effective college teacher. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Institutional Data as Motivation for Course-Level Change in EngineeringIntroduction and BackgroundFor decades, studies have called for attention to recruiting and retaining a diverse studentpopulation in STEM fields and increasing the numbers of STEM graduates [1, 2]. Multiplestudies have documented an “achievement gap” in terms of success for under-representedminorities (URM) [3] and first-generation college students [4], and also provide a multitude ofsuggestions for better supporting these students at the institutional and classroom levels [3, 5].In 2019, ASEE
brand, strengths,values, identity, power, privilege, bias, and microaggressions. The focus extended beyond genderto include race, sexual orientation, physical ability, and other categories of social identity.Gender non-binary students had the opportunity to choose between either of the two courses. InAutumn 2019, the courses’ enrolled students were limited to new first year engineering studentswho self-selected to take part in a pilot “Inclusive Leadership Cohort”. Students in this cohorttook the Inclusive Leadership Course concurrently with the first two required engineeringcourses in their first two semesters at The Ohio State University. Due to COVID, in Autumn2020, the courses went back to being open to all undergraduate engineering
primecandidates for benchmarking purposes.In developing Sacramento State’s HLP program, an effort was undertaken to benchmarkestablished engineering leadership education programs of various sizes and scope beforedesigning a curriculum which fits our needs. Our primary goal was to take inventory ofbest practices regardless of their size and scope.Benchmarking Various Engineering Leadership Development ProgramsThe MIT-Gordon Leadership program [7], Northeastern-Gordon Leadership program [14],University of California, San Diego-Gordon Leadership Center [8], and the University ofKansas-Engineering Fellows Program [11] were considered for the in-depth benchmarkingstudy. The ASEE conference (LEAD Division, 2019) also enabled us to benchmark over 40
the midpoint in the semester. The project wasscaffolded with instruction and intermediate low stakes assignments so that teams graduallyaddress the components, rather than hurriedly complete it at the end of the semester. Theseelements are described later in this section.This biomimicry module with EML was implemented for two cohorts of students in twosequential years, which we term cohort 2018 (n=33) and cohort 2019 (n=23) here. As notedpreviously, the biomimicry project was included in a previous iteration of the course but did notinclude instruction on EM and was a shorter duration.Project RequirementsThe final deliverable is a team presentation describing a bioengineering device or design conceptthat draws inspiration from nature. The
ASEE conference proceeding with the MULTI division was achieved through theASEE Peer database with the search for term “multidisciplinary” based on two inclusion criteria:1) the studywas published in MULTI division; 2) the study was published during 2006-2020. The search started from 2006because that was when the ASEE’s first ABET accreditation visits for multidisciplinary engineering programswere carried out and the ASEE MULTI division was formally recognized. In total, 488 records were foundusing these two criteria, among which 14 papers were also included in the “System Engineering” division (10in 2011 and 4 in 2016), 17 papers were also included in the “Liberal Education/Engineering & Society” division(12 in 2013 and 5 in 2019), and 4
] H. B. Karayaka, A. C. Thompson, and C. W. Ferguson, “Project based learning program for nuclear workforce development Phase I: Outreach, recruiting and selection,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc., 2019, doi: 10.18260/1-2--33203.[16] F. Kragh, J. Reed, C. Dietrich, and D. Miller, “Education in software defined radio design engineering,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc., 2008, doi: 10.18260/1-2--4112.[17] A. Fuentes, S. Crown, and B. Freeman, “Human bone solid mechanics challenge: functionally graded material structure with complex geometry and loading,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc., 2008, doi: 10.18260/1-2--4163.[18] J. L. Davis, N. Smith, and M. McLeod, “Collaborating with industry partner within an undergraduate finite
Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 97-128, 2019.[4] N. Klingbeil, and T. Bourne, “The Wright State Model for Engineering Mathematics Education: A Longitudinal Study of Student Perception Data,” Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Indianapolis, IN: American Society for Engineering Education, 2014.[5] J. Ahmad, J. Appleby, and P. Edwards, “Engineering mathematics should be taught by engineers!” In N. Gordon (Ed.), Proceedings of Undergraduate Mathematics Teaching Conference (pp. 32–40). Birmingham, Alabama: University of Birmingham, 2001.[6] L.L. Long III, L.M Abrams, L. Barclay, and J. Paulson, “Emulating the Wright State Model for
; Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2— 298647. Harackiewicz, F., & Chevalier, L. R., & Elsanusi, O. S., & Renzaglia, K. S. (2019, June), Board 64: NSF S-STEM Southern Illinois Energy Scholarship Program Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1- 2—323968. Morris, M. L., & Hensel, R. A. M., & Dygert, J. (2019, June), Board 109: Retention- focused, S-STEM Supported Program Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2—321839. Atwood, S. A., & DeGoede, K. M. (2020, June), NSF S-STEM EPIC Scholarship Program Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.New Orleans, LA.16. Faulkner, W. (2007). Nuts and Bolts and People' Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities.Social studies of science, 37(3), 331-356.17. Trevelyan, J. (2010). Mind the gaps: Engineering education and practice. In Proceedings ofthe 21st Annual Conference for the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (p. 383).Engineers Australia.18. Secules, S. (2019). Making the Familiar Strange: An Ethnographic Scholarship of IntegrationContextualizing Engineering Educational Culture as Masculine and Competitive. EngineeringStudies, 11(3), 196-216.19. Milanovic, B. (2019). Capitalism, alone: The future of the system that rules the world.Harvard University Press.20. Eastman, M. G., Miles
. Striker, and E. Swartz, “Federal Funding Opportunity Announcements as a Catalyst of Students’ Projects in MOOC Environments,” Milwaukee, WI, USA, Oct. 2019.[6] E. K. Van Beurden, A. M. Kia, A. Zask, U. Dietrich, and L. Rose, “Making sense in a complex landscape: how the Cynefin Framework from Complex Adaptive Systems Theory can inform health promotion practice,” Health Promotion International, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 73–83, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1093/heapro/dar089.[7] J. Karlin, L. James, R. Bates, E. Siverling, and J. Nelson, “The Missing Third: The Vital Role of Two-Year Colleges in Shrinking Engineering Education Deserts,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual On line, Jun. 2020
taxonomy on which our work in thispaper is based. We would also like to thank Dr. Chelsea Andrews at the Tufts Center forEngineering Education and Outreach (CEEO) who helped co-create the disability and designdiscussion exercise with Dr. Desen Ozkan, one of the authors of this paper. Additionally, wethank Dr. Ethan Danahy and Dr. Jenn Cross for implementing this discussion exercise in theirfirst-year engineering computation classes.ReferencesAmerican Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). (2016). Engineering by the Numbers: ASEE Retention and Time-to-Graduation Benchmarks for Undergraduate EngineeringAndrews, C., & Upadhya, R., K. (2019). Lessons from the Long Sixties for Organizing in Tech. Science for the People. 22(1). https
paperaccepted by the Minorities in Engineering Division of the 2021 ASEE annual conference (areference with the title and author details will be provided). For this specific project, theretention rate of the participants was 100%, higher than that of all freshman and sophomorestudents in CBAS, which is 69.1% from Fall 2019 to Fall 2020. As the delivery method of mostcourses offered by MTSU switched to Remote, Online, or Web-assisted in Fall 2020, manystudents had financial difficulties, mental health related issues, and difficulty adjusting to thenew learning methods. As a result, there was a significant negative impact to the students’ GPAin Fall 2020, caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, we did not see an improvementover the participants’ GPA
"failure" is an option. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference & Exposition. New Orleans, LA.Carr, R. L., Bennett, L. D., & Strobel, J. (2012). Engineering in the K-12 STEM standards of the 50 US states: An analysis of presence and extent. Journal of Engineering Education, 101 (3), 539-564.Diordieva, C., Yeter, I.H., & Smith, W. (2019). Middle school STEM teachers’ understandings of computational thinking: A case study of Brazil and the USA. In Proceeding of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL.Diordieva, C., Yeter, I.H., Smith, W. (2018). Cross-case analysis: K-12 international teachers
c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Creating a Diverse Next Generation of Technically- and Community-Minded STEM Professionals Purdue UniversityAbstractIn 2019, the National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center, CISTAR, partnered withthe National Society of Black Engineer’s Summer Engineering Experience for Kids, NSBESEEK, to develop a summer program like no other! Through an NSF Research Experience andMentoring (REM) summer program, CISTAR was able to give students and teachers anopportunity to do 6-weeks of cutting-edge research at CISTAR and then “give back” bymentoring kids for 4-weeks at NSBE SEEK—all in one summer. In this paper, we elaborate onthe rationale for the program, namely
, "Impact of a modeling intervention in an introductory programming course," presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Tampa, Florida, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/32918.14. K. J. Rodgers, M. A. Verleger, and F. Marbouti. " Comparing Students’ Solutions to an Open-ended Problem in an Introductory Programming Course with and without Explicit Modeling Interventions. " In American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) 127th Annual Conference and Exposition. 2020.15. J. P. A. Omer Farook, A. Kulatunga, A. Ahmed P.E., W. Yu, Y. Lee, H. A. Alibrahim, "Freshman experience course in electrical and computer engineering technology emphasizing computation, simulation, mathematical modeling
Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration, ASEE 2019.Dr. Jumanah A. Hajjat, Texas A&M University A highly energic and dedicated Ph.D. civil engineering woman with strong teaching skills, research, and project management. An expert in geotechnical/structural analysis and design. I am committed and responsible for offering students my expertise to help them in their academic and professional goals. I have excellent experience working in a diverse cultural environment. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Face-to-Face and E-Learning Styles for Undergraduate Engineering Technology Students During
test and interpreting the results.Importantly, the course is delivered virtually, which makes the implementation very differentfrom that in an in-person classroom setting. This paper provides a detailed discussion of the virtual laboratory modules added to‘Nondestructive Evaluation of Flaws’. In addition, we report how the changes impacted thestudent learning in Fall 2020 compared to Fall 2019, when the delivery was strictly lecture-based. Finally, we discuss ‘lessons learned’ and modifications planned for the next offerings ofthis class. Our overall assessment results indicate a positive impact of the virtual laboratories on
what has happened in the past when it hasn’t been sufficiently accounted for.” (8 Nov 2019). “I’m struggling with how to set-up these lectures…as I am writing this, I am going through [Professor D]'s [faculty reflection log] and learning a lot about what worked and what didn’t work in the classroom. I am hoping that the students gain knowledge from this assignment but I am already predicting that there will be pushback from the students…I can’t emphasize enough what great timing this interview assignment was with regards to reviewing [Professor D]’s [faculty reflection log] and also working on the ASEE paper focusing on the interview assignment. Although I am sure I can do better with preparing
, 2017.[14] L. Van Den Einde, N. Delson, E. Cowan, and D. Yang, “Increasing Student Persistence In A Sketching App For Spatial Visualization Training,” ICERI2017 Proceedings, pp. 5373– 5381, October 2017.[15] N. Delson, and L. Van Den Einde, “Sketching, Assessment, and Persistence in Spatial Visualization Training on a Touchscreen”, in 124th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition proceedings, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018. 10.18260/1-2--30968.[16] L. Van Den Einde, N. Delson, E. Cowan, “Freehand Sketching on Smartphones for Teaching Spatial Visualization”, in 126th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition proceedings, Tampa, FL, 2019. 10.18260/1-2--32859[17] N. Delson, L. Van Den Einde, E. Cowan, B. Mihelich, “Mini-Hints for
Telecommunication Engineering from Visveswaraiah Technological Uni- versity (VTU), India in 2007 and Ph.D. from Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA in 2012. Her research interests span the areas of Wireless Communication, Internet of Things (IoT), Optimization using Game Theory, and Engineering Education Research. She is a member of the IEEE and ASEE, a technical pro- gram committee member for IEEE Globecom, ICC, ICCCN and VTC conferences, and a reviewer for several international journals and conferences.Megan BekolayDr. Otsebele E. Nare, Hampton University Otsebele Nare is an Associate Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Hamp- ton University, VA. He received his electrical engineering doctorate
virtual realities: theory and practice for next-generation spatial computing. O’Reilly Media, Inc.Mitsubishi © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Southeast Section Conference Industrial Robot RV-2F Series (2019) Instruction Manual Robot Arm Setup & Maintenance,www.geva-roboter.at/files/rv-2f_series_robot_arm_setup__maintenance.pdfPapoutsi, C., Drigas, A., & Skianis, C.(2018).Mobile Applications to Improve Emotional Intelligence in Autism - A Review. Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol, 47-61 .Ploog, Bertram & Scharf, Alexa & Nelson, Deshawn & Brooks, Patricia.(2012). Use of Computer-Assisted Technologies (CAT) to Enhance
M. Degen. Teaching systems thinking in a capstone mechatronic design course. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, number 10.18260/1-2–33355, Tampa, Florida, June 2019. ASEE Conferences. https://peer.asee.org/33355. [6] Karim Heinz Muci-Kuchler, Mark David Bedillion, Shaobo Huang, Cassandra M Degen, Marius D Ellingsen, Walelign Messele Nikshi, and John Ziadat. Incorporating basic systems thinking and systems engineering concepts in a mechanical engineering sophomore design course. In 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, number 10.18260/1-2–28504, Columbus, Ohio, June 2017. ASEE Conferences. https://jee.org/28504. [7] Karim Heinz Muci-Kuchler, Cassandra M. Degen, Mark David Bedillion, and Marsha
intelligence on academic libraries,” Libr. Hi Tech, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 418–435, 2019.[2] A. Jean-Philippe, “Hot off the Press! Fab labs and libraries,” Libr. Hi Tech News, vol. 30, no. 7, Jan. 2013.[3] K. Kozak, “Board 76 : The Great Coffee Hunt : An Augmented Reality Scavenger Hunt,” in 2019 ASEE Anual Conference and Exposition, 2019.[4] M. Wójcik, “Internet of Things – potential for libraries,” Libr. Hi Tech, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 404–420, 2016.[5] A. Sample, “Using augmented and virtual reality in information literacy instruction to reduce library anxiety in nontraditional and international students,” Inf. Technol. Libr., vol. 39, no. 1, 2020.[6] S. LeMire, S. J. Graves, M. Hawkins, and S. Kailani
scientists,” Sci. Educ., vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 180– 192, Mar. 2000, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<180::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2- X.[8] L. Doyle and T. L. Nilsson, “Flipping the classroom: Do student learning gains and perceptions vary based on gender?,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa Bay, FL, 2019.[9] J. D. Stolk, Y. V. Zastavkerq, and M. D. Gross, “Gender, motiviation, and pedagogy in the STEM classroom: A quantitative characterization,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[10] E. A. Cech and T. J. Waidzunas, “Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesian, gay, and bisexual students
opportunity to sponsor an ECE SD team starting the following spring. ECE SD EEP class begins. EEP students form teams and and EEP instructors discuss the projects from the start generating project ideas and market research interested EEP teams and pick EEP projects which are and customer study to test business viability. suitable for collaboration with ECE based on the Oct 2018 criteria above. These teams are contacted and upcoming ECE SD Spring 2019 – Fall 2019 scheduled Each EEP team narrows down a project idea they is shared with them. Second
Situated Virtual Laboratories to Capstone Physical Laboratories, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 100, No. 3, pp 540-573, 2011. [4] www.abet.org [5] A.A. Ferri, B.H. Ferri, R. Lineberg, K.P. Ferri, Z. Crawford, and J. Tamayo, “Use of a Vertically Integrated Project Team to Develop Hands-On Learning Modules,” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, June 25-28, 2017. [6] J.I. Craig, A.A. Ferri, B.H. Ferri, M. Alemdar, “Development of a Portable, Experimental Platform to Demonstrate the Role of Material and Cross-Section in Beam Bending,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, June 16-19, 2019. [7] A. Ferri, J. Craig, B
Chemical Engineers, 2006. 1(1): p. 23-29.3. Paretti, M.C., L.D. McNair, and J.A. Leydens, Engineering Communication, in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B.M. Olds, Editors. 2014, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. p. 601-632.4. Sageev, P. and C.J. Romanowski, A Message from Recent Engineering Graduates in the Workplace: Results of a Survey on Technical Communication Skills. Journal of Engineering Education, 2001. 90(4): p. 685-693.5. Jeffrey, A.D., et al., Why Industry Says That Engineering Graduates Have Poor Communication Skills: What the Literature Says. 2011 ASEE Conferences: Vancouver, BC.6. Commission, A.E.A., Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. 2019
2019 2020 ASEE Annual Conference Figure 1: Result of search for "Entrepreneurial Mindset" within the Papers on Engineering Education Repository [https://peer.asee.org/ accessed Jan 2021]Entrepreneurial Mindset (EM) can be broadly defined as possessing the attributes of anentrepreneur in one’s way of thinking. More specifically, KEEN’s framework anchors the EM incuriosity, connections, and creating value; known as the 3C’s [3]. In parallel with
James McCormick Family Teaching Excellence Institute (MTEI) at Cornell University, where she received her PhD in Mechanical Engineering in 2008. Since then she has taught required and elective courses covering a wide range of topics in the undergraduate Mechanical Engineering curriculum. In her work with MTEI she co-leads teaching workshops for new faculty and assists with other teaching excellence initiatives. Her main teaching interests include solid mechanics and engineering mathematics. Among other teaching awards, she received the 2020 ASEE St. Lawrence Section Outstanding Teaching Award.Prof. Elizabeth Mills Fisher, Cornell University Elizabeth M. Fisher is an Associate Professor in the Sibley School of