and curricular resources forachieving engineering literacy for all. This resource exchangedocument will provide a brief introduction to the framework andexplore how the highlighted concepts can build upon each otherto influence more immediate and purposeful instructionalpractice. The complete framework can be downloaded forfree at https://p12framework.asee.org/.Defining Engineering Learning: The framework operationally defines Engineering Learning as three-dimensional which includes 1) the Engineering Habits of Mind (i.e., Optimism, Persistence, Creativity,Systems Thinking, Collaboration, and Conscientiousness) that students should develop over time throughrepetition and conditioning, 2) the Engineering Practices (i.e., Engineering Design
Paper ID #32573Can I have More Problems to Practice? Student Usage and Course SuccessRelated to Auto-graded, End-of-chapter Problems in a Material and EnergyBalances CourseKayla Chapman, Kayla Chapman is currently studying chemical engineering at the University of Toledo and expects to earn a B.S. degree in 2021. She has assisted with multiple areas of research and data analysis regarding zyBooks reading participation and challenge activities. She became interested in performing research after completing a chemical engineering course that used zyBooks.Prof. Matthew W. Liberatore, The University of Toledo Matthew W
Paper ID #32807The Development of Techie TimesMr. Brian D. Tedeschi, Purdue University, West Lafayette Brian Tedeschi is a current Graduate Student at Purdue University with research interests in STEM Educa- tion and informal learning environments. Brian received his Bachelor’s Degree from Purdue University in Mechanical Engineering Technology and is currently working towards a Master’s degree in Engineering Technology.Ms. Julia K. Miller, Purdue University, West Lafayette Julia Miller is a Grad Student pursuing a masters in Engineering Technology with a specialization in engi- neering/STEM education research at Purdue
increasingly complex world, higher educationinstitutions are more and more promoting entrepreneurial mindset and integratingentrepreneurship elements in their programs. Integration of entrepreneurially minded learning inengineering courses, which promotes entrepreneurial mindset and skills, is an approach that isgaining momentum among individual faculty members. This paper presents such effort involvinga junior level engineering statistics course. Given the abundance of data in today’s world and theimportance of extracting meaning out of them, statistics is an important tool for any disciplineincluding engineering. This importance is summed up in the following quote from WalterShewhart, who is known as the father of statistical quality control: “The
, conflict mediator and restorative justice facilitator and trainer. Annie is committed to transformative education that engages the whole person. She is inspired to cultivate the emotional intelligence and leadership effectiveness of students, staff and professionals. She is a certified Search Inside Yourself teacher; a mindfulness-based emotional intelligence program for leaders.Dr. Doug Reeve P.Eng., University of Toronto Dr. Reeve was the founding Director (Emeritus) of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engi- neering (ILead) (2010-2018) at the University of Toronto. After a lengthy career as a consulting engineer he made development of personal capability central to his work with engineering students
limitations at the time of the model implementation by theprofessors of the discipline, primarily in the competence of the conceive, design, implement,operate cycle. It is then assumed that a faculty member is expected to demonstrate her or his ability in the competencies proposed by the model. Specifically, CDIO Standards 9 and 10 address the issue of faculty training for the development of these competencies.[4]. With this in mind, the current research seeks to answer the question, do the faculties of engineering schools need to improve and update their knowledge, skills and attitudes in order to demonstrate their ability to guarantee the learning process of students under the requirements of engineering education standards such as CDIO or ABET
), working on initiatives to protect the watershed by bringing value to waste up-stream and transparency to the state of water quality. ● Twain High School, partnering for the participation of pregnant and parenting teens in a USD interdisciplinary course, Creative Minds, that combines ways of thinking from theatre, mathematics and engineering, to create tools or manipulatives that can be used by young children to facilitate mathematical learning. ● Viejas Band of the Kumeyaay Nation, enabling USD engineering students and Kumeyaay children to exchange ideas, collaborate, and share cultural knowledge in their Science Technology Engineering Art and Math (STEAM) lab. ● Waste for Life, supporting communities to develop
inengineering education focusing on women in engineering. We considered the context ofinclusive curriculum and showed the importance of a sense of belonging in developingengineering identity. Sense of belonging is a salient factor that enhances in-group feelingsthat confirm group membership and help develop stronger identity with the group [19]. Whileplanning and designing an intervention for empowering women in engineering classrooms, itshould be kept in mind whether the intervention is able to foster a sense of belonging in away that women feel they are a part of the engineering community. Strengthening groupdynamics can help minimize climate effects. So, interventions should be designed aroundincreasing women students’ belongingness in an
Utilization by U.S. College Students: 10-Year Population-Level Trends (2007–2017)," Psychiatric Services, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 60-63, 2019/01/01 2018, doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800332.[10] E. K. Czyz, A. G. Horwitz, D. Eisenberg, A. Kramer, and C. A. King, "Self-reported Barriers to Professional Help Seeking Among College Students at Elevated Risk for Suicide," Journal of American College Health, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 398-406, 2013/10/01 2013, doi: 10.1080/07448481.2013.820731.[11] D. Eisenberg et al., "The Healthy Minds Study: 2018-2019 Data Report," 2019.[12] S. A. Wilson, Hammer, J.H., Usher, E.L., "Engineering Student Mental Health: Analysis of national data from the Healthy Minds Study," in American Institute of
Paper ID #33435Student Communication of Engineering Design Solutions (Fundamental)Alexandria Muller, University of California, Santa Barbara Alexandria is a third-year doctoral student working with Dr. Danielle Harlow in the Gevirtz Graduate School of Education at University of California, Santa Barbara. She received her B.S. in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology from the University of Arizona in 2017. She has worked with informal science institutions for the past 11 years, including The Chandler Museum, Tucson Children’s Museum, and Biosphere 2. Currently, her research interests are facilitator, curriculum and exhibit
construction and implementation of engineering designs at scale.Some students went as far as to state that a lack of foresight about the consequences is simple,“bad practice” and thus directly hints at irresponsible innovation. “…it is incredibly important to consider in order to understand past, present, and future implications of technologies’ applications.” Student 14 “[Engineers]…in the design or production stages must keep in mind that their solution may have unintended consequences.” Student 23 “At the same time people solving these problems using engineering techniques must take into account the social implications. As many solutions can have consequences beyond what was initially intended.” Student 26
Paper ID #33459Framing Engineering as Community Activism for Values-Driven Engineer-ing(RFE Design and Development - Year 2)Dr. Joni M. Lakin, University of Alabama Joni M. Lakin (Ph.D. , The University of Iowa) is Associate Professor of Educational Research at the University of Alabama. Her research interests include educational assessment, educational evaluation methods, and increasing diversity in STEM fields.Dr. Daniela Marghitu, Auburn University Dr. Daniela Marghitu is a faculty member in the Computer Science and Software Engineering Department at Auburn University, where she has worked since 1996. She has published
Paper ID #33096Redefining Student Preparation for Engineering Leadership UsingModel-Based Systems Engineering in an Undergraduate CurriculumProf. George Frederick Halow, University of Michigan George F. Halow is named Professor of Practice in Aerospace Engineering effective May 1st, 2019 and is specializing in teaching leadership and professionalism in engineering. He is the winner of the 2020 Sigma Gamma Tau Silver Shaft Award as the top teacher in Aerospace Engineering, and the 2021 Aerospace Engineering Department Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Impact Award. Prior to his appointment at the University of Michigan
]. Shortly after World War I, there was an increasing classconsciousness within the American Society of Mechanical Engineers which led Thorstein Veblen[36], however erroneously, to posit in Engineers and the Price System that if there were to be aworkers’ revolution in industrial America, it would come via a “Soviet of Technicians.” Layton[37] unpacks Veblen’s errors in reading the power, position, and organization of the engineeringprofession.This internal contradiction has historically led to tensions within groups of engineers, with moremanagerial-minded engineers veering and lobbying for the growth of professional societies,which largely worked to exclude other technical workers as a means to protect the white-collarclass position of engineers
Paper ID #34151Are Civil Engineers ”Practicing What They Preach?”Nathalie Al Kakoun, Swansea University Nathalie Al Kakoun holds a BEng in Civil Engineering (Hons) and is now pursuing a multidisciplinary PhD, crossing engineering with psychology, at Swansea University. Nathalie is currently researching and designing interventions that characterise empathy and social consciousness in engineers and civil engineering design processes. She is also currently researching engineering mindsets, attempting to un- derstand (and further align) the compatibility of engineering mindsets to engineers’ engagement with public
organizations, low levels ofretention and promotion of racial minorities and women in the workplace indicate a lack ofinclusion within workplace cultures (Cook & Glass, 2013; Giscombe & Mattis, 2002; Hom &Ellis, 2008). With this in mind, ABET’s approach to Criteria 3 specifically identifies the abilityto create inclusive environments in engineering teams. Creating these inclusive environments requires individuals to practice behaviors thatfoster individuals’ feelings of belonging. Shore, Randel, Chung, and Dean (2011) go one stepbeyond belongingness in their definition of inclusion to include “the degree to which anemployee perceives that he or she is an esteemed member of the work group throughexperiencing treatment that satisfies
will help them as they progress into upper level-engineering classes.However, many students initially resist the provided steps for problem solving. At the beginningof the semester, students complain that the strategy is lengthy and 22% of students do not see thebenefit, while 19% of students said that the method helped them avoid making mistakes [14]. Atthe end of the semester, 52% of students reported that the method got easier with time, while thenumber of students who said it helped them avoid mistakes or find mistakes increased to 22% and30%, respectively [14]. Our intervention was designed with two things in mind; 1) If we reinforcedthe problem-solving strategy in more classes, it would help them catch their mistakes in PHY160and 2) if
mathematics,” Washington, DC: Office of the President, 2012.[8] N. B. Honken and P. Ralston, “Freshman engineering retention: A holistic look,” J. STEM Educ. Innov. Res., vol. 14, no. 2, 2013.[9] J. S. Eccles and A. Wigfield, “In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs,” Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 215–225, 1995, doi: 10.1177/0146167295213003.[10] J. L. Meece, A. Wigfield, and J. S. Eccles, “Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 82, no. 1, p. 60, 1990, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.60.[11] T. Perez, J. G
Paper ID #33631Assessing Metacognition Awareness of Freshmen Engineering StudentsMuhammad Dawood, New Mexico State University Dr. Muhammad Dawood received his BE degree from the NED University of Engineering and Technol- ogy, Karachi, Pakistan, 1985, and his MS and Ph.D. degrees, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, in 1998 and 2001, respectively, both in electrical engineering. Dr. Dawood is involved in teaching both nationally and internationally since 1995. At present, Dr. Dawood is an Associate Professor at the Klipsch School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New Mexico State University (NMSU), Las Cruces, New
themajority of caregivers shared how this engineering design program afforded them time to spendwith their child(ren), as well as make connections with their child(ren). As one caregiver stated,it allowed her a space to enter into her son’s domain. “…having to do it as a family brought mecloser to Zac, and to his mind, and to his world.” This was dedicated time and space that wasoften spent on the chaotic day-to-day tasks. As stated by another caregiver, “I guess the mostthing that I got out of the program is that it gave me a chance to do something with my kidsbecause there wasn't a lot of time that was put in to doing things with them. Between me going towork, them at school, coming home and running over here, running over here, trying to
the parent of one student participant and knows theother two children. The children may have felt compelled to give answers that they thought theauthor wanted to hear during the interviews and the sessions themselves.Because this was a one-time limited experience of three children during extraordinary times, theresults may not be broadly applicable. The research questions should be further addressed withstudies on a larger number of children and in different settings.References[1] L. Vygotsky, "Biographical Note," in Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge, MA, London, England, Harvard Univresity Press, 1978, pp. 15-16.[2] C. M. Cunningham and C. P. Lachapelle, "Designing engineering experiences to engage
can do that, a child can do that" (Prof. N.-E) Engineering education: More "It's probably only about 20%, the deep technical knowledge, and the than "intellectual" skills rest is kind of being able to make it happen" (Prof. B.-E)Perception of the What for? "higher-order skills, I think, is one of those areas of connectivityintegration because successful engineer and successful artists have to employ critical thinking, they have to identify problems or re-identify problems and questions, they have to be open-minded to solutions
Paper ID #34949Identifying Signature Pedagogies in a Multidisciplinary EngineeringProgramDr. Kimia Moozeh, University of Toronto Kimia Moozeh has a PhD in Engineering Education from University of Toronto. She received her Hon. B.Sc. in 2013, and her Master’s degree in Chemistry in 2014. Her dissertation explored improving the learning outcomes of undergraduate engineering laboratories by bridging the learning from a larger context to the underlying fundamentals, using digital learning objects.Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto Lisa Romkey serves as Associate Professor, Teaching Stream and Associate Chair, Curriculum
Paper ID #33453Migrator Stories in an Aerospace Engineering ProgramDr. Devayan D. Bir, Loras College Prior to teaching at Loras College, Devayan pursued his doctorate in Aerospace Engineering at Iowa State University and has worked as a Computer Aided Analyst in India. He earned his B.E. in Aeronautical Engineering, and has been passionate about Aerospace Engineering all his life. Hobbies include playing the guitar, soccer, and photography. Research interests include innovative pedagogies (Active, Flipped, and Online instruction) and applied numerical methods. Devayan has published peer reviewed papers, presented at
interviews with faculty, and email exchanges. Supplemented by field notes, a total of60 audio recordings, at least an hour each, were transcribed. A data log provides a summary ofthis data corpus, with data categorized as containing information about various topics (e.g.,assessment, technical writing instruction, learner-centeredness).The research team, composed of a learning scientist, a change management specialist, qualitativeresearchers, graduate assistants, and engineering faculty, individually reviewed the selected data withthe OCBs and Scott’s framework in mind, then met to discuss our interpretations [33]. Thisprocess also enabled the research team to perform member checking to establish trustworthiness ofinterpretations [34].To enhance the
support from role models (extrinsic) were major factors inhelping participants break barriers to engineering. L4 described how concepts didn’t come easyto her, “I just tend to work harder, but I had to work harder because I didn't come this natural tome as it would come to them” (L4). M5 struggled greatly in her calculus course and overcamethat as a barrier, “I started working really hard… I liked putting in hard work and seeing that Ican, I can get smarter and I can learn things if I put my mind to it” (M5). Barriers included thetraditional male dominated STEM classroom. M5 went on to describe challenges in a maledominated classroom that included both high school and her college experience, “I'm kind of lefton my own. I don't really get a
“engineering BS programs are notdesigned for team-based curriculum, even though team projects are paramount to engineeringpositions in the real world [16].”Another study focused on the differences between behaviors/skills of senior engineering studentsand actual skill requirements that professionals desire in the field. Among the findings is adisconnect of course outcomes and the competencies of interest to professionals. Industryprofessionals were more interested in graduates that had fundamental skills -- like being willing toask questions or say “I don’t know,” or being curious and open-minded to information and ideas -- rather than what the students were demonstrating in terms of technical accomplishment [17].These disconnects between the
in mind. It was in the memo-writingprocess that I began to link my findings back to postfeminist theories and frameworks regardinggender and work and tie themes together. Throughout the process, I was struck by the fact thatpracticing engineers on the site describe how they love their jobs, but are very vocal about thefact that they face barriers because they are women and that engineering is a difficult anddemanding profession. Furthermore, young women are encouraged to use individual strategiesthat often focus on cultivating a confident subjectivity and engaging in hard work to overcomebarriers in engineering. While such advice may seem to progressive, in many ways it contributesto the maintenance of gender inequalities in
keep in mind as we modify existing features and implement new ones? Based on your analysis of the space, identify one social distancing challenge that your team will address in that space. Propose a solution to address the challenge to ensure the space can be safely used when social distancing is the norm.The experience was designed so participants would learn about and receive resources related toengineering practices [7, 8]: a) the engineering design process [1] and human centered-design[9], b) the engineering habits of mind [10], and c) engineering notebooks [11]. The committeegathered materials that could serve as references about the pandemic, such as health guidelinesand suggestions for schools. These
today’s global economy, engineering graduates need to be prepared to possess both a strongtechnical skill set and an entrepreneurial mindset (EM) to drive innovations. According toKriewall and Mekemson [1], “an entrepreneurial minded engineer (i.e., an engineer instilled withthe entrepreneurial mindset) places product benefits before design features and leveragestechnology to fill unmet customer needs”. So, an engineer that is entrepreneurially minded canfocus on unmet customer needs and consider the benefits and impact of their designs in additionto their technical details. Many engineering programs and educators have now recognized theimportance of instilling an entrepreneurial mindset and many efforts have been made to improveprograms and