Engineering was introduced as a new course in the School,the first of its kind anywhere in the country [1]. The course was originally designed by a facultymember from the department’s structural engineering, mechanics and materials group, withexpertise and interest in computational mechanics, origami engineering, and topologyoptimization. The purpose of the course was to familiarize students with concepts andalgorithms to construct and analyze origami structures that address engineering and societalproblems. Origami folding techniques and differential geometry were also incorporated into thecourse [2,3,4]. The course was offered each Fall semester for the next four consecutive years,averaging 42 students per course.The course was well received by
success of academic women withdisabilities. In this paper we share lessons learned regarding policies, practices, and professionaldevelopment efforts designed to reduce structural and workplace barriers and to make academicSTEM careers more welcoming and accessible to women with disabilities.1. IntroductionFaculty, staff, and student successes are interrelated; students from underrepresented groupsfrequently indicate that finding faculty who ―look like‖ them is important to their academicsuccess, yet is often rare to actually happen[1],[2]. Although the number of students fromunderrepresented groups attending college is growing, the presence of faculty fromunderrepresented groups is not keeping pace [3]. The goal of AccessADVANCE is to
Powered by www.slayte.com The Effects of Assessment Method for Regular, Out-of-Class, Learning on Student Performance and Content Retention in a System Dynamics CourseIntroductionOver two decades ago, Feldmann asked instructors to look carefully at the desired outcome ofhomework and ask why they do what they do [1]. This work seeks to answer this question bycritically looking at formative assessment, such as homework and quizzes, and how to encouragestudents to reap the most benefit. It is generally well known that students completing regularformative assignments, such as homework, helps them to understand the material and performbetter on exams [2]-[5]. Unfortunately, this is dependent on students taking these
responsibility attitudes than their peersin other science and engineering disciplines. In light of growing ethical concerns about thecomputing profession, this study provides evidence about extant challenges in computingeducation and buttresses calls for more effective development of social responsibility incomputing students. We discuss implications for undergraduate computing programs, ethicseducation, and opportunities for future research.1. IntroductionIn recent years, computing and information technology have become objects of intense publicconcern due in part to ethical challenges and scandals related to artificial intelligence and socialmedia [1]. In response, governments and computing thought leaders have considered regulatoryand policy
Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Weaving Failure Analysis into a First-Year Robotics ProjectBackground and RationaleThis complete evidence-based practice paper describes the evolution and subsequent assessmentof what began as a failure analysis component in an existing first-year engineering cornerstonecourse. The Ohio State University's First-year Engineering Honors program engages students inan intensive design-and-build robotics project in the second course of a two-course sequence [1].The primary educational goal is to give students a realistic engineering experience, leading toeducated decisions about whether engineering is the profession they want for themselves, and, ifso
that rangefrom reinforcement of classical mechanics principles to empirical design of specific machinecomponents, advanced CAD modeling, and project management [1-3]. In addition to the sheervolume and breadth of expected learning objectives for the course, Machine Design is challengedby a lack of consensus among engineering educators as to the conceptual approach to the coretechnical content and the pedagogical techniques used to balance theory versus practice ofmachine design [2,4-6]. There is a general consensus that theoretical content in Machine Designshould be supplemented with application to design of machine components or systems [3,6].However, there is a wide range of pedagogical strategies for doing so, including variousembedded
determine the mosteffective pedagogical and delivery online instruction methods to maintain an engaging onlineclassroom. The experiences of 15 surveyed instructors, who experienced remote teaching for thefirst-time, and the experiences of 519 students were used to understand the troubles facing studentengagement in online classrooms. Adjusting the online classroom dynamics and allowing for moretime for online-class activities resulted in increased student engagement from ~67% to ~75%.1. IntroductionEarly in the year 2020, most schools around the world adopted remote-learning to face the COVID-19 pandemic [1, 2]. Instructors and students had to deal with remote learning platforms, which formany of them was a first-time experience. In the engineering
changing and demanding world. We take the attributes ofan EM as those defined by the KEEN Framework (1) that call for students to leverage their curiosity,ability to make connections, and understand how to create value.In most cases, faculty teach courses in subject areas closely related to their degrees and research interests.The modules were seen as a way to assist faculty in leveraging entrepreneurial minded learning (EML) intheir courses when the topics are likely outside their area of expertise. The development, integration, andstudents’ learning assessment efforts of the e-learning modules have been the topics of many ofour previous papers and presentations (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7). The basic strategy is as follows: The content isdelivered via
. Hauser, Ph.D., Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Kentucky1. IntroductionEngineers in industry are trained to have the knowledge and skills to significantly impact society andhuman life [1]–[3]. National organizations and professional engineering societies have highlighted theimportance of working in collaborative and inclusive environments to better equip students to solvesociety's grand and complex challenges [1], [4], [5]. In 2020, the National Academy of Engineering (NAE)reinforced its commitment to address social justice in engineering by increasing “engineering talentthrough a strong commitment to diversity and inclusion,” by instilling “a culture of ethical andenvironmental responsibility in engineering” and
91bachelor’s degrees and 11 master’s degrees, and that of a community college offering 65associate degrees and 44 certificate programs. To fill its community college mission, theinstitution maintains an open-enrollment policy. UVU has a high percentage of low-income(38%) and first-generation (37%) students. It also has a high number of non-traditional students(29%), students with spouses (35%) and/or children under age 12 (19%). Even though tuition islow, part-time attendance is high at 36% of degree-seeking students. These factors affect theoverall graduation rate, which is low at 33% (nationally standardized IPEDS rate for completionsin 150% time) and the overall 1-year retention rate of 67% for baccalaureate-degree seekingstudents.As an integral
Parker et al., (2006) proposed five levels of safetyunderstanding: 1. Pathological – It does not matter what we do if we do not get caught. 2. Reactive – We react with a safety drive after things go wrong, and then we stop. 3. Calculative – We have systems that can manage all hazards. 4. Proactive – We continue to work on problems that we identify. 5. Generative – We look for new areas of risk and we do not take past success as a guarantee against future failure.If the proposed safety education interventions influenced student perceptions about safety, then thosechanges could be assessed through the lens of safety culture.MethodologyWe introduced three specific educational interventions, e.g., safety moments, near miss
material. “Most [high school] graduates enter college without the properknowledge, skills and fundamentals needed to succeed [1].” The high school “experiences, alongwith the lack of independence, confidence and expertise that is necessary for higher education,ultimately leave students unprepared for what lies ahead [1].”Summer or winter bridge courses are common applications of this concept [2][3][4]. Whenpaired with a pre-course survey [5], the instructor may then use the gathered wealth of data tocustomize course delivery and content to the particular student population in their classroom.The case detailed in this paper is student feedback analysis regarding a virtual 8-hours-over-2-days pre-course college preparatory session developed during
Engineering Program at West Virginia University. She has served on program and organizing committees of many international conferences and workshops. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Development of a Cybersecurity Professional IdentityABSTRACTCybersecurity is a relatively new field in higher education and cybersecurity professionals areessential for protecting our nation’s infrastructure and ensuring public safety and nationalsecurity. Cybersecurity employment opportunities in the U.S. are expected to grow much fasterthan the average growth of all occupations in the U.S. over the next decade [1]. Because of thestrong
ProgramCriteria and propose revisions, if needed, based on (1) the content of the CEBOK3, (2) asignificant revision to the ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) General Criteriawhich became effective for reviews during the 2019-2020 accreditation cycle, and (3)compliance with guidance from the EAC on curricular topics and faculty qualifications. Thispaper is the second in a series of papers to describe the efforts by ASCE and the CEPCTC inreviewing and revising the Civil Engineering Program Criteria throughout the Task Committee’splanned two-year lifespan. The first paper, presented at the 2021 ASEE National Conference andExposition, documented the formation of CEPCTC and its development of an initial draft ofproposed criteria revisions.This
Engineering for Human Rights:Lessons Learned from a Case Study-Based Undergraduate ClassDavis Chacon-Hurtado, Assistant Research Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering &Human Rights Institute, University of Connecticut, davis.chacon@uconn.edu.Sandra Sirota, Assistant Professor-in-Residence, Human Rights Institute, University ofConnecticut, sandra.sirota@uconn.edu.Shareen Hertel, Professor of Political Science & Human Rights, University of Connecticut,shareen.hertel@uconn.edu. 1 ASEE 2022Abstract: Engineering and technological developments are at the core of societal change,influencing and being
about future work in the US manufacturing industry indicates a widening gap between themanufacturing jobs that need to be filled and the talent pool with the required skill sets. 1 It isestimated that the US manufacturing skills gap could leave up to 2.1 million jobs unfilled by 2030. 2The three leading causes of this widening gap are: 1) the skills needed for jobs are changing dueto the adoption of advanced technologies, and there is a lack of adequate preparation and diversityof domestic students in the educational pipeline; 3 2) the decline in student engagement in pursuingscience and engineering careers; 4 and 3) student and parent misperceptions about the nature ofcurrent manufacturing jobs as compared to traditional manufacturing jobs of
challenges of the world.Many engineering associations, including Engineering Deans Canada [1] and the National Academy ofEngineering [2], have published lists of engineering ‘grand challenges’ to outline these complex issuesthat society faces. These problems span the fields of medicine, clean energy, infrastructure, and more; allwill require innovative engineering design solutions to tackle. More recently, we have seen howengineering and manufacturing play a crucial role in the rapid response to the threat of global pandemics[3]. In addition to entrepreneurial software solutions, we will need to develop and validate hardwareproducts, sometimes called “tough-tech” or “hard-tech” solutions. A key tool required by the teamsdesigning these increasingly
engineering and physical science stillstruggle with equal numerical representation at the undergraduate level [1]. Moreover, thesegender gaps become more noticeable and persistent at the postdoctoral and faculty level in manySTEM fields [2, 3]. In addition to numerical representation, social and climate factors often sendsubtle (and not-so subtle) cues to women about whether or not they belong[4]. Unfortunately,women often experience aggressions, both at the micro and macro level, both in fields where theyhave high representation and where they do not. In order to make lasting impacts on these “chillyclimates” that hinder women’s sense of belonging [5], it is imperative that people be made awareof the lived experiences of women and women of color in
they are taken by students in a wide variety of majors such as engineering, technology, the sciences (physics, chemistry, etc.), healthcare, and other elds. As a discipline, Technical Communica on is taught from a genre perspec ve where a genre is a set of report-level standards or conven ons, and research suggests that a genre-based approach can improve student wri ng in engineering lab courses [1, 2, 3]. As such, students in these courses learn to produce speci c reports; however, since the course must be useful across a wide range of majors, students learn to write general reports that are
create socialblocks in erecting friendships and professional identity during these vital years. Exploring, committing, and reconsidering friendshipbonds is an interpersonal interaction that involves compliance between those with differing identities, goals, values, and desires [31].Adapting a previous model created by Gee [26] to the campus engineering identity, a student has five social spheres by which theydefine their belonging on campus: 1) as a student, 2) as a consumer of products offered by the university, 3) as a member of theircohort at university, 4) as a member of the cohort of engineering students across universities, and 5) as a member of the engineeringprofession [28]. Engineering students who receive support from those across
, Technology, and Society (STS) programI. IntroductionIn many orientations to social science research, study participants are positioned as objects ofinquiry, but are not treated as partners in the inquiry process or within knowledge developmentprocesses. This paper offers one account of an engineering education research team disruptingthis dichotomy between “researcher” and “researched.”This work takes place in the context of an NSF-funded ethnographic investigation of Universityof Maryland (UMD) College Park Scholars Science, Technology, and Society Living LearningCommunity (STS-LLC) [1]. Our investigation focuses on understanding how engineeringstudents’ macro-ethical reasoning develops within the cultural practices of this community [2-5].In our
bring different perspectives tostudent support. Supporting theory is also presented. Evidence of effectiveness includes thegraduation rate, the career placement rate of students, and student perceptions of preparation formeeting our program educational objectives.Theoretical FrameworkTheoretical foundations for this model include the Whole Student Model [1] for student supporton best practices for both advising and mentoring; Future Time Perspectives, or how students’perceptions of the future influence present decisions and behaviors; with support from contingentgoal path theory and future possible selves to better understand the connections between thepresent and their future career goals; and Schlossberg’s transition theory because our
and human language lab; China; Progress;Challenge; ProspectTHE CONSTRUCTION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND HUMAN LANGUAGE LAB 31.Introduction “Artificial intelligence + various fields” has become a common business form ofeconomy and people’s life. In 2018, the Notice of the Action Plan for ArtificialIntelligence Innovation in Colleges and Universities issued by the Ministry ofEducation of PRC China pointed out that colleges and universities should increaseinvestment in relevant disciplines in the field of artificial intelligence in theconstruction of “Double First-class”.[1] In 2019, the key points of the department ofscience and technology of the ministry of education in 2019 proposed to deeplyimplement the
project completion. A lead finding isthat the program was used sparingly by the students, with a perceived lack of value being the mostcommon reason for not using this resource. Nevertheless, the Consultants reported a very positiveexperience working with those teams who chose to participate.Introduction Experiential learning techniques cause a learner to have a direct sense experience with class tasksthat replicate real-world tasks [1]. Experiential learning is closely associated with problem-based learning,as both techniques center the learner in the course progress by allowing them to make meaningful,autonomous decisions. This co-creation of the educational experience often leads to increases in thelearners’ motivation, emotional
communication between thestudents and the instructor. It allowed the instructor to recognize patterns of student conceptualdifficulties, skill development obstacles, and behaviors that may affect their learning.IntroductionDue to the COVID-19 pandemic, a first-year engineering graphics course at a southeasternprivate institution was flipped in 2020 to encourage self-regulated learning (SRL) and appliedJust in time teaching (JiTT) to not only better assist students learning of concepts, but alsoaddress classroom management issues that came to light. Self-regulated learning focuses onone’s ability think metacognitively, motivationally, and behaviorally [1]. Learners can use thisprocess with many strategies including self-evaluation [2] and goal setting
Autonomous Systems, Telecommunications, Signal andInformation Processing). Computer engineering students can select threads in one of thefollowing ways: two computer engineering foundation threads, one computer engineeringfoundation thread and one computer science thread, or one computer engineering foundationthread and one electrical engineering thread. The bachelor’s degree in electrical engineeringconsists of eight electrical engineering threads: Signal and Information Processing, Robotics,Bioengineering, Telecommunications, Sensing and Exploration, Electric Energy Systems,Electronic Devices, and Circuit Technology. Students select any two of the electrical engineeringthreads to satisfy degree requirements [1].Course VisionThe design and
educators.IntroductionSociety calls upon engineers to engage with wicked, ill-defined problems, such as those outlinedin the NAE Grand Challenges [1]. These problems are generally open, complex, dynamic, andnetworked [2]. Practicing professionally in this space requires design competencies, in additionto professional, foundational, and technical competencies [3,4], as addressing such problems is acentral purpose of design [5]. Reflecting this, ABET’s criteria for accrediting engineeringprograms includes both student outcomes in this space as well as the need for a “culminatingmajor engineering design experience” [6]. However, while much scholarship has been producedon the nature of design, there remains a relative scarcity when looking at understanding andimplementing
university offices andcenters focused on global experiences and international relations. Students earn up to 10% of thedefinitive grade of the course for these global engagement projects. This approach has proved tobe fully sustainable, and with an overwhelming satisfaction of all the participants.It is important to note that the incorporation of a virtual platform during COVID-19 and thecontinuous monitoring and coaching by the instructor are producing best practices to fostercommunication between students and stakeholders.IntroductionThe final goal of the UN Sustainable Development Goals [1] is #17 “Partnership for the goals”. Ina certain way, this goal embraces all the other by strengthening the fact that better and faster resultsare obtained by
entrepreneurship into engineering curricula was set into motion [1]. From the unique position ofreceiving a donation from a local industrialist whose goal was to establish a high-quality engineeringschool in the REGION, the university had great momentum from capital investment and policy directionto create an engineering program from scratch. Efforts to achieve this ambitious goal includedappurtenant curriculum development, faculty recruitment, and educational policy implementation.The distinctive feature of the Henry M. Rowan College of Engineering’s (HMRCOE’s) curriculum is itseight-semester, multidisciplinary, hands-on and project-based sequence of engineering clinics. Theengineering clinics are intended to provide students with experience solving
team model. The resultingpilot model captures a transitional process, with some team and some individualized elements that attemptsto balance the benefits of both, while minimizing the challenges of each.Keywords: Capstone, Stakeholder analysis, Team effectiveness, individualized learning,Introduction In Watkins’ [1] review of ABET, the structure and content of design projects is not addressed ormandated. Instead, ABET [2] requires students complete a “major design experience” that is intended toprepare students for professional practice. The most common course in engineering programs that providesthis major design experience is the capstone course [3]. Capstone courses typically simulate a challengingdesign experience similar to the