• Class Project • Extra CreditEach of these folders contains information that would traditionally be distributed during classtime in hard copy. With the course information and handouts online, the students can access thisinformation at anytime and anyplace. This also reduces the amount of printing and copying bythe instructor prior to class time and enables the instructor to better prepare for class.Course InformationPertinent course information is uploaded into the course information folder. The courseinformation folder contains the following files: • Course Syllabus • Lecture/Laboratory Schedule • Other Handouts “Proceedings of the 2007 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for
laboratory instructors control the student’senvironment because they have monopoly on every single laboratory activity [5].However, there seems to be a lack of this type of monopoly in a distributed laboratoryenvironment. Students have their own control of pace, duration of their laboratories, andeven control the outcomes of their laboratory exercises. Thus, additional guidelines andstandards are crucial to the new online computer network laboratory modules. Newmeans and resources are developed to ensure the same goals are achieved in the onlinecomputer network laboratory: • Learning contracts – enhanced course syllabus and detailed lab manuals • Online course and multiple dimensional instructional strategies – a variety of means for
Course Management Service (CMS)The CMS became the online framework for the course called COSC 490 – Cyberinfrastructure.The CMS software and systems developed by CART at BSC allowed for full online courseadministration and access to syllabus, outline, surveys, quizzes, testing, reading material, chat,instructor collaboration and general remote student communication as substantiated in the articlereferenced above.Supplemental Materials Used and Online Course DevelopmentThe course modules were designed for flexibility for the BSC professors, students, and the VBIteam. As a test deployment, we needed to provide multiple instructor and assessment officerprivileges and the CMS accommodates this requirement seamlessly. To supplement themodules, BSC
before the next module becomes available. This assures that thematerial is delivered to the student in the designed and logical progression so there is no randomdelivery of the course material. The Exercise components address individual elements within theclass projects. They provide the student with the blueprints for successfully completing the classprojects.The online course ended up having ten modules: an introductory module, eight modulescontaining course content, and one module dedicated to the review of the course. Once thecontent of the course was developed, the syllabus was re-written and the course schedule wasdeveloped. An extremely important element of an online course is the Course Introduction. TheIntroduction sets the tone of the
Course Menu Item Department Content Item Information Table* Course Link Syllabus Link to S.O.E.T Folder Syllabus* Assignment Tool Course Outline Communication/ Tools Learning Outcomes* Week 1 Required Reading Week 2 Lecture Notes and Charts Week 3 Week 4 Chat Topic (Course Link) Communication
CD. Instructors use various approachesfor providing course content. The course material can consist of a course syllabus and/ora getting started overview, posted in-class presentation slides, lecture notes, recordedaudio based lectures, assignment descriptions, textbooks, articles, links and additionalresources and supplemental material.The learner-instructor interaction, the dialog and feedback between the learner andinstructor, is implemented through many mechanisms. During the online course, theinstructor proactively interacts with the students in a variety of ways, depending on thestyle and preferences of the instructor, as well as the nature of the course content.Instructors use a combination of weekly online discussions, e-mail, web
best practices in the classroom. The responsesfrom public 2-year educational institutions in North Carolina had three major areas of using bestpractices and they were: timely feedback, 74.1%; supporting students through onlinecommunication, 66.7%; and using discussion boards to facilitate interaction, 63.0%.Respondents also rated highly using online assessment tools (e.g. quizzes), 55.6%; setting rulesor a friendly online environment, 55.6%; providing introduction activities, 55.6%; and providingdetailed syllabus information (e.g. learning modules), 59.3.The responses from the public 4-year educational institutions in North Carolina had similarresponses with use of the following best practices in their online courses: timely feedback,75.0
blocks, attributes, and external referencesPart 3: Isometric drawing and three-dimensional modeling • Isometric drawing • Wireframe models • Surface models • Solid modelsMIT3301 course has the following course management modules in the WebCT system. • Course syllabus and information • Calendar, tips and grade book • Lecture materials and extra study materials • Tests, labs, practice quizzes, and homework • Discussions, chat and e-mail • SupplementsThis course has been successfully delivered as a hybrid engineering course before its onlineoffer. Based on the students’ interest, MIT3301 has been scheduled fully online since thesummer semester of 2005. There were twelve undergraduate students registered in
University of Memphis. Although delivered in a traditional face-to-face classroom setting,the course was "web-assisted" since a number of course materials were provided online.MethodsThe introductory thermodynamics course used in the study is taken by most engineering majorsin the college. It covers the First and Second Laws along with a number of other topics usuallycovered in such a course. Traditionally this course has been taught using the familiar chalk andblackboard approach. A few years ago, however, the course moved from the traditional approachto one of being web-assisted, meaning that a number of course materials were made available tostudents online. These materials included the course syllabus, assignments, homework solutions,class
technicalrecommendations. The preceding steps constitute the milestones in the project, allowing studentsto receive timely feedback prior to project completion.The course webpage, http://www.ee.calpoly.edu/~dbraun/courses/TGE/UNIV350.html1, containsvaluable course resources in addition to those described in this work. Page 12.946.2Learning Objectives and OutcomesConceived as the capstone course for the Minor in Environmental Studies, the course seeks toachieve an ambitious scope of objectives; perhaps too ambitious. The course syllabus describesthe course goals: “This interdisciplinary course enables students to examine global environmental issues from
Mechanics of Materials course offered at the South Dakota School of Mines andTechnology (SDSM&T). The students chose the source of the problem, made assumptions onthe behavior of the drill based on observations and some online research, modeled the behavior,solved for the internal stress and angle of twist, and evaluated the design based on theirobservations and calculations. While textbook problems have improved in how they try tomodel realistic situations, they still present examples in which all of the variables have beenpredetermined and for which there is a unique solution. Typical homework problems do notdevelop student skills in unstructured problem solving, emphasized in ABET 20004 criteria.Student developed problems help the students
it came to several of theseconcepts, some of them are strongly engrained from childhood experiences. These initialexercises involve use of the entire first day of class. On the second day, the course syllabus ispresented along with the various activities students will perform during the semester and thecourse learning objectives. To give the reader an idea of the course content and coverage, anabbreviated list of the course overview and objectives is given below:Course Overview and Objectives: Page 12.1109.4This course is designed for the science or engineering major at the junior level or above. At theconclusion of the course, the student
in electronics has a one unit laboratory associated with it. This work results from effortsto enhance the lecture portion of the course. The most recent course syllabus details coursemechanics and how the course schedules reading, homework, quizzes, midterm exams, a finalexam, and the course project.4Project AssignmentsThe projects focus on digital electronics subsystems. Table 1 lists project problems assigned todate. Complete assignments and a subset of student work appear online.4 Not as significant as theVLSI projects students would complete in a senior level IC design course, the design projectspoint in the direction of VLSI design by requiring similar and simpler analysis and simulationsupport. The projects have wider scope than
, Rebecca Maguda, and the EMET ProgramCoordinator, Irene Ferrara, worked cooperatively from February through May 2006 to developtopics for a one-credit course intended for advanced standing EMET students, in order to helpprepare them for the process of securing employment as well as succeeding in industry. Theoriginal syllabus for the course can be found in Appendix 1.Course ImplementationIn fall of 2006, eleven senior BSEMET students participated in the first offering of theEngineering Business Skills course. The class met for 75 minutes twice per week, for half of thesemester. During the first three weeks of class, students engaged in a variety of activitiesintended to prepare them for the Fall Career Fair at The Pennsylvania State University
courses itwill be of great benefit to us to examine and discuss the best practices already developed by theCDIO partners.CDIO will strongly influence our programs as we seek to apply the 12 CDIO Standards and theCDIO Syllabus to our new and existing courses. Although we have already applied some of thegeneral principles, CDIO provides a well thought-out, well-organized template forimplementation.Both of our new engineering programs are still under development and will continue to changesignificantly over the next few years. The course sequencing in our current catalog can beviewed online at (http://content.dwc.edu/pdf/catalog/currentcatalog.pdf). Both BS programscontain five-semester design sequences. We have also increased the number of credits
discussion.Students will generally only remember the instructor’s comments as they relate to the grade.In this modified method, an online critique is assigned as homework immediately after the in-class critique. Students provide the instructor with small, JPEG-formatted graphic files of theirwork, or links to the course server, which are posted on Blackboard. Students use these to referback to the work as they complete an on-line survey form incorporating Rikert scales andcomment fields for specific subjective criteria for each work being evaluated.To accomplish this, phpESP, an open source, easy-to-use software package for creating,deploying and managing web surveys is used. With phpESP, you can create a survey through aweb interface without having to
AC 2007-1800: SELF-PACED LABORATORY MODULES FOR ENGINEERINGMATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES LABORATORY COURSECarolyn Skurla, Baylor University Carolyn Skurla is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. She received a B.S. in Biomedical Science from Texas A&M University and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Colorado State University. In addition to the freshman engineering course, Dr. Skurla teaches courses in materials engineering, biomaterials, and biomedical engineering. Her research interests are in biomaterials and total joint replacements. Page
discussion time to solicit feedback from thestudents midway through the semester in order to make any necessary mid-course corrections.One problem encountered by the authors was the result of them carrying a full teaching load on-campus, with one of the authors carrying a teaching overload. This made rapid turnaround ofgraded assignments problematic. All lectures were not completed prior to the beginning of the Page 12.500.8semester, and this caused problems in the latter half of the semester. Some lectures had to bepresented out of order in order to work around lectures that were not ready for presentation ontheir designated date on the syllabus. In
teaching in the Republic of Korea (South Korea). Isubmitted my curriculum vitae and proposed course syllabus to Kyungpook NationalUniversity’s Office of International Affairs, doubtful that a technical-writing course would bewelcomed by KNU’s engineering program. Instead, the course was well received by KNU’sDepartment of English Language and Literature. By June 2006, I was teaching and livingabroad—only my second time ever to travel overseas and my first time to travel internationallyalone.Teaching and living abroad, even if only for one summer, was one of my most professionallychallenging and personally rewarding experiences. Not only has the experience expanded myteaching repertoire, but it has also informed and improved my interactions with
facilitate their participation in summer internships in industry and governmentallabs.Proposed ActivitiesIt is evident from various studies that active learning experiences through the use of appropriateinstructional technology can serve as a stimulus to attract students to any specific field includingengineering. Therefore, the program will be structured to meet the following objectives:1) To teach how scientists and environmental engineers use molecular biology based methods asresearch tools. This will be accomplished by three mechanisms:a. Fundamental discussion of molecular biology skills. Introductory materials will be expandedto include thirty percent of the total course (5 of 15 lectures, see course syllabus) in order to helpclarify the
MUSE program. In the precedingFall (i.e., in Fall 2005 for a course to be taught in Fall 2006), the faculty must submit a one-pagecourse proposal form that includes: a proposed title, the GE area requested for the course, a shortcourse description, a brief bio, and signatures of the Department Chair and Dean. A Januaryorientation workshop is required for new MUSE faculty and optional for returning MUSEfaculty. At the orientation workshop, the faculty are put into a peer review group by GE areawith a faculty coordinator. In addition to creating a course syllabus for the class, the facultymember must complete a MUSE checklist that indicates how their course meets both the MUSEand the General Education goals for their GE area.The peer group works
AC 2007-2525: THE BLENDED CLASSROOM: THE BEST OF BOTH WORLDS?Sophia Scott, Southeast Missouri State University Dr. Sophia Scott is an Assistant Professor at Southeast Missouri State University in the Department of Industrial and Engineering Technology. She teaches both undergraduate and graduate courses. She is currently interested in using face to face, blended, and online course formats to increase student learning, problem solving, project management and teaming. Page 12.1391.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 The Blended Classroom: The Best of Both Worlds?AbstractMost
developed in order to guideand provide support for both Learning Managers and Content Integrators. Resource Materialswould include Training for Learning Managers, Student Advisors, and Content Integrators,Procedures for online learning, and Support Websites. Course materials would include learningobjectives for the course, course mapping, matching objectives with content and evaluations,examples of high quality assignments, discussion topic outline & supporting materials, readings& supporting articles, suggested textbooks, and a list of faculty resource websites. TheStructured Course Frame would include: course plans (syllabus), high quality video, & audio,conferencing/chat/threaded discussions, textbooks, student notes, interactive
course syllabus is developed and posted onthe intranet and Blackboard to facilitate student access to course information, course content andto provide consistency and transparency of all course syllabi. All course syllabi use the mastercourse syllabus as a basis to cover course content and provide information on which learningoutcomes are covered.4. Learning Outcomes in the Master Course SyllabusThe master course syllabus is a critical component that addresses the integration of desiredlearning outcomes into particular courses. A master course syllabus is developed for all IS coreand elective courses. The components of the master course syllabus include course number andtitle, objectives, topics, learning outcomes, and evidence of outcome
. Page 12.1500.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Training of Teaching Assistants on Technology Driven Lesson DevelopmentAbstractThe Graduate Teaching with Technology Certificate (GTTC) course is a 28 contact hour trainingprogram for graduate student teaching assistants intending to become faculty members. Theprogram combines technology with pedagogy to better enable participants to design instructionand integrate technology to enhance student learning. After being introduced to a number oftechnology tools currently used for instruction, participants develop a one-hour online lessonutilizing any or all of the tools. Peer and instructor feedback is utilized to help guide
implementation of a project-centric bioinformatics course for CI-TEAM demonstration.alignments, phylogenetic tree production, and genome alignment software in Toolbus (He et al.,2005)8. A variety of software sources were introduced for sequence alignment and phylogenetictree production and viewing, however BSC professors tested and chose an appropriate source forits own use.The Center for Applied Research and Technology, Inc. (CART) Course Management Service(CMS) became the online framework for the course called COSC 490 – Cyberinfrastructure. TheCMS software and systems developed by CART at BSC allowed for full online courseadministration and access to syllabus, outline, surveys, quizzes, testing, reading material, chat
motivatedto do the hard work of solving the quantity and variety of problems needed for learning, withoutdemoralizing penalties for making mistakes while learning. Further, many professors prefer touse homework scores as a significant portion of the final course grade because it is difficult totest students on such a wide variety of problems.To achieve these goals, several homework options exist for the professor: traditional homework,homework that is graded online 3, 4, and homework that is assigned but not graded. Each of thevarious approaches addresses the homework balancing act differently, and each has itsdrawbacks (Table 1). An alternative approach described in this paper incorporates many of thebenefits of these various methods in a manner
Virginia Tech’s Institute for Distance and Distributed Learning (IDDL). She coordinates the end-of-course student and instructor perceptions of eLearning online survey processes, collaborates with academic departments to facilitate research in eLearning environments, and provides leadership in assessment. Her Ph.D. in Educational Research Methodology and her Masters in Science Education are from The University of Virginia. She also has a Masters in Business from Columbia University. Dr. Tretola has more than twenty years of experience in science and technical education across higher education, government and corporate sectors. She has managed all aspects of the instructional process including
an enduring, strong and personal commitment to underrepresented engineering students and faculty Page 12.305.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Benefits of a Tutorial Mathematics Program for Engineering Students Enrolled in PreCalculus: A Template for AssessmentAbstractAn interactive online tutorial program (ALEKS) was the focus of an engineering course createdto increase the success of engineering students in a Precalculus class. Engineering students wereembedded in two Precalculus courses with other students. An assessment rubric for measuringthe effect of ALEKS on Precalculus grades of
design of AL mode courses andrequirements, as described below: • Each course offered via AL mode was designated as second section of the on-campus course and the students could elect one of the two sections depending on the preference. The same instructor handled both the sections. • The College developed its own AL infrastructure with custom-designed website and a dedicated server that could handle a large number of students at any given moment. The instructors posted their instructional and course related material (course syllabus, course calendar, lecture notes, assignments, practice problems, etc.) on the site; the course site could be accessed only by students registered in the course. They could