winner were identified, with nograde being assigned to the students. According to the student survey conducted after the event,90% of the participants felt that AE Design Days was a positive experience and wish to have asimilar event in future academic terms. The paper will discuss details of the AE Design Daysevent and its effects on the students through the analysis of the survey questions.1.0 IntroductionThe event had the following learning objectives: 1. providing an opportunity to build working relationships with classmates, faculty, and staff, 2. introducing the students to core course content in a practical situation before any of the theory is introduced in class, 3. allowing the
Paper ID #24743Safe Zone Level 1 Ally Training (90-minute Workshop)Dr. Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University Dr. Stephanie Farrell is Professor and Founding Chair of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University (USA). Prior to 2016 she was a faculty member in Chemical Engineering at Rowan for eigh- teen years. Dr. Farrell has contributed to engineering education through her work in inductive pedagogy, spatial skills, and inclusion and diversity. She has been honored by the American Society of Engineer- ing Education with several teaching awards such as the 2004 National Outstanding Teaching Medal and the 2005
Paper ID #25383Work in Progress: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a 1-creditChemical Engineering First-Year SeminarDr. Deborah S. Goldberg, University of Maryland, College Park Deborah S. Goldberg is a full-time lecturer in the Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Maryland, College Park. She is passionate about teaching and mentoring students to prepare them for diverse careers in chemical engineering and biotechnology.Mr. Jinwang Zou, University of Maryland, College Park Jinwang Zou is a Ph.D. candidate in the Measurement, Statistics, and Evaluation Program at the University
Paper ID #26549Factors Influencing Course Withdrawal in Fundamental Engineering Coursesin a Research 1 UniversityMr. Johnny Crayd Woods Jr., Virginia Tech Johnny C. Woods, Jr. is a Higher Education PhD Student at Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia. He obtained his master’s in Educational Foundations from Makerere University (Uganda), and a bachelor’s in Sociology from A.M.E. Zion University College (Liberia). Prior to joining Virginia Tech, he served at Tubman University (Liberia) for 10 years in several capacities, including his last position as Chief of Staff to the University President and Liaison to the
Paper ID #25100Board 36: Evaluating the Long-Term Impact of Pre-College Computing Ed-ucation Phase 1 OverviewDr. Adrienne Decker, University at Buffalo Adrienne Decker is a faculty member in the newly formed Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. She has been studying computing education and teaching for over 15 years, and is interested in broadening participation, evaluating the effectiveness of pre-college computing activities, and issues of assessment, particularly in the introductory programming courses. She has been actively involved with the Advanced Placement Computer Science A course
Paper ID #25067Board 66: Reimagining Energy Year 1: Identifying Non-Canonical Examplesof Energy in EngineeringProf. Gordon D Hoople, University of San Diego Dr. Gordon D. Hoople is an assistant professor and one of the founding faculty members of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. He is passionate about creating engaging experiences for his students. His work is primarily focused on two areas: engineering education and design. Professor Hoople’s engineering education research examines the ways in which novel approaches can lead to better student outcomes. He is the principal investigator on the
Paper ID #28110Board 1: Aerospace: Inclusion of Sustainability Analysis in a National Air-port Design CompetitionProf. Mary E. Johnson, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Mary E. Johnson earned her BS, MS and PhD in Industrial Engineering from The University of Texas at Arlington. After 5 years in aerospace manufacturing, Dr. Johnson joined the Automation & Robotics Research Institute in Fort Worth and was program manager for applied research programs. Fourteen years later, she was an Industrial Engineering assistant professor at Texas A&M - Commerce before joining the Aviation Technology department at Purdue University
Paper ID #27417Board 1: Introduction to Design Thinking and Human Centered Design inthe Biomedical Engineering freshman yearMr. Jorge E Bohorquez, University of Miami Dr. Jorge Boh´orquez received his bachelor degrees in Physics and Electrical engineering in 1984 and his Ph.D. degree in Biomedical Engineering in 1991. Currently Dr. Boh´orquez works as an Associate professor of Professional Practice at the Department of Biomedical Engineering of the University of Miami. His research interests are Engineering Education, Neural Engineering, Biosignal Processing and Instrumentation.Dr. Ram´on Benjamin Montero, University of
universitywebsites with follow-up survey data to identify outreach programs that may be transformativefor STEM undergraduates. This review yielded a matrix of about 100 college-based outreachprograms. We then invited these programs to attend one of the following workshops: a Marchworkshop held at Tufts University in Boston or an April workshop held at the University ofNebraska in Lincoln. Nine institutions sent representatives to the Boston workshop, and fiveinstitutions sent representatives to the Lincoln workshop. In addition, we held conference calls togather information from an additional six institutions. The purpose of the workshops andconference calls was two-fold: (1) determine best practices for outreach that used STEMundergraduates, and (2
Paper ID #25687Board 1: In the Business of Innovation: Development of a Canvas Tool toPromote and Sustain Pedagogical Risk Taking by FacultyRohini N. Abhyankar, Arizona State University Rohini Abhyankar is a third year graduate student at Arizona State University’s Engineering Education Systems and Design doctoral program. Rohini has a Master’s degree in Electrical Engineering from Syra- cuse University and Master’s and Bachelor’s degrees in Physics from University of Delhi, India. Rohini has over ten years each of industry and teaching experience. Her dissertation focus is on understanding the strategies adopted by early
a whole and EE, CpE, and ME inparticular, our transformative mixed-methods project responds to calls for more cross-institutional qualitative and longitudinal studies of minorities in engineering education. Thestudy will investigate the following overarching research questions: 1. Why do Black men and women choose and persist in, or leave, EE, CpE, and ME? 2. What are the academic trajectories of Black men and women in EE, CpE, and ME? 3. In what ways do these pathways vary by gender or institution? 4. What institutional policies and practices promote greater retention of Black engineering students?Our mixed-methods approach combines the quantitative power of large sample sizes availablefrom the Multi-Institution
Paper ID #27793The On-going Status of The 3+1 Dual Degree Program in Electrical Engineer-ing and Computer Engineering between Northern Arizona University andChongqing University of Post and TelecommunicationDr. Xi Zhou, Northern Arizona University Dr. Zhou is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the School of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Sys- tems at Northern Arizona University and is primarily focused on the NAU/CQUPT dual degree program. He completed his Ph.D in Material Science and Engineering in 2014 at Norfolk State University in Vir- ginia. Dr. Zhou’s research interests are in semiconductors and electronics. He
and the successful execution of a world-class engineering designproject. This ensures that faculty-developed design projects are of an appropriate scope and contextin order to provide proper scaffolding to support the six individual educational modules. This paperdemonstrates how such a framework can be applied to both create new projects for the course, aswell as redesign existing projects to better meet course goals and incorporate module content.1. MOTIVATION AND BACKGROUND Introduction to Engineering Design (EDSGN 100) acts as the cornerstone engineering coursefor over 3800 students across Penn State’s numerous campuses each year. This includes studentsfrom almost all engineering disciplines offered at 20 Penn State campuses. Each
-centered learning experience that emphasizes faith, leadership,inclusiveness, and social responsibility. For example, the St. Joseph House of Faith in Action is anew residential volunteer-supported construction which will eventually be a home base forvolunteering and connecting in the community. A recent study found that a clear majority of studentswere willing to volunteer for weekend community service projects post-graduation [1]. A smallermajority were even willing to forgo some salary as a professional engineer working at a companyknown for its support of community activism.Engineering FYS students lean on their background and/or inclination in engineering design andconstruction to help carry out their particular service project. In past years
differentenvironments, cultures and other phenomena, which may or may not be easily understood oraccepted. Reflection is a form of mental processing, according to Moon [1], which can bedirected at a specific outcome, such as building knowledge of a different culture in order torespond with intercultural competency [2]. Participants also develop meaning by comparingtheir new experiences to prior ones, and recognize that other ways of life are no less worthwhilethan their own. This last realization arises from reflection, according to Kember, McKay,Sinclair and Wong, who considered reflection as a re-examination of beliefs [3].Moon proposed a framework for reflection consisting of four stages, from descriptive to highlyreflective writing, where the final stage
Engineering Students: Determining Educational ImpactIntroductionEvery day the worlds of business and engineering become more interconnected and interdependentdue to advancements in technology regarding communication and transportation. This hasproposed a need for engineering graduates to achieve a reasonably high level of “globalpreparedness,” which has been recognized and promoted by both the professional and educationalengineering communities in conferences, national reports and publications.1 The NationalAcademy of Engineering (NAE), the National Science Foundation (NSF), and the NationalResearch Council (NRC) have each challenged universities to graduate students who are globallyprepared or have a global perspective.2-4 Engineering educators and
Advanced Dynamics has a limited distribution. So, theideas expounded below may seem innovative and new, yet they are not. The purpose of thispaper is to demonstrate the use of rotation operators to solve this problem and to inspire readersto create other innovative solutions. This is the educational purpose of this paper. Since thissolution is based on rotation operators, and rotation operators are often overlooked in dynamics,let us begin with a brief historical overview of rotation operator. Then, I will start from thedefinition of rotation operator, provide examples of operations, and then verify the solutions. Rotation operator was first introduced by J. W. Gibbs in 1901 as mentioned in Ying’sAdvanced Dynamics [1]. A search of the
to handle its operation. In thispaper we discuss about a simple object tracking tilt-head robot that uses the power of a JevoisMachine Vision camera and can monitor the movement of a desired object and move along itsdirection12-14. This simple robot can serve as a starter experiment for the students to set foot inlearning concepts of computer vision through easier cost-effective implementations. Figure 1. Block diagram of the Object Tracking System using Jevois camera and Arduino This project aims to design, build, and test an autonomous 3D sorting system through theuse of an object tracking system and the Arduino microcontroller as the center of the whole system.It is equipped with a Jevois camera that is used to locate the
, print preparation, material extrusion, andmanufacturability constraints. The integration of the proposed solution with existingmanufacturing lessons and faculty skillsets is also discussed.1. MOTIVATION AND BACKGROUND Additive manufacturing (AM, or 3D printing) technology is quickly becoming a common sightin cornerstone engineering design courses [1,2]. The reason is twofold: (i) AM is set to be adominant tool for end-use manufacturing (and thus it benefits engineering students to be exposedas soon in their careers as possible) and (ii) low-cost AM systems can enable rapid prototypingand iteration in the design process, while dovetailing well with computer-aided design (CAD)skills also learned in cornerstone design courses. Learning
2019 FYEE Conference : Penn State University , Pennsylvania Jul 28 Work in Progress: An Introduction to Computer Vision for First-Year Electrical and Computer Engineering Students Daniel T. Klawson, Nathaniel A. Ferlic, and Cheng Peng Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Abstract-- This work-in-progress paper will detail one of of machine learning, artificial intelligence, image processing,ENEE101’s newest modules, computer vision. ENEE101 is the and self-driving cars.introductory course to electrical and computer engineering (ECE)at the University of Maryland (UMD) [1] [2]. This
design experiences.explore their potential through various course contents, The author’s previous works [1-6] describe the detailstopics, and activities integrated with the EML about the Freshman Engineering Discovery courses that havepedagogical approach. In order to indirectly assess and been running for more than ten years at Marquette Universitymeasure how freshman engineering students have built – Opus College of Engineering. The main objective of thetheir engineering entrepreneurial mindset through these two-semester course integrated with EML is to provide newtwo semester courses, course surveys were given to engineering students with a vision as engineers with anstudents twice a
primer when a field is significantly advanced (1). These types ofprimers can be used to help to make decisions by practitioners; for education, practitionersinclude administrators, educators, advisors, and researchers. In order to help with recruitmentand outreach for ASEE, primers can help assist novices with familiarizing themselves with thefield. Not only does the primer summarize the research, but it explains how to interpret researchoutput and apply it to practice. This paper adapts a model introduced by Weiner et al. (2018) to first-year engineeringeducation research at the ASEE and FYEE annual conferences (2). This study did not apply athorough systematic literature review defined by Borrego et al. (2014), and instead focuses onthe
sequence, beginning with a cornerstone design course and culminatingwith the capstone design course. Students in EDSGN 100 learn fundamental design skills,techniques, and tools that are built upon and applied throughout their engineering curricula. Theupdated student learning outcomes are as follows: Students will (1) apply engineering design toaddress design opportunities; (2) use systems thinking and apply it to engineering design; (3)develop professional skills necessary for becoming a successful engineer; (4) communicateengineering concepts and designs; and (5) gain experience in hands-on fabrication whiledeveloping a “maker” mindset.A common grading scheme (Table 1) was adopted to ensure common expectations for students.Compared with prior
design classroomAbstractThe effectiveness of a learner-centered pedagogical model called “Flip-J” is evaluated in thiswork-in-progress paper. First-year engineering students participated in a project-basedengineering design process curriculum with a service-learning component. Students wereassigned weekly reading materials to be discussed in-class using a four stage Flip-J process. Thestages were: 1) individual reading assignments outside of classroom; 2) in-class formation ofcollaborative expert groups; 3) in-class formation of cooperative Jigsaw groups and 4) in-classreflection exercises. More than 80% of the students indicated a productive experience from thecooperative learning strategy used. Students’ feedback also included recommendations
Full Paper: Hands-On Laboratory Exercises for Engineering Applications of Mathematics CourseIn Fall 2007, the First-Year Engineering Program (FEP) was started with the intent of increasingstudent retention and success. One of the main hindrances to retention at a public universityengineering program with open enrollment is the unpreparedness of students for rigorouscurriculum requirements of the first year. In an effort to help first year engineering students whoare one or two semesters behind Calculus I, FEP offers Engineering Applications of Mathematics(E-Math) course, which was inspired by the Wright State model for Engineering MathematicsEducation [1]. E-Math aims to teach College Algebra
Full Paper: Implement Hands-on Activities for Statics Course into Student Success Programs 1. BackgroundThe University of Wisconsin-Platteville (UWP) is a very much student-centered teachingschool with high reputation for its engineering programs. The College of Engineering,Mathematics and Science Student Success Programs (EMS SSP) plays a crucial role inhelping students become the next generation of successful engineers.In EMS SSP, there are three Living Learning Communities (LLCs) for students pursing adegree in STEM fields. In 2017, the UWP is proud to offer an Explore EMS LLC for allfreshman students in the College of EMS who are interested in exploring career opportunities inEMS fields. The Women in
includes teamsfrom around the globe [1-5].Team Design Project IThere are two major group design projects worth 50% of their total grade. The engineeringdesign process in introduced during the first design project. This project is based on reverseengineering a simple device like an electric toothbrush, and then redesigning the device foradded functionality. Teams are formed the first week of the semester, so team dynamics are a bitunstable because the students don’t know each other very well. Teams are typically formed bywho they happen to sit near. During this first project, students learn about reverse engineering,perform market analysis, derive specifications and functional diagrams, generate designconcepts, and apply concept selection
, etc.Tinkering has been defined as a type of making that sits on the more creative and improvisationalcontinuum where things could fail in unexpected and sometimes wonderful ways [1]. Thisapproach relies on materials, phenomena and models to inspire ideas along with a collaborativeculture of facilitators and fellow tinkers to support learners in realizing their ideas [2]. A learningdimensions framework for Making and Tinkering developed by the Exploratorium [3] providedguidance and structure to the “tinkering” instructional initiative for this project. Although theframework was generated with K-12 informal learning experiences in mind, it offers a promisingpedagogical approach for undergraduate engineering education. The five Learning Dimensions(LD) of
future course that is the focus of this work incorporates many ofcareers. Third, they are unsuccessful in building meaningful these practices. As described in the following sections, itconnections with their engineering faculty and peers, and as provides students with significant mastery experiences, thesuch do not develop a strong identity as an engineer [1]. opportunity to collaborate on a design project with their peersAnother study found that the three most common reasons for and apply their theoretical background to concretestudents leaving engineering were poor advising and engineering activities. Moreover, our results demonstrateteaching, the difficulty of engineering curriculum, and