well as their continued efforts to be asuccessful engineering student at Virginia Tech. During class time, the students are exposed to anumber of different speakers and activities that focus on leadership from a number of differentperspectives. Opportunities are available for the students to organize and lead events, givingthem first hand experience with planning programs and taking charge of a team. As in the firstyear seminar class, this course is also built around the theme that learning is both an individualand a collaborative process. The course topics for the second-year seminar course are listed inTable 2.The second-year course objectives are: • To foster achievement in second-year engineering students; • To enhance personal
tailored educationalmethods course, one instructional planning course, a Field Practicum course,Instructional Technology Across the Curriculum course, and Instructional Teaching &Learning Styles course. The education courses train them in: 1) methods, concepts,theory, and assessment of instruction; 2) design and implementation of science andmathematics curricula with an emphasis on instructional technology; 3) local, state andnational curriculum standards, educational practices, and pragmatic and logisticalsecondary education issues; and 4) advanced technology, time management andclassroom management techniques for technology use in classrooms 2-6. Each year, thegraduate Fellows present a one- or two-day “Teaching with Technology” workshop for
’ difficulties and to generate suggestions about effective instructional interventions. Inthe sections that follow, each of the three dimensions contained in the IPS model are discussedindependently. This discussion is followed by a presentation of the model itself.Problem Solving ProcessSince Polya’s seminal work in mathematics,8 the utility of learning and using a sequence of stepsduring problem solving has been widely accepted. Although several specific models exist, ageneric 4-step model captures most: (1) Represent the Problem, (2) Goal Setting and Planning,(3) Execute the Plan, and (4) Evaluate the Solution. In the first step, problem representation, thestudent must read the problem statement and discern the objective. Correct execution of this
EffortAbstractThis paper focuses on the development of a sustainable assessment plan for the ElectricalEngineering program at the University of Detroit Mercy. Other programs at theuniversity have adopted variations of this plan, which requires coordination amongdepartments. The paper will discuss the merits and shortcomings of this approach to thecontinuous assessment problem and explain why the adopted process was chosen.Background and Preparation for First EC2000 VisitIn the late 1990’s, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology’s (ABET)Engineering Accreditation Commission published new criteria for the accreditation ofengineering programs, Engineering Criteria 2000.1 Criterion 3 calls for programs todefine program outcomes and to measure
for the University and the State in developing new strategies to secure job growth in high-tech industries.BackgroundThe Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering Technology (EET/TET) programs’faculty established MISL in 2002 to enhance the senior project design experience for theundergraduate students. The single semester, “trashcan” project model typically employed inacademia was expanded to a two-semester sequence for (1) project planning and (2) projectexecution.4,5 This resulted in three key benefits to the curriculum. First, because the studentswere given an additional semester to complete their project, the faculty noticed a significantincrease in the quantity and quality of effort by the students. Second, this increase in
% 2.3% 4.5% 91.4% 8.6%In a recent survey we asked a representative sample of the high school students the followingquestions, and obtained the following responses.Are You Planning to go to College?When asked, “Are you planning to go to college?” 98.1% of the students responded: “Yes”, and1.9% responded that they were not sure (0% said “No”).Will These Students Enroll in an Engineering Program?We then asked the students, “In what program are you planning to enroll?” Thirty-seven percent(37%) responded that they were going to enroll in an engineering program, 11% indicated theywould enroll in a non-engineering, STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math)program, 44.4% had not made a decision, and 7.6% were planning to enroll in a
participate in service before theygraduate. Currently, more than 185,178 CSU students are providing service in Californiacommunities. Cal Poly Pomona, one of the 23 CSU Campuses, and its College of Engineeringrecently received an NSF grant to establish an Engineering Service Learning Institute (ESLI) todevelop a plan for college-wide implementation of service learning.Constructivist Teaching Model and Authentic Learning ExperiencesThe predominant pedagogical model today is based on a teacher-centered, didactic approach toinstruction. This is mostly due to the fact that educators, parents as well as administrators havenever encountered a learning experience in which they constructed meaning from the experience.Authentic learning approach to teaching
to 1,000freshmen for use in their Linear Algebra courses. With no other instruction, the students were able tolearn Mathcad and apply it proficiently to their homework problems.Without the videos we would have had to have conducted 60 “live” hands-on tutorials on Mathcad.This would not have been practical, consequently the plan to integrate Mathcad into the course wouldhave been scrapped.The course was broken up into Lessons (e.g. Calculus), and each lesson was divided into Steps (e.g.Differentiation). At the end of each step's video a summary screen reminded the students of what theyhad to make their Mathcad screen look like to match the video. Steps were about 3-5 minutes long.Students could pause and replay parts of the video that they
potential students to find out what the essential components of a degree are of interest to thestudents’ decision-making. Marketing a program includes addressing such things as coursedescription, course content and the importance of an assessment plan and what role assessmentplays in the process. Course consistency and course relevancy in the scope of the degree-seekingstudent are also essential considerations. Faculty within a program are key resources to themarketing success of their program within the institution.This paper will also discuss how busy professors can use elements of their existing assessmenttools within the ABET accreditation process to help them preserve and expand their programs.BackgroundThe Computer Graphics Technology program
; • Explain the principles of adult learning and how professional adults go about learning; • Explain the role of training in the strategic planning process; Page 11.655.3 • Analyze training needs; • Apply a systems approach to develop a unit of instruction for a comprehensive workplace training program; • Prepare and deliver a unit of training using current technologies and methods; • Apply the Kirkpatrick training evaluation model to effectiveness and outcome assessment.Student EvaluationThe students were evaluated on the following tasks: • Group
training andexamination processes and detail recommended areas to expand this research.Background on the Bureau of EngineeringThe City of Los Angeles’ Department of Public Works creates and maintains the physicalframework and underpinnings of one of the most geographically, economically, and ethnicallydiverse cities in the world. Consisting of seven separate Bureaus, the Department of PublicWorks is responsible for construction, renovation, and the operation of City Facilities andinfrastructures. One Bureau, the Bureau of Engineering, has over 800 employees and isresponsible for the planning, design, and construction management of capital improvementprojects for the city including stormwater, sewer systems, street and other
thisknowledge. A typical conversation an interviewer might have with a graduating student mightbe “well, yes I did a few use cases in my Software Requirements class, but no I have not doneone of that size nor do I understand how to use that model to drive analysis and test planning.”This paper presents an alternative approach underway at Arizona State University’s Polytechniccampus. In this approach, students are accelerated through the knowledge, comprehension,application levels through a hybrid teaching and learning model that combines multiplepedagogical approaches with a process-guided exposure to software engineering.1. The Software Enterprise: An OverviewIn the Division of Computing Studies (DCST) at Arizona State University’s Polytechnic Campus
. Other universities in the US arepreparing regional or conference-wide competitions and initial planning for nationalcompetitions has begun in several countries.The competition engages students in the early stages of emerging technology commercialization.The competition website provides additional information and may be found atwww.ideatoproduct.org. Student teams prepare a commercialization assessment addressingtechnical status, intellectual property, market needs and market characteristics. The teams presenttheir assessments to a panel of faculty, business leaders and entrepreneurs. While severalexamples of technology licenses and the development of new companies illustrate the impact ofthe competition, the real value and focus of the
undergraduate students GIS and GPS knowledgethrough several related courses in a construction engineering and management (CEM) program.This information could be disseminated through typical CEM courses such as Surveying,Construction Planning and Scheduling, Construction Contract and Field Management, and asenior level Special Topics in Construction course. The students will be exposed to the latestspatial technologies including GIS, GPS, laser scanning, aerial photography and satelliteimagery, and will learn how they can develop fully integrated spatial applications and solutionsin a wide variety of construction planning, decision, implementation, and management areas.Besides basic knowledge, in the senior level, students would be able to use GIS
11.57.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 A Jitter Education: An Introduction to Timing Jitter for the FreshmanAbstractThis is the second in a planned series of papers addressing jitter analysis education in theElectrical Engineering Technology (EET) curriculum. The first paper, “A Jitter Education:Finding a Place for Jitter Analysis in the EET Curriculum,” described the basic types of jitter andthe underlying causes, jitter measurements and displays (two related but distinctly differenttopics), and proposed how to incorporate jitter analysis into a four-year EET curriculum. Thefocus of this installment is how to introduce the subject of timing jitter to a first-year EETstudent.The
, networks and electronics.These are 1 or 2 week long intensive courses offered during the summer and winter vacationperiods. HRDI advertises these courses in the newspapers and through a daily web-site. In thispaper, the course instructor (AG) and the course moderator (HC) list the HRDI programs at KUTand present their experiences with one such course on VLSI Design.Human Resources Development Institute at KUTEstablished by the support from the Ministry of Labor in January 1999 as part of theGovernment's new five-year economy plan, HRDI has played a unique role of providingspecialized vocational training skills. Specifically, this institute has been set up in order toprovide both teachers from vocational training schools and technicians from
or full-time undergraduate students in Prescott. The topic of spacedebris was introduced in these classes and it was found that this field can serve as a veryelaborate example pool for applied orbital mechanics, mission planning, spacecraft design (busand payload), remote sensing and space surveillance, and classes in a traditional liberal artscurriculum such as history, policy, and law.Projects like the analysis of satellite fragmentations, interactive web based flux directionalitycalculations, and the long term effects of perturbations on a satellite’s orbit are a few exampleson how this important topic can be included in a university curriculum. Undergraduate studentshave been integrated into research projects in addition to the classes
. Initially part of the College of Engineering, Gayle has worked with the International Engineering Co-op Program since 1993. In 1998 she created and began working with similar programs in the College of Business and the College of Design, Architecture, Art and Planning. Under her direction the ICP has grown from ten engineers, working in Germany and Japan, to over 30 students, working annually in Germany, Japan, Mexico, and Chile. Gayle's responsibilities with the international program include: - Teaching Orientation to International Co-op, a class to prepare students for the challenges and opportunities of living and working abroad - Development of international co-op learning modules
Integration and business plan development, Systems Launch considerationsand product/business launch, etc. Concepts in strategy, team dynamics, and finance areintegrated into these courses focusing on Engineering Entrepreneurship. It appears thatEngineering Entrepreneurship has emerged as a Killer App for Systems Engineering.IntroductionThe emerging facts from successful organizations, including universities, indicate that the realsource of power in a knowledge economy is in combining technical prowess withentrepreneurship.1 A survey of business executives and managers indicated that highly successfulengineers are not only academically astute, but also possess entrepreneurial skills.2 TheEngineers of 2020 will need to be educated as innovators, with
, Systems Modeling, Engineering Economics and businessplanning, Systems Integration and business plan development, Systems Launch considerationsand product/business launch, etc. Concepts in strategy, team dynamics, and finance areintegrated into these courses focusing on Engineering Entrepreneurship. A unique “SEEntrepreneurship” program is being pioneered at Florida Tech.IntroductionThe emerging facts from successful organizations, including universities, indicate that the realsource of power in a knowledge economy is in combining technical prowess withentrepreneurship.1 A survey of business executives and managers indicated that highly successfulengineers are not only academically astute, but also possess entrepreneurial skills.2 TheEngineers of
Industrial Revolution, into modern times; 2. Understand the limitations of technology and how today’s engineering solutions can become tomorrow’s societal problems; 3. Develop a historic perspective on the development of the United Kingdom; 4. Understand how traditions, customs, and culture impact engineering projects; 5. Understand how projects in one country can be affected by policies, laws, and customs of other countries; 6. Understand how political, financial, and environmental constraints affect the planning, design, construction, and operation of large engineering projects; 7. Understand why personal property rights that are so important in the US are less important in European countries
Page 11.868.7in the appendix. Only those courses that currently include some coverage of a lean topic areshown. An entry of “1” in the table indicates that the topic is currently included in the course,though in some cases it may not be mentioned that the topic is considered by some to be a leantopic. A “2” indicates topics which we may not include in our courses right now, but which fitnaturally into one of the courses we offer. It also includes topics that are discussed briefly in theindicated course with more thorough coverage elsewhere. For example, the role of a bill ofmaterial as a source of planning information is covered in the facilities course, but they arecovered in more detail in the production planning course. A “3” denotes that
background information on a variety of SWEPT andRET programs around the country, including a discussion of their evaluation plans, introduceliterature and research that supports the effectiveness of SWEPT and RET programs as a teacherprofessional development model, and discuss the issues surrounding the development ofevaluation tools to assess teacher and student impacts of these programs. The GIFT program andits current evaluation plan will then be discussed as a case study. This case study evaluationincludes 1) the results of a multi-site SWEPT study in which GIFT participated, 2) a recentalumni survey sent to all current and former program participants, and 3) Pre & Post Summer,School Year Follow and Mentor Surveys administered during the
each semester commences and voted upon my chosen faculty and students. The review ofproposals process is done in order to ensure quality projects that will engage participants andoffer the chance to acquire knowledge of the Learning Objectives. Types of IPRO projectsinclude research, design, process improvement, and business planning, performed as servicelearning projects, entrepreneurial projects, consulting projects and international service. IPROprojects are among the general education requirement for all undergraduates (i.e., two three-credit hour semester-long project courses fulfill the requirement). Over the past few years, theIPRO Program has begun to establish systematic evaluation of the various parts of the programin order to
build a nationally recognized firm in affiliate marketing, if not a globalpowerhouse. While the vision was a bold one for a 21 year-old undergraduate student, success ofother Hinman CEOs and alumni provided precedence and support. This vision and commitmentto growth parallels the literature review. The importance of planning is evident with Anik.Contrary to the literature, the relationships with other firms have not played a role in AffiliateClassroom’s growth thus far. Page 11.289.8 7 Table 2. Comparisons and contrasts of firm attributes Our
and saying “Fellas’ I am the truth, I’ll tell you what you are doingright and I’ll tell you when you’re making mistakes. Every team member knows right up frontthat not only will I tell them the truth-but I will do so as soon as possible,”(Krzyzewski &Phillips, 2000, p.75). This straight forward approach eliminates possible excuses or negativeadjustments. This can be is a valuable approach, because now your staff members know exactlywhere you stand-always with the truth. As simple as it may seem, the problem may fall back onthe manager (librarian or coach) because it only works as long as they are consistent and fair.The test occurs when a project sequence (library) or game plan (coach) goes wrong (assumingthe task is executed correctly
ofScience in Project Management Program.MIE 7440 Taguchi Methods of Designing Experiments This course was developed in 2001 and made available online with the assistanceprovided by the University of Wisconsin Learning Innovations (UWLI). It was taughtusing the Prometheus course management system once. In 2002, the course was move tothe Blackboard course management system. It was taught using the Desire-to-Learn(D2L) course management system from 2003. This DOE course provides experience in planning, conducting, and analyzingstatistically designed experiments using the Taguchi methods. The primary objective ofthe course is to educate and train students in the quantitative and qualitative methods forquality planning, measurement
. This balancing act then becomesquite a challenge. To address this challenge, a two-tier approach was developed and delivered duringthe Fall 05 term at Robert Morris University to deal with the differing expectations of thestakeholders in the teaching/learning environment as described in Figure 1. This approachis further discussed in this article.3. The Two-Tier Approach The first tier of the teaching plan, called the ‘essential teaching plan’ includes all ofthe essential teaching elements. These elements consist of the following: • Set teaching method(s): The options are lecture, discussion, tutorial, laboratory, mutli-media resources. For different topics, the instructor identifies appropriate teaching methods and
experiences. This variety of people and experience makes the meetingsmuch more productive and the board much more effective. Finding and attracting the rightoutside advisors is not as easy as it seems, and it is not always possible to cover every area with aparticular group of advisory board members. Regardless of who is on your board, it is importantthat they can be relied upon for good advice and direction.Advisory Board FundamentalsMany university programs are now beginning to discover that an advisory board can serve as avaluable complement to the program’s leadership team. In today’s increasingly complex andcompetitive world, the proliferation of advisory boards is helping university programs developspecific plans with clear and effective