s design possibly leading to an unacceptable level of vibration. The P.E. overrules the concerns without discussion and prepares the bridge design for delivery to the project sponsor
Paper ID #41866Teaching Strategies that Incorporate Social Impacts in Technical Courses andEase Accreditation Metric CreationMs. Ingrid Scheel, Oregon State University Ingrid Scheel is a Project Instructor at Oregon State University in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. She teaches Electrical and Computer Engineering fundamentals and design courses, and as a graduate student in Education is focused on curriculum design. Scheel’s industry experience includes prototype development, test article instrumentation, data acquisition, data analysis, and reporting. She contributes to the International Society for Optics
students. The Engineering+program at Oregon State University exemplifies this approach by combining traditional lectureswith small-group studios and socially relevant projects. Previous research indicates that students'engagement correlates directly with academic progress. This is especially relevant in theEngineering+ setting, where students are in the process of choosing their majors and planningtheir futures. Students take three courses on varying topics to explore their interests and practicefundamental engineering skills during their first year. Therefore, enhancing student engagementin these courses not only aids in a deeper understanding of the offered materials but alsofacilitates social interactions that can inform better decision-making
understanding the characteristics of thosestudents who persist within their studies through graduation.The next stage of this project is to expand the use of the survey instrument to other PSIs within the BCTransfer System, including both those hosting engineering schools and those from which studentstransfer to engineering schools after their first year of studies. It is expected that the instrument willcontinue to evolve, and support work to develop resources for engineering programs that enhanceequity, allyship, and representation. Additionally, these tailored resources provide opportunities forlike-minded students to establish support systems, fostering a sense of belonging that produces aunified, resilient, and persistent student body.1.0
presents a significant issue for assessment. How is aneducator able to formatively identify student misconceptions precisely, accurately and quicklywhen the topic is so complex?The result is that a troublesome percentage of students fail the course or drop their engineeringmajor because of the class. For example, a study across 55 offerings of introductorythermodynamics over eight years and nine instructors at the University of Texas, San Antonio,reports that only 52.7% of course enrolments led to completion, with subsequent attempts havinglower rates than initial attempts [6].In this Work in Progress paper, we describe a project to develop a fine-grained assessment ofcore thermodynamic concepts embedded within an interactive simulation