deployment of 15+ courses used at over 10 universities. In addition he leads the technical content for the Electrical and Computer Engineer capstone projects course at OSU. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Longitudinal Study to Develop and Evaluate the Impacts of a“Transformational” Undergraduate ECE Design Program: Study Results and Best Practices ReportAcknowledgement: The authors are grateful for support provided by the National ScienceFoundation grant DUE 1347817. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation
guide students through the cognitive and metacognitive processes of choosingtopics, asking questions, identifying an appropriate problem and locating adequate data sources.The worksheets are introduced in a linear manner and completed in order. This progressive pathis intended to provide a logical and methodical approach for developing research questions.However, each worksheet can be completed independently. The worksheets can also be used as apedagogical approach to introduce research methods into the classroom. The design activityworksheets have been used in multiple venues: undergraduate and graduate data visualizationcourses, workshops and more recently, a graduate seminar designed to help students identifytheir thesis topics in partial
EECS Department. His current research activities include nanomagnetics/spintronics, graphene electron- ics, nanophotonics, and nano-electromechanical systems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Career Development Impacts of a Research Program on Graduate Student and Postdoc MentorsAbstract—This evidence-based practice paper explores how graduate students and postdocsbenefit from serving as mentors to undergraduate research interns. Utilizing three years ofqualitative data from 38 mentors, our findings indicate that mentors feel better prepared forfuture faculty careers as they gain skills in project management, supervision, andcommunication. This paper
in part to thepromise that the flipped classroom design holds for engineering faculty to find a compromisebetween the long-venerated lecture format and the research-based instructional practices ofactive learning. In its idealized form, the flipped design allows instructors to maintain delivery ofcritical theoretical and background information by presenting this material to the students outsideof the formal classroom setting, thus preserving classroom time for more active learning andproblem-based activities [2], [3].Despite the enthusiasm around the flipping movement, there remains relatively littlecomprehensive research on student outcomes in flipped engineering courses, with most availableengineering-related publications focusing on the
several federal agencies including NSF, USDA and NASA. He recently received an NSF-IGE award for launching a new Gradu- ate for Advancing Professional Skills (GAPS) education program, which integrates project management training with thesis research for graduate students.Dr. Ann M Gansemer-Topf, Iowa State University Ann Gansemer-Topf is an Associate Professor in Higher Education and Student Affairs, and Faculty Fel- low in the Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching at Iowa State University She teaches courses in program evaluation and assessment, student affairs and higher education. Her research interests focus on examining the micro (student) and macro (institutional, state, federal) factors that impact
department.INTRODUCTIONUndergraduate students can gain various benefits by conducting research to foster relationshipswith faculty members, discover their interests, and explore and prepare for future academic orprofessional pursuits. Throughout the research process, they can enhance critical and analyticalthinking skills, learn how to collaborate and work effectively as part of a team, and developproblem solving and communication skills. The importance and effectiveness of undergraduateresearch have been highlighted in past studies. Kuh (2008) mentioned that engaging inundergraduate research is identified as a High Impact Practice (HIP), as experience that increasestudent retention and success, and many research studies show that even early engagement inresearch is
Distance Education at Nova Southeastern Education, and an Ed D in Instructional Design and Technology at Nova Southeastern University. If you want to learn more about my work, go to http://www.lilisteiner.com/ c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Dynamics Online Course: A Challenge content delivered with best teaching practices keeps students engagedAbstractDynamics is a core course in the mechanical and civil engineering programs; and, because of itscomplexity, this course continues to represent one of the main challenges facing our students.Historically, faculty were resistant to deliver the content of this course online. In order to offer anequivalent, or
Tulsa, also in Mechanical Engineering. He currently teaches first-year engineering courses as well as various courses in Mechanical Engineering, primarily in the mechanics area. His pedagogical research areas include standards-based assessment and curriculum design, including the incorporation of entrepreneurial thinking into the engineering curriculum and especially as pertains to First-Year Engineering.Dr. Lawrence Funke, Ohio Northern University Dr. Funke received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Notre Dame in 2017. He is currently an assistant professor at Ohio Northern University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Exploring Impacts of a Flipped
Mechanical Engineering. The study uses a material-semioticapproach based on actor-network theory (ANT), which focuses on the interactions betweenpeople, things, and ideas within a constantly shifting network. That approach is used to study theintersections between students’ network of academic practice and the network of industry-basedpractice that they are preparing to enter. Specifically, it looks at how industry-based problemsand examples are represented in material aspects of students’ academic practice throughhomework, lecture slides, and other course materials.The study was designed to provide a foundation for a new initiative being launched in Spring2019. That initiative is part of a multi-year effort in the Department of Mechanical
practice?We consider one aspect of professional practice—failure. Despite many improvement efforts byorganizations, systems engineering failures continue to occur. Previous research identified a set ofcommon causes for these project failures. Does PBL provide students with opportunities to failsafely, and thereby learn to avoid failure in professional practice? We present here an approach tocompare the rates of occurrence of failure causes in student team projects with industry projects.By comparing the occurrence rates, we achieve our first research goal to evaluate whether PBLoffers sufficient opportunities of failure to students. Out of the ten failure causes we examined, wefound that four are underrepresented in PBL, two of which are
. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environ- mental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living- learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service- learning, sustainable engineering, social
, thereports and feedback were treated as exam-like constructs under a fixed mindset by the chaptersand not shared for best practices. Finally, the CFFs components, while purposeful, wereimproperly implemented within the EOYR and NRP’s episodic-oriented components, namely thereports. Thus, during the revision of the NRP, SHPE national leadership provided the NAC the 9opportunity to overhaul the program’s design but constrained to having measurable outcomes andalignment towards SHPE’s mission. The addressable threat for the NAC was that the significantchanges to the NRP would lead to a lack of participation by the chapters. However, the NRP wasintegrated
students’ experience and degree completion. Such challenges havehighlighted the need for further discussion and reform in graduate education. One such examplewas a workshop with graduate students, administrators, faculty members, and postdoctoralresearchers that culminated in suggestions for engineering graduate education: (1) clarifyexpectations, (2) attend to the community, (3) organize the research group for mentoring, and (4)structure student development toward independence [8].A civil engineering research group at a public research-intensive university developed a retreat tosupport socialization, address the aforementioned challenges, and integrate best practices ingraduate education while also drawing on organizational change and workforce
Experimental Education, Educational Psychology and Multivariate Behavioral Research. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 SETS: Lessons Learned and Best Practices of Implementing S-STEM project in the Engineering Technology Department of a Large Urban Minority Serving Public Research Intensive UniversityAbstractsIn this paper, the authors detail their journey implementing a S-STEM project in the EngineeringTechnology Department of a large urban minority serving public research intensive university. Sincereceiving the award on their “Succeed in Engineering Technology Scholars (SETS)” project in 2015,they gathered support from university and college as well as various student support and
GE’s Design for Six Sigma initiative. Dr. Steiner has taught advanced design methods to hundreds of new and experienced engineers. His research interests include; design education, product architecture, mechanical reliability, design for manufacture and quality. Mark graduated from Rensselaer with a B.S. in mechanical engineering in 1978 and a Ph.D. in 1987. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Framework for Developing a Deeper Understanding of the Factors that Influence Success and Failure in Undergraduate Engineering Capstone Design ExperiencesAbstractThe engineering undergraduate curriculum presents substantial opportunities for
, work-life balance and integration into the scientific communitywere cited as the two most common factors in driving them to leave. Issues related to relationshipswith the advisor, department, and the scientific community as a whole are mentioned as negativelyimpacting the students’ experiences in graduate school.While external factors may be at play, few studies have researched how students’ initialexpectations for graduate school impact their experiences. In a case study of two “questioners”(students who are seriously considering leaving their graduate programs) in engineering graduateprograms, the results showed that academic capability and advisor relationships were not majorfactors in each student’s decision to leave [14]. Instead
noted from surveys conducted by the ASCE BOK EducationalFulfillment Committee (BOKEdFC) [7].High-Impact Learning Practices (HILP) have received the attention of higher educationinstitutions due to a developing case of benefits in student engagement, success, and persistence.In 2007, the Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) published theCollege Learning for a New Global Century report and found several promising “high-impact”activities including first-year seminars, common intellectual experiences, learning communities,service learning, undergraduate research, study abroad, internships, and capstone projects,among others. This report recommends that institutions prioritize HILPs to enhance studentengagement and increase
, the effectiveness ofsuch projects within the context of competition is largely unexplored.Surveys of recent graduates will serve as the primary assessment tool for the effectiveness ofinterdisciplinary versus non-interdisciplinary teams and competition versus non-competitionteams. The authors will assess both the impact of student competitions on learning and theimpact of interdisciplinary teams on the learning and effectiveness of competition teams.Additional assessment tools will include competition scores and feedback received from facultymembers based on the performance of the 2020 West Point Steel Bridge Team.IntroductionIt only takes a quick look at the news over the past few years to see that the world is changing ata rapid pace
inquiry-based research experience for teachers," Science Education, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 322-360, 2008.[29] R. J. Miranda and J. B. Damico, "Science teachers’ beliefs about the influence of their summer research experiences on their pedagogical practices," Journal of Science Teacher Education, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1241-1261, 2013.[30] A. L. Zydney, J. S. Bennett, A. Shahid and K. W. Bauer, "Impact of Undergraduate Research Experience in Engineering," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 151-157, 2002.[31] W. Aung, "Undergraduate and graduate education activities of current engineering research centers.," ERC Education Assessment and Dissemination Task Group, 2006.[32] S. H. Russel, "Evaluation of NSF support
on 6 disciplines of study and research:aerodynamics and fluid mechanics; aeroelasticity and structural dynamics; flight mechanics andcontrols; propulsion and combustion; structural mechanics and materials; and system design andoptimization. The school has a faculty of more than 40 tenure-track professors and enrollment ofmore than 1,300 graduate and undergraduate students. There are nearly 20 labs and researchgroups housed within the school.Selected Literature ReviewResearch libraries have provided data management services for over a decade. Many suchservices continue to provide value and to make an impact in their respective researchcommunities. In order to improve data services for research communities, librarians haveconstantly sought
Wighton Fellow for excellence in development and teaching of laboratory-based courses in Canadian UG engineering programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Graduate student pedagogical impact through development and delivery of a collaborative inquiry focused high school STEM programAbstractConsidering a changing academic landscape that desires skill development beyond that oftraditional research, post-secondary STEM students now require broad opportunities to improvetheir translatable skill set. Notably, we routinely observe an increasing number of doctoralstudents focused on developing their teaching skills, given opportunities to pursue
Paper ID #30769Transforming an Engineering Design Course into an Engaging LearningExperience using ePortfoliosMiss Taylor Tucker, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Taylor Tucker graduated from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with a Bachelor’s degree in engineering mechanics and is now pursuing a master’s in Curriculum and Instruction through the Digital Environments for Learning, Teaching, and Agency (DELTA) program. She is interested in engineering design and lends her technical background to her research with the Collaborative Learning Lab, exploring how to improve ill-structured tasks for
Paper ID #28780Student practices developing needs statements for design problemsMr. Robert P. Loweth, University of Michigan Robert P. Loweth is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. He earned a B.S. in Engineering Sciences from Yale University, with a double major in East Asian Studies. He also holds a Graduate Certificate in Chinese and American Studies, jointly awarded by Johns Hopkins University and Nanjing University in China. His research focuses on how undergraduate engineering students solicit information from stakeholders and use this information to assess
the University of Illinois at Chicago. Darrin performs research with the Bioengineering Experience for Science Teachers (BEST) Program as a Graduate Assistant. He has also worked as a high school biology and environmental science teacher for over 10 years. Darrin received his B.A. in Environmental Science from Denison University and an M.A.T. from National Louis University. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Building the Bioengineering Experience for Science Teachers (BEST) Program (Work in Progress, Diversity)INTRODUCTION With the release of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) in 2013, the teachingof
with program faculty. Finally, students created portfolios and individualdevelopment plans which would be expected to support their career development, but studentsreported that these requirements were more onerous than helpful. The D3EM program serves asan example of how impactful programs can be designed to encourage students to explore avariety of potential future career pathways, particularly beyond tenure-track faculty positions.Implications from the findings include the continued implementation of such programs andsustained efforts to change the conversation about PhD careers that reflect the job market andgraduate student interests.Introduction In the past decade, graduate engineering education has emerged as a research
- signed for elementary education majors. He is director of the ASU Physics Teacher Education Coalition (PhysTEC) Project, which strives to produce more and better high school physics teachers. He is also director of Master of Natural Science degree program, a graduate program designed for in-service science teachers. He works on improving persistence of students in STEM majors, especially under-prepared students and students from under-represented groups.Ke Liu, Arizona State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Extending Faculty Development through a Sustainable Community of PracticeAbstractResearch has shown that creating communities of practice can help solidify
, research involvingexchange students and/or multi-location projects, and research project topics having a primarilyhands-on nature vs. hypothesizing/fundamental research. The paper will conclude with reporting andreflecting on their experiences and feedback, the effectiveness of the activities as high-impactlearning experiences, the lessons learned, and best practices moving forward. KeywordsUndergraduate research, Engineering technology, High-impact learning, Honors thesis, Hands-on. IntroductionEngineering technology programs generally have curricula that are very hands-on and experiential innature. As a result, research projects/problems, and more
. To overcome the aforementioned drawbacks of different capstone design patterns, thereform of the capstone design course was conducted at the School of MechanicalEngineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. This reform focuses on cultivatingengineering students by paying attention to both individual and team abilities. This paperpresents the methodology of the redesign of capstone design course in Shanghai Jiao TongUniversity, and the results of a three years’ practice of the capstone design course are alsoanalyzed.2. Related Works Prior research reported capstone design and courses’ positive impact on developingengineering students’ both professional and comprehensive quality and ability, includingmore competitive employability skills [4
-learning community where students learned about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in en- gineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Health Stress and Support System Narratives of Engineering StudentsAbstractAcross the country and the world, health of college students is gaining more deserved attention.In particular, mental and physical health shocks and stresses weigh heavily on engineeringstudents. This work highlights, in their own words, the ways that undergraduate engineeringstudents managed physical
and mentoring philosophies);helping mentees become independent researchers and make appropriate plans for their futurestudies and careers; and fostering an environment that values inclusion, diversity and ethicalresearch practices.Discussions about ethics are woven throughout the CMSE 890 curriculum, in contexts that rangefrom the best practices for handling outlying data in experimental results to the implications ofhow unconscious biases about gender might impact opportunities for women in STEM. Allgraduate students at MSU are required to complete a minimum of 6 hours of discussion-basedtraining in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) prior to graduation. Given the emphasis onethics within this course and the interactive, discussion