Physics: A daily lecture laboratory class with topic on physics and design projects in Physics required of Year 2 participants. • Technical Writing: A daily writing class required for Year 3 students. • Statistics and Probability: A daily lecture class required for Year 3 participants.In addition to these curricular components, a number of special activities with an emphasis on Page 11.487.13space and NASA have been conducted over the past several years7.TexPREP provides a curriculum to better prepare its participants for future college studies inengineering. The bulk of the curriculum is centered in mathematics preparation and
appeal to women andbecause of its place in the freshman engineering curriculum. Desired results are a largeparticipation by freshman women engineering students, a qualitative increase in confidence (bothacademically and in engineering in general), a quantitative increase in grades, and, over the longrun, an increase in the retention rate for women in engineering at Northeastern University.Freshman Physics ClassesEngineering students at Northeastern take their first physics class in the spring semester of theirfreshman year, covering the elements of Newtonian physics. This class involves a twice-weeklylecture held in a large lecture hall, a weekly small ILS session where students take quizzes andwork on homework, two weekly homework assignments
curriculum istaught and interpersonal climate (Anderson1;2; Anderson-Rowland6, 1997; Brainard & Carlin16,1998; Liu & Blanc38, 1996).Most of the studies that have concentrated on the recruitment and retention of women inengineering, have studied the factors that affect the educational journey of students at thebeginning, and/or in the middle of their college years. There is very little systemic empiricalresearch that focuses on students’ who are about to graduate from an engineering department. Itis important to study the experiences of students who have completed or are about to obtain anengineering degree because, since they have recently gone through situations that femalestudents experience by being a minority in engineering, they can
students to examine the properties of various signal processingalgorithms using real-life signals. A simple audio compression scheme that usesthe Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) is described with details. The algorithm exposesthe students to the application of the FFT in a simplified MPEG-like audiocompression scheme. The hardware–software interaction of J-DSP with the TIDSK is also explained to students; an introduction to the architecture and itsperipherals is also part of the learning experience. Pre- and Post- assessmentinstruments have been developed and administered. 1. INTRODUCTIONAn effective course in Digital Signal Processing (DSP) must convey theoreticaland practical knowledge of concepts associated with the
students, to more easily collaborate on student problems in anappropriate contextual environment. Without a laptop policy, students and mentors discussproblems and issues using paper listings of code and errors. This does not address problems thatarise from installation, configuration, and integration inconsistencies among softwarecomponents installed in the system. Configuration and integration problems are common inpractice and experiencing them in an academic environment has great educational value.The final academic motivation, and perhaps the strongest, is the educational benefits studentsreceive administering their personalized computing environment. Computing and technology
degree and an MBA.Andrea Ogilvie, University of Texas-Austin Andrea Ogilvie is the Director of the Equal Opportunity in Engineering Program at UT Austin. She came to UT as Director in July 2001 after six years in industry where she worked as a Structural Engineer for KBR and HDR Engineering, Inc. designing petrochemical and commercial structures, respectively. Andrea received her BS Civil Engineering degree from UT in May 1995 and her Texas Professional Engineering License in February 2001.Randy Emelo, Triple Creek Associates, Inc. Randy Emelo is President of Triple Creek Associates, Inc., an organization development firm that specializes in mentoring. He has over 20 years of management, training
introduced into the OPL course several years ago. It hasnow become an integral component of the course: each student must complete a paper by the endof the quarter, and the paper should meet certain requirements. Each student is also required togive a presentation on the paper in the last week of the quarter. The student’s paper andpresentation are weighted 20% and 10%, respectively, of his/her final grade for the course. Thestudent who is not able to turn in the paper on time or give the presentation fails the course. Thescores for papers and presentations are determined by both the peer evaluations among thestudents themselves and by the instructor’s own judgment.In addition to the paper and presentation, a student’s final grade for the course
2006-305: DESIGNING OUR COMMUNITY: EVALUATING THE SUCCESS OF APROGRAM TO RECRUIT AND RETAIN AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS TOENGINEERINGCarolyn Plumb, Montana State University Carolyn Plumb, PhD, is the Director of Educational Innovation and Strategic Projects at Montana State University. Her work revolves around instructional development, curriculum reform and enhancement, and assessment of student learning. Prior to August of 2004, Plumb was at the University of Washington, where she directed the College of Engineering's Communication Program and also served as an instructional development and assessment specialist for the School of Law.Heidi Sherick, Montana State University Heidi M
2006-1722: HOLD PARAMOUNT: DESIGNING AN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONTO OPEN MINDS AND SERVE THE PUBLIC GOODCarole Womeldorf, Ohio University-Athens Carole Womeldorf is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Ohio University. Her areas of technical expertise and interests include distributed energy generation, combustion, heat transfer and fluid dynamics. She worked in the Fire Sciences Division of the Building and Fire Research Laboratory at the National Institute of Standards and Technology from 1993 to 2000. Dr. Womeldorf earned her Sc.B. et A.B. in Mechanical Engineering and English and American Literature from Brown University, her Masters of Science in Oceanographic Engineering from
activities for K-12 level motivating engineering andtechnology careers2. A report, Engineering in the K-12 Classroom: An Analysis of CurrentPractices & Guidelines for the Future, based on the proceedings from the 2004 LeadershipWorkshop on K-12 Engineering Outreach is available3. The ASEE Engineering K-12 Centeroffers portals for students and educators. The MAA has many resource materials for motivatingMathematics at the K-12 level4. Cornell University sponsors an award winning website5 with Page 11.931.7links to educators and students in grades 9-12. ITEA is a professional association for technologyeducation teachers who teach a problem-based
2006-1629: USING DIVERSITY STATEMENTS TO PROMOTE ENGAGEMENTWITH DIVERSITY AND TEACHINGJennifer Turns, University of Washington Jennifer Turns is an assistant professor in the Department of Technical Communication at the University of Washington. She holds a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Her interests include engineering education, learner-centered design, user-centered design, and audience analysis. Dr. Turns is currently working on multiple NSF grants dealing with engineering education including an NSF Career award exploring the impact of portfolio construction on engineering students’ professional identity. Email: jturns
, analyze a model in computer-aided design software, use machine shop equipment forhardware manufacturing, or conduct an integrated system test for flight acceptance andqualification.3.3 End-to-end design cycleS3FL projects are designed to be more than paper studies or construction of simple prototypes.The S3FL projects attempt to expose students to the entire end-to-end design cycle, fromrequirements definitions to post-flight data evaluation. Students become involved at the initialstages of a project by interacting with principal investigators or equivalent customers andoutlining mission objectives and top-level requirements. Subsystem teams are responsible forperforming the trade studies and analyses to converge on a specific flight
2006-2270: A QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION TOOL FORAN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING LEARNING COMMUNITYMani Mina, Iowa State University Mani Mina (SM’98) received the B.S. degree, the M.S. degree in physics, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from Iowa State University, Ames, in 1982, 1985, 1987, and 1989, respectively. He has research experience in applied electromagnetics, microelectronics and device physics, nondestructive evaluation, instrumentation, networking and physical layer issues. He has had industrial experience in the areas of instrumentation, system integration, and design in nondestructive evaluation and handheld computer systems. Currently
2006-2307: DESIGNING, BUILDING, AND TESTING AN ADVANCEDINDUSTRIAL-GRADE THREE-PHASE DIGITAL POWER METERBobbie Meredith, Middle Tennessee State University BOBBIE JO MEREDITH, Mrs. Meredith is currently a graduate student, Computer Engineering Technology major in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Studies at Middle Tennessee State University. She earned her BS degree in Computer Engineering Technology with minor in Computer Science from MTSU in 2005. She is currently working as an Electronics Test Engineer for Schneider Electric, Power Monitoring and Control Division. Her interests include the design, building, programming, and testing of microprocessor and microcontroller based
, No. 4, American Society for Engineering Education, October, 2002, pp. 367-368.2. Wilczynski, Vincent, “A Virtual Instrumentation Based Engineering Experimentation Course,” Proceedings of the 2000 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exhibition, St. Louis, MS, 2000.3. McStravick, D., and O’Malley, M., “Virtual Labs in the Engineering Curriculum,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exhibition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2004.4. Akins, Robert E., and Nelson, Jr., James K., “Integration of Engineering Measurement and Analysis Into Civil Engineering Programs,” Proceedings of the 2000 ASEE Southeast Section Conference, Roanoke, VA
prominence and the line thatseparates the different roles in the construction industry has already become blurred. Thetwo professions are so interrelated that the industry values a background in both fields.Increasingly more universities across the country and the world have an ArchitecturalEngineering curriculum. However, most existing programs emphasize training inArchitectural Engineering with significantly less emphasis placed on structuralengineering. In this report, I devised an undergraduate curriculum(s) at NC StateUniversity to build a professional career in building/bridge design with strong emphasisin both the structural as well as the architectural aspects. This plan may serve as a modelfor programs interested in a similar training path
sequence within an integrated curriculum in the 1999 academic year. Although thecourse has always undergone a gradual evolution from year to year (as a result of our ABET-related self evaluation and feedback loop), there was a marked shift three years ago as explainedin the next sub-sections.Original Format: Integrated Lectures and ProjectsWhen this capstone course was first introduced in 1999 it was conceived as an integrated lectureplus project course. The course spanned the Fall-Spring semesters worth 4 units each semester(8 units total). The mechanics involved traditional lectures twice a week (75 minutes each),although since projects were running concurrently, approximately every three weeks the lectureswould give way to student presentations
appeared on the Basic-Level Curriculum table for all of the five schools studied.The checkmarks identify which schools identified each class as a design class. No checkmark means the schoolidentified the course as 100% engineering science.For example, in only two of the five mechanical engineering programs examined, was SolidMechanics designated a design course on BLC tables, whereas an examination of the coursesyllabi revealed that these courses were essentially equivalent (at least, as described in thesyllabi). Indeed, the only course that was consistently labeled as a design course across all of thecurricula examined was the Capstone Design Course. A partial explanation for this discrepancycan be found in the fact that, in School C, the
2006-209: WRITING IN THE DISCIPLINE - A CASE STUDY IN CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENTAmitabha Bandyopadhyay, SUNY Amitabha Bandyopadhyay, Ph.D., P.E. is a Distinguished Service Professor and Chair of Architecture and Construction Management Department at State University of New York -Farmingdale. He has been involved in Writing Across Curriculum and Writing in the Discipline for last fifteen years. Page 11.1458.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Writing in the Discipline – A Case Study in Construction ManagementAbstractCommunication for the engineering and technology graduates always scored very
2006-1444: ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK FOR CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSESSteven Beyerlein, University of Idaho Steven Beyerlein is professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Idaho, where he coordinates the Mechanical Engineering and Electrical Engineering capstone design program and where he regularly participates in ongoing program assessment activities. For these efforts he won the UI Outstanding Teaching Award in 2001. He has been an active participant in the Transferable Integrated Design Engineering Education (TIDEE) Consortium for the last five years and collaborates with other authors on the NSF/ASA grant.Denny Davis, Washington State University Denny Davis is professor of
may work for that program. One program which does not face thistype of ongoing technological change, Organizational Leadership and Supervision, makes greatuse of industrial advisory boards to keep the curriculum current and responsive to current marketrequirements, but does not need to update on an annual or biennial basis. Their assessmentmeasures are done on a course and program basis and reviewed periodically, but the type ofprogram and course assessment remains more stable over time. There is more opportunity forthe program to test what works over a relatively long period of time, without factoring in thehigh level of content change faced by programs such as CG.Many engineering technology programs exhibit a mix of constant, basic skills
Schmidt, University of Texas-Austin KATHY J. SCHMIDT is the director of the Faculty Innovation Center for the College of Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. In this position, she promotes the College of Engineering's commitment to enriched teaching and learning. Dr. Schmidt works in all aspects of education including curriculum design, faculty development, learner support, and evaluation.Matthew Green, LeTourneau University MATTHEW G. GREEN is an assistant professor of Mechanical Engineering at LeTourneau University, Longview. His objective is to practice and promote engineering as a serving profession, with special recognition of opportunities to improve the quality of life for
criteria to an outcomes-based model is now complete. The onus for defining curricular content has shifted from ABET(‘one size fits all’) to the program’s faculty (‘stakeholder-driven continuous improvement’). Thisnew-found autonomy in determining curricular content has created varied ‘localized’interpretations and implementations. It comes with its own set of challenges. Heightenedemphasis has been placed on development and documentation of professional skills (aka ‘soft’skills) such as oral and written communication, team work, lifelong learning, and global andsocietal issues. Teaching, assessing and documenting soft skills necessitates a new synthesis oftopics. In this paper, we describe our experiences in a capstone design course for
an Assistant Professor of Writing Arts at Rowan University and has been a part of Rowan’s Sophomore Clinic team since 1998. She received her Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Page 11.281.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 BOTTLE ROCKETS AND PARAMETRIC DESIGN IN A DIVERGING-CONVERGING DESIGN STRATEGYAbstractThe Sophomore Engineering Clinic covers two semesters in an eight-semester design sequence.The course integrates engineering with writing and public speaking. In the past the course hasused two semester-long design projects to teach design through a series of
integrating design education throughout the engineering curriculum at Northwestern University.Gregory Olson, Northwestern University Gregory B. Olson, Fellow of ASM and TMS, is the Wilson-Cook Professor of Engineering Design and Professor of Materials Science and Engineering at Northwestern University, Associate Director for Research of the IDEA Institute for Design Engineering & Applications, Director of the Materials Technology Laboratory/Steel Research Group, and a founder of QuesTek Innovations LLC. He received the B.S. and M.S. in 1970 and Sc.D in 1974 in Materials Science from MIT and remained there in a series of senior research positions before joining the faculty of Northwestern in
their own fashion (usual homework style) and introduced to thedesign process and teamwork where schedules not of their own making and interaction withothers dominate how they work. By introducing these ideas in the context of an enjoyableproject, the students indicate they are able to integrate the concepts and practice engineeringeffectively. The students perform well against the course objectives, and student evaluations andfaculty feedback indicate the course is successful.Bibliography[1] Moore, D.J. and Volmer, D.R., “Curriculum for an Engineering Renaissance”, IEEE Transactions on Education,v46, n4, pp. 452-455, 2003.[2] Boeing “Desired Attributes of an Engineer” webpage, online,http://www.boeing.com/companyoffices/pwu/attributes
school to create the first high school EPICS program. The commitment of these alums to continue theirservice to the community demonstrates the long-term impact that EPICS has on the lives of our students. The high school students have developed a system consisting of several devices that enable a fellow studentwith cerebral palsy to sense when she needs to swallow in order to avoid drooling. One device, which measuresthe time between swallows, is integrated into an inconspicuous necklace that she wears. If the time betweenswallows does become too long, then another device worn on the wrist or the waist can either vibrate or makenoise to remind her to swallow.This is an innovative device – the students found nothing like it despite diligent
Choudhury, Western Michigan University Alamgir A. Choudhury is an assistant professor of industrial and manufacturing engineering at Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan. He earned his MS and PhD from NMSU(Las Cruces) and BS in mechanical engineering from BUET (Dhaka). His interest includes computer applications in curriculum, MCAE, mechanics, fluid power and instrumentation & process control. He is also a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Ohio and affiliated with ASME, ASEE, SME and TAP.James Kamman, Western Michigan University Dr. James Kamman is an Associate Professor of Mechanical & Aeronautical Engineering at Western Michigan University. He has
, University of Idaho Dr. Beyerlein is a professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Idaho. He has numerous publications in engineering education has been a contributor to numerous NSF grants on engineering education.Phillip Thompson, Seattle University Dr. Phillip Thompson is an associate professor in civil and environmental engineering at Seattle University. He has interests in capstone design education.Olakunle Harrison, Tuskegee University Page 11.112.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 A Review of Literature on Assessment Practices in Capstone Engineering
2006-1301: NEW ENGINEERING DESIGN CONCEPTS FOR SUSTAINABLEPRODUCTSSerdar Tumkor, Istanbul Technical University Dr. Serdar Tumkor is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey. He has been a full-time faculty member since 1996. Dr. Tumkor received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Istanbul Technical University in 1994. His teaching interests are Machine Design, Engineering Design, and Computer-Aided Technical Drawing. His research interests include Ecological Manufacturing, Design Methodology, Design for Disassembly, End of Life Strategies, Automated Disassembly, Electronic Packaging, PCB Soldering, computer integrated