make changes to building assemblies and components with an understanding ofoverall cost and schedule impact. Importantly, cross-discipline integration between design andconstruction dramatically decreased the time needed for cost estimating, planning andscheduling. It also facilitated reductions in consultant billings for specific civil, structural, andMEP design services.Through a case study approach, this paper validates the use of Building Information Modeling asan integrated format for construction education. It demonstrates the advantage which acomprehensive interface can provide to an engineering student; one which depicts the integrationbetween design and construction services. In such an environment, students are able tosimultaneously
programming language. However, due to significant changes in the Freshman andSophomore curriculum, the prerequisite programming course is no longer available.Due to the removal of programming from the general engineering curriculum at Ohio Northern,two options were considered: ending the requirement for structured programming in upper-levelcourses (relying solely on application-specific software tools), or offering a Programming courseconcurrently with Numerical Methods in the Junior year. While commercial software is usefulfor solving many problems, the mechanical engineering faculty decided that knowledge of astructured programming language was still an important skill for our students to develop12. As aresult, a C++ programming course was
MediaProgram (fall 2005 and spring 2006 meetings), commendation was extended to the program forthe technical and creative abilities demonstrated by our graduates, but a lack of adequateprofessional skills was noted. The advisors indicated that weak presentation skills, writing skills,communication skills and overall professionalism often were a barrier to our students when theywere competing for jobs against other applicants. More attention to development of these skillsin the curriculum, and more exposure to the industry via work experiences in the form ofinternships and real world projects, was strongly recommended in order to better prepare ourgraduates to perform effectively as professionals, and to give them an edge as they enter
Conference. Page 12.331.106. Manuel-Dupont S, “Writing Across the Curriculum in an Engineering Program,” J of Eng Ed 1996 p. 35-40 Building Engineering Communication Skills 107. Morello, J, “Comparing Speaking Across the Curriculum and Writing Across the Curriculum Programs,” Communication Education. January 20008. McNair LD, Norback JS, Miller B, “Integrating Discipline-Specific Communication Instruction based on Workforce Data into Technical Communication Courses, “ Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Conference.9. Norback JS, McNair LD, Laughter MJ, Forehand GA, Sutley-Fish, B, “Teaching Workplace
“The perceived diminishedrelevance of Computer Science is being driven by two complementary phenomena: computingapplications are being viewed less as applications of computing technology and more as integralcomponents of everyday tasks, and the field of computing is examining itself in an effort tounderstand how to prepare students for rapidly changing careers increasingly integrated withother disciplines.” These types of observations require that educational program administratorsand other computing professionals continually review the evolving field of computing in aneffort to understand how to prepare students for rapidly changing careers increasingly integratedwith other disciplines.3. Reasons for Loss of IT JobsIt is true that the high
” criteria - ABET 2007-20081).With the advent of the 21st century, communication effectiveness has received even moreattention as the concept of the “global engineer” influences the engineering profession2. Manyengineering programs address communication skills through a specific required course incommunications, often administered by a non-engineering department (see reference 3 for anoverview of communication in current engineering curricula). Such a course will typicallyaddress both nonverbal and verbal communication skills. However, it is well recognized thatcommunication skills must be integrated into the engineering curriculum to be effective4. Formany institutions, where written communication is often a significant activity in
innovation and commercialization, and rapid product developmentDavid Street, Rochester Institute of Technology David M. Street received BS degree in Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) from Rochester Institute of Technology. He is graduate student at RIT in the Manufacturing and Mechanical Systems Integration department. His research interest includes rapid prototyping, product innovation & commercialization, and rapid product development.William Leonard, Rochester Institute of Technology is the program chair has been on faculty in the MET Department at Rochester Institute of Technology since 1998. Bill has a BSME from the College of Engineering at RIT and an M.S. at RIT. He has
speakers were invited to address evolving principles of sustainable civilengineering, eco-renovation, ecological home improvements, deconstruction as discussed above,besides many issues.CONCLUSIONSThe green construction engineering course provides skills and techniques in sustainabilitythat is becoming an essential component of the civil engineering practice. A number ofresults measured throughout this course include skills in critical thinking, datainterpretation and analysis, integrative ability, data collection techniques of various greenconstruction projects. The qualities assessed include curiosity, creativity, appreciation forrole of science and technology (e.g., using LEED by the USGBC in design andconstruction), and a continued interest in
applicationof social sciences in civil engineering courses such as transportation, environmentalengineering and in a capstone design course. Page 12.1461.12Both outcomes require an engineering student to have achieved proficiency at Level 3“Application” of Bloom’s taxonomy. It is assumed that this is achieved as part of theBachelor of Science in Civil Engineering.How does a program achieve these outcomes? How does this change the currentsmorgasbord of humanities and social science electives from which our students choose?These and other issues remain to be explored further. Certainly, the role of humanitiesand social sciences in the curriculum is not a new
problems”.This approach is well suited to a laboratory environment. The laboratory exercises we aredeveloping are designed to promote active learning: through guided inquiry with simpleequipment, students make observations that illustrate qualitative features of standard engineeringmodels. Students are first introduced to the hardware during an in-class demonstration. Duringlecture instruction after the demonstration, the measurements made during the demonstration arerelated to established theories. Students then return to the laboratory to test and deepen theirunderstanding of the concepts presented in lecture. A good example of how cognitive science informs the development of educational materialsis the Physics by Tutorial curriculum
integrate theirlearning into their lives. There have been long-standing claims in the research literature thatstudents learn faster and retain more information the more they are involved in the learningprocess (Liu & Hsiao23, Royer & Royer24). Therefore, the more students interact, the more theywill learn. From a theoretical perspective, Hamilton25 saw the curriculum as a process thatshould not separate what is learned from how it is learned. This duality is the fundamentalidentity of multimedia.Since this class has continuous assignments for students, each week they must write about thecourse topics each week. Our surveys show that students enjoy the self-paced multimediamodules for Units 1 through 4 and their answers to the class
techniques to the current mechanicscourses, namely Mechanics of Materials, will provide students a learner-friendly environment,lower the difficulty of students’ understanding, and improve the retention rates of studentsenrolled in the construction curriculums. However, the traditional chalk board still has its ownstrengths for students’ understanding of course material. Below are detailed students commentsin an organization of selected questions followed by summaries of students’ feedback. What are the benefits of using visualization tools instead of conventional chalk and board? Which part of class gets more benefits from visualization? Lecture or problem solving lab? • Being able to see makes much difference. Labs are the biggest
. Page 12.83.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 A NOVEL LABWORK APPROACH FOR TEACHING A MECHATRONICS COURSE Abstract This paper presents a novel approach adopted to enhance the hands-on learning aspect ofa Mechatronics course for undergraduate mechanical engineering students. In addition totraditional homework, which is usually solved analytically and/or numerically and conventionallaboratory experiments, in which students follow certain pre-written, spoon-feeding proceduresto complete assignment, our approach designed a set of “labwork” as an integral part of thiscourse for students’ learning through their own “design of experiments” to solve engineeringproblems. To solve these
on the partof the Professor, Project Manager and the students to make it work well. This innovativeapproach can be used together with the traditional capstone course to enhance the problemsolving skills of students. This course may however serve as the capstone equivalent forConstruction Management students. Construction engineering students are required to take thiscourse in their final year of studies to prepare them for the construction industry.Bibliography1. Walker, Ellen, L. and Slotterbeck, Oberta, A. “Incorporating Realistic Teamwork into a Small College SoftwareEngineering Curriculum” NSF sponsored Research under Grant No. 9952749.2. Grayson, L. P., “The Making of an Engineer”, John Wiley and Sons, NY, 1993.3. ABET: Accreditation
-on learning? An hands-on learning approach requires students to become activeparticipants instead of passive learners who simply listen to lectures. The concept of “hands-onlearning” is not new in engineering education. A previous study of engineering educationshowed that hands-on learning is an effective method for engineering classes.1 In fact, over thepast 10 years or so, many engineering schools and programs have started to adopt “hands-onlearning” into their curricula. Whether using simple everyday household items or sophisticatedequipment, professors are now trying to integrate hands-on learning into their classes.Laboratory activities are the traditional method of providing students hands-on experience.However, with advancements in
learning outcome of students. 3 To improve the conditions for the staff. 4 To establish an interdisciplinary learning environment. 5 To sustain integration of research in the education. 6 To present a teaching and learning institution that matches the demands of modern society. 7 To sustain a learning setting where solutions are correlated with the context of which it will serve. 8 To create a setting where changes in demands from industry and society can be integrated in the curriculum when the demands appear. 9 Increase the cooperation with industries and society. 10 International competition. 11
from Harvey Mudd College in Claremont, California in May 2002 with a B.S. in engineering. She is working at Honeywell International, an aerospace and defense manufacturer in El Segundo, CA. Her interests are systems integration and hardware development.Kevin Alley, Southwest Research Institute Kevin J. Alley graduated from Harvey Mudd College in Claremont, California in May 2005 with a B.S. in engineering. He is working at Southwest Research Institute, a nonprofit research institute in San Antonio, Texas. His interests are in business management and law.John Silny, Raytheon John F. Silny graduated from both Harvey Mudd College and Claremont McKenna College in Claremont, California in
give up. But then … realized,…If Ijust keep giving up, it’s not gonna help at all. So I would just keep studying even if I gotbad grades, I would just keep going. And that’s really what helped me my first year ofcollege.”Similarly, Peggy, an African American chemical engineering student, also had an earlyintroduction to a focused science curriculum before college. “…in high school, I wentthrough a lot of transitions. It was fun. First year I was really…doin’ whatever, just silly,bouncing off the walls. I got my work done, and I won [the] science fair the first year,and went to the international science and engineering fair and I joined the … area pre-college engineering program, officially. …I was in it for middle school. But once you win,you
solving problems,so that they can later apply this knowledge to engineering system design.Of course, an inductive discussion (the “why”) about the inductive teaching/learningapproach is of value, but a deductive discussion (the “how”) on inductive teaching is alsoimportant. Certainly, there are many different ways to teach design effectively; thebalance of this paper attempts to illustrate some specific successful teaching techniquesthat seem to improve the learning environment in the authors’ hydraulic structures designcourse.Course ExampleAlong with the philosophical ideas just discussed, the development of the hydraulicstructure design course illustrated here was based upon three general principles: 1)integrating lab and lecture topics, 2
University, ranging in age from 10 - 13 were instructed to first build a boat; thenmodify their boat to become a submersible. The activity required the students to test theircreations in a small pool away from the building area in order to reinforce the iterative nature oftesting and redesign. Each student’s process was mapped out in time and with a flow diagram tovividly illustrate his individual process. Through this analysis, the study supplies an example ofhow underwater robotics can be used to integrate the engineering design process with relatedscience topics in the classroom.IntroductionUnderwater robotics is an up and coming field of study in engineering. This area is beingstudied not only for uses in scientific exploration[1], but also for
deficiencies in packages available at the time, the Department producedits own software package, OASIS (Online Assessment System with Integrated Study),described in the next section.Only a prototype version of OASIS existed in 2002. This software package was well-regarded by the instructors using it, who saw it as both reducing their workload and liftingstudent achievement, and the decision was made to develop it further. This development wasinformed by an action-research program, conducted by the author over a four-year period.The research program had two aims. The first aim was to develop and implement OASIS soas to best support student learning. The second aim was to confirm that OASIS did enhancestudent learning and to investigate the extent to
will show how East Carolina adapted to the challenge of teaching thesevarious types of students in an online classroom and the techniques that were used in our IDIS3790 Technical Presentation course.About East Carolina University:Chartered by the North Carolina General Assembly on March 8, 1907, East Carolina Universityhas moved in a rapid but orderly transition from its beginnings as a two-year normal school to aDoctoral/Research-Intensive level comprehensive university whose outreach now transcends itsregional origins. On October 5, 1909, East Carolina Teachers Training School began its firstregular session; during that year 174 men and women students were enrolled. The first class tograduate from the two-year normal curriculum received its
courses. That is, the need toevolve traditional classroom courses into dispersed virtual learning experiences.Much of the motivation for writing such a report hinges on globalization. Without the currentstatus of globalization, the report would not have been written. The process of globalization hascreated an environment where we must do more for engineering education to influence the USeconomy such that the United States is able to retain its leadership position.Globalization will drive more uniformity in the educational systems between that of the UnitedStates and those around the world. We will require additional knowledge to remain globallycompetitive and maintain that global leadership.Globalization also levels the playing field for
surveys, and behavior rubrics.Bibliography1. Ng, Y. (2005). Taste of Engineering, Integrating Engineering into a Liberal Arts Institution. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 2192.2. http://www.stkate.edu/~ysng/PROJECTS/METoo/index.html3. Steadman, S., Dewey, B.R., Jacquot, R.G., & Marquard, P.J. (2001). Enhancement of an introductory computing course with experiential and cooperative learning. Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 3553.4. Beder, S. (1999). Beyond technicalities: Expanding engineering thinking. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 125, 12
-K through post-secondary education programs and of professional development programs for educators. She has worked on projects relating primarily to the areas of literacy, science, technology, engineering, and math. Prior to joining the Donahue Institute, she worked as an independent assessment and evaluation consultant. Ms. Quinn received an M.A. in Developmental Psychology from Clark University and a B.A. in Psychology from Case Western Reserve University.Jill Rulfs, Worcester Polytechnic Institute JILL RULFS is Associate Professor of Biology & Biotechnology at WPI. In addition to being a former public school teacher herself, she has remained active in university/public
. When studying how to retain engineering students, this raises the questionof what factors influence academic success. For, if academic success can be achieved, thenumber of students defecting or being dismissed from the engineering program would decrease.Some researchers have recognized that social integration is also an important factor to academicsuccess.10, 19-21Social integration within a classroom allows peer-to-peer interaction. Students are able to buildsocial capital, which “consists of social networks, habits or cooperation and bonds of reciprocitythat serve to generate benefits for members of a community.”10 Students are willing to shareinformation within their network, issues out of the class and issues in the class. Unfortunately
improvement. All of this information was to beused towards quantitative analysis as well as ongoing improvement/updating of the teachingmaterials, experimental facility, and delivery approach. At the end of the semester, studentswere also asked to provide a qualitative assessment of the overall system and their experiencefrom this remote laboratory facility. Student activity profile: As an integral part of the remote laboratory system, students’activity profiles were monitored. This provision records when a student logs in or logs out to thesystem and also how long he/she performed an experiment. This allows the course teacher tomonitor when and for how long a student access to experiment. At the same time the data can beused to develop an
earlier gains, characterized stage two. Stage three:the stage of pondering and deliberations, which has lingered on for a long time, is characterizedby calls from industries, engineering graduates, and invited experts, for more rounded engineerswith the skills and abilities to function in a modern business climate. Unfortunately, the responseto these calls has been slow. The “piece meal” approach and/or periodic adjustments to analready over-burdened curriculum, in an attempt to meet a broad set of demands, have not beeneffective in meeting objectives, and have convinced many stakeholders that the time has comefor a radical departure from the traditional layered and sequential structure that has prevailed fordecades. There are clearly significant
AC 2007-1185: PROMOTING UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH BY CREATING ARESEARCH OPTION IN A TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION COURSEJenny Lo, Virginia Tech JENNY LO, assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, is interested in engineering ethics, curriculum design, issues related to engineering freshmen, and undergraduate research.Lisa McNair, Virginia Tech LISA MCNAIR, assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, is interested in qualitative methods, interdisciplinary learning and collaboration, strategies for improving professional skills of engineering students, and risk communication.Whitney Edmister, Virginia Tech WHITNEY EDMISTER
the relevant axes of figures have been predefined. Mass Transfer Operations(ENGG*3470) is a course that was introduced into the Environmental Engineering curriculum atthe University of Guelph in 1998. A lack of facilities initially meant the course started withoutan appropriate laboratory component. Over the past four years the course has evolved throughstudent designed, built and tested experiments as an integral component of their coursework.Currently, the students are responsible for choosing a mass transfer topic, selecting compoundsinvolved in the mass transfer process, identifying most appropriate analytical techniques,designing, building and trouble-shooting the required apparatus, performing a minimum of twoexperiments and