, “School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 59- 109, 2004.[7] “Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities – HSIs,” Hacu.net, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.hacu.net/hacu/HSIs.asp.[8] E.R. Ewumi, O. Adesope, C.S. Claiborn, A. Minichiello, “Work-in-Progress (WIP): Insights gathered from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) about engineering/computer science participation in high impact educational practices at two western land grant institutions,” In 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2021.[9] A. Minichiello, M. Asghar, E.R. Ewumi, O. Adesope, C.S. Claiborn, “A characterization
PreparationPreparing the data involved four steps: (1) collecting relevant papers, (2) documenting designprocedures from the selected manuscripts, (3) coding the content, and (4) defining thesequencing of design procedures. In this case, the publication venues chosen were the Journal ofEngineering Education (n = 17), the European Journal of Engineering Education (n = 20), andthe ASEE Annual Conference proceedings (n = TBD). The search for manuscripts wasconducted using Creswell and Plano Clark’s [4] recommended strings: “mixed method*” ORmixed-method* OR “qualitative AND qualitative” between 2014 and 2021 to avoid overlap withprevious reviews. From there, each manuscript was reviewed to verify if the research design wasindeed mixed methods and if the
Paper ID #37481Perception of Students’ understanding of BIM withSustainable DesignSanjeev Adhikari (Dr.) Dr. Sanjeev Adhikari is faculty from Kennesaw State University. Previously he was faculty at Morehead State University from 2009 to 2016 and faculty at Purdue University – Indianapolis from 2016 to 2019. He completed a Ph.D. degree in civil engineering, focusing on construction management, from Michigan Technological University in 2008. He has an extensive teaching background with 20 years of the academic experience at five different universities. Students and departments have always praised him for his
Expertise and Knowledge Fluency in Design and Innovation,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.[6] A. W. Johnson and J. E. S. Swenson, “Open-Ended Modeling Problems in a Sophomore- Level Aerospace Mechanics of Materials Courses,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Nov. 02, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/open-ended-modeling-problems-in-a-sophomore-level-aerospace- mechanics-of-materials-courses[7] E. Treadway, J. E. S. Swenson, and A. W. Johnson, “Open-Ended Modeling Group Projects in Introductory Statics and Dynamics Courses,” presented at the
–329, 2005, publisher: American School Counselor Association. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42732626 [4] M. Kargarmoakhar, M. Ross, Z. Hazari, M. Weiss, M. Georgiopoulos, K. Christensen, and T. Solis, “Computing Pathways: A Quantitative Inquiry into the Dynamic Pathways of Students in Computing with Gender Comparisons,” 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Jun. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10194755-computing-pathways- quantitative-inquiry-dynamic-pathways-students-computing-gender-comparisons [5] J. Margolis and A. Fisher, Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. MIT press, 2002. [6] J. Zhu, L. Zahedi, and M. S. Ross, “Evaluating Publications’ Keywords in Computer
? Science Scope 2008;32(2). [6] Roy J. Engineering by the numbers: 2017-2018. Asee 2019. [7] Chen X. STEM attrition: College students' paths into and out of STEM fields statistical analysis report. NCES 2014-001. ; 2013. [8] Sonnert G, Fox MF, Adkins K. Undergraduate women in science and engineering: Effects of faculty, fields, and institutions over time. Social Science Quarterly 2007;88(5). [9] Marra RM, Rodgers KA, Shen D, Bogue B. Women engineering students and self- efficacy: A multi-year, multi-institution study of women engineering student self- efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education 2009;98(1). [10] Dou R, Cian H. Constructing STEM identity: An expanded structural model for STEM identity
screwdrivers.Developing the tool skills necessary for the printer build subsequently proved to be avaluable active learning experience for the students, as well as a confidence builder.While many research libraries provide 3D printing services, UF was the first university toprovide portable 3D printers for check-out and one of the first to offer a class wherestudents build a 3D printer. These services have helped center the engineering librarywithin the network of university maker resources and, through these connections, haveled to new instruction and research partnerships across campus.References[1] L. Mann, "Making a Place for Makerspaces in Information Literacy," Reference &User Services Quarterly, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 82-86, 2019.[2] H. Moorefield-Lang
Community Engagement and Scholarship, vol. 9, no. 2, Jun. 2019, [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/jces/vol9/iss2/3[6] S. Brown-Fraser, I. Forrester, R. Rowel, A. Richardson, and A. N. Spence, “Development of a Community Organic Vegetable Garden in Baltimore, Maryland: A Student Service- Learning Approach to Community Engagement,” Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 409–436, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1080/19320248.2014.962778.[7] M. Assefa et al., “Next Steps from a School Gardening Partnership Conference (AGES: Academic Gardening to Enrich our Students): Expanding the Impact of School Gardens Through Higher Education, K-12 School and Community Coalitions
comprise 10% of the sample of students who take remedial courses comparedto only 5% of the students who did not take remedial courses. Given the current low 9representation of URM students across engineering in general (ASEE, 2017, 2019; NSF, 2020),their relative representation in remedial courses makes examining the impact of these courses onacademic pathways even more important (e.g., Attewell et al., 2006; Bahr, 2010; Flores et al.,2014). In terms of academic outcomes, only 28% of remediated students declare engineering astheir major on time (by the end of their first year of college), compared to 69% of non-remediated students. The gap
] Kleba & Reina-Rozo, (2021) Fostering peace engineering and rethinking development: A Latin American view. Technology Forecasting and Social Change 167(1)[10] Charleton, Callie,* Desai, Miral*, Noriego, Carrisa E.*, Gooding, Elise*, Reyna, Micahel S.*, Thompson, Lizabeth L., and Lehr, Jane L, (2021) Engineers Without Borders at a Community college: Lessons Learned, Presentation and Paper at ASEE Annual Meeting, Long Beach, CA July 2021.[11] Klein, Taylor (2019) Redefining Failure reports. Poster presented at the EWB-USA national conference in Pittsburgh PA, November 2019
often at odds over workplace equity”, 2018. 8 Shackelford, R., A. McGettrick, R. Sloan, H. Topi, G. Davies, R. Kamali, J. Cross, J. Impagliazzo, R. LeBlanc, and B. Lunt, “Computing Curricula 2005: The Overview Report”. Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2006, p. 456. 9 Clear, A., A. Parrish, J. Impagliazzo, and M. Zhang, “Computing Curricula 2020: Introduction and community engagement”. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2019, pp. 653-654. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Annual Conference10 Exter, M., S
institutions,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 2502–2511, 2020. [4] L. M. Top, S. A. Schoonraad, and V. K. Otero, “Development of pedagogical knowledge among learning assistants,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2018. [5] H. E. Jardine, “Instructional partnerships between science faculty and undergraduate teaching and learning assistants: Implications for formative assessment,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, 2019. [6] D. J. Orser, K. Dukart, C. Choi, and F. Wood, “Utilizing peer learning assistants to improve student outcomes in an introductory ece course,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020. [7] S. J. Pollock, “No Single Cause
faculty at the US Military Academy at West Point teaching civil engineering. He also served as the Director, Graduate Professional Development at Northeastern University’s College of Engineering. He is the recipient of the 2021 NSPE Engineering Education Excellence Award and the 2019 ASCE Thomas A Lenox ExCEEd Leadership Award.Tanya Kunberger Dr. Tanya Kunberger is a Professor and Chair of the Department of Environmental Engineering, Civil Engineering and Construction Management in the U.A. Whitaker College of Engineering at Florida Gulf Coast University. Dr. Kunberger's educational research interests are in self-efficacy, persistence, and effective learning approaches in engineering and the development of an interest
. Across the Disciplines, 2011. 8(3).5. Russell, D.R. and E.P. Maimon, Writing in the Academic Disciplines: A Curricular History. 2002: Southern Illinois University Press.6. Catherine Anne, H., et al., A Writing in the Disciplines Approach to Technical Report Writing in Chemical Engineering Laboratory Courses. 2019 ASEE Conferences: Tampa, Florida.7. Ryan, W., et al., Writing Across Engineering: A Collaborative Approach to Support STEM Faculty’s Integration of Writing Instruction in their Classes. 2019 ASEE Conferences: Tampa, Florida.8. Wilhout, S., WAC without a WAC program, in Sustainable WAC: A Whole Systems Approach to Launching and Developing Writing Across the Curriculums Programs, M
: Baseline data and analysis,” 2010 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/16181[14] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), “Criteria 3: Studentoutcomes,” Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020. [Online]. Available:https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/#GC3[15] American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), “Transforming undergraduateeducation in engineering phase I: Synthesizing and integrating industry perspectives; Workshopreport,” 2013. [Online]. Available: http://tuee.asee.org/[16] K. Gray, “Competencies: Employers weigh importance versus new grad proficiency,”National
). “From" Leaky Pipelines" to" Diversity of Thought": What Does" Diversity" Mean inEngineering Education?” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[20] C. Baillie & A. Pawley. (Eds.). (2012). Engineering and social justice: In the university andbeyond. Purdue University Press.[21] J. A. Leydens and J.C. Lucena. (2017) Engineering justice: Transforming engineeringeducation and practice. John Wiley & Sons.[22] D. Riley. (2008). Engineering and social justice. Synthesis Lectures on Engineers,Technology, and Society, 3(1), 1-152.AppendixPage 1: General informationThis page will collect general information about your participation with ECX and ETWI was a presenter or moderator at the following ECX sessions: Check all that apply
: 10.18260/1-2--35001.[2] D. Newnan, T. Eschenbach, J. Lavelle, and N. Lewis, Engineering Economy Analysis, 14th ed. New york: Oxford University, 2019.[3] J. A. White, K. E. Case, and D. B. Pratt, Principles of Engineering Economic Analysis, 6th ed. Wiley, 2012.[4] W. Sullivan, E. Wicks, and C. Koelling, Engineering Economy, 17th ed. Pearson, 2019.[5] C. Park, Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 4th ed. Pearson, 2019.[6] A. Sarfaraz and T. Shraibati, “Increasing student engagement in engineering economy class,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2006, doi: 10.18260/1-2--1249.[7] “Problem-Based Learning | Center for Teaching Innovation.” https://teaching.cornell.edu/teaching-resources/engaging-students/problem
, IN, 2019. Available:https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284316908.[12] J. Mendez and J. Lofton, “Two Approaches to Concept Maps in Undergraduate FluidMechanics,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jun. 2020.Available: https://peer.asee.org/two-approaches-to-concept-maps-in-undergraduate-fluid-mechanics.[13] M. Govindaraj, “Title: Concept Maps for Engineering Courses as an Addition toSyllabi.,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jun. 2020.Available: https://peer.asee.org/title-concept-maps-for-engineering-courses-as-an-addition-to-syllabi.[14] N. Fang, “Using Concept Maps to Illustrate the Evolution of Key Concepts: StudentLearning Experience in a Foundational Undergraduate
that the study of engineering is hardfor incoming students as it presents students with various academic challenges which requireshigh levels of persistence, self-discipline (Direito, Chance, & Malik, 2019). Due to thechallenges that engineering students face during their years in engineering school, engineeringeducation researchers have explored psychological factors that influence students’ achievementin engineering programs (Hsieh, Sullivan, Sass, & Guerra, 2012).Despite the great interest and attention that the grit construct has received which allowed it tocapture public imagination and influence education policy through multiple bestselling booksand articles about the importance of grit in determining an individual’s success in
engineer. Mosier worked 6 years in municipal government public works. Mosier researches infrastructure specifically focused on sustainable infrastructure and its cost. Other research interests include engineering education topics. She has been a member of ASEE since 2015 and is currently serving as Program Chair of the Architectural Engineering Division and is the Construction Division Chair. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Using tools and lessons from online learning to enhance in-person Soil Mechanics Laboratory experiencesAbstractDuring and immediately after the Covid-19 pandemic, faculty
outstanding teaching awards in 1997, 2001, 2003, 2005, 2014, 2017, and 2019. He served as a NASA Fellow at Goddard Space Flight Center in 1996 and 1997 through the ASEE Summer Faculty Fellowship Program. He served as Dean of the ORU College of Science and Engineering from 2007 to 2012. He also served as Director of the Center for Faith and Learning at ORU from 2013 to 2016. His current research involves engineering education, reverse engineering, and contributions from the field of engineering to the science and faith conversation. He and his student research team, have produced many publications in these areas. His first book, which combines all three of these areas, came out in 2019: Hacking the Cosmos: How Reverse
socialjustice. Constructing a More Restorative, Inclusive, Engineering Practice: A Case Study of Engineering Social Justice in an Introductory Civil Engineering CourseINTRODUCTION Engineering doesn’t occur in a vacuum, devoid of inequalities, social hierarchy, and politics,thus, neither should students’ exposure to engineering concepts in the classroom. Withoutunpacking racial and cultural supremacy values held in society, engineers will further perpetuate,rather than disrupt, the normative standards of marginalization, oppression, exploitation, anddehumanization of groups (Semmes, 1995; Karwat, 2019). One of the ways engineering educatorsare seeking to address sustained injustice is through changes to engineering practice. For example
. The New Electronics Technology, Circa 2015, by Gary J. Mullett, Proceedings of the 2009 American Society of Engineering Educators Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin, Texas. 19. Verizon Nextstep Program, by Gary J. Mullett & William S. Mullett, Proceedings of the 2003 American Society of Engineering Educators Annual Conference and Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee.20. The Verizon NextStep Program – 15 Year Partnership, by Gary Mullett, Paper presented at the 2009 ASEE CIEC Conference, Palm Springs, CA.21. Who is Going to Teach the Skills Needed by the IoT Field Technician?, by G. J. Mullett, Proceedings of the 2019 American Society of Engineering Educators Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa
years of occupational experience, with her most recent experience being in teaching, research, and service. Dr. Ofori-Boadu is a dedicated instructor, advisor, mentor, and role model who has served over 1,500 undergraduate and graduate students. Andrea has received almost $2M from funding agencies to include the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Engineering Information Foundation (EIF), the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), the National Housing Endowment (NHE), and East Coast Construction Services (ECCS). In 2019, she received her prestigious NSF CAREER grant to construct substantive theories that explain professional identity development processes in undergraduate architecture, engineering, and
demand data and desired peakreduction (power capacity). The program is designed for educational purposes but can also havepractical use in sizing ESSs.* E-mail address: jelio@asu.edu (J. Elio).1. Introduction Reducing electricity demand is commonly seen as one of the most promising solutions tomitigating global climate change [1]. This is for good reason, since electricity productionconstituted 25% of greenhouse gas emissions in 2019, totaling nearly 1,625 million metric tonsof carbon dioxide in the United States [2]. When electricity consumers run consistently, powergeneration plants can run consistently which leads to their highest efficiency and lowest carbonemissions. To explain, baseload power generation plants typically operate
. Table 2: Basic information of the eight cohorts Maximum possible Number of Number of number of Average number students who students who did Class exercise submittals of submittals completed course not resubmit work 2018 Spring 12 7.4 19 11 2018 Fall 15 9.3 23 5 2019 Fall 23 8.3 19 9 2020 Spring 18 8.9 18 3 2020 Fall 23
within CPI’s curation, including a library’s mobile maker lab, a communitycollege’s summer camps, a tech company’s mentorship program, among other programs.Preliminary results are additionally promising. Recently, CPI researchers examined growth incomputer programming attitudes among middle school CPI users (N=610; MeanAge = 12.07years, SDAge = .77 years, %female = 37.2%; 68.3% Hispanic/Latinx, 16.3% Asian/AsianAmerican, 4.9% Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, 4.7% White/European American, 3.5% AmericanIndian or Alaskan Native, 2.0% Black/African American, 20.1% Other category) enrolled ineither the 2017-2018 or 2018-2019 academic year in minority-serving schools 25 . Even whenaccounting for existing differences in students’ math attitudes, there was
, Machine Design, Renewable Energy and Additive Manufacturing. His current research interests include Robotics, CIM, Sustainable Manufacturing, Micro Machining, Additive Machining and Engineering & Technology Education. He has published several papers, in these areas, in various national & international conferences and journals. He has worked in heavy and light manufacturing industries manufacturing pumps, motors, and CNC machine tools in the areas of system design, production planning and control and manufacturing. Edinbarough also served in paramilitary forces and in the Indian Air Force. He is a Life Member of the ISTE, a senior life member of the IE (India), a member of the ASEE & SME, and a licensed
., Evangelinos, D., Psillos, D., & Valassi- ades, O., (2003). Teaching measurement in the introductory physics laboratory, The physics teacher,41(7), 394-401. [4] Norouzi, M., Pawloski, J. S., Qi, H., & Jafari, F. (2019). Enhancing Uncertainty Analysis for Engineering Students, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1- 2—32753. [5] Kessler, M. (2005). Air Rocket Thrust Experiment Involving Computerized Data Acquisition, Calibration, And Uncertainty Analysis, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2—15328 [6] Kirkup, L., (2004). Reforming the teaching of uncertainty to undergraduate science and engineering students. Proceedings of the MSA (Metrology Society of
Challenges.” In Proceedings of Pacific Southwest AmericanSociety of Engineering Education Conference, Tempe, AZ, USA, April 20, 2017.[6] M. Matthews, “A grand challenge curriculum,” ASEE Prism, 29 (7), 34-35, 2020.[7] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Environmental Engineering forthe 21st Century: Addressing Grand Challenges. Washington, D.C.: The National AcademiesPress, 2019, https://doi.org/10.17226/25121.[8] C.T. Miller, W.G. Gray, and K. Bruning, “Evolution of environmental engineering:Challenges and solutions,” J. Environ. Eng., 146 (7), 02520001, 2020.[9] ABET, “Accreditation,” Baltimore, MD, USA, 2022.[10] M. Besterfield-Sacre, M.F. Cox, M. Borrego, K. Beddoes, and J. Zhu, “Changingengineering education: Views of US