State University, University ParkDr. Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Sarah Zappe is Research Associate and Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. She holds a doctoral degree in educational psychology emphasizing applied measurement and testing. In her position, Sarah is responsible for developing instructional support programs for faculty, providing evaluation support for educational proposals and projects, and working with faculty to publish educational research. Her research interests primarily involve creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship education.Dr. Steven B. Shooter, Bucknell
Violet Haas Award (for efforts on behalf of women), all at Purdue University.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests include human-centered design learning and assessment, service-learning, ethical reasoning development and assessment, leadership, and assistive technology.Prof. Jonathan Beever, Penn State University Jonathan Beever is currently a Post-Doctoral Scholar
Environmental & Science Education, vol. 3, pp. 193-206, 2008.[13] J. Shimazoe and H. Aldrich, "Group Work Can Be Gratifying: Understanding & Overcoming Resistance to Cooperative Learning," College Teaching, vol. 58, pp. 52-57, 2010.[14] I. E. Harel and S. E. Papert, Constructionism. Ablex Publishing, 1991.[15] L. B. Resnick, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser. Lawrence Erlbaum, 1989.[16] J. Hennessy, N. Jouppi, S. Przybylski, C. Rowen, T. Gross, F. Baskett and J. Gill, "MIPS: A microprocessor architecture," in Proceedings of the 15th Annual Workshop on Microprogramming, Palo Alto, California, United States, 1982, pp. 17-22.[17] Digilent Nexys2 Spartan-3E FPGA Board http
Institutional Change. Her research interests include image compression and image processing, with a focus on developing video compression algorithms to allow for cell-phone transmission of American Sign Language. She was awarded a National Science Foundation Young Investigator Award, a Sloan Research Fellowship, and the 2006 Hewlett-Packard Har- riett B. Rigas Award. She is a Fellow of the IEEE.Dr. John B. Schneider, Washington State University John Schneider is the associate dean for undergraduate programs in the College of Engineering and Ar- chitecture at Washington State University (WSU) and a faculty member in WSU’s School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS). He has taught courses ranging from
,” The Journal of Experimental Education, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 143–157, Jan. 1994.[7] K. Struyven, F. Dochy, and S. Janssens, “Students’ Perceptions About Evaluation and Assessment in HigherEducation: A Review,” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 325–341, Aug. 2005.[8] M. Zeidner, “Essay Versus Multiple-Choice Type Classroom Exams: The Student’s Perspective,” The Journal ofEducational Research, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 352–358, 1987.[9] A. Ben-Simon, D. V. Budescu, and B. Nevo, “A Comparative Study of Measures of Partial Knowledge inMultiple-Choice Tests,” Applied Psychological Measurement, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 65–88, Mar. 1997.[10] F. Lord, M. Novick, and A. Birnbaum, Statistical theories of mental test scores
the simplicity to be built bystudents over the course of five semesters. The work is designed to test two hypotheses: 1. A long-term design project that integrates knowledge from multiple courses strengthens student knowledge retention. 2. A large-scale design project requiring tools from many courses improves student problem-solving and design skills.By integrating five semesters of the mechanical engineering curriculum into a cohesive whole,this project has the potential to transform the way undergraduate education is delivered. Beforeand after testing is being conducted to assess: a) Change in retention between courses and b)Change in student problem-solving and design skills.Students at Rowan University have built almost all
Solaris One. Following a disastrous solar flare, two major systems on thespace station become unstable; the parabolic dish beaming energy back to Earth as well as theenergy distribution system running throughout the asteroid. To fix the two systems, there are Page 24.1092.3two mini-games that the player must complete to accomplish their mission. Because theasteroid is open to exploration, the games do not have to be completed in any particular order. Figure 1: An image of the interface for the rocket launch game.Figure 2: (a) A successful rocket launch (b) Rocket running off the track due to unbalanced energy production
, Linda, Roger Burton, Jonathan Stolk, Julie B. Zimmerman, Larry J. Leifer, Paul T. Anastas (2010) "The systemic correlation between mental models and sustainable design: implications for engineering educators" International Journal for Engineering EDucation 26(2) 438- 45026. Winner, Langdon (1986) "Do Artifacts have politics?" Ch 2 in The Whale and the Reactor, Chicago University Press27. Wright, Ronald, 2005. A Short History of Progress. Da Capo Press.March discussion: where are we stuck?The main area of this lively conversation evolved over two weeks, with an initial focus closer tothe posed question, and a later focus on more philosophical issues about the place of science andengineering (together and separate) in knowledge
4 1 0 3.25(b) I/O Addressing Format Exam I(c) Addressing Mode2. Understand and ConstructLadder Logic Programs NSF -ATE Labs 2, 3,(a) Instruction Set Relay, Timer, Module 1-10: 70.7 Final Exam 82 82.2 3 4 1 0 3.25 4,6,7Counter, Arithmatic, Exam IIComparison, File Instruction,3. Manipulate data using PLCinstruction sets NSF -ATE(a) Relay, Timer
Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Temple University specializing in electrical machines and power systems, multimedia tutoring, and control and optimization of dynamic systems. He has been the principle investigator of a project for the development of an intelligent tutoring shell that allows instructors create their own web-based tutoring system. His current research focuses on security of cyber-physical systems based on multiagent framework with applications to the power grid, and the integration of an intelligent virtual laboratory environment in curriculum. He is an associate editor of Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete and Impulsive Systems: Series B, and is a member of IEEE, ASEE, and Sigma Xi
and solution taken by the group (the video that you are watching). a. Comment on the steps and modifications that you think align with your team’s process–were these steps justified in a similar way? b. Comment on the steps and modifications that you do not think align with your team’s process – do you agree with their justifications?2. Suggest changes for the solution that students are watching.Phase III: Revisiting Solution and Sheet Metal Forming Design ProcessStudents were instructed to turn in an individual report with the following:1. Student’s proposed final design - with sketches (students can use the provided drawing and mark the changes on it or provide hand sketches.)2. The step
. Page 24.683.7 Table 1 – Symbol Library for FEASYExamplesFigure 2 shows an example of a bracket being modeled in FEASY and the deformation results inANSYS.Figure 4 shows an example of a two-dimensional cantilever beam with a point-load applied at itsend illustrating the sketching process. The user sketches a rectangle with one input stroke ingeometry mode (black ink) as shown in Fig. 4(a). The sketch beautified by the system is shownin Fig. 4(b). The user then switches to „symbol‟ mode to select the boundary conditions, loads,and dimensions (shown in red). On pressing the „process‟ button, the system processes the inputand the result is shown in Fig. 4(c). The user selects material properties as required to
studentswere exposed to robotics and engineering design concepts via a) two elective consecutiverobotics courses, b) college and high school mentorship opportunities, c) leadership roles duringthe robotics club and outreach day activities, and d) involvement with the IEEE Region-5robotics design contest. The traditional robotics lectures were transformed into project-basedhands-on design and implementation experiences in classroom and laboratory environments byteams of 3-5 students with the highest level of diversity. The open-ended robotics design contestprovided a challenging environment to effectively ensure superior engineering design skills andenhanced critical and creative thinking, communication, teamwork, and project management.Robotics-I
supported by a National Science FoundationAdvanced Technological Education3 (ATE) Grant. The goals of the grant project are to: a) createand implement a new Associate of Applied Science Photonics and Laser Technology (AAS PLT)program; b) fully equip an Optics and Photonics Laboratory for education and training; c) trainfaculty to teach core courses in the AAS PLT program; d) perform outreach activities to localhigh schools to promote the new program; e) educate 30 or more students or workers by the endof the project.The paper discusses the efforts and activities performed towards achieving the project goals, andthe results and outcomes obtained in the first year of the grant. Activities included convening anAdvisory Board with industry
, the leecture was broken b into thhree laboratoory sections. During botthsemesters, two sectio ons were assiigned contex xtual exercisses (either thhroughout orr in onelaboratorry meeting) and a one secttion was a co ontrol that wwas assigned the stylized book exampplefor their self-guided exercise. e Th udent broughht in for the contextual eexercises werre he objects stuphotograaphed. Studen nts were proovided a ruleer to help theem determine the dimenssions of theiirobject. a. b. c. Figure 1. Self--guided
Paper ID #9119Engaged in Thermodynamics – Learning What We Don’t KnowDr. Patrick A. Tebbe, Minnesota State University, Mankato Dr. Patrick Tebbe is a professor and chair of the Department of Mechanical and Civil Engineering at Minnesota State University, Mankato. Dr. Tebbe received B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering as well as the M.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri–Columbia. He is currently a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), the American Nuclear Society (ANS), and a student branch advisor for
Paper ID #8866Access to Cooperative Education Programs and the Academic and Employ-ment Returns by Race, Gender, and DisciplineDr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University and Central Queensland University Matthew W. Ohland is Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University and a
given purpose (i.e.,evaluation)2. Within the context of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET),the lowest levels in any learning hierarchy model are incompatible with required ABET programoutcomes. According to ABET1, three of the required 11 ABET student outcomes include 1) theability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (i.e., ABET studentoutcome [a]), 2) the ability to design and conduct experiments (i.e., ABET student outcome [b]),and 3) the ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (i.e., ABET studentoutcome [e]). It is important that engineering faculty of all disciplines continuously push theenvelope and work to elevate student learning and comprehension so that
the U.S. Navy (SPAWAR). She held a Fulbright fellowship at the Center for Wireless Communications (CWC) at the University of Oulu in Finland. She has received teaching excellence awards from her Division and the College of Engineering. She has received funding for her research from the NSF, the US Navy, NASA, and the business community. She is an ABET IEEE ETAC Commissioner and an active program evaluator.Mr. Thomas B. Stout, Tidewater Community College Thomas Stout is an associate professor of Electromechanical Controls Technology at Tidewater Commu- nity College in Chesapeake Virginia. He has worked in industrial maintenance, mechatronics and safety. He earned his BS degree from Old Dominion University in 2004
Paper ID #8617Forming a Coalition to Decrease Freshout Rampup Time in the EngineeringWorkplace: A Business Plan for an Academic, Industry, and GovernmentPartnershipDr. Steven W Villachica, Boise State University Steve Villachica is an Associate Professor of Instructional and Performance Technology (IPT) at Boise State University. His research interests focus on leveraging expertise in the workplace in ways that meet organizational missions and business goals. He is currently working on an NSF grant to increase engineer- ing faculty adoption of evidence-based instructional practices [NSF #1037808: Engineering Education
%+/*!! :.;" ?8" )$%" !!!" !!" ($%" '$%" &$%" #$%" *+,,-./"0"1+.,-23"*3343.2" 1+.,-23"*3343.2" *+,,-./"*3343.2" 5678393.2"" CD-E"5FGHD-E":15I" CJ8K7"5FGHD-E":15I" !!! CD-E"5FGHJ8K7":15I" CJ8K7"5FGHJ8K7":15I" !,A$#%B"!!,A$%)B"!!!,A$%#B"!!!!,A$%%#" Figure 7. The Role of Motivation by APCM GroupAs shown in Figure 7, students who ultimately graduated in engineering indicated that EGR 101increased their motivation to study engineering more strongly than students who ultimately didnot graduate, which is consistent with the results of Figure 3. The statistically significantdifference was for the Purpose Seekers
% 4% 5% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Agree Disagree Agree Disagree (a) (b)Figure 1: Changes in participant beliefs that active learning and conceptual
beliefs about their calculus class (either a Project CALCclass or a regular calculus class). In its original form, the Project CALC survey consists of 40closed-ended 4-point Likert scale questions with response categories ranging from StronglyAgree (“A”) to Strongly Disagree (“D”). Somewhat Agree (“B”) and Somewhat Disagree (“C”)are provided as intermediate choices. Response options A through D are provided in alphabeticalorder, left to right. For the purpose of the study, we tailored the original survey in several ways. Weexpanded the scale of each question to a 7-point scale in order to provide for sufficient variabilityin responses as well as a designate a true midpoint and thus allow a neutral selection. Wechanged the A-D response
in Fig. 1. The circuit thatthe students are intending to test, called a device-under-test (DUT – A in Fig. 1), is inserted into atest board, called the device-interface-board (DIB – B in Fig. 1). Depending on the lab, the DUTwill be a comparator, a DAC, or an ADC. The DIB contains circuits that will allow the DUT to beplaced into different configurations for different specification tests (e.g. input bias current, offsetvoltage, linearity, propagation delay, etc.). The DIB circuits may be as simple as load structures(output resistors and/or capacitors) or input resistors to gain up input current measurements, or ascomplicated as negative feedback servo-loops to force the device into a known state. Relays areactivated to change the DIB
Biomaterials. Liverpool: Liverpool UniversityPress; 1999.2. Polymer Characterization Techniques.247-56.3. Ratner B, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE. Biomaterials Science: AMultidisciplinary Endeavor. Biomaterials Science: A Introduction to Materials in Medicine. SanDiego: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. p. 1-9.4. Moss A. Use of Selected Medical Device Implants in the United States. Hyattsville, MD:National Center of Health Statistics, 1988.5. Black J, Shalaby SW, LaBerge M. Biomaterials Education: An Academic Viewpoint.Journal of Applied Biomaterials. 1992;3:231-6.6. Vanderbilt N, Texas, and Harvard-MIT Engineering Research Center.http://www.vanth.org/curriculum/curr_bio_domains.asp.7. Saterbak A, editor Laboratory
Anatomy, Biology, Environmental Science, and even Spanish. Participantsreceived 20 hours of professional development credit.The program was structured into two workshop sessions. The first session, during the summer of2012, consisted of three days of hands-on instruction. It focused on several instructional topics,including (a) Overview of Cloud Services, (b) Storing and Sharing Data in the Cloud, (c) Cloudsin Education and Collaboration in and out of the Classroom, (d) Cloud-based Tools for Real-timeCollaboration, (e) Course Management using Piazza, (f) Standards-based Lesson Planning andPost-workshop Assignment, (g) Creating a Lesson Plan, and (h) Using Public Data SetsAvailable in Amazon’s Cloud. At the end of the three-day workshop
science,mathematics, and the physical and social sciences. As a result, engineers and scientists are better able topredict and optimize systems affecting almost all aspects of our lives and work, including ourenvironment, our security and safety, and the products we use and export. Other benefits include, but arenot limited to:(a) having one-on-one contact with the instructor, (b) improving qualifications, whether for graduateschool or for industry, and (c) increasing self-esteem. The CSET-STEM Scholars will use the trainingmodules used in the computer technology course and in the NSF/HBCU-UP program at XYZ State.Some of these courses and modules are (a) Web programming (b) Game Programming and GraphicalProgramming, and (c) Application software
, and other tutoringsystems,” Educat. Psychologist 46, 197 (2011).2 C. D. Whitlatch, Q. Wang, and B. J. Skromme, “Automated problem and solution generation software forcomputer-aided instruction in elementary linear circuit analysis,” in Proceedings of the 2012 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (Amer. Soc. Engrg. Educat., Washington, D.C., 2012),Session M356.3 B. J. Skromme, C. D. Whitlatch, Q. Wang, P. M. Rayes, A. Barrus, J. M. Quick, R. K. Atkinson, and T. Frank,“Teaching linear circuit analysis techniques with computers,” in Proceedings of the 2013 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (Amer. Soc. Engrg. Educat., Washington, D.C., 2013),paper 7940.4 B. J
required toparticipate in the project activities and in presenting the project results. Each team member wasexpected to have a thorough understanding of the project, make a presentation and assumeleadership responsibility for their portion of the project.Soft skills can be seen in the Technology Accreditation Criteria of ABET. For example,TAC/ABET Criterion 23 lists the eleven areas of expertise a graduate must possess uponprogram completion, known as the “a-k” criterion. Under this standard an engineeringtechnology program must demonstrate that graduates have: 2a. an appropriate mastery of the knowledge, techniques, skills and modern tools of theirdisciplines,b. an ability to apply current knowledge and adapt to emerging applications of
Paper ID #8982A Summer Program to promote an Integrated Undergraduate Research andGroup Design ExperienceDr. Chiang Shih, Florida A&M University/Florida State University Dr. Chiang Shih is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering Department, FAMU-FSU College of Engineer- ing, Florida State University. He received his Ph.D. degree from the Aerospace Engineering Department at University of Southern California in 1988. He has served as the department Chair from 2002 until 2011 and is currently the Director of the Aeropropulsion, Mechatronics and Energy Center established in 2012. He is also the PI of the NSF REU program on