confidence, confidence following topic coverage, and metacognitive reflection,as well as with mock FE exam scores. An exploratory k-means cluster analysis further identifiedstudents belonging to four clusters. A potential implication of this study for engineeringeducation is to highlight the importance of students’ confidence in problem-solving skills forsubsequent performance. Importantly, this study presents students’ perceptions and appraisals ofthe course activities that impact their problem-solving confidence.IntroductionEngineers are problem solvers and thus fostering problem-solving skills during their academicendeavors is extremely important [1]. Problem-solving is defined as a process used to obtain abest answer to a context or situation [1
, construction has been booming throughout the USA. The construction industry is one of the nation'slargest industries and one of the largest sources of employment. Employment in construction is projected to grow 6percent from 2020 to 2030 [1]. At the same time, since projects are becoming more complex, attaining a bachelor'sdegree is an increasingly important requirement for obtaining access to high-demand, well-paying careers in theconstruction management industry [2]. The demand for construction education graduates has increased markedly inthe past several years. As a result of this demand, construction education programs flourish throughout the nation [3,4]. The search result of ASC Archives for all past articles on construction programs shows that
' understanding of career opportunities inBME, we developed a series of 1-credit (4-week) BME-In-Practice Modules that exposedbiomedical learners to biomedical engineering practice. Each 1-credit module in the series wasdesigned to run for four weeks and focused on different areas in BME such as Tissueengineering, Computational Modeling, Medical Device Development, Drug Development,Regulations, and Neural Engineering. Learners' enrolled in one or multiple modules and engagedin experiential learning for 4-weeks to gain knowledge and skills relevant to the BME area offocus in the module(s). Following the conclusion of the BME-In-Practice series, we collectedsurvey data from learners who participated in the modules to address the following researchquestions
Electrical Systems, was chosen and includedthese broad topics as well as plumbing. The faculty know it as the MEP course, and studentsnickname it the Mechanical course since that is the first area in the course they study. Forconstruction engineering students, this course broadens their curriculum and allows them tointeract with faculty and students in other departments. Mechanical engineering students can takethis course as an elective to apply many theoretical concepts from previous courses into anarrower field. Since its inception, the course has been taught by a mechanical engineeringfaculty member.The ASME Vision 2030 [1] states that the problems that mechanical engineers work on ofteninclude elements of other engineering disciplines, require
-introduce socio-technical context in CEE curricula, weare conducting a systematic review of the published literature. The objectives of this research areto document, synthesize, and amplify the work of these scholars and to encourage the communityof CEE faculty to re-contextualize the knowledge and skills taught in the CEE curriculum. Thispaper describes the methodology, including search terms and sources examined, reports thepreliminary results of the review, and synthesizes the preliminary findings. Future work willpropose strategies and structures that could be adapted and employed by civil engineering facultythroughout the U.S. to 1) engage and retain students from groups that historically have beenexcluded from CEE and 2) better educate CEE
transitioninto college Dr. Maria Elena Chavez-Echeagaray, Dr. Tamara Coronella, and Robert Dodge Arizona State UniversityAbstractThis Work in Progress paper describes the effect of Homework 0 (HW 0), an activity offered atWestern University designed to support Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics(STEM) students’ successful transition to the first year of college. This transition is a criticaltime as students face several personal and academic challenges [1] or most, college means a newlifestyle and level of independence [1]. Pre-college academic activities are positively correlatedwith a student’s persistence and graduation [2] because these activities can support thedevelopment of a student’s sense
is important to briefly consider several types of definitions and select which type ofdefinition that we will employ in this paper.In Chapter 3 of his book on formal logic, Clark [1] described three commonly used types ofdefinitions: connotative definitions, denotative definitions, and ostensive definitions. To helpillustrate the differences between these types of definitions let us borrow Clark’s example andconsider the varying ways to define the term eligible voter. A connotative definition defines theterm by listing the necessary and sufficient qualifications that attach to those to whom the termvalidly applies (e.g., a human being, over the age of 18, and who is a citizen of the geographicalor political region in which the election
be employed to measure and address inequities withina population. Comprehensive demographic data collection allows for the representation of diverse livedexperiences among the surveyed population. However, in many cases the survey instruments developedto collect demographic data lack the nuance required to fully capture the diversity of lived experience amongall members of the population under study. In particular, the LGBTQ+ community is one that remainscritically understudied. Recent studies have begun to examine the unique difficulties that LGBTQ+ peopleface in STEM careers and education, which include navigating coming out in the workplace [1], harassment,and professional devaluation [2]. These difficulties have detrimental effects on
applyingsustainability to their design work. As a general trend based on the alumni data, women alsotended to feel less confident in applying sustainability to their design work. However, they weremore interested in the concept than men. This paper will suggest improvements in ALMs relatedto sustainability concepts at Boise State University.IntroductionIn recent years, sustainability concepts have piqued an interest in many professionalcommunities and have been emphasized in workforce development and student education [1],[2]. With interest in sustainability rising, many universities have begun integrating sustainabilityconcepts into their engineering curriculum [3]–[5]. Many universities, including Boise StateUniversity (BSU), introduced sustainable concepts
the demographics and the situation are different, the human touch cannot entirely bereplaced by virtual advising. Some authors have written about how students faced wideningbarriers in higher education due to lack of informed guidance as a result of inability to adapt tovirtual formats, particularly those who were not proactive about their next educational steps7.The International Association of Student Affairs and Services (IASAS) mentions acomprehensive set of out of- the-classroom student services that are designed to “enable andempower students to focus more intensely on their studies and personal growth, both cognitivelyand emotionally8. It mentions three key objectives that higher education institutions should aimfor (1) identify the
demonstrates awareness of downstream effects [1].Approaches such as sustainable design [2], human-centered design [3], value-sensitive design[4], and universal design [5] have gained popularity in pushing engineering design toward amore holistic thought process. These methodologies ask engineers to expand their design scopeand consider the impact of their engineering solutions on a global scale, with new stakeholdersfrom a wide range of backgrounds, countries, cultures, and experiences. Engineering designersmust now constantly consider effects on the environment and natural resources, both for the sakeof the present and for future generations. Engineers must design not just for individual wants andneeds, but also for the public good. These
. She received her B. S. in Bioengineering from the University of Pittsburgh.Kate FinleyVictoria Longfield © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com A Module on Ethics and Social Implications of Computing for Introductory Engineering Computing CoursesIntroduction Documentaries like The Social Dilemma [1] and Coded Bias [2] present ethical and socialimplications of computing to the public, increasing awareness of these critical concerns. Thelatter features several researchers who have been investigating algorithmic bias and howdifferent groups of people (with respect to race, class, and gender) are harmed more by
campusactivities; as to teaching and learning, two-thirds of the institutions claim to have replacedclassroom learning with distance learning, facing major challenges such as technicalinfrastructure, competences and pedagogies for distance learning and study requirements, whilegaining some benefits of more opportunities for flexible learning possibilities 1 . Other challengesregarding affordability, life-long learning, education policy, and students with special needs arewell summarized in a 2021 literature review 2 . Till 2022, an abundance of researches have focusedon the general impact of campus closure and classes moving online 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 . Studiesfocusing on specific areas or needs of education, however, are gaining popularity recently as
simulation resultswith respect to an accepted failure theory for the selected material. This facilitates thedevelopment of students’ critical thinking skills by making connections between theory andsimulation, and illustrates some of the fundamental mechanics principles and concepts.1. IntroductionAdvanced computational tools provide a powerful resource to address the need for learningthrough real-world concepts. Computational simulations offer an interactive learning tool forstudents to explore various concepts, test ideas, and receive feedback [1]. The use of computersimulations as a learning aid in higher education is growing rapidly and has become a majortrend in undergraduate engineering education [2]. On the subject of machine design
proficiencyby employers using a Likert scale of 0 as not important or not proficient to 4 as absolutelyessential or absolutely proficient (Hirudayaraj, 2021). According to their findings, the topprofessional competencies ranked most important for entry-level engineers were: 1) reliability,with an importance rating of 3.93 and proficiency rating of 3.35; 2) ability to work in teams(ABET required competency), with an importance rating of 3.86 and proficiency rating of 3.38;3) responsibility, with an importance rating of 3.86 and proficiency rating of 3.32; 4) self-motivation, with an importance of 3.85 and a proficiency rating of 3.30; and 5) positive attitude,with an importance rating of 3.82 and proficiency rating of 3.55 (Hirudayaraj, 2021). Sincemany
are known problem-solvers. Through their rigorous education and subsequent practice,they learn to solve complex open-ended problems for the betterment of society. What is lesswell-known is that professional engineers are also great visualizers. In tests with more than30,000 professionals [1], engineers demonstrated the highest level of spatial visualization skills,followed closely by architects and other STEM professionals. A more recent study shows astrong correlation between spatial visualization skills and creativity and technical innovation [2].This leads to the hypothesis that undergraduate engineering degree programs should producegraduates with well-developed spatial skills if we are to produce engineers who are capable ofsolving the
from pilot tests with students.IntroductionIn many engineering classes, active experimentation is an important step in the learning process[1], [2]. Through this activity the learner is able to translate an abstract concept into practicalapplication. Translation of abstract principles to real world concepts is often achieved throughinstructional laboratories that typically require significant space, time, and faculty resources. Toaddress the heavy burden of labs on these resources, remote or fully virtual labs have becomemore popular in different areas of STEM in the last decade, especially with the increase in thenumber of online classes offered [3], [4], [5]. Remote labs are physically existing labs, which canbe used online without being
appropriatesource of evidence for decision-making due to the lack of rigour in their methodology (Green et al.,2006). Since the purpose of this paper is to foster a philosophical discussion around the translation ofactor-network theory in engineering education research, we chose narrative literature review as ourmethodology.We searched for ANT literature in the Journal of Engineering Education, European Journal of EngineeringEducation, Engineering Studies and the conference proceedings of the Canadian Association ofEngineering Education and American Society for Engineering Education. First, we selected all papers thatcontained any mention to actor-network theory and engineering in the full text. Next, we appliedselection criteria to exclude papers that 1
response is possible. Simulation toolsprovide a convenient way to visualize the dynamics of differential equations, but they are not asubstitute for experiencing with your own eyes and hands how the dynamic stiffness of a controlsystem can be changed with feedback gain or how the stabilization of a control system can belimited by sensor noise or actuator power supply limits. For some learners, the kinestheticexperience is essential to deeply grasping the concepts of control systems.Educational theory of engineering laboratoriesIn this section, the literature on engineering labs and remote labs is briefly reviewed.Feisel [1] identified 13 learning objectives for labs. These include traditional objectives such asinstrumentation, models, experiment
of women in mining and metallurgy professions. We interviewed professionals inthe industry and the university to obtain their perceptions of activities or initiatives that willincrease the percentages of women in mining fields. The study consisted of semi-structuredinterviews with professionals to learn how they entered their professions and what can be done toincrease the participation of women in the mining industry. The interviewees were primarily 1)mining industry professionals, 2) academic program managers, and 3) part-time academicians andindustry workers. The study results yielded initiatives and actions to be implemented by theindustry, academia, and joint efforts. The action plans will promote the integration of women intothe
given the limits imposed by social distancing, andwhether these workarounds reveal unexpected strategies which might be applicable to futureremote learning, and to community-based learning even when physical reconnection is allowed.IntroductionCritical of traditional textbook-focused teaching strategies, universities are exploring ways toprepare engineering students to develop more open-ended problem-solving skills. [1]. Buildingon the ideas of learning through practice [2], engineering programs are developing alternativemodels for teaching and learning, in which creative exploration, and broader human-centeredaspects are introduced as early stages of the research process, preceding the definition andresolution of the typical engineering
’ cyber capabilities, preparedness and resilience [1]. This makes it morechallenging to develop and operate educational programs that effectively train cybersecuritytalent, which is able to take on and perform in multiple roles and responsibilities, withouttailoring the program to be very specific to such roles. Hence, cybersecurity educationalprograms must train professionals that can stand the test of time, in a fast-paced and quicklychanging career [2].Educators are quickly recognizing that the curriculum structure and delivery modalities must bedeveloped to ensure foundational concepts and frameworks are clearly comprehended andtranslated into practice. This has motivated several efforts at different levels to outline theexpected skillsets
studyAbstractAs a highly interdisciplinary industry, architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) requireeffective and seamless collaboration to deliver projects timely and with high quality. To betterprepare students with the demanding cooperative skill, collaborative learning has always been anintegral part of the education of undergraduate students. Augmented reality (AR) technology hasmatured rapidly in recent years and has been widely used in various fields such as medical,manufacturing, entertainment, and education. The seamless combination of the real world andvirtual environment is one of the most important characteristics of AR technology [1]. In thisstudy, we utilized this characteristic to develop a multi-user design application in
accidents might have been caused by human factors. In this aspect,autonomous driving, in some cases, could save lives. For the safety and functionality ofautonomous driving, there have been active R&D (Research and Development) projects inacademia and industry. To target autonomous car research, a capstone project with fourundergraduate engineering students at Texas A&M University was created in Fall 2020. By themotivation of creating a capstone project that is related to the development of an educationalautonomous car simulator. As a phase 1, four Engineering Technology (ET) students haveformed a team in Fall 2020 and one ET faculty member advised this team, they concluded theirwork in Spring 2021. The task for this capstone project was to
: Redesigning an Introductory Mechanics Course to Include Meaningful Design Experiences Damon Kirkpatrick1 and Michael Anderson1 1 United States Air Force Academy Department of Mechanical Engineering 2354 Fairchild Hall, Ste 6L-121 USAFA, CO 80840AbstractThe United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) is a commissioning source for the U.S. AirForce, and as such, it strives to provide each graduate a well-rounded undergraduate education,grounded in a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) curriculum, in addition tomilitary officership
) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Scaffolding reflection across the design curriculum: Triangulating Student, Alumni, and Faculty Perspectives of the Role of Design within an Engineering Science Program1.0 IntroductionHigher education institutions regularly make significant investments to promote a high-qualityundergraduate experience [1]. Curriculum design in higher education is localized, andstandardization of higher education curricula mainly targets meeting specific accreditationbodies' requirements [2]. As such, little relational emphasis is placed on how the plannedcurriculum is enacted by instructors and experienced by students
and services include perspectives of the project leadership, andfeedback from the participating scholars collected as part of program evaluation. This feedbackhelped fine-tune the partnership model to provide participating scholars with the mostmeaningful support possible.Findings suggest three design features of successful support: 1. While general training and support such as those offered by career service centers are useful, specific support by STEM faculty with real-time efforts in applying for academic positions was more timely and valuable for URM scholars. 2. Transition support is critical as scholars’ needs shift from dissertator to postdoctoral researcher to early career faculty. For example, requests to review
. This study analyzes the results of the three cohorts to understand the effects ofusing the PSS approach for teaching this subject.Key Words: Problem-Solving Studio, classroom research, learning outcomes assessment1. IntroductionThe problem-solving studio (PSS) is a pedagogical technique that focuses on problem-basedlearning. Because of PSS’s features, instructors can adjust the level of support they provide inreal time, as well as the difficulty level of the problems, to ensure that each student is challengedat a level that is beyond what they could achieve on their own, but at the upper end of what theycan achieve in a PSS setting [1]. This approach was initially implemented in the BiomedicalEngineering program at Georgia Institute of
Resources Engineering. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work-in-Progress: Monitoring the Attainment of ABET Student Outcomes and Projected Achievement of Program Educational Objectives by CohortAbstractIn this study, a systematic methodology is proposed to 1) monitor progress in program-levelattainment of ABET Student Outcomes and Program Educational Objectives using the collectedassessment data, 2) relate the projected Program Educational Objectives achievement with alumniand senior student surveys for closure and evidence-based revision of Program EducationalObjectives and curriculum improvement. The proposed method aggregates
prepare studentsfor structural design. In particular, the design of bolted steel connections requires numerouschecks using both the tension member limit states of AISC Chapter D and the bolted connectionlimit states of AISC Chapter J [1]. Students often end up confused about the limit statecalculations, unable to connect the written mathematical formulas to physical behavior.On assessments, the instructor requires the students to sketch failure paths for the various modesof failure. However, students seemingly have difficulty identifying where the basic tensionmember limit state failures occur, let alone the more complex connection limit states. As can beseen in Figure 1, the student has placed the yielding limit state towards the rear of the