’ perceptions is focused on the notion of balance. Consequently, the research questions thatorientate the study are: 1) what do the professional development plans of engineering graduate studentsportray about their striving for balance in their future faculty careers? And 2) how does writing aprofessional development plan with expert guidance in a formal class help these students prepare for afaculty position?Research DesignTheoretical frameworkThe students in the SEP class come from diverse cultural and disciplinary backgrounds, but they all havesomething in common: the motivation to pursue a career in academia as faculty members. Suchmotivation constitutes the common ground explored in search of different approaches to a balancedfaculty life. Among
best with his opening slide captioned “Do I really look like a guy with aplan?” Despite this initial apprehension of coming up with a long term plan, the students foundthe assignment personally rewarding.One revelation from the odyssey project was the vast career opportunities that an engineeringundergraduate degree provides. Universities and career centers have could potentially use thisfindings in organizing career exploration fairs for undergraduate engineering students, exposingthem to different career opportunities after graduation.Barriers to SuccessThough all the students anticipated success after graduation in their odyssey plans, they alsodiscussed barriers to this success. The barriers to success could be categorized as intrinsic
education is often described by faculty and graduate students as “a journey”, “alearning process”, and “a transformative experience”. These descriptions speak to theexperiential nature of doctoral education which aims at bringing about some change in studentsto prepare them for their future career. In the research literature, the path and process ofbecoming an engineering education researcher is an emerging field. In this paper, we present theframing of a co-operative inquiry project to explore our personal growth as graduate students.Co-operative inquiry is a research method in which multiple people share and explore a topicfrom their own perspectives through collective dialogue, reflection, interrogation, andtransformation. Our co-operative
. Julie P Martin, Clemson University Julie P. Martin, Ph.D. is an associate professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson Univer- sity. Her research agenda has focused on diversity and inclusion in engineering education. In particular, her NSF-funded CAREER work has investigated how social relations—operationalized as social capi- tal—influence student academic decisions and success, especially for underrepresented and underserved students. Her CAREER research supports the need for continued proactive outreach, educational and support systems that have the potential to form ”resource-rich” networks in which students receive infor- mation and resources in routine exchanges. Dr. Martin’s current projects
todifferentiate between career certain and uncertain students.In conclusion, the career uncertain students are significantly different than their careercertain counterparts with regard to some of their background characteristics, personality,future career goals, as well as school and work experiences.6. Implications and LimitationsThere are a number of implications that our study suggests to support students to becomecertain (or at least more certain) about their professional future. First, students should beencouraged to take advantage of internship opportunities where possible. In addition,engineering departments should consider how advising systems can foster faculty-studentconversations about possible career options for graduates with an engineering
Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. She is the recipient of a 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Educational Research and Methods Di- vision Apprentice Faculty Grant. She has also been recognized for the synergy of research and teaching as an invited participant of the 2016 National Academy of Engineering
Paper ID #19066Measuring Students’ Subjective Task Values Related to the Post-UndergraduateCareer SearchDr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Dr. Brunhaver joined Arizona State after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She also has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University. Dr. Brunhaver’s research examines the career decision-making and professional identity formation of engineering students, alumni, and
, which is acomponent of job applications for faculty positions. The professional development facet of theprogram includes workshops for writing a CV or a Cover Letter and academic interviewing, attendingdiscipline specific conferences, presenting research, and interviewing faculty members to learn moreabout their career trajectory. The academic life facet includes workshops on the tenure and promotionprocess and student advising, as well as service involvement in the university. Participants alsocomplete a series of interviews of faculty, including administrators, to learn more about their careers.Overall, the program provides a large set of resources, support, and guidance through professionaldevelopment for graduate students who seek to be
/presentation notes and faculty-student interaction. The A/CE3 staff and studentobserver collaborate to create a brief document summarizing major successes and weaknesses ofthe class; these are presented to and discussed with the faculty in a one hour post-observationmeeting. As a graduate student this whole cycle is an immersive learning experience where youtake part in classroom observation training, critically examine several lectures from newerfaculty members, hear from an expert providing feedback to the faculty, and you are also grantedthe opportunity to contribute your student perspective in this process.Focus Groups to Collect Student FeedbackAnother function that the A/CE3 can provide to faculty in the College of Engineering isconducting focus
as exploring students’ conceptions of diversity and its importance within engineering fields.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of
results from individuals’ own values, interests, and preferences for a particular 4career path as well as their pre-existing skills.26 Building occupational knowledge refers to thetangible facts that an individual may have about an occupational position. Such knowledgeresults from personal research, actual exposure to a career path, and training opportunities.Research shows that student veterans are most concerned about finding a job after graduationand thus want to major in fields that will assist this goal.27 Greater understanding of SVEs’career intentions and decisions could boost the graduation rate of student veterans, a trend thathas improved in recent years, according to the Million Records
survey results (n = 116 all students answered every question)This anonymous survey is designed to assess your opinion of your learning in the Engineering Economy coursethat you took, and the use of personal finance examples, assignments and content. Personal finance refers to thefinancial decisions that students face as persons, versus as working engineers. As an example, below are twoequivalent questions both of which teach/test finding the future worth of a present investment:Personal Finance Orientation: An engineer inherits $10,000 on graduation day, and invests it in an account thatearns 2% per year. How much will they have in this account to help with a down payment on a house in 6 years?Engineer/firm Orientation: ABC Inc. invests $10,000
the General and Basic Engineering (GBE) department thattalk about an engineering topic. This exercise serves to serve students in General Engineering, Computer Science,connect the students to their discipline of study, to explore Engineering Technology, and Mechanical Engineering.the human factor associated with engineering, and to have These course sections are coordinated by the Chair of thean informal introduction to public speaking. Our paper GBE department. Faculty include members of the GBEwill help to better explain the reasons behind our chosen
opportunities that are created independent of facultyactivities (e.g., courses for GTAs). This case of an integrated teaching development experiencebrings teaching development for graduate students into the same kinds of department-basedmentoring experiences that are used for their research. In this case, GTAs worked closely with afaculty member on a discipline-based education research project. We recognize that GTAs atsome institutions may be benefitting from mentoring from faculty about their teaching. In thiscase, however, we explored a formal structure in which both GTAs and faculty were learningabout teaching and about discipline-based education research. Exploring how the graduatestudents pushed the faculty to learn more is an area for future
in many educational institutions. The purpose of thismixed method study was two-fold. First, the researchers examined faculty member’s reactions toworking in a culturally diverse environment. Secondly, the researchers wanted to uncover bestpractices or strategies that might improve cultural awareness in workforce development in termsof navigating daily life within an educational institution. This study delved into the experiencesfaculty members reported having in their workplace. The study involved 224 faculty membersacross various departments and career statuses working at a public coeducational researchinstitution in the United States of America. The survey and interview responses to apredetermined set of questions were analyzed in order
Paper ID #18748An Exploration of Female Engineering Students’ Functional Roles in theContext of First-year Engineering CoursesMiss Juebei Chen, Shanghai Jiaotong University Juebei Chen is a graduate student at the Graduate School of Education in Shanghai Jiao Tong University. She obtained a B.Admin in business administration from Minzu University. Her current interest focuses on the cognitive development of engineering graduate and undergraduate students, the assessment of teaching and learning in graduate education.Dr. Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Jiabin Zhu is an Associate Professor at the Graduate School of
intersecting theories that lend themselves well to strategies for the “careand keeping” of graduate students. By considering the processes and mechanisms by whichgraduate students develop, faculty members can reform or revise their leadership practices(formally and informally) to better meet the needs of graduate students at various stages in theiracademic careers. Although these theories may seem disparate, they intersect and overlap in anacademic research group context. As we lead the attendees of this interactive panel workshopthrough the following activities, we ask them to reflect on how these theories impact how theymake decisions for their research group and how theory-guided decisions might help themimprove or plan for effective and productive
different needs andpreferences for teaching development. The two profiles were developed through an exploratory study conducted on the first yearof the groups. The data from the second year will be used to conduct a confirmatory study, whichwill verify the profiles and/or potentially identify new ones. We also aim to explore other effortsof group members that are not about their own teaching improvement. For example, somegroups’ work in our project included directions in educational research or department-levelteaching improvement, which may result in additional profiles. We are also interested in howdifferent group composition functions might impact the types and outcomes of participation thatoccur (e.g., including graduate students, the
joined the Designing Edu- cation Lab to learn more about the drivers of entrepreneurial career goals of students and entrepreneurship in general. Since 2016 he is working full-time for Celonis, an innovative Process Mining software com- pany based in Munich.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading
returning students may feel out of place or unwelcomedin their graduate programs1, 5. An earlier qualitative study of engineering doctoral returners bytwo members of our team7 supports these findings and suggested returners face a number ofcosts, including those related to finances, balance of work and personal responsibilities, theirlevel of academic preparedness, and adapting to the cultural environment of engineering PhDprograms.Despite these challenges, having extensive prior work experience before pursuing PhD workmay prove to be valuable for returners’ academic work. Returners have a wide range of pastpersonal and professional experiences, which may include work in education, industry,government, or the military, that can inform their
, 1996). Because original items were not specificallydeveloped for the target population, we interviewed several key informants to provide context onengineering graduate students’ experiences as they related to their engineering and researchidentities. The key informants were one PhD engineering faculty member, one PhD postdoctoralfellow, one PhD engineer in industry, and four PhD and two master’s students. All intervieweeswere either employed by or alumni of the same large public research university. Some of theinterview questions were “do you consider yourself an engineer?” “do you consider yourself aresearcher?” and “describe a moment when you felt you were doing well in engineering? Whatcontributed to this success?”The initial 81 items were
another endorsement of the ‘you’ve done goodthings.’” He hopes there is more freedom to work and less administrative duties involved in hisnew job after he earns his Ph.D. in comparison to the military lab.KristenSituating the CaseTaking the advice of an engineering faculty member, Kristen joined a non-profit organizationafter graduation for the summer to investigate cookstoves for developing countries. She met herhusband there, and they decided to spend the next few years fulfilling their humanitarian sense ofduty. Kristen was a pre-school teacher, worked with special needs children and adults, and re-joined the non-profit organization as a laboratory manager. She created test protocols, wrotereports, and traveled to developing countries. After
federallyfunded research in mathematics, science, and engineering and encouraging United States citizensto work in these fields. Since we rely on public schools to provide high-school graduatesprepared to enter these careers and task our universities with preparing tomorrow’s innovativeworkforce, it is critical to examine our students’ perceptions of their own skill development,feelings of self- efficacy, and formation of STEM identities throughout the STEM pipeline.Underrepresentation of Women in EngineeringAs an underrepresented group in the STEM fields, young women’s standards for mathematicsachievement are lower than young men’s, resulting in lower self-efficacy and greater feelings ofself-doubt that negatively contribute to a woman’s decision to
engineering graduate programs22 and MOOCofferings, 23 are increasing as computer technology advances. Furthermore, the literature supportsthat e-learning is effective in achieving student learning outcomes.24-26We are in the third year of implementing this curriculum model at our campus. In spring 2016,we launched a pilot program to deploy these e-learning modules in engineering courses at otherinstitutions to assess their effectiveness in developing an entrepreneurial mindset in engineeringstudents. Six e-learning modules were deployed at 25 institutions across the country during the2016-17 academic year. We report findings based on data collected from the fall 2016deployment.BackgroundAt the University of New Haven we employ an innovative
education include service-learning, sustainable engi- neering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Fourth Year Engineering Students’ Descriptions of the Importance of Improving Society Through their Engineering CareersAbstractAs engineering students graduate and enter the workforce, they gain significant responsibility forindividuals and society through their future decisions. Problematically, multiple recent studieshave shown that over their time in college, students tend to become more disengaged from theimpact of their work and their feelings of social responsibility decrease. The question explored inthis research was to determine the
engineering doctoral program to develop at a record pace.Since its inception, the program has grown and prospered. Current enrollment is approximately30 PhD students with two to three students graduating per year. The research productivity of thefaculty members has grown over time along with their connections to local industry. One of thechallenges in being the first doctoral program in the College of Engineering is that the otherdepartments were not as capable of supporting the same level of research and some of theadministrative processes in the university needed to be revised and expanded to support doctoralresearch. For example, an ECE doctoral program will often leverage faculty members andresearch in Physics and Computer Science. At the start
. To date, abundant research exists on the mechanics of teaching ethics, butthere remains a paucity of work investigating what informs faculty decisions to teach ethics (or,conversely, not to teach it) and how they discern the manifold inputs affecting those decisions. Over the past decade, research on engineering ethics in undergraduate programs hasconsidered myriad perspectives. One branch of work has approached it from the studentperspective, ranging from an investigation on student perspectives toward ethics and professionalidentity6 to a more tangential approach looking at students’ views toward social responsibility7.8.A separate branch has also looked at this topic from recent graduates’ perspectives andencounters with ethical
Systems Engineering Research and the Fulbright International Science and Technology Award. Dr. Salado holds a BSc/MSc in electrical engineering from Polytechnic University of Valencia, an MSc in project management and a MSc in electronics engineering from Polytechnic University of Catalonia, the SpaceTech MEng in space systems engineering from Delft University of Technology, and a PhD in systems engineering from the Stevens Institute of Technology. He is a member of INCOSE and a senior member of IEEE and IIE.Mr. John Ray Morelock, Virginia Tech John Morelock is a doctoral candidate at Virginia Tech. His research interests include student motivation, game-based learning, and gamified classrooms. He received the NSF
reported that high student loan debt may cause frictionin a student’s ability to pursue graduate education or achieve financial independence4. A 2016survey, given to major manufacturing executives from the National Association ofManufacturers, showed that a leading indicator of the disparity of employable STEM candidatesin the manufacturing industry, is due to the failure to provide students with career coaching thatpaints an accurate picture of the many occupational opportunities for STEM-trained graduates5.This survey was discussed at the 2016 National Academic Press conference where one executiveclaimed that another solution to resolve this shortage to reinforce the concept to students thatlearning is a lifetime notion required for career
joining Carnegie Mellon University as a Teaching Faculty in August 2016. Dr. Bedillion’s research interests include distributed manipulation, control applications in data storage, control applications in manufacturing, and STEM education.John Ziadat, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Mr. Ziadat received his Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines & Technology (SDSM&T) in 2014 before going to work for Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX) in Hawthorne, CA as a Mechanical Design Engineer. In 2015, his decision to pursue graduate studies in Mechanical Engineering led him back to SDSM&T, where his thesis topic involves the numer- ical simulation of ballistic