‘anunderstanding of professional and ethical responsibility.’ Starting in the 2019-20accreditation cycle, this student outcome was replaced with SO4: ‘an ability torecognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and makeinformed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global,economic, environmental, and societal contexts.’ On the computer science side, ABETstudent outcome 4 requires that students ‘recognize professional responsibilities andmake informed judgments in computing practice based on legal and ethicalprinciples.’ While both thus mention ethics, there is less explicitly stated about justice,equity, diversity and inclusion. Engineering student outcome 4, as stated above,implicitly covers
. Figure 10: Average pre- and post-test scores for hands-on (N = 213) and virtual (N = 136) implementations from Fall 2019 to Fall 2020. * = p < 0.05 in paired samples t-test comparingpre- and posttest scores; ^^, ^^^ = small and medium Hedge’s g effect size for pre- and post-test comparison Results indicate that both implementation methods promoted statistically significantimprovements in performance on the post-activity conceptual assessment and that there was nostatistical difference between average score increases from pre-test to post-test for the hands-onand virtual methods.Conclusion This project has continued for four years with our development of low-cost hands-onlearning modules
of Machines. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 1982.[7] D. H. Myszka, Machines and Mechanisms. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999.[8] S. Dordević and R. Bulatović, "On the optimum synthesis of a four-bar linkage using differential evolution and method of variable controlled deviations," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 44, pp. 235-246, 2009.[9] C. E. Wilson and J. P. Sadler, Kinematics and Dynamics of Machinery. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003.[10] E. Constans, K. Dyer, and S. Sangelkar, "A New Method for Teaching The Fourbar Linkage and its Application to Other Linkages," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[11] E. Constans, T. R. Chandrupatla, and H
forthcoming decade,” Design Studies, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 123–153, 2005.[5] B. Trilling and C. Fadel, “National Academy Of Engineering.(2004). The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century,” 21st century skills: learning for life in our times.[6] S. Olson, Educating engineers: Preparing 21st century leaders in the context of new modes of learning: Summary of a forum. National Academies Press, 2013.[7] P. Petrone, “Why creativity is the most important skill in the world,” LinkedIn, The Learning Blog, 2019.[8] A. Abraham, The neuroscience of creativity. Cambridge University Press, 2018.[9] M. T. Ahad et al., “Behavioral Pattern Analysis between Bilingual and Monolingual Listeners’ Natural Speech Perception on
10 0 Perfectly Closely Somehow Slighly No Figure 6. Students’ responses to Q4HANDS-ON APPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE CLASSROOM DEMONSTRATIONSAs mentioned earlier, the table was developed for multiple interactive hands-on applications instatics. The authors were a little rushed because they just finished the development process, andthe assessment of student learning could have been more thoughtful and detailed. But theauthors were excited to share this table with the ASEE community in Minneapolis as part of thebest in 5 minutes demonstration sessions
within the first-year general engineering undergraduate program. He also is interested in study abroad, expanding service learning opportunities for students, and serves as the faculty advisor for the Engineers in Action student design team.Catherine Twyman Catherine Twyman has been an Instructor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech since 2019, teaching ENGE 1215 and 1216. Ms. Twyman also taught the first-year engineering classes at New River Community College from 2016-2019. Prior to this, she completed a M.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering in 2015 and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in 2011 at Virginia Tech.Benjamin Daniel Chambers (Associate Professor of Practice) Dr. Ben Chambers is an
, FL, USA, 2018, vol. 2.[11] K. F. Hulme, E. Estes, M. Schiferle, and R. Lim, "Game-based Learning to Enhance Post-secondary Engineering Training Effectiveness," in The Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference (I/ITSEC)(Training subcommittee| 1), Orlando, FL, 2019.[12] K. F. Hulme, M. Schiferle, R. S. A. Lim, A. Estes, and M. Schmid, "Incorporation of modeling, simulation, and game-based learning in engineering dynamics education towards improving vehicle design and driver safety," Safety, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 30, 2021.[13] B. Coller, D. J. Shernoff, and A. Strati, "Measuring engagement as students learn dynamic systems and control with a video game," Advances in Engineering
Massachusetts and Virginia and maintains an active consulting practice.David M. Feinauer (Associate Professor Electrical and ComputerEngineering) Dr. Feinauer is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Virginia Military Institute. His scholarly work spans a number of areas related to engineering education, including P-12 engineering outreach, the first-year engineering experience, and incorporating innovation and entrepreneurship practice in the engineering classroom. Additionally, he has research experience in the areas of automation and control theory, system identification, and energy resilience fundamentals. His work has been published through the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and
, doi: 10.1145/3375462.3375472.[2] R. Matz et al., “Analyzing the efficacy of ecoach in supporting gateway course success through tailored support,” ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., pp. 216–225, 2021, doi: 10.1145/3448139.3448160.[3] D. Turnbull, R. Chugh, and J. Luck, “Learning Management Systems: An Overview,” in Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies, A. Tatnall, Ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_248-1.[4] V. Shurygin, N. Saenko, A. Zekiy, E. Klochko, and M. Kulapov, “Learning Management Systems in Academic and Corporate Distance Education,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 121–139, 2021, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v16i11.20701.[5] T. Naz
Paper ID #37497Engagement in Practice: Community service buildsexcitement in designDavid R Mikesell (Professor & Chair) David Mikesell is professor and chair of mechanical engineering at Ohio Northern University. He joined the faculty after graduate work in automotive engineering at Ohio State, six years designing automated assembly machines and metal- cutting tools, and service as an officer in the U.S. Navy. His research interests are in land vehicle dynamics, autonomous vehicles, manufacturing, and robotics. Since 2015 he has served in leadership of the ASEE Mechanical Engineering Division including
www.slayte.com The Community College Pathway: A Study of Women in STEMPurpose of the StudyMany women begin their postsecondary education at a community college (CC), so encouragingand supporting them on the transfer pathway is critical for addressing the lack of gender diversityin STEM – particularly in engineering and technology. The National Academy of Engineering(NAE) has highlighted the importance of community colleges in broadening participation inengineering because of the diversity they represent [1] [2]. In fall 2019, approximately 41% ofHispanic undergraduates, 38% of American Indian/Alaskan Native undergraduates, and 31% ofBlack undergraduates were enrolled in two-year colleges in the U.S. [3] Approximately 34% ofwomen undergraduate
Education Research (J-PEER), vol. 9, no. 2, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.7771/2157-9288.1244.[2] A. Godwin, G. Sonnert, and P. M. Sadler, “Disciplinary Differences in Out-of-School High School Science Experiences and Influence on Students’ Engineering Choices,” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), vol. 6, no. 2, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.7771/2157-9288.1131.[3] F. Lewis, J. Edmonds, and L. Fogg-Rogers, “Engineering science education: the impact of a paired peer approach on subject knowledge confidence and self-efficacy levels of student teachers,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 793–822, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2021.1887544.[4] M. Riojas, S. Lysecky, and J. Rozenblit
to capture students’perspectives. Responses to open-ended questions have mixed results. Two studies report morepositive student comments on opened-ended questions, while one study reports receiving morenegative comments regarding the implementation of the mastery learning method.IntroductionThis theory paper focuses on understanding how mastery learning has been implemented inundergraduate engineering courses through a systematic literature review. Academic environmentsthat promote learning, mastery, and continuous improvement rather than inherent abilitysubsequently lead to increased student performance and persistence (Feldman, 2019; Malcom &Feder, 2016). Scholarship has argued that students could achieve mastery of the course
Introduction to Engineering and Design. He is also the Director of the Vertically Integrated Projects Program at NYU. His Vertically Integrated Projects course is on the future of engineering education. His primary focus is developing curriculum, mentoring students, and engineering education research, particularly for project-based curriculum, first-year engineering, and student success. He is active in the American Society for Engineering Education and is the NYU ASEE Campus Representative. He serves on the First-Year Programs Division Executive Board as well as the Webmaster for the ASEE First-Year Programs Division and the First-Year Engineering Experience Conference.Victoria Bill (MakerSpace Director) Victoria Bill is the
were in the CE instructor’s sections. Theresults from this study, however, show insignificant differences in the overall academic performances,engagement, and perceptions among the students. One section, or one instructor, did not inherentlyoffer a “better” learning experience.References[1] D. R. Webster, D. M. Majerich, and A. G. Madden, “Flippin' Fluid Mechanics - Comparison Using Two Groups,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 5(3), n3, Fall 2016.[2] L. Albers and L. Bottomley, “The Impact of Activity Based Learning, a New Instructional Method, in an Existing Mechanical Engineering Curriculum for Fluid Mechanics,” In 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, June 2011, 10.18260/1-2—18852.[3] L. A. Garrison and
A Walnut-Sized Part Changed The Way GE Aviation Builds JetEngines. (2018, November 19). GE. https://www.ge.com/news/reports/transformation-3d-walnut-sized-part-changed-way-ge-aviation-builds-jet-engines (accessed on 20 February 2022).[5] Drone market outlook in 2022: industry growth trends, market stats and forecast. BusinessInsider. https://www.businessinsider.com/drone-industry-analysis-market-trends-growth-forecasts. (accessed on 20 February 2022).[6] B. Hur, D. Malawey, J. Morgan and C. Ma, “3-D Printed Metal and Plastic Propeller Designand Manufacturing for Smallscale, Underwater Thrusters”, American Society of EngineeringEducation, 126th Annual Conference and Exposition, 2019, Paper ID #26855 © American Society
engineering useto cope with situational hidden curriculum?” ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2021.https://peer.asee.org/38051.[2] I. Villanueva, M. Di Stefano, L. Gelles, K. Youmans, & A. Hunt, “Development andassessment of a vignette survey instrument to identify responses due to hidden curriculum amongengineering students and faculty,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(5), 1–21,2020.[3] C. Funk and K. Parker, “Diversity in the stem workforce varies widely across jobs,” PewResearch Center's Social & Demographic Trends Project, 31-Dec-2019. [Online]. Available:https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2018/01/09/diversity-in-the-stem-workforce-varies-widely-across-jobs/. [Accessed: 01-Feb-2022].[4] D. Solórzano &T. Yosso
. Sprin Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Fall Spring Fall Spring Semester g 2015 2016 2016 2017 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 2018 Total no. of students 23 28 23 21 26 30 19 22 23 17 Supported Total amount $54,800 $69,540 $56,153 $55,320 $55,575 $64,225 $36,350 $51,527 $55,400 $3100* awarded 9 12 11 9 13 15 11 15
minds network dataset,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2019.[2] T. M. Evans, L. Bira, J. B. Gastelum, L. T. Weiss, and N. L. Vanderford, “Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 282– 284, 2018.[3] N. S. Bekkouche, R. F. Schmid, and S. Carliner, “‘Simmering Pressure’: How Systemic Stress Impacts Graduate Student Mental Health,” Performance Improvement Quarterly, pp. 1–26, 2021.[4] M. Schmidt and E. Hansson, “Doctoral students’ well-being: a literature review,” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, vol. 13, no. 1, 2018.[5] V. Gewin, “Mental Health: Under a cloud
publications have appeared in a variety of journals, including Gender & Society, Social Currents, and Research in Higher Education. She is a co-editor of the volume, Intersectionality and Higher Education: Identity and Inequality on College Campuses (2019, Rutgers University Press). She is the author of Race, Class and Choice in Latino/a Higher Education: Pathways in the College-for-All Era (2017, Palgrave Macmillan). She is the recipient of a 2015 NSF CAREER award, investigating intersectional inequalities in STEM and non-STEM undergraduate pathways. From 2016–2020, she was a co-PI of the Life Sciences Mentoring Program, which matched incoming life sciences majors with near-peer mentors to provide mentoring training
-T2D: IEEE.[18] G. Davis and M. Butkus, "A study in engineering and military ethics," in 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, 2008, pp. 13.114. 1-13.114. 11.[19] C. Mitcham and E. E. Englehardt, "Ethics across the curriculum: Prospects for broader (and deeper) teaching and learning in research and engineering ethics," J Science Engineering Ethics, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1735-1762, 2019.[20] J. Mueller, M. D. Lovell, and M. A. Robinson, "Addressing the Cognitive and Affective Domain of Ethics Across the Civil and Environmental Engineering Curriculum," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.
. Allen et al., “Equity Toolkit: Equipping Educators to Erase Equity Gaps,” ColoradoDepartment of Higher Education, 2019. Accessed: Feb. 21, 2020. [Online]. Available:http://masterplan.highered.colorado.gov/equitytoolkit/[2] D. Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.[3] R. H. Thaler and C. R. Sunstein, Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, andHappiness. New York, NY: Penguin Books, 2009.[4] National Academy of Engineering, “Attributes of Engineers in 2020,” in The Engineer of2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century, The National Academies Press, 2004. doi:10.17226/10999.[5] National Science Board, “Revisiting the STEM Workforce: A Companion to Science andEngineering Indicators 2014
–3651, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4085-09.2010.[29] A. Tachibana, J. A. Noah, Y. Ono, D. Taguchi, and S. Ueda, “Prefrontal activation related to spontaneous creativity with rock music improvisation: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52348-6.[30] C. K. W. De Dreu, B. A. Nijstad, M. Baas, I. Wolsink, and M. Roskes, “Working Memory Benefits Creative Insight, Musical Improvisation, and Original Ideation Through Maintained Task-Focused Attention,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 656–669, May 2012, doi: 10.1177/0146167211435795.[31] S. W. Kleibeuker, P. C. M. P. Koolschijn, D. D. Jolles, M. A
“real-world” linear algebra problems, emphasizingthe importance in connecting fundamental and applied concepts in modern mathematicsinstruction; and (3) incorporate collaborative learning activities that motivate students to learnmathematics and promote an environment for them to develop social and communication skills.The linear algebra course was redesigned through a Community of Practice consisting of facultyfrom Engineering and Mathematics Departments, collaborating closely to design the newcurriculum and implement the changes in stages, and with a view to sustainability of theproject.This effort was begun in the fall of 2019, and has led to a successful, stable implementation as anapproved new course by the fall of 2021. Figure 1 shows
uncertainty to improve pressure field reconstruction from PIV/PTV flow measurements," Experiments in Fluids, vol. 61, no. 6, p. 131, 2020/05/21 2020.[20] G. Xiao, "A Study on the bridging strategy between the theory of fluid mechanics and engineering applications," Advances in Computer Science Research, vol. 91, p. 6, 2019.[21] J. Hertzberg, B. R. Leppek, and K. E. Gray, "Art for the sake of improving attitudes toward engineering," in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2012, pp. 25.206. 1-25.206. 30.[22] J. S. Rossmann and K. A. Skvirsky, "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows: The Art & Science of Flow Visualization," in 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference
developing the assessment, we first asked former teaching assistants in heat transfer coursesto take the assessment to ensure that the questions were being interpreted the way we intendedand that the prompts were adequately capturing the thought process of the solver 29 . Theassessment was then pilot tested with 12 experts (faculty members who do research in heattransfer, as well as professional engineers who design heat exchangers) and 12 undergraduatestudents. The experts were either acquaintances of members of the research team or volunteersrecruited through email lists of The American Physical Society (APS) and American Society forEngineering Education (ASEE). The students were undergraduate students who were taking orhad recently taken a heat
, pp. 61– 68, 2022.[7] M. A. Mestiraihi, K. H. Becker, R. R. Dupont, and D. K. Stevens, “Developing Undergraduate Water Program Courses: Meeting the Needs of the Egyptian Workforce,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Jan. 17, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/developing- undergraduate-water-program-courses-meeting-the-needs-of-the-egyptian-workforce[8] A. Wallisch, J. C. BRIEDE-WESTERMEYER, and M. Luzardo-Briceno, “Fostering User- Empathy Skills of Engineering Students by Collaborative Teaching,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 223–243, 2021.[9] L. Crumpton-Young et al., “Engineering leadership development
). Universidad de Deusto.[8] May, D. (2020). Cross Reality Spaces in Engineering Education – Online Laboratories for Supporting International Student Collaboration in Merging Realities. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE), 16(03), pp. 4–26.[9] Trudgen, M, May D. & Zanone R. (2019). BYOE: Creating the STAND: Sensors and Transducers Active eNgineering Design-bench. Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. 10.18260/1-2--36777
, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 535–546, 2010.[4] J. A. Leydens and J. C. Lucena, “Social Justice: A Missing, Unelaborated Dimension in Humanitarian Engineering and Learning Through Service,” IJSLE, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–28, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.24908/ijsle.v9i2.5447.[5] B. Reynante, “Learning to design for social justice in community-engaged engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 338–356, 2022, doi: 10.1002/jee.20444.[6] L. Wang, T. Carroll, and D. Delaine, “A Pilot Study of the Development of Empathy within a Service-learning Trip from a Qualitative Perspective,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Salt Lake City, Utah, Jun. 2018, p. 29711. doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 29711.[7] M